darwin and modern science-第63节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
noid complexity of sutures; and in the Permian their number and variety cause them to form a striking element of the marine faunas。 It is in the Mesozoic era; however; that these shells attain their full development; increasing enormously in the Triassic; they culminate in the Jurassic in the number of families; genera and species; in the complexity of the sutures; and in the variety of shell…ornamentation。 A slow decline begins in the Cretaceous; ending in the complete extinction of the whole group at the end of that period。 As a final phase in the history of the ammonites; there appear many so…called 〃abnormal〃 genera; in which the shell is irregularly coiled; or more or less uncoiled; in some forms becoming actually straight。 It is interesting to observe that some of these genera are not natural groups; but are 〃polyphyletic;〃 i。e。 are each derived from several distinct ancestral genera; which have undergone a similar kind of degeneration。
In the huge assembly of ammonites it is not yet possible to arrange all the forms in a truly natural classification; which shall express the various interrelations of the genera; yet several beautiful series have already been determined。 In these series the individual development of the later general shows transitory stages which are permanent in antecedent genera。 To give a mere catalogue of names without figures would not make these series more intelligible。
The Brachiopoda; or 〃lamp…shells;〃 are a phylum of which comparatively few survive to the present day; their shells have a superficial likeness to those of the bivalved Mollusca; but are not homologous with the latter; and the phylum is really very distinct from the molluscs。 While greatly reduced now; these animals were incredibly abundant throughout the Palaeozoic era; great masses of limestone being often composed almost exclusively of their shells; and their variety is in keeping with their individual abundance。 As in the case of the ammonites; the problem is to arrange this great multitude of forms in an orderly array that shall express the ramifications of the group according to a genetic system。 For many brachiopods; both recent and fossil; the individual development; or ontogeny; has been worked out and has proved to be of great assistance in the problems of classification and phylogeny。 Already very encouraging progress has been made in the solution of these problems。 All brachiopods form first a tiny; embryonic shell; called the protegulum; which is believed to represent the ancestral form of the whole group; and in the more advanced genera the developmental stages clearly indicate the ancestral genera of the series; the succession of adult forms in time corresponding to the order of the ontogenetic stages。 The transformation of the delicate calcareous supports of the arms; often exquisitely preserved; are extremely interesting。 Many of the Palaeozoic genera had these supports coiled like a pair of spiral springs; and it has been shown that these genera were derived from types in which the supports were simply shelly loops。
The long extinct class of crustacea known as the Trilobites are likewise very favourable subjects for phylogenetic studies。 So far as the known record can inform us; the trilobites are exclusively Palaeozoic in distribution; but their course must have begun long before that era; as is shown by the number of distinct types among the genera of the lower Cambrian。 The group reached the acme of abundance and relative importance in the Cambrian and Ordovician; then followed a long; slow decline; ending in complete and final disappearance before the end of the Permian。 The newly…hatched and tiny trilobite larva; known as the protaspis; is very near to the primitive larval form of all the crustacea。 By the aid of the correlated ontogenetic stages and the succession of the adult forms in the rocks; many phylogenetic series have been established and a basis for the natural arrangement of the whole class has been laid。
Very instructive series may also be observed among the Echinoderms and; what is very rare; we are able in this sub…kingdom to demonstrate the derivation of one class from another。 Indeed; there is much reason to believe that the extinct class Cystidea of the Cambrian is the ancestral group; from which all the other Echinoderms; star…fishes; brittle…stars; sea…urchins; feather…stars; etc。; are descended。
The foregoing sketch of the palaeontological record is; of necessity; extremely meagre; and does not represent even an outline of the evidence; but merely a few illustrative examples; selected almost at random from an immense body of material。 However; it will perhaps suffice to show that the geological record is not so hopelessly incomplete as Darwin believed it to be。 Since 〃The Origin of Species〃 was written; our knowledge of that record has been enormously extended and we now possess; no complete volumes; it is true; but some remarkably full and illuminating chapters。 The main significance of the whole lies in the fact; that JUST IN PROPORTION TO THE COMPLETENESS OF THE RECORD IS THE UNEQUIVOCAL CHARACTER OF ITS TESTIMONY TO THE TRUTH OF THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY。
The test of a true; as distinguished from a false; theory is the manner in which newly discovered and unanticipated facts arrange themselves under it。 No more striking illustration of this can be found than in the contrasted fates of Cuvier's theory and of that of Darwin。 Even before Cuvier's death his views had been undermined and the progress of discovery soon laid them in irreparable ruin; while the activity of half…a…century in many different lines of inquiry has established the theory of evolution upon a foundation of ever growing solidity。 It is Darwin's imperishable glory that he prescribed the lines along which all the biological sciences were to advance to conquests not dreamed of when he wrote。
XII。 THE PALAEONTOLOGICAL RECORD。
II。 PLANTS。
By D。H。 SCOTT; F。R。S。 President of the Linnean Society。
There are several points of view from which the subject of the present essay may be regarded。 We may consider the fossil record of plants in its bearing: I。 on the truth of the doctrine of Evolution; II。 on Phylogeny; or the course of Evolution; III。 on the theory of Natural Selection。 The remarks which follow; illustrating certain aspects only of an extensive subject; may conveniently be grouped under these three headings。
I。 THE TRUTH OF EVOLUTION。
When 〃The Origin of Species〃 was written; it was necessary to show that the Geological Record was favourable to; or at least consistent with; the Theory of Descent。 The point is argued; closely and fully; in Chapter X。 〃On the Imperfection of the Geological Record;〃 and Chapter XI。 〃On the Geological Succession of Organic Beings〃; there is; however; little about plants in these chapters。 At the present time the truth of Evolution is no longer seriously disputed; though there are writers; like Reinke; who insist; and rightly so; that the doctrine is still only a belief; rather than an established fact of science。 (J。 Reinke; 〃Kritische Abstammungslehre〃; 〃Wiesner…Festschrift〃; page 11; Vienna; 1908。) Evidently; then; however little the Theory of Descent may be questioned in our own day; it is desirable to assure ourselves how the case stands; and in particular how far the evidence from fossil plants has grown stronger with time。
As regards direct evidence for the derivation of one species from another; there has probably been little advance since Darwin wrote; at least so we must infer from the emphasis laid on the discontinuity of successive fossil species by great systematic authorities like Grand'Eury and Zeiller in their most recent writings。 We must either adopt the mutationist views of those authors (referred to in the last section of this essay) or must still rely on Darwin's explanation of the absence of numerous intermediate varieties。 The attempts which have been made to trace; in the Tertiary rocks; the evolution of recent species; cannot; owing to the imperfect character of the evidence; be regarded as wholly satisfactory。
When we come to groups of a somewhat higher order we have an interesting history of the evolution of a recent family in the work; not yet completed; of Kidston and Gwynne…Vaughan on the fossil Osmundaceae。 (〃Trans。 Royal Soc。 Edinburgh〃; Vol。 45; Part III。 1907; Vol。 46; Part II。 1908; Vol。 46; Part III。 1909。) The authors are able; mainly on anatomical evidence; to trace back this now limited group of Ferns; through the Tertiary and Mesozoic to the Permian; and to show; with great probability; how their structure has been derived from that of early Palaeozoic types。
The history of the Ginkgoaceae; now represented only by the isolated maidenhair tree; scarcely known in a wild state; offers another striking example of a family which can be traced with certainty to the older Mesozoic and perhaps further back still。 (See Seward and Gowan; 〃The Maidenhair Tree (Gingko biloba)〃; 〃Annals of Botany〃; Vol。 XIV。 1900; page 109; also A。 Sprecher 〃Le Ginkgo biloba〃; L。; Geneva; 1907。)
On the wider question of the derivation of the great groups of plants; a very considerable advance has been made