the antiquities of the jews-1-第324节

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


Apostles；　because　the　present　copies　of　his　citation　of　it；　Hist。
Eceles。　B。　II。　ch。　10。；　omit　the　words　an　owlon　a　certain　rope；
which　Josephus's　present　copies　retain；　and　only　have　the
explicatory　word　or　angel；　as　if　he　meant　that　angel　of　the　Lord
which　St。　Luke　mentions　as　smiting　Herod；　Acts　12：23；　and　not
that　owl　which　Josephus　called　an　angel　or　messenger；　formerly　of
good；　but　now　of　bad　news；　to　Agrippa。　This　accusation　is　a
somewhat　strange　one　in　the　case　of　the　great　Eusebius；　who　is
known　to　have　so　accurately　and　faithfully　produced　a　vast　number
of　other　ancient　records；　and　particularly　not　a　few　out　of　our
Josephus　also；　without　any　suspicion　of　prevarication。　Now；　not
to　allege　how　uncertain　we　are　whether　Josephus's　and　Eusebius's
copies　of　the　fourth　century　were　just　like　the　present　in　this
clause；　which　we　have　no　distinct　evidence　of；　the　following
words；　preserved　still　in　Eusebius；　will　not　admit　of　any　such
exposition：　〃This　＇bird＇　（says　Eusebius）　Agrippa　presently
perceived　to　be　the　cause　of　ill　fortune；　as　it　was　once　of　good
fortune；　to　him；〃　which　can　only　belong　to　that　bird；　the　owl；
which　as　it　had　formerly　foreboded　his　happy　deliverance　from
imprisonment；　Antiq。　B。　XVIII。　ch。　6。　sect。　7；　so　was　it　then
foretold　to　prove　afterward　the　unhappy　forerunner　of　his　death
in　five　days'　time。　If　the　improper　words　signifying　cause；　be
changed　for　Josephus's　proper　word　angel　or　messenger；　and　the
foregoing　words；　be　inserted；　Esuebius's　text　will　truly
represent　that　in　Josephus。　Had　this　imperfection　been　in　some
heathen　author　that　was　in　good　esteem　with　our　modern　critics；
they　would　have　readily　corrected　these　as　barely　errors　in　the
copies；　but　being　in　an　ancient　Christian　writer；　not　so　well
relished　by　many　of　those　critics；　nothing　will　serve　but　the
ill…grounded　supposal　of　willful　corruption　and　prevarication。

（22）　This　sum　of　twelve　millions　of　drachmae；　which　is　equal　to
three　millions　of　shekels；　i。e。　at　2s。　10d。　a　shekel；　equal　to
four　hundred　and　twenty…five　thousand　pounds　sterling；　was
Agrippa　the　Great's　yearly　income；　or　about　three　quarters　of　his
grandfather　Herod's　income；　he　having　abated　the　tax　upon　houses
at　Jerusalem；　ch。　6。　sect。　3；　and　was　not　so　tyrannical　as　Herod
had　been　to　the　Jews。　See　the　note　on　Antiq。　B。　XVII。　ch。　11。
sect。　4。　A　large　sum　this！　but　not；　it　seems；　sufficient　for　his
extravagant　expenses。

（23）　Reland　takes　notice　here；　not　improperly；　that　Josephus
omits　the　reconciliation　of　this　Herod　Agrippa　to　the　Tyrians　and
Sidoninus；　by　the　means　of　Blastus　the　king's　chamberlain；
mentioned　Acts　12：20。　Nor　is　there　any　history　in　the　world　so
complete；　as　to　omit　nothing　that　other　historians　take　notice
of；　unless　the　one　be　taken　out　of　the　other；　and　accommodated　to
it。

（24）　Photius；　who　made　an　extract　out　of　this　section；　says　they
were　not　the　statues　or　images；　but　the　ladies　themselves；　who
were　thus　basely　abused　by　the　soldiers。

BOOK　20　FOOTNOTES

（1）　Here　is　some　error　in　the　copies；　or　mistake　in　Josephus；　for
the　power　of　appointing　high　priests；　alter　Herod　king　of　Chalcis
was　dead；　and　Agrippa；　junior；　was　made　king　of　Chalcis　in　his
room；　belonged　to　him；　and　he　exercised　the　same　all　along　till
Jerusalem　was　destroyed；　as　Josephus　elsewhere　informs　us；　ch。　8。
sect。　；　11；　ch。　9。　sect。　1；　4；　6；　7。

（2）　Josephus　here　uses　the　word　monogene；　an　only　begotten　son；
for　no　other　than　one　best　beloved；　as　does　both　the　Old　and　New
Testament；　I　mean　where　there　were　one　or　more　sons　besides；
Genesis　22：2；　Hebrew　11：17。　See　the　note　on　B。　I。　ch。　13。　sect。
1。

（3）　It　is　here　very　remarkable；　that　the　remains　of　Noah's　ark
were　believed　to　he　still　in　being　in　the　days　of　Josephus。　See
the　note　on　B。　I。　ch。　3。　sect。　5。

（4）　Josephus　is　very　full　and　express　in　these　three　chapters；
3。；　4。；　and　5。；　in　observing　how　carefully　Divine　Providence
preserved　this　Izates；　king　of　Adiabene；　and　his　sons；　while　he
did　what　he　thought　was　his　bounden　duty；　notwithstanding　the
strongest　political　motives　to　the　contrary。

（5）　This　further　account　of　the　benefactions　of　Izates　and　Helena
to　the　Jerusalem　Jews　which　Josephus　here　promises　is；　I　think；
no　where　performed　by　him　in　his　present　works。　But　of　this
terrible　famine　itself　in　Judea；　take　Dr。　Hudson's　note　here：　…
〃This　（　says　he　）　is　that　famine　foretold　by　Agabus；　Acts　11：28；
which　happened　when　Claudius　was　consul　the　fourth　time；　and　not
that　other　which　happened　when　Claudius　was　consul　the　second
time；　and　Cesina　was　his　colleague；　as　Scaliger　says　upon
Eusebius；　p。　174。〃　Now　when　Josephus　had　said　a　little　afterward；
ch。　5。　sect。　2；　that　〃Tiberius　Alexander　succeeded　Cuspius　Fadus
as　procurator；〃　he　immediately　subjoins；　that〃　under　these
procurators　there　happened　a　great　famine　in　Judea。〃　Whence　it　is
plain　that　this　famine　continued　for　many　years；　on　account　of
its　duration　under　these　two　procurators。　Now　Fadus　was　not　sent
into　Judea　till　after　the　death　of　king　Agrippa；　i。e。　towards　the
latter　end　of　the　4th　year　of　Claudius；　so　that　this　famine
foretold　by　Agabus　happened　upon　the　5th；　6th；　and　7th　years　of
Claudius；　as　says　Valesius　on　Euseb。　II。　12。　Of　this　famine　also；
and　queen　Helena's　supplies；　and　her　monument；　see　Moses
Churenensis；　p。　144；　145；　where　it　is　observed　in　the　notes　that
Pausanias　mentions　that　her　monument　also。

（6）　This　privilege　of　wearing　the　tiara　upright；　or　with　the　tip
of　the　cone　erect；　is　known　to　have　been　of　old　peculiar　to　great
kings；　from　Xenophon　and　others；　as　Dr。　Hudson　observes　here。

（7）　This　conduct　of　Izates　is　a　sign　that　he　was　become　either　a
Jew；　or　an　Ebionite　Christian；　who　indeed　differed　not　much　from
proper　Jews。　See　ch。　6。　sect。　1。　However；　his　supplications　were
heard；　and　he　was　providentially　delivered　from　that　imminent
danger　he　was　in。

（8）　These　pyramids　or　pillars；　erected　by　Helena；　queen　of
Adiabene；　near　Jerusalem；　three　in　number；　are　mentioned　by
Eusebius；　in　his　Eccles。　Hist。　B。　II。　ch。　12；　for　which　Dr。
Hudson　refers　us　to　Valesius's　notes　upon　that　place。They　are
also　mentioned　by　Pausanias；　as　hath　been　already　noted；　ch。　2。
sect。　6。　Reland　guesses　that　that　now　called　Absalom's　Pillar　may
be　one　of　them。

（9）　This　Theudas；　who　arose　under　Fadus　the　procurator；　about
A。D。　45　or　46；　could　not　be　that　Thendas　who　arose　in　the　days　of
the　taxing；　under　Cyrenius；　or　about　A。D。　7；　Acts　v。　36；　37。　Who
that　earlier　Theudas　was；　see　the　note　on　B。　XVII。　ch。　10。　sect。
5。

（10）　This　and。　many　more　tumults　and　seditions　which　arose　at　the
Jewish　festivals；　in　Josephus；　illustrate　the　cautious　procedure
of　the　Jewish　governors；　when　they　said；　Matthew　26：5；　〃Let　us
not　take　Jesus　on　the　feast…day；　lest　there　be　an　up　roar　among
the　people；〃　as　Reland　well　observes　on　tins　place。　Josephus　also
takes　notice　of　the　same　thing；　Of　the　War；　B。　I。　ch。　4。　sect。　3。

（11）　This　constant　passage　of　the　Galileans　through　the　country
of　Samaria；　as　they　went　to　Judea　and　Jerusalem；　illustrates
several　passages　in　the　Gospels　to　the　same　purpose；　as　Dr。
Hudson　rightly　observes。　See　Luke　17：11；　John　4：4。　See　also
Josephus　in　his　own　Life；　sect。　52；　where　that　journey　is
determined　to　three　days。

（12）　Our　Savior　had　foretold　that　the　Jews'　rejection　of　his
gospel　would　bring　upon　them；　among　other　miseries；　these　three；
which　they　themselves　here　show　they　expected　would　be　the
consequences　of　their　present　tumults　and　seditions：　the　utter
subversion　of　their　country；　the　conflagration　of　their　temple；
and　the　slavery　of　themselves；　their　wives；　and　children　See　Luke
21：6…24。

（13）　This　Simon；　a　friend　of　Felix；　a　Jew；　born　in　Cyprus；　though
he　pretended　to　be　a　magician；　and　seems　to　have　been　wicked
enough；　could　hardly　be　that　famous　Simon　the　magician；　in　the
Acts　of　the　Apostles；　8：9；　etc。；　as　some　are　ready　to　suppose。
This　Simon　mentioned　in　the　Acts　was　not　properly　a　Jew；　but　a
Samaritan；　of　the　town　of　Gittae；　in　the　country　of　Samaria；　as
the　Apostolical　Constitutions；　VI。　7；　the　Recognitions　of
Clement；　II。　6；　and　Justin　Martyr；　himself　born　in　the　country　of
Samaria；　Apology；　I。　34；　inform　us。　He　was　also　the　author；　not
of　any　ancient　Jewish；　but　of　the　first　Gentile　heresies；　as　the
forementioned　authors　assure　us。　So　I　suppose　him　a　different
person　from　the　other。　I　mean　this　only　upon　the　hypothesis　that
Josephus　was　not　misinformed　as　to　his　being　a　Cypriot　Jew；　for
otherwise　the　time；　the　name；　the　profession；　and　the　wickedness
of　them　both　would　strongly　incline　one　to　believe　them　the　very
same。　As　to　that　Drusilla；　the　sister　of　Agrippa；　junior；　as
Josephus　informs　us　here；　and　a　Jewess；　as　St。　Luke　informs　us；
Acts　24：24；　whom　this　Simon　mentioned　by　Josephus　persuaded　to
leave　her　former　husband；　Azizus；　king　of　Emesa；　a　proselyte　of
justice；　and　to　marry　Felix；　the　heathen　procurator　of　Judea；
Tacitus；　Hist。　V。　9；　supposes　her　to　be　a　heathen；　and　the
grand…daughter　of　Antonius　and　Cleopatra；　contrary　both　to　St。
Luke　and　Josephus。　Now　Tacitus　lived　somewhat　too　remote；　both　as
to　time　and　place；　to　be　compared　with　either　of　those　Jewish
writers；　in　a　matt