god the invisible king-及6准
梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ● 辛指欺云匈競何
!!!!隆堋響頼紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響
re for the avenger察their sexual passions and perplexities。 。 。 。 Each of these great systems of needs and efforts brings its own sort of sediment into religion。 Each察that is to say察has its own kind of heresy察its distinctive misapprehension of God。 It is only in the synthesis and mutual correction of many divergent ideas that the idea of God grows clear。 The effort to understand completely察for example察leads to the endless Heresies of Theory。 Men trip over the inherent infirmities of the human mind。 But in these days one does not argue greatly about dogma。 Almost every conceivable error about unity察about personality察about time and quantity and genus and species察about begetting and beginning and limitation and similarity and every kink in the difficult mind of man察has been thrust forward in some form of dogma。 Beside the errors of thought are the errors of emotion。 Fear and feebleness go straight to the Heresies that God is Magic or that God is Providence察restless egotism at leisure and unchallenged by urgent elementary realities breeds the Heresies of Mysticism察anger and hate call for God's Judgments察and the stormy emotions of sex gave mankind the Phallic God。 Those who find themselves possessed by the new spirit in religion察realise very speedily the necessity of clearing the mind of all these exaggerations察transferences察and overflows of feeling。 The search for divine truth is like gold washing察nothing is of any value until most has been swept away。
2。 HERESIES OF SPECULATION
One sort of heresies stands apart from the rest。 It is infinitely the most various sort。 It includes all those heresies which result from wrong´headed mental elaboration察as distinguished from those which are the result of hasty and imperfect apprehension察the heresies of the clever rather than the heresies of the obtuse。 The former are of endless variety and complexity察the latter are in comparison natural察simple confusions。 The former are the errors of the study察the latter the superstitions that spring by the wayside察 or are brought down to us in our social structure out of a barbaric past。 To the heresies of thought and speculation belong the elaborate doctrine of the Trinity察dogmas about God's absolute qualities察such odd deductions as the accepted Christian teachings about the virginity of Mary and Joseph察and the like。 All these things are parts of orthodox Christianity。 Yet none of them did Christ察even by the Christian account察expound or recommend。 He treated them as negligible。 It was left for the Alexandrians察for Alexander察for little察red´haired察busy察wire´pulling Athanasius to find out exactly what their Master was driving at察three centuries after their Master was dead。 。 。 。 Men still sit at little desks remote from God or life察and rack their inadequate brains to meet fancied difficulties and state unnecessary perfections。 They seek God by logic察ignoring the marginal error that creeps into every syllogism。 Their conceit blinds them to the limitations upon their thinking。 They weave spider´like webs of muddle and disputation across the path by which men come to God。 It would not matter very much if it were not that simpler souls are caught in these webs。 Every great religious system in the world is choked by such webs察each system has its own。 Of all the blood´stained tangled heresies which make up doctrinal Christianity and imprison the mind of the western world to´day察not one seems to have been known to the nominal founder of Christianity。 Jesus Christ never certainly claimed to be the Messiah察never spoke clearly of the Trinity察was vague upon the scheme of salvation and the significance of his martyrdom。 We are asked to suppose that he left his apostles without instructions察that were necessary to their eternal happiness察that he could give them the Lord's Prayer but leave them to guess at the all´important Creed* and that the Church staggered along blindly察putting its foot in and out of damnation察 until the ;experts; of Nicaea察that ;garland of priests察─marshalled by Constantine's officials察came to its rescue。 。 。 。 From the conversion of Paul onward察the heresies of the intellect multiplied about Christ's memory and hid him from the sight of men。 We are no longer clear about the doctrine he taught nor about the things he said and did。 。 。 。 * Even the ;Apostles' Creed; is not traceable earlier than the fourth century。 It is manifestly an old察patched formulary。 Rutinius explains that it was not written down for a long time察but transmitted orally察kept secret察and used as a sort of password among the elect。 We are all so weary of this theology of the Christians察we are all at heart so sceptical about their Triune God察that it is needless here to spend any time or space upon the twenty thousand different formulae in which the orthodox have attempted to believe in something of the sort。 There are several useful encyclopaedias of sects and heresies察compact察but still bulky察to which the curious may go。 There are ten thousand different expositions of orthodoxy。 No one who really seeks God thinks of the Trinity察either the Trinity of the Trinitarian or the Trinity of the Sabellian or the Trinity of the Arian察any more than one thinks of those theories made stone察those gods with three heads and seven hands察who sit on lotus leaves and flourish lingams and what not察in the temples of India。 Let us leave察therefore察these morbid elaborations of the human intelligence to drift to limbo察and come rather to the natural heresies that spring from fundamental weaknesses of the human character察and which are common to all religions。 Against these it is necessary to keep constant watch。 They return very insidiously。
3。 GOD IS NOT MAGIC
One of the most universal of these natural misconceptions of God is to consider him as something magic serving the ends of men。 It is not easy for us to grasp at first the full meaning of giving our souls to God。 The missionary and teacher of any creed is all too apt to hawk God for what he will fetch察he is greedy for the poor triumph of acquiescence察and so it comes about that many people who have been led to believe themselves religious察are in reality still keeping back their own souls and trying to use God for their own purposes。 God is nothing more for them as yet than a magnificent Fetish。 They did not really want him察but they have heard that he is potent stuff察their unripe souls think to make use of him。 They call upon his name察they do certain things that are supposed to be peculiarly influential with him察such as saying prayers and repeating gross praises of him察or reading in a blind察 industrious way that strange miscellany of Jewish and early Christian literature察the Bible察and suchlike mental mortification察 or making the Sabbath dull and uncomfortable。 In return for these fetishistic propitiations God is supposed to interfere with the normal course of causation in their favour。 He becomes a celestial log´roller。 He remedies unfavourable accidents察cures petty ailments察contrives unexpected gifts of medicine察money察or the like察he averts bankruptcies察arranges profitable transactions察and does a thousand such services for his little clique of faithful people。 The pious are represented as being constantly delighted by these little surprises察these bouquets and chocolate boxes from the divinity。 Or contrawise he contrives spiteful turns for those who fail in their religious attentions。 He murders Sabbath´breaking children察or disorganises the careful business schemes of the ungodly。 He is represented as going Sabbath´breakering on Sunday morning as a Staffordshire worker goes ratting。 Ordinary everyday Christianity is saturated with this fetishistic conception of God。 It may be disowned in THE HIBBERT JOURNAL察but it is unblushingly advocated in the parish magazine。 It is an idea taken over by Christianity with the rest of the qualities of the Hebrew God。 It is natural enough in minds so self´centred that their recognition of weakness and need brings with it no real self´surrender察but it is entirely inconsistent with the modern conception of the true God。 There has dropped upon the table as I write a modest periodical called THE NORTHERN BRITISH ISRAEL REVIEW察illustrated with portraits of various clergymen of the Church of England察and of ladies and gentlemen who belong to the little school of thought which this magazine represents察it is察I should judge察a sub´sect entirely within the Established Church of England察that is to say within the Anglican communion of the Trinitarian Christians。 It contains among other papers a very entertaining summary by a gentleman entitledI cite the unusual title´page of the periodical ;Landseer Mackenzie察Esq。察─of the views of Isaiah察Ezekiel察and Obadiah upon the Kaiser William。 They are distinctly hostile views。 Mr。 Landseer Mackenzie discourses not only upon these anticipatory condemnations but also upon the relations of the weather to this war。 He is convinced quite simply and honestly that God has been persistently rigging the weather against the German