god the invisible king-及12准
梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ● 辛指欺云匈競何
!!!!隆堋響頼紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響
t individuals。 Natural History察which began by putting individuals into species as if the latter were mere classificatory divisions察has come to see that the species has its adventures察its history and drama察far exceeding in interest and importance the individual adventure。 ;The Origin of Species; was for countless minds the discovery of a new romance in life。 The contrast of the individual life and this specific life may be stated plainly and compactly as follows。 A little while ago we current individuals察we who are alive now察were each of us distributed between two parents察then between four grandparents察and so on backward察we are temporarily assembled察as it were察out of an ancestral diffusion察we stand our trial察and presently our individuality is dispersed and mixed again with other individualities in an uncertain multitude of descendants。 But the species is not like this察it goes on steadily from newness to newness察remaining still a unity。 The drama of the individual life is a mere episode察beneficial or abandoned察in this continuing adventure of the species。 And Metchnikoff finds most of the trouble of life and the distresses of life in the fact that the species is still very painfully adjusting itself to the fluctuating conditions under which it lives。 The conflict of life is a continual pursuit of adjustment察and the ;ills of life察─of the individual life that is察are due to its ;disharmonies。; Man察acutely aware of himself as an individual adventure and unawakened to himself as a species察 finds life jangling and distressful察finds death frustration。 He fails and falls as a person in what may be the success and triumph of his kind。 He does not apprehend the struggle or the nature of victory察but only his own gravitation to death and personal extinction。 Now Professor Metchnikoff is anti´religious察and he is anti´ religious because to him as to so many Europeans religion is confused with priest´craft and dogmas察is associated with disagreeable early impressions of irrational repression and misguidance。 How completely he misconceives the quality of religion察how completely he sees it as an individual's affair察his own words may witness
;Religion is still occupied with the problem of death。 The solutions which as yet it has offered cannot be regarded as satisfactory。 A future life has no single argument to support it察 and the non´existence of life after death is in consonance with the whole range of human knowledge。 On the other hand察resignation as preached by Buddha will fail to satisfy humanity察which has a longing for life察and is overcome by the thought of the inevitability of death。;
Now here it is clear that by death he means the individual death察 and by a future life the prolongation of individuality。 But Buddhism does not in truth appear ever to have been concerned with that察and modern religious developments are certainly not under that preoccupation with the narrower self。 Buddhism indeed so far from ;preaching resignation; to death察seeks as its greater good a death so complete as to be absolute release from the individual's burthen of KARMA。 Buddhism seeks an ESCAPE FROM INDIVIDUAL IMMORTALITY。 The deeper one pursues religious thought the more nearly it approximates to a search for escape from the self´centred life and over´individuation察and the more it diverges from Professor Metchnikoff's assertion of its aims。 Salvation is indeed to lose one's self。 But Professor Metchnikoff having roundly denied that this is so察is then left free to take the very essentials of the religious life as they are here conceived and present them as if they were the antithesis of the religious life。 His book察when it is analysed察resolves itself into just that research for an escape from the painful accidents and chagrins of individuation察which is the ultimate of religion。 At times察indeed察he seems almost wilfully blind to the true solution round and about which his writing goes。 He suggests as his most hopeful satisfaction for the cravings of the human heart察such a scientific prolongation of life that the instinct for self´ preservation will be at last extinct。 If that is not the very ;resignation; he imputes to the Buddhist I do not know what it is。 He believes that an individual which has lived fully and completely may at last welcome death with the same instinctive readiness as察in the days of its strength察it shows for the embraces of its mate。 We are to be glutted by living to six score and ten。 We are to rise from the table at last as gladly as we sat down。 We shall go to death as unresistingly as tired children go to bed。 Men are to have a life far beyond the range of what is now considered their prime察 and their last period won by scientific self´control will be a period of ripe wisdom from seventy to eighty to a hundred and twenty or thereabouts and public service 。But why察one asks察public service拭 Why not book´collecting or the simple pleasure of reminiscence so dear to aged egotists拭 Metchnikoff never faces that question。 And again察what of the man who is challenged to die for right at the age of thirty拭 What does the prolongation of life do for him拭 And where are the consolations for accidental misfortune察for the tormenting disease or the lost limb殖 But in his peroration Professor Metchnikoff lapses into pure religiosity。 The prolongation of life gives place to sheer self´ sacrifice as the fundamental ;remedy。; And indeed what other remedy has ever been conceived for the general evil of life
;On the other hand察─he writes察 the knowledge that the goal of human life can be attained only by the development of a high degree of solidarity amongst men will restrain actual egotism。 The mere fact that the enjoyment of life according to the precepts of Solomon Ecelesiastes ix。 7´10* is opposed to the goal of human life察will lessen luxury and the evil that comes from luxury。 Conviction that science alone is able to redress the disharmonies of the human constitution will lead directly to the improvement of education and to the solidarity of mankind。 * Go thy way察eat thy bread with joy察and drink thy wine with a merry heart察for God now accepteth thy works。 Let thy garments be always white察and let thy head lack no ointment。 Live joyfully with the wife whom thou lovest all the days of the life of thy vanity察 which he hath given thee under the sun察all the days of thy vanity for that is thy portion in this life察and in thy labour which thou takest under the sun。 whatsoever thy hand findeth to do察do it with thy might察for there is no work察nor device察nor knowledge察nor wisdom察in the grave察whither thou goest。 ;In progress towards the goal察nature will have to be consulted continuously。 Already察in the case of the ephemerids察nature has produced a complete cycle of normal life ending in natural death。 In the problem of his own fate察man must not be content with the gifts of nature察he must direct them by his own efforts。 Just as he has been able to modify the nature of animals and plants察man must attempt to modify his own constitution察so as to readjust its disharmonies。 。 。 。 ;To modify the human constitution察it will be necessary first察to frame the ideal察and thereafter to set to work with all the resources of science。 ;If there can be formed an ideal able to unite men in a kind of religion of the future察this ideal must be founded on scientific principles。 And if it be true察as has been asserted so often察that man can live by faith alone察the faith must be in the power of science。;
Now this察after all the flat repudiations that have preceded it of ;religion; and ;philosophy; as remedies for human ills察is nothing less than the fundamental proposition of the religious life translated into terms of materialistic science察the proposition that damnation is really over´individuation and that salvahon is escape from self into the larger being of life。 。 。 。 What can this ;religion of the future; be but that devotion to the racial adventure under the captaincy of God which we have already found察like gold in the bottom of the vessel察when we have washed away the confusions and impurities of dogmatic religion拭 By an inquiry setting out from a purely religious starting´point we have already reached conclusions identical with this ultimate refuge of an extreme materialist。 This altar to the Future of his察we can claim as an altar to our Godan altar rather indistinctly inscribed。
2。 SACRIFICE IMPLIES GOD
Almost all Agnostic and Atheistical writings that show any fineness and generosity of spirit察have this tendency to become as it were the statement of an anonymous God。 Everything is said that a religious writer would sayexcept that God is not named。 Religious metaphors abound。 It is as if they accepted the living body of religion but denied the bones that held it togetheras they might deny the bones of a friend。 It is true察they would admit察the body moves in a way that implies bones in its every movement察but WE HAVE NEVER SEEN THOSE BONES。 The disputes in theoryI do not say the difference in reality between the modern believer a