湊徨勵弌傍利 > 哂囂窮徨慕 > god the invisible king >

及12准

god the invisible king-及12准

弌傍 god the invisible king 忖方 耽匈4000忖

梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ● 辛指欺云匈競何
!!!!隆堋響頼紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響



t individuals。  Natural History察which began by  putting individuals into species as if the latter were mere  classificatory divisions察has come to see that the species has its  adventures察its history and drama察far exceeding in interest and  importance the individual adventure。  ;The Origin of Species; was  for countless minds the discovery of a new romance in life。 The contrast of the individual life and this specific life may be  stated plainly and compactly as follows。  A little while ago we  current individuals察we who are alive now察were each of us  distributed between two parents察then between four grandparents察and  so on backward察we are temporarily assembled察as it were察out of an  ancestral diffusion察we stand our trial察and presently our  individuality is dispersed and mixed again with other  individualities in an uncertain multitude of descendants。  But the  species is not like this察it goes on steadily from newness to  newness察remaining still a unity。  The drama of the individual life  is a mere episode察beneficial or abandoned察in this continuing  adventure of the species。  And Metchnikoff finds most of the trouble  of life and the distresses of life in the fact that the species is  still very painfully adjusting itself to the fluctuating conditions  under which it lives。  The conflict of life is a continual pursuit  of adjustment察and the ;ills of life察─of the individual life that  is察are due to its ;disharmonies。;  Man察acutely aware of himself as  an individual adventure and unawakened to himself as a species察 finds life jangling and distressful察finds death frustration。  He  fails and falls as a person in what may be the success and triumph  of his kind。  He does not apprehend the struggle or the nature of  victory察but only his own gravitation to death and personal  extinction。 Now Professor Metchnikoff is anti´religious察and he is anti´ religious because to him as to so many Europeans religion is  confused with priest´craft and dogmas察is associated with  disagreeable early impressions of irrational repression and  misguidance。  How completely he misconceives the quality of  religion察how completely he sees it as an individual's affair察his  own words may witness

;Religion is still occupied with the problem of death。  The  solutions which as yet it has offered cannot be regarded as  satisfactory。  A future life has no single argument to support it察 and the non´existence of life after death is in consonance with the  whole range of human knowledge。  On the other hand察resignation as  preached by Buddha will fail to satisfy humanity察which has a  longing for life察and is overcome by the thought of the  inevitability of death。;

Now here it is clear that by death he means the individual death察 and by a future life the prolongation of individuality。  But  Buddhism does not in truth appear ever to have been concerned with  that察and modern religious developments are certainly not under that  preoccupation with the narrower self。  Buddhism indeed so far from  ;preaching resignation; to death察seeks as its greater good a death  so complete as to be absolute release from the individual's burthen  of KARMA。  Buddhism seeks an ESCAPE FROM INDIVIDUAL IMMORTALITY。   The deeper one pursues religious thought the more nearly it  approximates to a search for escape from the self´centred life and  over´individuation察and the more it diverges from Professor  Metchnikoff's assertion of its aims。  Salvation is indeed to lose  one's self。  But Professor Metchnikoff having roundly denied that  this is so察is then left free to take the very essentials of the  religious life as they are here conceived and present them as if  they were the antithesis of the religious life。  His book察when it  is analysed察resolves itself into just that research for an escape  from the painful accidents and chagrins of individuation察which is  the ultimate of religion。 At times察indeed察he seems almost wilfully blind to the true  solution round and about which his writing goes。  He suggests as his  most hopeful satisfaction for the cravings of the human heart察such  a scientific prolongation of life that the instinct for self´ preservation will be at last extinct。  If that is not the very  ;resignation; he imputes to the Buddhist I do not know what it is。   He believes that an individual which has lived fully and completely  may at last welcome death with the same instinctive readiness as察in  the days of its strength察it shows for the embraces of its mate。  We  are to be glutted by living to six score and ten。  We are to rise  from the table at last as gladly as we sat down。  We shall go to  death as unresistingly as tired children go to bed。  Men are to have  a life far beyond the range of what is now considered their prime察 and their last period won by scientific self´control will be a  period of ripe wisdom from seventy to eighty to a hundred and  twenty or thereabouts and public service 。But why察one asks察public service拭 Why not book´collecting or the  simple pleasure of reminiscence so dear to aged egotists拭  Metchnikoff never faces that question。  And again察what of the man  who is challenged to die for right at the age of thirty拭 What does  the prolongation of life do for him拭 And where are the consolations  for accidental misfortune察for the tormenting disease or the lost  limb殖 But in his peroration Professor Metchnikoff lapses into pure  religiosity。  The prolongation of life gives place to sheer self´ sacrifice as the fundamental ;remedy。;  And indeed what other remedy  has ever been conceived for the general evil of life

;On the other hand察─he writes察 the knowledge that the goal of  human life can be attained only by the development of a high degree  of solidarity amongst men will restrain actual egotism。  The mere  fact that the enjoyment of life according to the precepts of Solomon  Ecelesiastes ix。 7´10* is opposed to the goal of human life察will  lessen luxury and the evil that comes from luxury。  Conviction that  science alone is able to redress the disharmonies of the human  constitution will lead directly to the improvement of education and  to the solidarity of mankind。 * Go thy way察eat thy bread with joy察and drink thy wine with a  merry heart察for God now accepteth thy works。  Let thy garments be  always white察and let thy head lack no ointment。  Live joyfully with  the wife whom thou lovest all the days of the life of thy vanity察 which he hath given thee under the sun察all the days of thy vanity  for that is thy portion in this life察and in thy labour which thou  takest under the sun。  whatsoever thy hand findeth to do察do it with  thy might察for there is no work察nor device察nor knowledge察nor  wisdom察in the grave察whither thou goest。 ;In progress towards the goal察nature will have to be consulted  continuously。  Already察in the case of the ephemerids察nature has  produced a complete cycle of normal life ending in natural death。   In the problem of his own fate察man must not be content with the  gifts of nature察he must direct them by his own efforts。  Just as he  has been able to modify the nature of animals and plants察man must  attempt to modify his own constitution察so as to readjust its  disharmonies。 。 。 。 ;To modify the human constitution察it will be necessary first察to  frame the ideal察and thereafter to set to work with all the  resources of science。 ;If there can be formed an ideal able to unite men in a kind of  religion of the future察this ideal must be founded on scientific  principles。  And if it be true察as has been asserted so often察that  man can live by faith alone察the faith must be in the power of  science。;

Now this察after all the flat repudiations that have preceded it of  ;religion; and ;philosophy; as remedies for human ills察is nothing  less than the fundamental proposition of the religious life  translated into terms of materialistic science察the proposition that  damnation is really over´individuation and that salvahon is escape  from self into the larger being of life。 。 。 。 What can this ;religion of the future; be but that devotion to the  racial adventure under the captaincy of God which we have already  found察like gold in the bottom of the vessel察when we have washed  away the confusions and impurities of dogmatic religion拭 By an  inquiry setting out from a purely religious starting´point we have  already reached conclusions identical with this ultimate refuge of  an extreme materialist。 This altar to the Future of his察we can claim as an altar to our  Godan altar rather indistinctly inscribed。

2。 SACRIFICE IMPLIES GOD

Almost all Agnostic and Atheistical writings that show any fineness  and generosity of spirit察have this tendency to become as it were  the statement of an anonymous God。  Everything is said that a  religious writer would sayexcept that God is not named。  Religious  metaphors abound。  It is as if they accepted the living body of  religion but denied the bones that held it togetheras they might  deny the bones of a friend。  It is true察they would admit察the body  moves in a way that implies bones in its every movement察but WE  HAVE NEVER SEEN THOSE BONES。 The disputes in theoryI do not say the difference in reality between the modern believer a

卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 0 0

低辛嬬浪散議