太子爷小说网 > 英语电子书 > representative government >

第61节

representative government-第61节

小说: representative government 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



ting to govern a dependency; is about the worst; and betrays in its advocates a total want of comprehension of the conditions of good government。 To govern a country under responsibility to the people of that country; and to govern one country under responsibility to the people of another; are two very different things。 What makes the excellence of the first is that freedom is preferable to despotism: but the last is despotism。 The only choice the case admits is a choice of despotisms: and it is not certain that the despotism of twenty millions is necessarily better than that of a few; or of one。 But it is quite certain that the despotism of those who neither hear; nor see; nor know anything about their subjects; has many chances of being worse than that of those who do。 It is not usually thought that the immediate agents of authority govern better because they govern in the name of an absent master; and of one who has a thousand more pressing interests to attend to。 The master may hold them to a strict responsibility; enforced by heavy penalties; but it is very questionable if those penalties will often fall in the right place。   It is always under great difficulties; and very imperfectly; that a country can be governed by foreigners; even when there is no extreme disparity; in habits and ideas; between the rulers and the ruled。 Foreigners do not feel with the people。 They cannot judge; by the light in which a thing appears to their own minds; or the manner in which it affects their feelings; how it will affect the feelings or appear to the minds of the subject population。 What a native of the country; of average practical ability; knows as it were by instinct; they have to learn slowly; and after all imperfectly; by study and experience。 The laws; the customs; the social relations; for which they have to legislate; instead of being familiar to them from childhood; are all strange to them。 For most of their detailed knowledge they must depend on the information of natives; and it is difficult for them to know whom to trust。 They are feared; suspected; probably disliked by the population; seldom sought by them except for interested purposes; and they are prone to think that the servilely submissive are the trustworthy。 Their danger is of despising the natives; that of the natives is of disbelieving that anything the strangers do can be intended for their good。 These are but a part of the difficulties that any rulers have to struggle with who honestly attempt to govern well a country in which they are foreigners。 To overcome these difficulties in any degree will always be a work of much labour; requiring a very superior degree of capacity in the chief administrators; and a high average among the subordinates: and the best organisation of such a government is that which will best ensure the labour; develop the capacity; and place the highest specimens of it in the situations of greatest trust。 Responsibility to an authority which bas gone through none of the labour; acquired none of the capacity; and for the most part is not even aware that either; in any peculiar degree; is required; cannot be regarded as a very effectual expedient for accomplishing these ends。   The government of a people by itself has a meaning and a reality; but such a thing as government of one people by another does not and cannot exist。 One people may keep another as a warren or preserve for its own use; a place to make money in; a human cattle farm to be worked for the profit of its own inhabitants。 But if the good of the governed is the proper business of a government; it is utterly impossible that a people should directly attend to it。 The utmost they can do is to give some of their best men a commission to look after it; to whom the opinion of their own country can neither be much of a guide in the performance of their duty; nor a competent judge of the mode in which it has been performed。 Let any one consider how the English themselves would be governed if they knew and cared no more about their own affairs than they know and care about the affairs of the Hindoos。 Even this comparison gives no adequate idea of the state of the case: for a people thus indifferent to politics altogether would probably be simply acquiescent and let the government alone: whereas in the case of India; a politically active people like the English; amidst habitual acquiescence; are every now and then interfering; and almost always in the wrong place。 The real causes which determine the prosperity or wretchedness; the improvement or deterioration; of the Hindoos are too far off to be within their ken。 They have not the knowledge necessary for suspecting the existence of those causes; much less for judging of their operation。 The most essential interests of the country may be well administered without obtaining any of their approbation; or mismanaged to almost any excess without attracting their notice。   The purposes for which they are principally tempted to interfere and control the proceedings of their delegates are of two kinds。 One is to force English ideas down the throats of the natives; for instance; by measures of proselytism; or acts intentionally or unintentionally offensive to the religious feelings of the people。 This misdirection of opinion in the ruling country is instructively exemplified (the more so; because nothing is meant but justice and fairness; and as much impartiality as can be expected from persons really convinced) by the demand now so general in England for having the Bible taught; at the option of pupils or of their parents; in the Government schools。 From the European point of view nothing can wear a fairer aspect; or seem less open to objection on the score of religious freedom。 To Asiatic eyes it is quite another thing。 No Asiatic people ever believes that a government puts its paid officers and official machinery into motion unless it is bent upon an object; and when bent on an object; no Asiatic believes that any government; except a feeble and contemptible one; pursues it by halves。 If Government schools and schoolmasters taught Christianity; whatever pledges might be given of teaching it only to those who spontaneously sought it; no amount of evidence would ever persuade the parents that improper means were not used to make their children Christians; or at all events; outcasts from Hindooism。 If they could; in the end; be convinced of the contrary; it would only be by the entire failure of the schools; so conducted; to make any converts。 If the teaching had the smallest effect in promoting its object it would compromise not only the utility and even existence of the government education; but perhaps the safety of the government itself。 An English Protestant would not be easily induced; by disclaimers of proselytism; to place his children in a Roman Catholic seminary: Irish Catholics will not send their children to schools in which they can be made Protestants: and we expect that Hindoos; who believe that the privileges of Hindooism can be forfeited by a merely physical act; will expose theirs to the danger of being made Christians!   Such is one of the modes in which the opinion of the dominant country tends to act more injuriously than beneficially on the conduct of its deputed governors。 In other respects; its interference is likely to be oftenest exercised where it will be most pertinaciously demanded; and that is on behalf of some interest of the English settlers。 English settlers have friends at home; have organs; have access to the public; they have a common language and common ideas with their countrymen: any complaint by an Englishman is more sympathetically heard; even if no unjust preference is intentionally accorded to it。 Now; if there be a fact to which all experience testifies; it is that when a country holds another in subjection; the individuals of the ruling people who resort to the foreign country to make their fortunes are of all others those who most need to be held under powerful restraint。 They are always one of the chief difficulties of the government。 Armed with the prestige and filled with the scornful overbearingness of the conquering nation; they have the feelings inspired by absolute power without its sense of responsibility。   Among a people like that India the utmost efforts of the public authorities are not enough for the effectual protection of the weak against the strong; and of all the strong; the European settlers are the strongest。 Wherever the demoralising effect of the situation is not in a most remarkable degree corrected by the personal character of the individual; they think the people of the country mere dirt under their feet: it seems to them monstrous that any rights of the natives should stand in the way of their smallest pretensions: the simplest act of protection to the inhabitants against any act of power on their part which they may consider useful to their commercial objects; they denounce; and sincerely regard; as an injury。 So natural is this state of feeling in a situation like theirs that even under the discouragement which it has hitherto met with from the ruling authorities it is impossible that more or less of the spirit should not perpetually break out。 The Government; itself free from this spir

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的