太子爷小说网 > 英语电子书 > representative government >

第4节

representative government-第4节

小说: representative government 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



promote the interests of any given society。   Before entering into this inquiry; it may seem necessary to decide what are the proper functions of government; for; government altogether being only a means; the eligibility of the means must depend on their adaptation to the end。 But this mode of stating the problem gives less aid to its investigation than might be supposed; and does not even bring the whole of the question into view。 For; in the first place; the proper functions of a government are not a fixed thing; but different in different states of society; much more extensive in a backward than in an advanced state。 And; secondly; the character of a government or set of political institutions cannot be sufficiently estimated while we confine our attention to the legitimate sphere of governmental functions。 For though the goodness of a government is necessarily circumscribed within that sphere; its badness unhappily is not。 Every kind and degree of evil of which mankind are susceptible may be inflicted on them by their government; and none of the good which social existence is capable of can be any further realised than as the constitution of the government is compatible with; and allows scope for; its attainment。 Not to speak of indirect effects; the direct meddling of the public authorities has no necessary limits but those of human existence; and the influence of government on the well…being of society can be considered or estimated in reference to nothing less than the whole of the interests of humanity。   Being thus obliged to place before ourselves; as the test of good and bad government; so complex an object as the aggregate interests of society; we would willingly attempt some kind of classification of those interests; which; bringing them before the mind in definite groups; might give indication of the qualities by which a form of government is fitted to promote those various interests respectively。 It would be a great facility if we could say the good of society consists of such and such elements; one of these elements requires such conditions; another such others; the government; then; which unites in the greatest degree all these conditions; must be the best。 The theory of government would thus be built up from the separate theorems of the elements which compose a good state of society。   Unfortunately; to enumerate and classify the constituents of social well…being; so as to admit of the formation of such theorems; is no easy task。 Most of those who; in the last or present generation; have applied themselves to the philosophy of politics in any comprehensive spirit; have felt the importance of such a classification; but the attempts which have been made towards it are as yet limited; so far as I am aware; to a single step。 The classification begins and ends with a partition of the exigencies of society between the two heads of Order and Progress (in the phraseology of French thinkers); Permanence and Progression in the words of Coleridge。 This division is plausible and seductive; from the apparently clean…cut opposition between its two members; and the remarkable difference between the sentiments to which they appeal。 But I apprehend that (however admissible for purposes of popular discourse) the distinction between Order; or Permanence; and Progress; employed to define the qualities necessary in a government; is unscientific and incorrect。   For; first; what are Order and Progress? Concerning Progress there is no difficulty; or none which is apparent at first sight。 When Progress is spoken of as one of the wants of human society; it may be supposed to mean Improvement。 That is a tolerably distinct idea。 But what is Order? Sometimes it means more; sometimes less; but hardly ever the whole of what human society needs except improvement。   In its narrowest acceptation Order means Obedience。 A government is said to preserve order if it succeeds in getting itself obeyed。 But there are different degrees of obedience; and it is not every degree that is commendable。 Only an unmitigated despotism demands that the individual citizen shall obey unconditionally every mandate of persons in authority。 We must at least limit the definition to such mandates as are general and issued in the deliberate form of laws。 Order; thus understood; expresses; doubtless; an indispensable attribute of government。 Those who are unable to make their ordinances obeyed; cannot be said to govern。 But though a necessary condition; this is not the object of government。 That it should make itself obeyed is requisite; in order that it may accomplish some other purpose。 We are still to seek what is this other purpose; which government ought to fulfil; abstractedly from the idea of improvement; and which has to be fulfilled in every society; whether stationary or progressive。   In a sense somewhat more enlarged; Order means the preservation of peace by the cessation of private violence。 Order is said to exist where the people of the country have; as a general rule; ceased to prosecute their quarrels by private force; and acquired the habit of referring the decision of their disputes and the redress of their injuries to the public authorities。 But in this larger use of the term; as well as in the former narrow one; Order expresses rather one of the conditions of government; than either its purpose or the criterion of its excellence。 For the habit may be well established of submitting to the government; and referring all disputed matters to its authority; and yet the manner in which the government deals with those disputed matters; and with the other things about which it concerns itself; may differ by the whole interval which divides the best from the worst possible。   If we intend to comprise in the idea of Order all that society requires from its government which is not included in the idea of Progress; we must define Order as the preservation of all kinds and amounts of good which already exist; and Progress as consisting in the increase of them。 This distinction does comprehend in one or the other section everything which a government can be required to promote。 But; thus understood; it affords no basis for a philosophy of government。 We cannot say that; in constituting a polity; certain provisions ought to be made for Order and certain others for Progress; since the conditions of Order; in the sense now indicated; and those of Progress; are not opposite; but the same。 The agencies which tend to preserve the social good which already exists are the very same which promote the increase of it; and vice versa: the sole difference being; that a greater degree of those agencies is required for the latter purpose than for the former。   What; for example; are the qualities in the citizens individually which conduce most to keep up the amount of good conduct; of good management; of success and prosperity; which already exist in society? Everybody will agree that those qualities are industry; integrity; justice; and prudence。 But are not these; of all qualities; the most conducive to improvement? and is not any growth of these virtues in the community in itself the greatest of improvements? If so; whatever qualities in the government are promotive of industry; integrity; justice; and prudence; conduce alike to permanence and to progression; only there is needed more of those qualities to make the society decidedly progressive than merely to keep it permanent。   What; again; are the particular attributes in human beings which seem to have a more especial reference to Progress; and do not so directly suggest the ideas of Order and Preservation? They are chiefly the qualities of mental activity; enterprise; and courage。 But are not all these qualities fully as much required for preserving the good we have; as for adding to it? If there is anything certain in human affairs; it is that valuable acquisitions are only to be retained by the continuation of the same energies which gained them。 Things left to take care of themselves inevitably decay。 Those whom success induces to relax their habits of care and thoughtfulness; and their willingness to encounter disagreeables; seldom long retain their good fortune at its height。 The mental attribute which seems exclusively dedicated to Progress; and is the culmination of the tendencies to it; is Originality; or Invention。 Yet this is no less necessary for Permanence; since; in the inevitable changes of human affairs; new inconveniences and dangers continually grow up; which must be encountered by new resources and contrivances; in order to keep things going on even only as well as they did before。 Whatever qualities; therefore; in a government; tend to encourage activity; energy; courage; originality; are requisites of Permanence as well as of Progress; only a somewhat less degree of them will on the average suffice for the former purpose than for the latter。   To pass now from the mental to the outward and objective requisites of society; it is impossible to point out any contrivance in politics; or arrangement of social affairs; which conduces to Order only; or to Progress only; whatever tends to either promotes both。 Take; for instance; the common institution of a police。 Order is the object which seems most immediately inter

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的