representative government-第34节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
d are usually far too well satisfied with their own opinion to be willing to change them； or listen without impatience to any one who tells them that they are in the wrong。 The position which gives the strongest stimulus to the growth of intelligence is that of rising into power； not that of having achieved it； and of all resting…points； temporary or permanent； in the way to ascendancy； the one which develops the best and highest qualities is the position of those who are strong enough to make reason prevail； but not strong enough to prevail against reason。 This is the position in which； according to the principles we have laid down； the rich and the poor； the much and the little educated； and all the other classes and denominations which divide society between them； ought as far as practicable to be placed。 And by combining this principle with the otherwise just one of allowing superiority of weight to superiority of mental qualities； a political constitution would realise that kind of relative perfection which is alone compatible with the complicated nature of human affairs。
In the preceding argument for universal； but graduated suffrage； I have taken no account of difference of sex。 I consider it to be as entirely irrelevant to political rights as difference in height or in the colour of the hair。 All human beings have the same interest in good government； the welfare of all is alike affected by it； and they have equal need of a voice in it to secure their share of its benefits。 If there be any difference； women require it more than men； since； being physically weaker； they are more dependent on law and society for protection。 Mankind have long since abandoned the only premises which will support the conclusion that women ought not to have votes。 No one now holds that women should be in personal servitude； that they should have no thought； wish； or occupation； but to be the domestic drudges of husbands； fathers； or brothers。 It is allowed to unmarried； and wants but little of being conceded to married women； to hold property； and have pecuniary and business interests； in the same manner as men。 It is considered suitable and proper that women should think and write； and be teachers。 As soon as these things are admitted； the political disqualification has no principle to rest on。 The whole mode of thought of the modern world is with increasing emphasis pronouncing against the claim of society to decide for individuals what they are and are not fit for； and what they shall and shall not be allowed to attempt。 If the principles of modern politics and political economy are good for anything； it is for proving that these points can only be rightly judged of by the individuals themselves and that； under complete freedom of choice； wherever there are real diversities of aptitude； the great number will apply themselves to the things for which they are on the average fittest； and the exceptional course will only be taken by the exceptions。 Either the whole tendency of modern social improvements has been wrong； or it ought to be carried out to the total abolition of all exclusions and disabilities which close any honest employment to a human being。 But it is not even necessary to maintain so much in order to prove that women should have the suffrage。 Were it as right； as it is wrong； that they should be a subordinate class； confined to domestic occupations and subject to domestic authority； they would not the less require the protection of the suffrage to secure them from the abuse of that authority。 Men； as well as women； do not need political rights in order that they may govern； but in order that they may not be misgoverned。 The majority of the male sex are； and will be all their lives； nothing else than labourers in cornfields or manufactories； but this does not render the suffrage less desirable for them； nor their claim to it less irresistible； when not likely to make a bad use of it。 Nobody pretends to think that woman would make a bad use of the suffrage。 The worst that is said is that they would vote as mere dependents； the bidding of their male relations。 If it be so； so let it be。 If they think for themselves； great good will be done； and if they do not； no harm。 It is a benefit to human beings to take off their fetters； even if they do not desire to walk。 It would already be a great improvement in the moral position of women to be no longer declared by law incapable of an opinion； and not entitled to a preference； respecting the most important concerns of humanity。 There would be some benefit to them individually in having something to bestow which their male relatives cannot exact； and are yet desirous to have。 It would also be no small benefit that the husband would necessarily discuss the matter with his wife； and that the vote would not be his exclusive affair； but a joint concern。 People do not sufficiently consider how markedly the fact that she is able to have some action on the outward world independently of him raises her dignity and value in a vulgar man's eyes； and makes her the object of a respect which no personal qualities would ever obtain for one whose social existence he can entirely appropriate。 The vote itself； too； would be improved in quality。 The man would often be obliged to find honest reasons for his vote； such as might induce a more upright and impartial character to serve with him under the same banner。 The wife's influence would often keep him true to his own sincere opinion。 Often； indeed； it would be used； not on the side of public principle； but of the personal interest or worldly vanity of the family。 But wherever this would be the tendency of the wife's influence； it is exerted to the full already in that bad direction； and with the more certainty； since under the present law and custom she is generally too utter a stranger to politics in any sense in which they involve principle to be able to realise to herself that there is a point of honour in them； and most people have as little sympathy in the point of honour of others； when their own is not placed in the same thing； as they have in the religious feelings of those whose religion differs from theirs。 Give the woman a vote； and she comes under the operation of the political point of honour。 She learns to look on politics as a thing on which she is allowed to have an opinion； and in which if one has an opinion it ought to be acted upon； she acquires a sense of personal accountability in the matter； and will no longer feel； as she does at present； that whatever amount of bad influence she may exercise； if the man can but be persuaded； all is right； and his responsibility covers all。 It is only by being herself encouraged to form an opinion； and obtain an intelligent comprehension of the reasons which ought to prevail with the conscience against the temptations of personal or family interest； that she can ever cease to act as a disturbing force on the political conscience of the man。 Her indirect agency can only be prevented from being politically mischievous by being exchanged for direct。 I have supposed the right of suffrage to depend； as in a good state of things it would； on personal conditions。 Where it depends； as in this and most other countries； on conditions of property； the contradiction is even more flagrant。 There something more than ordinarily irrational in the fact that when a woman can give all the guarantees required from a male elector； independent circumstances； the position of a householder and head of a family； payment of taxes； or whatever may be the conditions imposed； the very principle and system of a representation based on property is set aside； and an exceptionally personal disqualification is created for the mere purpose of excluding her。 When it is added that in the country where this is done a woman now reigns； and that the most glorious ruler whom that country ever had was a woman； the picture of unreason； and scarcely disguised injustice； is complete。 Let us hope that as the work proceeds of pulling down； one after another； the remains of the mouldering fabric of monopoly and tyranny； this one will not be the last to disappear； that the opinion of Bentham； of Mr。 Samuel Bailey； of Mr。 Hare； and many other of the most powerful political thinkers of this age and country （not to speak of others）； will make its way to all minds not rendered obdurate by selfishness or inveterate prejudice； and that； before the lapse another generation； the accident of sex； no more than the accident of skin； will be deemed a sufficient justification for depriving its possessor of the equal protection and just privileges of a citizen。 Chapter 9 Should there be Two Stages of Election？
IN SOME representative constitutions the plan has been adopted of choosing the members of the representative body by a double process； the primary electors only choosing other electors； and these electing the member of parliament。 This contrivance was probably intended as a slight impediment to the full sweep of popular feeling； giving the suffrage； and with it the complete ultimate power； to the Many； but compelling them to exercise it through the agency of a comparatively few； who； it was supposed； wou
