太子爷小说网 > 英语电子书 > autobiography and selected essays >

第5节

autobiography and selected essays-第5节

小说: autobiography and selected essays 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!




visible; it stands forth with the parts all nicely related and

compactly joined。  In reference to structure; his son and

biographer writes; 〃He loved to visualize his object clearly。  The

framework of what he wished to say would always be drawn out

first。〃  Professor Ray Lankester also mentions Huxley's love of

form。  〃He deals with form not only as a mechanical engineer IN

PARTIBUS (Huxley's own description of himself); but also as an

artist; a born lover of form; a character which others recognize in

him though he does not himself set it down in his analysis。〃

Huxley's own account of his efforts to shape his work is

suggestive。  〃The fact is that I have a great love and respect for

my native tongue; and take great pains to use it properly。

Sometimes I write essays half…a…dozen times before I can get them

into proper shape; and I believe I become more fastidious as I grow

older。〃  And; indeed; there is a marked difference in firmness of

structure between the earlier essays; such as On the Educational

Value of the Natural History Sciences; written; as Huxley

acknowledges; in great haste; and the later essays; such as A

Liberal Education and The Method of Scientific Investigation。  To

trace and to define this difference will be most helpful to the

student who is building up a knowledge of structure for his own

use。



According to Huxley's biographer in the Life and Letters of Thomas

Henry Huxley; the essays which represent him at his best are those

published in 1868。  They are A Piece of Chalk; A Liberal Education;

and On the Physical Basis of Life。  In connection with the comment

on these essays is the following quotation which gives one

interesting information as to Huxley's method of obtaining a clear

style:





This lecture on A Piece of Chalk together with two others delivered

this year; seems to me to mark the maturing of his style into that

mastery of clear expression for which he deliberately labored; the

saying exactly what he meant; neither too much nor too little;

without confusion and without obscurity。  Have something to say;

and say it; was the Duke of Wellington's theory of style; Huxley's

was to say that which has to be said in such language that you can

stand cross…examination on each word。  Be clear; though you may be

convicted of error。  If you are clearly wrong; you will run up

against a fact sometime and get set right。  If you shuffle with

your subject; and study chiefly to use language which will give a

loophole of escape either way; there is no hope for you。



This was the secret of his lucidity。  In no one could Buffon's

aphorism on style find a better illustration; Le style c'est

l'homme meme。  In him science and literature; too often divorced;

were closely united; and literature owes him a debt for importing

into it so much of the highest scientific habit of mind; for

showing that truthfulness need not be bald; and that real power

lies more in exact accuracy than in luxuriance of diction。





Huxley's own theory as to how clearness is to be obtained gets at

the root of the matter。  〃For my part; I venture to doubt the

wisdom of attempting to mould one's style by any other process than

that of striving after the clear and forcible expression of

definite conceptions; in which process the Glassian precept; first

catch your definite conception; is probably the most difficult to

obey。〃



Perfect clearness; above every other quality of style; certainly is

characteristic of Huxley; but clearness alone does not make

subject…matter literature。  In addition to this quality; Huxley's

writing wins the reader by the racy diction; the homely

illustration; the plain; honest phrasing。  All these and other

qualities bring one into an intimate relationship with his subject。

A man of vast technical learning; he is still so interested in the

relation of his facts to the problems of men that he is always able

to infuse life into the driest of subjects; in other words; to

HUMANIZE his knowledge; and in the estimation of Matthew Arnold;

this is the true work of the scholar; the highest mission of style。





III



SUGGESTED STUDIES IN SUBJECT…MATTER; STRUCTURE; AND STYLE





Although fully realizing that the questions here given are only

such as are generally used everywhere by instructors in English;

the editor has; nevertheless; included them with the hope that some

one may find them helpful。



The studies given include a few general questions and suggestions

on subject…matter; structure; and style。  The questions on

structure are based on an analysis of the whole composition and of

the paragraph; those on style are based on a study of sentences and

words。  Such a division of material may seem unwarranted; for; it

may be urged; firmness of structure depends; to a certain extent;

upon sentence…form and words; and clearness of style; to a large

extent; upon the form of the paragraph and whole composition。  The

two; certainly; cannot be in justice separated; and especially is

it true; more deeply true than the average student can be brought

to believe; that structure; 〃MIND; in style〃 as Pater phrases it;

primarily determines not only clearness; but also such qualities of

style as reserve; refinement; and simple Doric beauty。  Since;

however; structure is more obviously associated with the larger

groups; and style with the smaller; the questions have been

arranged according to this division。





I。 Suggestions for the Study of Subject…Matter。





1。 To whom does Huxley address the essay?



2。 Can you see any adaptation of his material to his audience?



3。 How would A Piece of Chalk be differently presented if given

before a science club?



4。 Does Huxley make his subject interesting?  If so; how does he

accomplish this?



5。 Is the personality of Huxley suggested by the essays?  See Life

and Letters; vol。 ii; p。 293。





II。 Suggestions for the Study of Structure。





A。 Analysis of the whole composition。



1。 State in one complete sentence the theme of the essay。



2。 Analyze the essay for the logical development of the thought。



a。 Questions on the Introduction。

   In the introduction; how does the author approach his material?

   Does he give the main points of the essay?

   Does he give his reasons for writing?

   Does he narrow his subject to one point of view?

   Is the introduction a digression?



b。 Questions on the Body。

   Can you find large groups of thought?

   Are these groups closely related to the theme and to each other?

   Do you find any digressions?

   Is the method used in developing the groups inductive or deductive?

   Is the method different in different groups?

   Are the groups arranged for good emphasis in the whole composition?



c。 Questions on the Conclusion。

   How does the author conclude the essay?

   Does the conclusion sum up the points of the essay?

   Are any new points suggested?

   Is the thought of the whole essay stated?

   Do you consider it a strong conclusion?



3。 Make out an outline which shall picture the skeleton of the

essay studied。  In making the outline express the topics in the

form of complete statements; phrase the thought for clear sequence;

and be careful about such matters as spacing and punctuation。



B。 Analysis of paragraph structure。



1。 Can a paragraph be analyzed in the same manner as the whole

composition?



2。 Can you express the thought of each paragraph in a complete

sentence?



3。 Can you find different points presented in the paragraph

developing the paragraph topic; as the large groups of the whole

composition develop the theme?



4。 Are the paragraphs closely related; and how are they bound

together?



5。 Can any of the paragraphs be combined to advantage?



6。 Read from Barrett Wendell's English Composition the chapter on

paragraphs。  Are Huxley's paragraphs constructed in accordance with

the principles given in this chapter?



7。 Is the paragraph type varied?  For paragraph types; see Scott

and Denny's Paragraph Writing。



C。 Comparative study of the structure of the essay。



1。 Do you find any difference between Huxley's earlier and later

essays as regards the structure of the whole; or the structure of

the paragraph?



2。 Which essay seems to you to be most successful in structure?



3。 Has the character of the audience any influence upon the

structure of the essays?



4。 Compare the structure of one of Huxley's essays with that of

some other essay recently studied。



5。 Has the nature of the material any influence upon the structure

of the essay?





III。 Suggestions for the Study of Style。





A。 Exactly what do you mean by style?



B。 Questions on sentence structure。



1。 From any given essay; group together sentences which are long;

short; loose; periodic; balanced; simple; compound; note those

pe

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的