太子爷小说网 > 英语电子书 > meno >

第6节

meno-第6节

小说: meno 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!





must be a sort of wisdom or prudence?



  Men。 I quite agree。



  Soc。 And the other goods; such as wealth and the like; of which we



were just now saying that they are sometimes good and sometimes



evil; do not they also become profitable or hurtful; accordingly as



the soul guides and uses them rightly or wrongly; just as the things



of the soul herself are benefited when under the guidance of wisdom



and harmed by folly?



  Men。 True。



  Soc。 And the wise soul guides them rightly; and the foolish soul



wrongly。



  Men。 Yes。



  Soc。 And is not this universally true of human nature? All other



things hang upon the soul; and the things of the soul herself hang



upon wisdom; if they are to be good; and so wisdom is inferred to be



that which profits…and virtue; as we say; is profitable?



  Men。 Certainly。



  Soc。 And thus we arrive at the conclusion that virtue is either



wholly or partly wisdom?



  Men。 I think that what you are saying; Socrates; is very true。



  Soc。 But if this is true; then the good are not by nature good?



  Men。 I think not。



  Soc。 If they had been; there would assuredly have been discerners of



characters among us who would have known our future great men; and



on their showing we should have adopted them; and when we had got



them; we should have kept them in the citadel out of the way of



harm; and set a stamp upon them far rather than upon a piece of



gold; in order that no one might tamper with them; and when they



grew up they would have been useful to the state?



  Men。 Yes; Socrates; that would have been the right way。



  Soc。 But if the good are not by nature good; are they made good by



instruction?



  Men。 There appears to be no other alternative; Socrates。 On the



supposition that virtue is knowledge; there can be no doubt that



virtue is taught。



  Soc。 Yes; indeed; but what if the supposition is erroneous?



  Men。 I certainly thought just now that we were right。



  Soc。 Yes; Meno; but a principle which has any soundness should stand



firm not only just now; but always。



  Men。 Well; and why are you so slow of heart to believe that



knowledge is virtue?



  Soc。 I will try and tell you why; Meno。 I do not retract the



assertion that if virtue is knowledge it may be taught; but I fear



that I have some reason in doubting whether virtue is knowledge: for



consider now。 and say whether virtue; and not only virtue but anything



that is taught; must not have teachers and disciples?



  Men。 Surely。



  Soc。 And conversely; may not the art of which neither teachers nor



disciples exist be assumed to be incapable of being taught?



  Men。 True; but do you think that there are no teachers of virtue?



  Soc。 I have certainly often enquired whether there were any; and



taken great pains to find them; and have never succeeded; and many



have assisted me in the search; and they were the persons whom I



thought the most likely to know。 Here at the moment when he is



wanted we fortunately have sitting by us Anytus; the very person of



whom we should make enquiry; to him then let us repair。 In the first



Place; he is the son of a wealthy and wise father; Anthemion; who



acquired his wealth; not by accident or gift; like Ismenias the Theban



(who has recently made himself as rich as Polycrates); but by his



own skill and industry; and who is a well…conditioned; modest man; not



insolent; or over…bearing; or annoying; moreover; this son of his



has received a good education; as the Athenian people certainly appear



to think; for they choose him to fill the highest offices。 And these



are the sort of men from whom you are likely to learn whether there



are any teachers of virtue; and who they are。 Please; Anytus; to



help me and your friend Meno in answering our question; Who are the



teachers? Consider the matter thus: If we wanted Meno to be a good



physician; to whom should we send him? Should we not send him to the



physicians?



  Any。 Certainly。



  Soc。 Or if we wanted him to be a good cobbler; should we not send



him to the cobblers?



  Any。 Yes。



  Soc。 And so forth?



  Any。 Yes。



  Soc。 Let me trouble you with one more question。 When we say that



we should be right in sending him to the physicians if we wanted him



to be a physician; do we mean that we should be right in sending him



to those who profess the art; rather than to those who do not; and



to those who demand payment for teaching the art; and profess to teach



it to any one who will come and learn? And if these were our



reasons; should we not be right in sending him?



  Any。 Yes。



  Soc。 And might not the same be said of flute…playing; and of the



other arts? Would a man who wanted to make another a flute…player



refuse to send him to those who profess to teach the art for money;



and be plaguing other persons to give him instruction; who are not



professed teachers and who never had a single disciple in that



branch of knowledge which he wishes him to acquire…would not such



conduct be the height of folly?



  Any。 Yes; by Zeus; and of ignorance too。



  Soc。 Very good。 And now you are in a position to advise with me



about my friend Meno。 He has been telling me; Anytus; that he



desires to attain that kind of wisdom and…virtue by which men order



the state or the house; and honour their parents; and know when to



receive and when to send away citizens and strangers; as a good man



should。 Now; to whom should he go in order that he may learn this



virtue? Does not the previous argument imply clearly that we should



send him to those who profess and avouch that they are the common



teachers of all Hellas; and are ready to impart instruction to any one



who likes; at a fixed price?



  Any。 Whom do you mean; Socrates?



  Soc。 You surely know; do you not; Anytus; that these are the



people whom mankind call Sophists?



  Any。 By Heracles; Socrates; forbear! I only hope that no friend or



kinsman or acquaintance of mine; whether citizen or stranger; will



ever be so mad as to allow himself to be corrupted by them; for they



are a manifest pest and corrupting influences to those who have to



do with them。



  Soc。 What; Anytus? Of all the people who profess that they know



how to do men good; do you mean to say that these are the only ones



who not only do them no good; but positively corrupt those who are



entrusted to them; and in return for this disservice have the face



to demand money? Indeed; I cannot believe you; for I know of a



single man; Protagoras; who made more out of his craft than the



illustrious Pheidias; who created such noble works; or any ten other



statuaries。 How could that A mender of old shoes; or patcher up of



clothes; who made the shoes or clothes worse than he received them;



could not have remained thirty days undetected; and would very soon



have starved; whereas during more than forty years; Protagoras was



corrupting all Hellas; and sending his disciples from him worse than



he received them; and he was never found out。 For; if I am not



mistaken;…he was about seventy years old at his death; forty of



which were spent in the practice of his profession; and during all



that time he had a good reputation; which to this day he retains:



and not only Protagoras; but many others are well spoken of; some



who lived before him; and others who are still living。 Now; when you



say that they deceived and corrupted the youth; are they to be



supposed to have corrupted them consciously or unconsciously? Can



those who were deemed by many to be the wisest men of Hellas have been



out of their minds?



  Any。 Out of their minds! No; Socrates; the young men who gave



their money to them; were out of their minds; and their relations



and guardians who entrusted their youth to the care of these men



were still more out of their minds; and most of all; the cities who



allowed them to come in; and did not drive them out; citizen and



stranger alike。



  Soc。 Has any of the Sophists wronged you; Anytus? What makes you



so angry with them?



  Any。 No; indeed; neither I nor any of my belongings has ever had;



nor would I suffer them to have; anything to do with them。



  Soc。 Then you are entirely unacquainted with them?



  Any。 And I have no wish to be acquainted。



  Soc。 Then; my dear friend; how can you know whether a thing is



good or bad of which you are wholly ignorant?



  Any。 Quite well; I am sure that I know what manner of men these are;



whether I am acquainted with them or not。



  Soc。 You must be a diviner; Anytus; for I really cannot make out;



judging from your own words; how; if you are not acquainted with them;



you know about them。 But I am not enquiring of you who are the



teachers who will corrupt Meno (let them be; if you please; the



Sophists)

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的