太子爷小说网 > 英语电子书 > meno >

第3节

meno-第3节

小说: meno 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!





good know that they are evils?



  Men。 Certainly not。



  Soc。 Is it not obvious that those who are ignorant of their nature



do not desire them; but they desire what they suppose to be goods



although they are really evils; and if they are mistaken and suppose



the evils to be good they really desire goods?



  Men。 Yes; in that case。



  Soc。 Well; and do those who; as you say; desire evils; and think



that evils are hurtful to the possessor of them; know that they will



be hurt by them?



  Men。 They must know it。



  Soc。 And must they not suppose that those who are hurt are miserable



in proportion to the hurt which is inflicted upon them?



  Men。 How can it be otherwise?



  Soc。 But are not the miserable ill…fated?



  Men。 Yes; indeed。



  Soc。 And does any one desire to be miserable and ill…fated?



  Men。 I should say not; Socrates。



  Soc。 But if there is no one who desires to be miserable; there is no



one; Meno; who desires evil; for what is misery but the desire and



possession of evil?



  Men。 That appears to be the truth; Socrates; and I admit that nobody



desires evil。



  Soc。 And yet; were you not saying just now that virtue is the desire



and power of attaining good?



  Men。 Yes; I did say so。



  Soc。 But if this be affirmed; then the desire of good is common to



all; and one man is no better than another in that respect?



  Men。 True。



  Soc。 And if one man is not better than another in desiring good;



he must be better in the power of attaining it?



  Men。 Exactly。



  Soc。 Then; according to your definition; virtue would appear to be



the power of attaining good?



  Men。 I entirely approve; Socrates; of the manner in which you now



view this matter。



  Soc。 Then let us see whether what you say is true from another point



of view; for very likely you may be right:…You affirm virtue to be the



power of attaining goods?



  Men。 Yes。



  Soc。 And the goods which mean are such as health and wealth and



the possession of gold and silver; and having office and honour in the



state…those are what you would call goods?



  Men。 Yes; I should include all those。



  Soc。 Then; according to Meno; who is the hereditary friend of the



great king; virtue is the power of getting silver and gold; and



would you add that they must be gained piously; justly; or do you deem



this to be of no consequence? And is any mode of acquisition; even



if unjust and dishonest; equally to be deemed virtue?



  Men。 Not virtue; Socrates; but vice。



  Soc。 Then justice or temperance or holiness; or some other part of



virtue; as would appear; must accompany the acquisition; and without



them the mere acquisition of good will not be virtue。



  Men。 Why; how can there be virtue without these?



  Soc。 And the non…acquisition of gold and silver in a dishonest



manner for oneself or another; or in other words the want of them; may



be equally virtue?



  Men。 True。



  Soc。 Then the acquisition of such goods is no more virtue than the



non…acquisition and want of them; but whatever is accompanied by



justice or honesty is virtue; and whatever is devoid of justice is



vice。



  Men。 It cannot be otherwise; in my judgment。



  Soc。 And were we not saying just now that justice; temperance; and



the like; were each of them a part of virtue?



  Men。 Yes。



  Soc。 And so; Meno; this is the way in which you mock me。



  Men。 Why do you say that; Socrates?



  Soc。 Why; because I asked you to deliver virtue into my hands



whole and unbroken; and I gave you a pattern according to which you



were to frame your answer; and you have forgotten already; and tell me



that virtue is the power of attaining good justly; or with justice;



and justice you acknowledge to be a part of virtue。



  Men。 Yes。



  Soc。 Then it follows from your own admissions; that virtue is



doing what you do with a part of virtue; for justice and the like



are said by you to be parts of virtue。



  Men。 What of that?



  Soc。 What of that! Why; did not I ask you to tell me the nature of



virtue as a whole? And you are very far from telling me this; but



declare every action to be virtue which is done with a part of virtue;



as though you had told me and I must already know the whole of virtue;



and this too when frittered away into little pieces。 And; therefore;



my dear I fear that I must begin again and repeat the same question:



What is virtue? for otherwise; I can only say; that every action



done with a part of virtue is virtue; what else is the meaning of



saying that every action done with justice is virtue? Ought I not to



ask the question over again; for can any one who does not know



virtue know a part of virtue?



   Men。 No; I do not say that he can。



   Soc。 Do you remember how; in the example of figure; we rejected any



answer given in terms which were as yet unexplained or unadmitted?



   Men。 Yes; Socrates; and we were quite right in doing so。



   Soc。 But then; my friend; do not suppose that we can explain to any



one the nature of virtue as a whole through some unexplained portion



of virtue; or anything at all in that fashion; we should only have



to ask over again the old question; What is virtue? Am I not right?



   Men。 I believe that you are。



   Soc。 Then begin again; and answer me; What; according to you and



your friend Gorgias; is the definition of virtue?



   Men。 O Socrates; I used to be told; before I knew you; that you



were always doubting yourself and making others doubt; and now you are



casting your spells over me; and I am simply getting bewitched and



enchanted; and am at my wits' end。 And if I may venture to make a jest



upon you; you seem to me both in your appearance and in your power



over others to be very like the flat torpedo fish; who torpifies those



who come near him and touch him; as you have now torpified me; I



think。 For my soul and my tongue are really torpid; and I do not



know how to answer you; and though I have been delivered of an



infinite variety of speeches about virtue before now; and to many



persons…and very good ones they were; as I thought…at this moment I



cannot even say what virtue is。 And I think that。 you are very wise in



not voyaging and going away from home; for if you did in other



places as do in Athens; you would be cast into prison as a magician。



  Soc。 You are a rogue; Meno; and had all but caught me。



  Men。 What do you mean; Socrates?



  Soc。 I can tell why you made a simile about me。



  Men。 Why?



  Soc。 In order that I might make another simile about you。 For I know



that all pretty young gentlemen like to have pretty similes made about



them…as well they may…but I shall not return the compliment。 As to



my being a torpedo; if the torpedo is torpid as well as the cause of



torpidity in others; then indeed I am a torpedo; but not otherwise;



for I perplex others; not because I am clear; but because I am utterly



perplexed myself。 And now I know not what virtue is; and you seem to



be in the same case; although you did once perhaps know before you



touched me。 However; I have no objection to join with you in the



enquiry。



  Men。 And how will you enquire; Socrates; into that which you do



not know? What will you put forth as the subject of enquiry? And if



you find what you want; how will you ever know that this is the



thing which you did not know?



  Soc。 I know; Meno; what you mean; but just see what a tiresome



dispute you are introducing。 You argue that man cannot enquire



either about that which he knows; or about that which he does not



know; for if he knows; he has no need to enquire; and if not; he



cannot; for he does not know the; very subject about which he is to



enquire。



  Men。 Well; Socrates; and is not the argument sound?



  Soc。 I think not。



  Men。 Why not?



  Soc。 I will tell you why: I have heard from certain wise men and



women who spoke of things divine that…



  Men。 What did they say?



  Soc。 They spoke of a glorious truth; as I conceive。



  Men。 What was it? and who were they?



  Soc。 Some of them were priests and priestesses; who had studied



how they might be able to give a reason of their profession: there;



have been poets also; who spoke of these things by inspiration; like



Pindar; and many others who were inspired。 And they say…mark; now; and



see whether their words are true…they say that the soul of man is



immortal; and at one time has an end; which is termed dying; and at



another time is born again; but is never destroyed。 And the moral



is; that a man ought to live always in perfect holiness。 〃For in the



ninth year Persephone sends the souls of those from whom she has



received the penalty of ancient crime back again from beneath into the



light of the sun above; and these are they who be

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的