vill2-第39节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
cmen of ancient demesne。 In most cases only the negative side; namely the absence of a charter; is mentioned; but there are entries which disclose the positive side; and speak of tenants or even free tenants holding without charter by ancient tenure。(46*) It is to be added; that we find such people in central and western counties; that is outside of the Danelagh。 In Domesday their predecessors were entered as villains; but their tenure is nevertheless not only a free but an ancient one。 It must also be added that it is not only free socmen that one finds outside the ancient demesne; bond socmen are mentioned as well。 Now this seems strange at first sight; because the usual and settled terminology treats villain socage as a peculiarity of ancient demesne; My notion is that it is not 'bond' that qualities the 'socmen;' but vice versa。 To put it in a different way; the documents had to name a class which held by certain custom; although by base service; and they added the 'socman' to qualify the 'bond' or the 'villain。' Two cases from the Hundred Rolls may serve as an illustration of this not unimportant point。 The vill of Soham in Cambridgeshire (47*) was owned in 1279 partly by the King; partly by the Earl Marshall; and partly by the Bishop of Ely。 There are two socmen holding from the King thirty acres each; fourteen socmen holding fifteen acres each; and twenty…six 'toftarii' possessed of small plots。 No villains are mentioned; but the socmen are designated on the margin in a more definite way as bond socmen。 The manor had been in the possession of the Crown at the time of the Conquest; and it is to be noticed; to begin with; that the chief population of the part which remained with the King appears as socmen a good illustration of the principle that the special status did not originate when the manor was granted out by the Crown。 The sixteen peasants first mentioned are holders of virgates and half…virgates; and form as it were the original stock of the tenantry it would be impossible to regard them as a later adjunct to the village。 Their status is not a result of commutation they are still performing agricultural work; and therefore bond socmen。 The Domesday Survey speaks only of villains and 'bordarii;' and it is quite clear that it calls villains the predecessors of the 'bond socmen' of the Hundred Rolls。 And now let us examine the portion of the manor which had got into the hands of the Earl Marshall。 We find there several free socmen whose holdings are quite irregular in size: they pay rent; and are exempted from agricultural work。 Then come five bond socmen; holding thirty acres each; and nine bonds holding fifteen acres each: all these perform the same services as the corresponding people of the King's portion。 And lastly come twenty…two tofters。 Two facts are especially worth notice: the free socman appears by the side of the bond socman; and the opposition between them reduces itself to a difference between rent…paying people and labourers; the holdings of the rent…payers are broken up into irregular plots; while the labourers still remain bound up by the system of equalised portions。 The second significant fact is; that the term 'socman;' which has evidently to be applied to the whole population except the tofters; has dropped out in regard to the half…virgate tenants of the Earl Marshall。 If we had only the fragment relating to his nine bondmen; we might conclude perhaps that there was no certain tenure in the manor。 The inference would have been false; but a good many inferences as to the social standing of the peasantry are based on no better foundation。 In any case the most important part of the population of Soham; as far as it belonged to the king and to the earl; consisted of socmen who at the same time are called bondmen; and were called villains in Domesday。 Soham is ancient demesne。 Let us now take Crowmarsh in Oxfordshire。(48*) Two…thirds of it belonged to the Earl of Oxford in 1279; and one…third to the Lord de Valence。 At the time of the Domesday Survey it was in the hands of Walter Giffard; and therefore not ancient demesne。 On the land of the Earl of Oxford we find in 1279 nine servi socomanni holding six virgates; there are a few cotters and a few free tenants besides; the remaining third is occupied by two 'tenentes per servicium socomannorum;' and by a certain number of cotters and free tenants。 It can hardly be doubted that the opposition between servi and liberi is not based on the certainty of the tenure; the socmen hold as securely as the free tenants; but they are labourers; while these latter are exempted from the agricultural work of the village。 The terms are used in the same way as the 'terra libera' and the 'terra operabilis' of the Glastonbury inquest。 I need not say that the socmen of ancient demesne; privileged villains as Bracton calls them; are sometimes subjected to very burdensome services and duties。 Merchet is very common among them; it even happens that they have to fine for it at the will of the lord。(49*) But all the incidents of base tenure are to be found also outside the ancient demesne in connexion with the class under discussion。 If we take the merchet we shall find that at Magna Tywa; Oxon;(50*) it is customary to give the steward a sword and four pence for licence to give away one's daughter within twenty miles in the neighbourhood; in Haneberg; Oxon;(51*) a spear and four pence are given in payment。 The socmen of Peterborough Abbey (52*) have to pay five shillings and four pence under the name of merchet as a fine for incontinence (the legerwite properly so…called); and there is besides a marriage payment (redempcio sanguinis) equal for socmen and villains。 The same payment occurs in the land of Spalding Priory; Lincoln。(53*) The same fact strikes us in regard to tallage and aids; i。e。 the taxes which the lord had a right to raise from his subjects。 In Stoke Basset; Oxon;(54*) the socmen are placed in this respect on the same footing with the villains。 The Spalding Cartulary adds that their wainage is safe in any case。(55*) On the lands of this priory the classes of the peasantry are generally very near to each other; so that incidents and terms often get confused。(56*) And not only socmen have to bear such impositions: we find them constantly in all shapes and gradations in connection with free tenantry。 The small freeholder often takes part in rural work;(57*) sometimes he has to act as a kind of overseer;(58*) and in any case this base labour would not degrade him from his position。(59*) Already in Bracton's day the learned thought that the term 'socage' was etymologically connected with the duty of ploughing: a curious proof both of the rapidity with which past history had become unintelligible; and of the perfect compatibility of socage with labour services。 Merchet; heriot; and tallage occur even more often。(60*) All such exactions testify to the fact that the conceptions of feudal law as to the servile character of particular services and payments were in a great measure artificial。 Tallage; even arbitrary tallage; was but a tax after all; and did not detract from personal freedom or free tenure in this sense。 Then heriot often occurs among free people in the old Saxon form of a surrender of horse and arms as well as in that of the best ox。(61*) Merchet is especially interesting as illustrating the fusion of different duties into one。 It is the base payment par excellence; and often used in manorial documents as a means to draw the line between free and unfree men。(62*) Nevertheless free tenants are very often found to pay it。(63*) In most cases they have only to fine in the case when their daughters leave the manor; and this; of course; has nothing degrading in it: the payment is made because the lord loses all claim as to the progeny of the woman who has left his dominion。 But there is evidence besides to show that free tenants had often to pay in such a case to the hundred; and the lords had not always succeeded in dispossessing the hundred。(64*) Such a fine probably developed out of a payment to the tribe or to a territorial community in the case when a woman severed herself from it。 It had nothing servile in its origin。 And still; if the documents had not casually mentioned these instances; we should have been left without direct evidence as to a difference of origin in regard to merchet or gersum。 Is it not fair to ask; whether the merchet of the villains themselves may not in some instances have come from a customary recompense paid originally to the community of the township into the rights of which the lord has entered? However this may be; one fact can certainly not be disputed: men entirely free in status and tenure were sometimes subjected to an exaction which both public opinion and legal theory considered as a badge of servitude。 The passage from one great class of society to the other was rendered easy in this way by the variety of combinations in which the distinguishing features of both classes appear。 No wonder that we hear constantly of oppression which tended to substitute one form of subjection for another; and thus to lower the social standing of intermediate groups。 The free socmen of Swaffham Prior; in Cambridgeshire;(65