太子爷小说网 > 英语电子书 > philebus >

第5节

philebus-第5节

小说: philebus 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!





  Pro。 In the class of the infinite; you mean?



  Soc。 Yes; and now mingle this with the other。



  Pro。 What is the other。



  Soc。 The class of the finite which we ought to have brought together



as we did the infinite; but; perhaps; it will come to the same thing



if we do so now;…when the two are combined; a third will appear。



  Pro。 What do you mean by the class of the finite?



  Soc。 The class of the equal and the double; and any class which puts



an end to difference and opposition; and by introducing number creates



harmony and proportion among the different elements。



  Pro。 I understand; you seem to me to mean that the various



opposites; when you mingle with them the class of the finite; takes



certain forms。



  Soc。 Yes; that is my meaning。



  Pro。 Proceed。



  Soc。 Does not the right participation in the finite give health…in



disease; for instance?



  Pro。 Certainly。



  Soc。 And whereas the high and low; the swift and the slow are



infinite or unlimited; does not the addition of the principles



aforesaid introduce a limit; and perfect the whole frame of music?



  Pro。 Yes; certainly。



  Soc。 Or; again; when cold and heat prevail; does not the



introduction of them take away excess and indefiniteness; and infuse



moderation and harmony?



  Pro。 Certainly。



  Soc。 And from a like admixture of the finite and infinite come the



seasons; and all the delights of life?



  Pro。 Most true。



  Soc。 I omit ten thousand other things; such as beauty and health and



strength; and the many beauties and high perfections of the soul: O my



beautiful Philebus; the goddess; methinks; seeing the universal



wantonness and wickedness of all things; and that there was in them no



limit to pleasures and self…indulgence; devised the limit of law and



order; whereby; as you say; Philebus; she torments; or as I



maintain; delivers the soul…What think you; Protarchus?



  Pro。 Her ways are much to my mind; Socrates。



  Soc。 You will observe that I have spoken of three classes?



  Pro。 Yes; I think that I understand you: you mean to say that the



infinite is one class; and that the finite is a second class of



existences; but what you would make the third I am not so certain。



  Soc。 That is because the amazing variety of the third class is too



much for you; my dear friend; but there was not this difficulty with



the infinite; which also comprehended many classes; for all of them



were sealed with the note of more and less; and therefore appeared



one。



  Pro。 True。



  Soc。 And the finite or limit had not many divisions; and we ready



acknowledged it to be by nature one?



  Pro。 Yes。



  Soc。 Yes; indeed; and when I speak of the third class; understand me



to mean any offspring of these; being a birth into true being;



effected by the measure which the limit introduces。



  Pro。 I understand。



  Soc。 Still there was; as we said; a fourth class to be investigated;



and you must assist in the investigation; for does not everything



which comes into being; of necessity come into being through a cause?



  Pro。 Yes; certainly; for how can there be anything which has no



cause?



  Soc。 And is not the agent the same as the cause in all except



name; the agent and the cause may be rightly called one?



  Pro。 Very true。



  Soc。 And the same may be said of the patient; or effect; we shall



find that they too differ; as I was saying; only in name…shall we not?



  Pro。 We shall。



  Soc。 The agent or cause always naturally leads; and the patient or



effect naturally follows it?



  Pro。 Certainly。



  Soc。 Then the cause and what is subordinate to it in generation



are not the same; but different?



  Pro。 True。



  Soc。 Did not the things which were generated; and the things out



of which they were generated; furnish all the three classes?



  Pro。 Yes。



  Soc。 And the creator or cause of them has been satisfactorily proven



to be distinct from them…and may therefore be called a fourth



principle?



  Pro。 So let us call it。



  Soc。 Quite right; but now; having distinguished the four; I think



that we had better refresh our memories by recapitulating each of them



in order。



  Pro。 By all means。



  Soc。 Then the first I will call the infinite or unlimited; and the



second the finite or limited; then follows the third; an essence



compound and generated; and I do not think that I shall be far wrong



in speaking of the cause of mixture and generation as the fourth。



  Pro。 Certainly not。



  Soc。 And now what is the next question; and how came we hither? Were



we not enquiring whether the second place belonged to pleasure or



wisdom?



  Pro。 We were。



  Soc。 And now; having determined these points; shall we not be better



able to decide about the first and second place; which was the



original subject of dispute?



  Pro。 I dare say。



  Soc。 We said; if you remember; that the mixed life of pleasure and



wisdom was the conqueror…did we not?



  Pro。 True。



  Soc。 And we see what is the place and nature of this life and to



what class it is to be assigned?



  Pro。 Beyond a doubt。



  Soc。 This is evidently comprehended in the third or mixed class;



which is not composed of any two particular ingredients; but of all



the elements of infinity; bound down by the finite; and may



therefore be truly said to comprehend the conqueror life。



  Pro。 Most true。



  Soc。 And what shall we say; Philebus; of your life which is all



sweetness; and in which of the aforesaid classes is that to be placed?



Perhaps you will allow me to ask you a question before you answer?



  Phi。 Let me hear。



  Soc。 Have pleasure and pain a limit; or do they belong to the



class which admits of more and less?



  Phi。 They belong to the class which admits of more; Socrates; for



pleasure would not be perfectly good if she were not infinite in



quantity and degree。



  Soc。 Nor would pain; Philebus; be perfectly evil。 And therefore



the infinite cannot be that element which imparts to pleasure some



degree of good。 But now…admitting; if you like; that pleasure is of



the nature of the infinite…in which of the aforesaid classes; O



Protarchus and Philebus; can we without irreverence place wisdom and



knowledge and mind? And let us be careful; for I think that the danger



will be very serious if we err on this point。



  Phi。 You magnify; Socrates; the importance of your favourite god。



  Soc。 And you; my friend; are also magnifying your favourite goddess;



but still I must beg you to answer the question。



  Pro。 Socrates is quite right; Philebus; and we must submit to him。



  Phi。 And did not you; Protarchus; propose to answer in my place?



  Pro。 Certainly I did; but I am now in a great strait; and I must



entreat you; Socrates; to be our spokesman; and then we shall not



say anything wrong or disrespectful of your favourite。



  Soc。 I must obey you; Protarchus; nor is the task which you impose a



difficult one; but did I really; as Philebus implies; disconcert you



with my playful solemnity; when I asked the question to what class



mind and knowledge belong?



  Pro。 You did; indeed; Socrates。



  Soc。 Yet the answer is easy; since all philosophers assert with



one voice that mind is the king of heaven and earth…in reality they



are magnifying themselves。 And perhaps they are right。 But still I



should like to consider the class of mind; if you do not object; a



little more fully。



  Phi。 Take your own course; Socrates; and never mind length; we shall



not tire of you。



  Soc。 Very good; let us begin then; Protarchus; by asking a question。



  Pro。 What question?



  Soc。 Whether all this which they call the universe is left to the



guidance of unreason and chance medley; or; on the contrary; as our



fathers have declared; ordered and governed by a marvellous



intelligence and wisdom。



  Pro。 Wide asunder are the two assertions; illustrious Socrates;



for that which you were just now saying to me appears to be blasphemy;



but the other assertion; that mind orders all things; is worthy of the



aspect of the world; and of the sun; and of the moon; and of the stars



and of the whole circle of the heavens; and never will I say or



think otherwise。



  Soc。 Shall we then agree with them of old time in maintaining this



doctrine…not merely reasserting the notions of others; without risk to



ourselves;…but shall we share in the danger; and take our part of



the reproach which will await us; when an ingenious individual



declares that all is disorder?



  Pro。 That would certainly be my wish。



  Soc。 Then now please to consider the next stage of the argument。



  Pro。 Let me hear。



  Soc。 We see that the elements which enter into the nature of the



bodies of all animals; fire; water; air; an

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的