philebus-第5节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
Pro。 In the class of the infinite； you mean？
Soc。 Yes； and now mingle this with the other。
Pro。 What is the other。
Soc。 The class of the finite which we ought to have brought together
as we did the infinite； but； perhaps； it will come to the same thing
if we do so now；…when the two are combined； a third will appear。
Pro。 What do you mean by the class of the finite？
Soc。 The class of the equal and the double； and any class which puts
an end to difference and opposition； and by introducing number creates
harmony and proportion among the different elements。
Pro。 I understand； you seem to me to mean that the various
opposites； when you mingle with them the class of the finite； takes
certain forms。
Soc。 Yes； that is my meaning。
Pro。 Proceed。
Soc。 Does not the right participation in the finite give health…in
disease； for instance？
Pro。 Certainly。
Soc。 And whereas the high and low； the swift and the slow are
infinite or unlimited； does not the addition of the principles
aforesaid introduce a limit； and perfect the whole frame of music？
Pro。 Yes； certainly。
Soc。 Or； again； when cold and heat prevail； does not the
introduction of them take away excess and indefiniteness； and infuse
moderation and harmony？
Pro。 Certainly。
Soc。 And from a like admixture of the finite and infinite come the
seasons； and all the delights of life？
Pro。 Most true。
Soc。 I omit ten thousand other things； such as beauty and health and
strength； and the many beauties and high perfections of the soul： O my
beautiful Philebus； the goddess； methinks； seeing the universal
wantonness and wickedness of all things； and that there was in them no
limit to pleasures and self…indulgence； devised the limit of law and
order； whereby； as you say； Philebus； she torments； or as I
maintain； delivers the soul…What think you； Protarchus？
Pro。 Her ways are much to my mind； Socrates。
Soc。 You will observe that I have spoken of three classes？
Pro。 Yes； I think that I understand you： you mean to say that the
infinite is one class； and that the finite is a second class of
existences； but what you would make the third I am not so certain。
Soc。 That is because the amazing variety of the third class is too
much for you； my dear friend； but there was not this difficulty with
the infinite； which also comprehended many classes； for all of them
were sealed with the note of more and less； and therefore appeared
one。
Pro。 True。
Soc。 And the finite or limit had not many divisions； and we ready
acknowledged it to be by nature one？
Pro。 Yes。
Soc。 Yes； indeed； and when I speak of the third class； understand me
to mean any offspring of these； being a birth into true being；
effected by the measure which the limit introduces。
Pro。 I understand。
Soc。 Still there was； as we said； a fourth class to be investigated；
and you must assist in the investigation； for does not everything
which comes into being； of necessity come into being through a cause？
Pro。 Yes； certainly； for how can there be anything which has no
cause？
Soc。 And is not the agent the same as the cause in all except
name； the agent and the cause may be rightly called one？
Pro。 Very true。
Soc。 And the same may be said of the patient； or effect； we shall
find that they too differ； as I was saying； only in name…shall we not？
Pro。 We shall。
Soc。 The agent or cause always naturally leads； and the patient or
effect naturally follows it？
Pro。 Certainly。
Soc。 Then the cause and what is subordinate to it in generation
are not the same； but different？
Pro。 True。
Soc。 Did not the things which were generated； and the things out
of which they were generated； furnish all the three classes？
Pro。 Yes。
Soc。 And the creator or cause of them has been satisfactorily proven
to be distinct from them…and may therefore be called a fourth
principle？
Pro。 So let us call it。
Soc。 Quite right； but now； having distinguished the four； I think
that we had better refresh our memories by recapitulating each of them
in order。
Pro。 By all means。
Soc。 Then the first I will call the infinite or unlimited； and the
second the finite or limited； then follows the third； an essence
compound and generated； and I do not think that I shall be far wrong
in speaking of the cause of mixture and generation as the fourth。
Pro。 Certainly not。
Soc。 And now what is the next question； and how came we hither？ Were
we not enquiring whether the second place belonged to pleasure or
wisdom？
Pro。 We were。
Soc。 And now； having determined these points； shall we not be better
able to decide about the first and second place； which was the
original subject of dispute？
Pro。 I dare say。
Soc。 We said； if you remember； that the mixed life of pleasure and
wisdom was the conqueror…did we not？
Pro。 True。
Soc。 And we see what is the place and nature of this life and to
what class it is to be assigned？
Pro。 Beyond a doubt。
Soc。 This is evidently comprehended in the third or mixed class；
which is not composed of any two particular ingredients； but of all
the elements of infinity； bound down by the finite； and may
therefore be truly said to comprehend the conqueror life。
Pro。 Most true。
Soc。 And what shall we say； Philebus； of your life which is all
sweetness； and in which of the aforesaid classes is that to be placed？
Perhaps you will allow me to ask you a question before you answer？
Phi。 Let me hear。
Soc。 Have pleasure and pain a limit； or do they belong to the
class which admits of more and less？
Phi。 They belong to the class which admits of more； Socrates； for
pleasure would not be perfectly good if she were not infinite in
quantity and degree。
Soc。 Nor would pain； Philebus； be perfectly evil。 And therefore
the infinite cannot be that element which imparts to pleasure some
degree of good。 But now…admitting； if you like； that pleasure is of
the nature of the infinite…in which of the aforesaid classes； O
Protarchus and Philebus； can we without irreverence place wisdom and
knowledge and mind？ And let us be careful； for I think that the danger
will be very serious if we err on this point。
Phi。 You magnify； Socrates； the importance of your favourite god。
Soc。 And you； my friend； are also magnifying your favourite goddess；
but still I must beg you to answer the question。
Pro。 Socrates is quite right； Philebus； and we must submit to him。
Phi。 And did not you； Protarchus； propose to answer in my place？
Pro。 Certainly I did； but I am now in a great strait； and I must
entreat you； Socrates； to be our spokesman； and then we shall not
say anything wrong or disrespectful of your favourite。
Soc。 I must obey you； Protarchus； nor is the task which you impose a
difficult one； but did I really； as Philebus implies； disconcert you
with my playful solemnity； when I asked the question to what class
mind and knowledge belong？
Pro。 You did； indeed； Socrates。
Soc。 Yet the answer is easy； since all philosophers assert with
one voice that mind is the king of heaven and earth…in reality they
are magnifying themselves。 And perhaps they are right。 But still I
should like to consider the class of mind； if you do not object； a
little more fully。
Phi。 Take your own course； Socrates； and never mind length； we shall
not tire of you。
Soc。 Very good； let us begin then； Protarchus； by asking a question。
Pro。 What question？
Soc。 Whether all this which they call the universe is left to the
guidance of unreason and chance medley； or； on the contrary； as our
fathers have declared； ordered and governed by a marvellous
intelligence and wisdom。
Pro。 Wide asunder are the two assertions； illustrious Socrates；
for that which you were just now saying to me appears to be blasphemy；
but the other assertion； that mind orders all things； is worthy of the
aspect of the world； and of the sun； and of the moon； and of the stars
and of the whole circle of the heavens； and never will I say or
think otherwise。
Soc。 Shall we then agree with them of old time in maintaining this
doctrine…not merely reasserting the notions of others； without risk to
ourselves；…but shall we share in the danger； and take our part of
the reproach which will await us； when an ingenious individual
declares that all is disorder？
Pro。 That would certainly be my wish。
Soc。 Then now please to consider the next stage of the argument。
Pro。 Let me hear。
Soc。 We see that the elements which enter into the nature of the
bodies of all animals； fire； water； air； an
