lect06-第1节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
Lecture VI
The Chief and the Land
The Brehon law…tracts strongly suggest that; among the things
which we in modern times have most forgotten; is the importance
of horned cattle; not merely in the infancy of society; but at a
period when it had made some considerable advance towards
maturity It is scarcely possible to turn over a page without
finding some allusion to beeves; to bulls; cows; heifers; and
calves。 Horses appear; sheep; swine; and dogs; and bees; the
producers of the greatest of primitive luxuries; have a place
assigned to them as an article of property which has something
corresponding to it in old Roman law。 But the animals much the
most frequently mentioned are kine。 There are some few facts both
of etymology and of legal classification which point to the
former importance of oxen。 Capitale kine reckoned by the
head…cattle has given birth to one of the most famous terms of
law and to one of the most famous terms of political economy;
Chattels and Capital。 Pecunia was probably the word for money
which was employed by the largest part of mankind for the longest
time together。 But oxen; though they have furnished a modern
synonym for personal property; were not; I need scarcely say;
classed in the lower order of commodities in all ancient systems
of law。 The primitive Roman law placed them in the highest class;
and joined them with land and slaves as items of the Res Mancipi。
As in several other instances; the legal dignity of this
description of property among the Romans appears to answer to its
religious dignity among the Hindoos。 Kine; which the most ancient
Sanscrit literature shows to have been eaten as food; became at
some unknown period sacred; and their flesh forbidden;
and。ultimately two of the chief 'Things which required a
Mancipation' at Rome; oxen and landed property; had their
counterpart in the sacred bull of Siva and the sacred land of
India。
The subject has possibly been obscured by an impression that
horned cattle were only of preeminent importance to mankind in
that pastoral stage of society which has been the theme of so
much not altogether profitable speculation。 The actual evidence
seems to show that their greatest value was obtained when groups
of men settled on spaces of land and betook themselves to the
cultivation of food…grains。 It is very possible that kine were at
first exclusively valued for their flesh and milk; but it is
clear that in very early times a distinct special importance
belonged to them as the instrument or medium of exchange。 In the
Homeric literature; they are certainly a measure of value; there
seems no reason to doubt the traditional story that the earliest
coined money known at Rome was stamped with the figure of an ox;
and at all events the connection between 'pecus' and 'pecunia' is
unmistakeable。 Part; but by no means all; the prominence given by
the Brehon lawyers to horned cattle wises certainly from their
usefulness in exchange。 Throughout the Brehon tracts fines; dues;
rents; and returns are calculated in live…stock; not exclusively
in kine; but nearly so。 Two standards of value are constantly
referred to; 'sed' and 'cumhal。' 'Cumhal' is said to have
originally meant a female slave; just as 'ancilla' in medieval
Latinity sometimes means the price of a slave…girl; but 'sed' is
plainly used for an amount or quantity of live stock; probably to
some small extent variable。 The next stage; however; in the
history of cattle is that at which their service to mankind is
greatest。 They are now valued chiefly; in some communities
exclusively; for their use in tillage; for their labour and their
manure。 Their place has been taken very generally in Western
Europe by horses as beasts of plough; but the change was even
there both gradual and comparatively modern; and there are still
large portions of the world where the horse is exclusively
employed; as it seems everywhere to have been at one time; for
war; for pleasure; or the chase。 Oxen were thus almost the sole
representatives of what a Political Economist would now call
Capital applied to land。 I think it probable that the economical
causes which led to the disuse of oxen as a medium of exchange
led also to the change in their legal position which we find to
have taken place at Rome and in India。 The sanctification of the
ox among the Hindoos; rendering his flesh unlawful as food; must
certainly have been connected with the desire to preserve him for
tillage; and his elevation to a place among the Res Mancipi may
well have been supposed to have the same tendency; since it made
his alienation extremely difficult; and must have greatly
embarrassed his employment in exchange。 At this point the history
of horned cattle becomes unhappily mixed up with that of large
portions of mankind。 The same causes which we perceive altering
the position of the ox and turning him into an animal partially
adscriptus glebaei undoubtedly produced also a great extension of
slavery。 The plentifulness of land; even in what are considered
old countries; down to comparatively recent times; and the
scarcity of capital even in its rudest forms; seem to me to be
placed in the clearest light by Mr Thorold Rogers's deeply
instructive volumes on Agriculture and Prices during the Middle
Ages; and much in history which has been only partially
intelligible is explained by them。 The enormous importation of
slaves into the central territories of the Roman Commonwealth;
and the wholesale degradation of the free cultivating communities
of Western Europe into assemblages of villeins; seem to be
expedients of the same nature as restrictions on the alienation
of the ox and on its consumption for food; and to have been alike
suggested by the same imperious necessity of procuring and
preserving instruments for the cultivation of land。
The importance of horned cattle to men in a particular state
of society must; as it seems to me; be carefully borne in mind if
we are to understand one of the most remarkable parts of the
ancient Irish law which relates to the practice of 'giving
stock。' I stated before that; though I did not draw the same
inferences from the fact; I agreed with the writers who think
that the land…system of ancient Ireland was theoretically based
on the division of the tribe…lands among the free tribesmen。 But
I also said that in my opinion the true difficulty of those days
was not to obtain land but to obtain the means of cultivating it。
The want of capital; taken in its original sense; was the
necessity which pressed on the small holder of land and reduced
him occasionally to the sorest straits。 On the other hand; the
great owners of cattle were the various Chiefs; whose primitive
superiority to the other tribesmen in this respect was probably
owing to their natural functions as military leaders of the
tribe。 The Brehon law suggests to me that the Chiefs too were
pressed by a difficulty of their own; that of finding sufficient
pasturage for their herds。 Doubtless their power over the
waste…lands of the particular group over which they happened to
preside was always growing; but the most fruitful portions of the
tribal territory would probably be those which the free tribesmen
occupied。 The fact that the wealth of the Chiefs in cattle was
out of proportion to their power of dealing with the tribal
lands; and the fact that the tribesmen were every now and then
severely pressed by the necessity of procuring the means of
tillage; appear to me to supply the best explanation of the
system of giving and receiving stock; to which two sub…tracts of
the Senchus Mor are devoted; the Cain…Saerrath and the
Cain…Aigillne; the Law of Saer…stock