太子爷小说网 > 英语电子书 > lecture20 >

第1节

lecture20-第1节

小说: lecture20 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!












Lecture XX







CONCLUSIONS







The material of our study of human nature is now spread before



us; and in this parting hour; set free from the duty of



description; we can draw our theoretical and practical



conclusions。  In my first lecture; defending the empirical



method; I foretold that whatever conclusions we might come to



could be reached by spiritual judgments only; appreciations of



the significance for life of religion; taken 〃on the whole。〃   



Our conclusions cannot be as sharp as dogmatic conclusions would



be; but I will formulate them; when the time comes; as sharply as



I can。







Summing up in the broadest possible way the characteristics of



the religious life; as we have found them; it includes the



following beliefs:







1。  That the visible world is part of a more spiritual universe



from which it draws its chief significance;







2。  That union or harmonious relation with that higher universe



is our true end;







3。  That prayer or inner communion with the spirit thereof be



that spirit 〃God〃 or 〃law〃is a process wherein work is really



done; and spiritual energy flows in and produces effects;



psychological or material; within the phenomenal world。







Religion includes also the following psychological



characteristics:







4。  A new zest which adds itself like a gift to life; and takes



the form either of lyrical enchantment or of appeal to



earnestness and heroism。







5。  An assurance of safety and a temper of peace; and; in



relation to others; a preponderance of loving affections。







In illustrating these characteristics by documents; we have been



literally bathed in sentiment。  In re…reading my manuscript; I am



almost appalled at the amount of emotionality which I find in it。







After so much of this; we can afford to be dryer and less



sympathetic in the rest of the work that lies before us。







The sentimentality of many of my documents is a consequence of



the fact that I sought them among the extravagances of the



subject。  If any of you are enemies of what our ancestors used to



brand as enthusiasm; and are; nevertheless; still listening to me



now; you have probably felt my selection to have been sometimes



almost perverse; and have wished I might have stuck to soberer



examples。  I reply that I took these extremer examples as



yielding the profounder information。  To learn the secrets of any



science; we go to expert specialists; even though they may be



eccentric persons; and not to commonplace pupils。  We combine



what they tell us with the rest of our wisdom; and form our final



judgment independently。  Even so with religion。  We who have



pursued such radical expressions of it may now be sure that we



know its secrets as authentically as anyone can know them who



learns them from another; and we have next to answer; each of us



for himself; the practical question:  what are the dangers in



this element of life?  and in what proportion may it need to be



restrained by other elements; to give the proper balance?







But this question suggests another one which I will answer



immediately and get it out of the way; for it has more than once



already vexed us。'330' Ought it to be assumed that in all men the



mixture of religion with other elements should be identical? 



Ought it; indeed; to be assumed that the lives of all men should



show identical religious elements?  In other words; is the



existence of so many religious types and sects and creeds



regrettable?







'330' For example; on pages 135; 160; 326 above。















To these questions I answer 〃No〃 emphatically。  And my reason is



that I do not see how it is possible that creatures in such



different positions and with such different powers as human



individuals are; should have exactly the same functions and the



same duties。  No two of us have identical difficulties; nor



should we be expected to work out identical solutions。  Each;



from his peculiar angle of observation; takes in a certain sphere



of fact and trouble; which each must deal with in a unique



manner。  One of us must soften himself; another must harden



himself; one must yield a point; another must stand firmin



order the better to defend the position assigned him。  If an



Emerson were forced to be a Wesley; or a Moody forced to be a



Whitman; the total human consciousness of the divine would



suffer。  The divine can mean no single quality; it must mean a



group of qualities; by being champions of which in alternation;



different men may all find worthy missions。  Each attitude being



a syllable in human nature's total message; it takes the whole of



us to spell the meaning out completely。  So a 〃god of battles〃



must be allowed to be the god for one kind of person; a god of



peace and heaven and home; the god for another。  We must frankly



recognize the fact that we live in partial systems; and that



parts are not interchangeable in the spiritual life。  If we are



peevish and jealous; destruction of the self must be an element



of our religion; why need it be one if we are good and



sympathetic from the outset?  If we are sick souls; we require a



religion of deliverance; but why think so much of deliverance; if



we are healthy…minded?'331'  Unquestionably; some men have the 



completer experience and the higher vocation; here just as in the



social world; but for each man to stay in his own experience;



whate'er it be; and for others to tolerate him there; is surely



best。







'331' From this point of view; the contrasts between the healthy



and the morbid mind; and between the once…born and the twice…born



types; of which I spoke in earlier lectures (see pp。 159…164);



cease to be the radical antagonisms which many think them。  The



twice…born look down upon the rectilinear consciousness of life



of the once…born as being 〃mere morality;〃 and not properly



religion。  〃Dr。 Channing;〃 an orthodox minister is reported to



have said; 〃is excluded from the highest form of religious life



by the extraordinary rectitude of his character。〃  It is indeed



true that the outlook upon life of the twice…bornholding as it



does more of the element of evil in solutionis the wider and



completer。  The 〃heroic〃 or 〃solemn〃 way in which life comes to



them is a 〃higher synthesis〃 into which healthy… mindedness and



morbidness both enter and combine。  Evil is not evaded; but



sublated in the higher religious cheer of these persons (see pp。



47…52; 354…357)。  But the final consciousness which each type



reaches of union with the divine has the same practical



significance for the individual; and individuals may well be



allowed to get to it by the channels which lie most open to their



several temperaments。  In the cases which were quoted in Lecture



IV; of the mind…cure form of healthy…mindedness; we found



abundant examples of regenerative process。  The severity of the



crisis in this process is a matter of degree。  How long one shall



continue to drink the consciousness of evil; and when one shall



begin to short…circuit and get rid of it; are also matters of



amount and degree; so that in many instances it is quite



arbitrary whether we class the individual as a once…born or a



twice…born subject。







But; you may now ask; would not this one…sidedness be cured if we



should all espouse the science of religions as our own religion? 



In answering this question I must open again the general



relations of the theoretic to the active life。



















Knowledge about a thing is not the thing itself。  You remember



what Al…Ghazzali told us in the Lecture on Mysticismthat to



understand the causes of drunkenness; as a physician understands



them; is not to be drunk。  A science might come to understand



everything about the causes and elements of religion; and might



even decide which elements were qualified; by their general



harmony with other branches of knowledge; to be considered true;



and yet the best man at this science might be the man who found



it hardest to be personally devout。  Tout savoir c'est tout



pardonner。  The name of Renan would doubtless occur to many



persons as an example of the way in which breadth of knowledge



may make one only a dilettante in possibilities; and blunt the



acuteness of one's living faith。'332'  If religion be a function



by which either God's cause or man's cause is to be really



advanced; then he w

返回目录 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的