Ì«×ÓүС˵Íø > Ó¢Óïµç×ÓÊé > the unseen world and other essays >

µÚ8½Ú

the unseen world and other essays-µÚ8½Ú

С˵£º the unseen world and other essays ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



on¡¡materialistic¡¡grounds£»¡¡but¡¡this¡¡is¡¡altogether¡¡too¡¡hasty¡¡an¡¡assumption¡£¡¡Our¡¡authors£»¡¡indeed£»¡¡are¡¡not¡¡philosophical¡¡materialists£»¡¡like¡¡Dr¡£¡¡Priestley£»who¡¡nevertheless¡¡believed¡¡in¡¡a¡¡future¡¡life£»but¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡primary¡¡doctrines¡¡of¡¡materialism¡¡lies¡¡at¡¡the¡¡bottom¡¡of¡¡their¡¡argument¡£¡¡Materialism¡¡holds¡¡for¡¡one¡¡thing¡¡that¡¡consciousness¡¡is¡¡a¡¡product¡¡of¡¡a¡¡peculiar¡¡organization¡¡of¡¡matter£»¡¡and¡¡for¡¡another¡¡thing¡¡that¡¡consciousness¡¡cannot¡¡survive¡¡the¡¡disorganization¡¡of¡¡the¡¡material¡¡body¡¡with¡¡which¡¡it¡¡is¡¡associated¡£¡¡As¡¡held¡¡by¡¡philosophical¡¡materialists£»¡¡like¡¡Buchner¡¡and¡¡Moleschott£»¡¡these¡¡two¡¡opinions¡¡are¡¡strictly¡¡consistent¡¡with¡¡each¡¡other£»¡¡nay£»¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡seems¡¡to¡¡be¡¡the¡¡inevitable¡¡inference¡¡from¡¡the¡¡former£»¡¡though¡¡Priestley¡¡did¡¡not¡¡so¡¡regard¡¡it¡£¡¡Now¡¡our¡¡authors¡¡very¡¡properly¡¡refuse¡¡to¡¡commit¡¡themselves¡¡to¡¡the¡¡opinion¡¡that¡¡mind¡¡is¡¡the¡¡product¡¡of¡¡matter£»¡¡but¡¡their¡¡argument¡¡nevertheless¡¡implies¡¡that¡¡some¡¡sort¡¡of¡¡material¡¡vehicle¡¡is¡¡necessary¡¡for¡¡the¡¡continuance¡¡of¡¡mind¡¡in¡¡a¡¡future¡¡state¡¡of¡¡existence¡£¡¡This¡¡material¡¡vehicle¡¡they¡¡seek¡¡to¡¡supply¡¡in¡¡the¡¡theory¡¡which¡¡connects¡¡by¡¡invisible¡¡bonds¡¡of¡¡transmitted¡¡energy¡¡the¡¡perishable¡¡material¡¡body¡¡with¡¡its¡¡counterpart¡¡in¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡ether¡£¡¡The¡¡materialism¡¡of¡¡the¡¡argument¡¡is¡¡indeed¡¡partly¡¡veiled¡¡by¡¡the¡¡terminology¡¡in¡¡which¡¡this¡¡counterpart¡¡is¡¡called¡¡a¡¡¡¨spiritual¡¡body£»¡¨¡¡but¡¡in¡¡this¡¡novel¡¡use¡¡or¡¡abuse¡¡of¡¡scriptural¡¡language¡¡there¡¡seems¡¡to¡¡me¡¡to¡¡be¡¡a¡¡strange¡¡confusion¡¡of¡¡ideas¡£¡¡Bear¡¡in¡¡mind¡¡that¡¡the¡¡¡¨invisible¡¡universe¡¨¡¡into¡¡which¡¡energy¡¡is¡¡constantly¡¡passing¡¡is¡¡simply¡¡the¡¡luminiferous¡¡ether£»¡¡which¡¡our¡¡authors£»¡¡to¡¡suit¡¡the¡¡requirements¡¡of¡¡their¡¡hypothesis£»¡¡have¡¡gratuitously¡¡endowed¡¡with¡¡a¡¡complexity¡¡and¡¡variety¡¡of¡¡structure¡¡analogous¡¡to¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡visible¡¡world¡¡of¡¡matter¡£¡¡Their¡¡language¡¡is¡¡not¡¡always¡¡quite¡¡so¡¡precise¡¡as¡¡one¡¡could¡¡desire£»¡¡for¡¡while¡¡they¡¡sometimes¡¡speak¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ether¡¡itself¡¡as¡¡the¡¡¡¨unseen¡¡universe£»¡¨¡¡they¡¡sometimes¡¡allude¡¡to¡¡a¡¡primordial¡¡medium¡¡yet¡¡subtler¡¡in¡¡constitution¡¡and¡¡presumably¡¡more¡¡immaterial¡£¡¡Herein¡¡lies¡¡the¡¡confusion¡£¡¡Why¡¡should¡¡the¡¡luminiferous¡¡ether£»¡¡or¡¡any¡¡primordial¡¡medium¡¡in¡¡which¡¡it¡¡may¡¡have¡¡been¡¡generated£»¡¡be¡¡regarded¡¡as¡¡in¡¡any¡¡way¡¡¡¨spiritual¡¨£¿¡¡Great¡¡physicists£»¡¡like¡¡less¡¡trained¡¡thinkers£»¡¡are¡¡sometimes¡¡liable¡¡to¡¡be¡¡unconsciously¡¡influenced¡¡by¡¡old¡¡associations¡¡of¡¡ideas¡¡which£»¡¡ostensibly¡¡repudiated£»¡¡still¡¡lurk¡¡under¡¡cover¡¡of¡¡the¡¡words¡¡we¡¡use¡£¡¡I¡¡fear¡¡that¡¡the¡¡old¡¡associations¡¡which¡¡led¡¡the¡¡ancients¡¡to¡¡describe¡¡the¡¡soul¡¡as¡¡a¡¡breath¡¡or¡¡a¡¡shadow£»¡¡and¡¡which¡¡account¡¡for¡¡the¡¡etymologies¡¡of¡¡such¡¡words¡¡as¡¡¡¨ghost¡¨¡¡and¡¡¡¨spirit£»¡¨¡¡have¡¡had¡¡something¡¡to¡¡do¡¡with¡¡this¡¡spiritualization¡¡of¡¡the¡¡interstellar¡¡ether¡£¡¡Some¡¡share¡¡may¡¡also¡¡have¡¡been¡¡contributed¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Platonic¡¡notion¡¡of¡¡the¡¡¡¨grossness¡¨¡¡or¡¡¡¨bruteness¡¨¡¡of¡¡tangible¡¡matter£»a¡¡notion¡¡which¡¡has¡¡survived¡¡in¡¡Christian¡¡theology£»¡¡and¡¡which¡¡educated¡¡men¡¡of¡¡the¡¡present¡¡day¡¡have¡¡by¡¡no¡¡means¡¡universally¡¡outgrown¡£¡¡Save¡¡for¡¡some¡¡such¡¡old¡¡associations¡¡as¡¡these£»¡¡why¡¡should¡¡it¡¡be¡¡supposed¡¡that¡¡matter¡¡becomes¡¡¡¨spriritualized¡¨¡¡as¡¡it¡¡diminishes¡¡in¡¡apparent¡¡substantiality£¿¡¡Why¡¡should¡¡matter¡¡be¡¡pronounced¡¡respectable¡¡in¡¡the¡¡inverse¡¡ratio¡¡of¡¡its¡¡density¡¡or¡¡ponderability£¿¡¡Why¡¡is¡¡a¡¡diamond¡¡any¡¡more¡¡chargeable¡¡with¡¡¡¨grossness¡¨¡¡than¡¡a¡¡cubic¡¡centimetre¡¡of¡¡hydrogen£¿¡¡Obviously¡¡such¡¡fancies¡¡are¡¡purely¡¡of¡¡mythologic¡¡parentage¡£¡¡Now¡¡the¡¡luminiferous¡¡ether£»¡¡upon¡¡which¡¡our¡¡authors¡¡make¡¡such¡¡extensive¡¡demands£»¡¡may¡¡be¡¡physically¡¡¡¨ethereal¡¨¡¡enough£»¡¡in¡¡spite¡¡of¡¡the¡¡enormous¡¡elasticity¡¡which¡¡leads¡¡Professor¡¡Jevons¡¡to¡¡characterize¡¡it¡¡as¡¡¡¨adamantine¡¨£»¡¡but¡¡most¡¡assuredly¡¡we¡¡have¡¡not¡¡the¡¡slightest¡¡reason¡¡for¡¡speaking¡¡of¡¡it¡¡as¡¡¡¨immaterial¡¨¡¡or¡¡¡¨spiritual¡£¡¨¡¡Though¡¡we¡¡are¡¡unable¡¡to¡¡weigh¡¡it¡¡in¡¡the¡¡balance£»¡¡we¡¡at¡¡least¡¡know¡¡it¡¡as¡¡a¡¡transmitter¡¡of¡¡undulatory¡¡movements£»¡¡the¡¡size¡¡and¡¡shape¡¡of¡¡which¡¡we¡¡can¡¡accurately¡¡measure¡£¡¡Its¡¡force¡­relations¡¡with¡¡ponderable¡¡matter¡¡are¡¡not¡¡only¡¡universally¡¡and¡¡incessantly¡¡maintained£»¡¡but¡¡they¡¡have¡¡that¡¡precisely¡¡quantitative¡¡character¡¡which¡¡implies¡¡an¡¡essential¡¡identity¡¡between¡¡the¡¡innermost¡¡natures¡¡of¡¡the¡¡two¡¡substances¡£¡¡We¡¡have¡¡seen¡¡reason¡¡for¡¡thinking¡¡it¡¡probable¡¡that¡¡ether¡¡and¡¡ordinary¡¡matter¡¡are¡¡alike¡¡composed¡¡of¡¡vortex¡­rings¡¡in¡¡a¡¡quasi¡­frictionless¡¡fluid£»¡¡but¡¡whatever¡¡be¡¡the¡¡fate¡¡of¡¡this¡¡subtle¡¡hypothesis£»¡¡we¡¡may¡¡be¡¡sure¡¡that¡¡no¡¡theory¡¡will¡¡ever¡¡be¡¡entertained¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡analysis¡¡of¡¡ether¡¡shall¡¡require¡¡different¡¡symbols¡¡from¡¡that¡¡of¡¡ordinary¡¡matter¡£¡¡In¡¡our¡¡authors'¡¡theory£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡the¡¡putting¡¡on¡¡of¡¡immortality¡¡is¡¡in¡¡no¡¡wise¡¡the¡¡passage¡¡from¡¡a¡¡material¡¡to¡¡a¡¡spiritual¡¡state¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡the¡¡passage¡¡from¡¡one¡¡kind¡¡of¡¡materially¡¡conditioned¡¡state¡¡to¡¡another¡£¡¡The¡¡theory¡¡thus¡¡appeals¡¡directly¡¡to¡¡our¡¡experiences¡¡of¡¡the¡¡behaviour¡¡of¡¡matter£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡deriving¡¡so¡¡little¡¡support¡¡as¡¡it¡¡does¡¡from¡¡these¡¡experiences£»¡¡it¡¡remains¡¡an¡¡essentially¡¡weak¡¡speculation£»¡¡whatever¡¡we¡¡may¡¡think¡¡of¡¡its¡¡ingenuity¡£¡¡For¡¡so¡¡long¡¡as¡¡we¡¡are¡¡asked¡¡to¡¡accept¡¡conclusions¡¡drawn¡¡from¡¡our¡¡experiences¡¡of¡¡the¡¡material¡¡world£»¡¡we¡¡are¡¡justified¡¡in¡¡demanding¡¡something¡¡more¡¡than¡¡mere¡¡unconditioned¡¡possibility¡£¡¡We¡¡require¡¡some¡¡positive¡¡evidence£»¡¡be¡¡it¡¡ever¡¡so¡¡little¡¡in¡¡amount£»¡¡and¡¡no¡¡theory¡¡which¡¡cannot¡¡furnish¡¡such¡¡positive¡¡evidence¡¡is¡¡likely¡¡to¡¡carry¡¡to¡¡our¡¡minds¡¡much¡¡practical¡¡conviction¡£

This¡¡is¡¡what¡¡I¡¡meant¡¡by¡¡saying¡¡that¡¡the¡¡great¡¡weakness¡¡of¡¡the¡¡hypothesis¡¡here¡¡criticized¡¡lies¡¡in¡¡its¡¡materialistic¡¡character¡£¡¡In¡¡contrast¡¡with¡¡this¡¡we¡¡shall¡¡presently¡¡see¡¡that¡¡the¡¡assertion¡¡of¡¡a¡¡future¡¡life¡¡which¡¡is¡¡not¡¡materially¡¡conditioned£»¡¡though¡¡unsupported¡¡by¡¡any¡¡item¡¡of¡¡experience¡¡whatever£»¡¡may¡¡nevertheless¡¡be¡¡an¡¡impregnable¡¡assertion¡£¡¡But¡¡first¡¡I¡¡would¡¡conclude¡¡the¡¡foregoing¡¡criticism¡¡by¡¡ruling¡¡out¡¡altogether¡¡the¡¡sense¡¡in¡¡which¡¡our¡¡authors¡¡use¡¡the¡¡expression¡¡¡¨Unseen¡¡Universe¡£¡¨¡¡Scientific¡¡inference£»¡¡however¡¡remote£»¡¡is¡¡connected¡¡by¡¡such¡¡insensible¡¡gradations¡¡with¡¡ordinary¡¡perception£»¡¡that¡¡one¡¡may¡¡well¡¡question¡¡the¡¡propriety¡¡of¡¡applying¡¡the¡¡term¡¡¡¨unseen¡¨¡¡to¡¡that¡¡which¡¡is¡¡presented¡¡to¡¡¡¨the¡¡mind's¡¡eye¡¨¡¡as¡¡inevitable¡¡matter¡¡of¡¡inference¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡true¡¡that¡¡we¡¡cannot¡¡see¡¡the¡¡ocean¡¡of¡¡ether¡¡in¡¡which¡¡visible¡¡matter¡¡floats£»¡¡but¡¡there¡¡are¡¡many¡¡other¡¡invisible¡¡things¡¡which¡¡yet¡¡we¡¡do¡¡not¡¡regard¡¡as¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡¡¨unseen¡¡world¡£¡¨¡¡I¡¡do¡¡not¡¡see¡¡the¡¡air¡¡which¡¡I¡¡am¡¡now¡¡breathing¡¡within¡¡the¡¡four¡¡walls¡¡of¡¡my¡¡study£»¡¡yet¡¡its¡¡existence¡¡is¡¡sufficiently¡¡a¡¡matter¡¡of¡¡sense¡­perception¡¡as¡¡it¡¡fills¡¡my¡¡lungs¡¡and¡¡fans¡¡my¡¡cheek¡£¡¡The¡¡atoms¡¡which¡¡compose¡¡a¡¡drop¡¡of¡¡water¡¡are¡¡not¡¡only¡¡invisible£»¡¡but¡¡cannot¡¡in¡¡any¡¡way¡¡be¡¡made¡¡the¡¡objects¡¡of¡¡sense¡­perception£»¡¡yet¡¡by¡¡proper¡¡inferences¡¡from¡¡their¡¡behaviour¡¡we¡¡can¡¡single¡¡them¡¡out¡¡for¡¡measurement£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡Sir¡¡William¡¡Thomson¡¡can¡¡tell¡¡us¡¡that¡¡if¡¡the¡¡drop¡¡of¡¡water¡¡were¡¡magnified¡¡to¡¡the¡¡size¡¡of¡¡the¡¡earth£»¡¡the¡¡constituent¡¡atoms¡¡would¡¡be¡¡larger¡¡than¡¡peas£»¡¡but¡¡not¡¡so¡¡large¡¡as¡¡billiard¡­balls¡£¡¡If¡¡we¡¡do¡¡not¡¡see¡¡such¡¡atoms¡¡with¡¡our¡¡eyes£»¡¡we¡¡have¡¡one¡¡adequate¡¡reason¡¡in¡¡their¡¡tiny¡¡dimensions£»¡¡though¡¡there¡¡are¡¡further¡¡reasons¡¡than¡¡this¡£¡¡It¡¡would¡¡be¡¡hard¡¡to¡¡say¡¡why¡¡the¡¡luminiferous¡¡ether¡¡should¡¡be¡¡relegated¡¡to¡¡the¡¡¡¨unseen¡¡world¡¨¡¡any¡¡more¡¡than¡¡the¡¡material¡¡atom¡£¡¡Whatever¡¡we¡¡know¡¡as¡¡possessing¡¡resistance¡¡and¡¡extension£»¡¡whatever¡¡we¡¡can¡¡subject¡¡to¡¡mathematical¡¡processes¡¡of¡¡measurement£»¡¡we¡¡also¡¡conceive¡¡as¡¡existing¡¡in¡¡such¡¡shape¡¡that£»¡¡with¡¡appropriate¡¡eyes¡¡and¡¡under¡¡proper¡¡visual¡¡conditions£»¡¡we¡¡MIGHT¡¡see¡¡it£»¡¡and¡¡we¡¡are¡¡not¡¡entitled¡¡to¡¡draw¡¡any¡¡line¡¡of¡¡demarcation¡¡between¡¡such¡¡an¡¡object¡¡of¡¡inference¡¡and¡¡others¡¡which¡¡may¡¡be¡¡made¡¡objects¡¡of¡¡sense¡­perception¡£¡¡To¡¡set¡¡apart¡¡the¡¡ether¡¡as¡¡constituting¡¡an¡¡¡¨unseen¡¡universe¡¨¡¡is¡¡therefore¡¡illegitimate¡¡and¡¡confusing¡£¡¡It¡¡introduces¡¡a¡¡distinction¡¡where¡¡there¡¡is¡¡none£»¡¡and¡¡obscures¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡both¡¡invisible¡¡ether¡¡and¡¡visible¡¡matter¡¡form¡¡but¡¡one¡¡grand¡¡universe¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡sum¡¡of¡¡energy¡¡remains¡¡constant£»¡¡though¡¡the¡¡order¡¡of¡¡its¡¡distribution¡¡endlessly¡¡varies¡£

Very¡¡different¡¡would¡¡be¡¡the¡¡logical¡¡position¡¡of¡¡a¡¡theory¡¡which¡¡should¡¡assume¡¡the¡¡existence¡¡of¡¡an¡¡¡¨Unseen¡¡World¡¨¡¡entirely¡¡spiritual¡¡in¡¡constitution£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡which¡¡material¡¡conditions¡¡like¡¡those¡¡of¡¡the¡¡visible¡¡world¡¡should¡¡have¡¡neither¡¡place¡¡nor¡¡meaning¡£¡¡Such¡¡a¡¡world¡¡would¡¡not¡¡consist¡¡of¡¡ethers¡¡or¡¡gases¡¡or¡¡ghosts£»¡¡but¡¡of¡¡purely¡¡psychical¡¡relations¡¡akin¡¡to¡¡such¡¡as¡¡constitute¡¡thoughts¡¡and¡¡feelings¡¡when¡¡our¡¡minds¡¡are¡¡least¡¡solicited¡¡by¡¡sense¡­perceptions¡£¡¡In¡¡thus¡¡marking¡¡off¡¡the¡¡¡¨Unseen¡¡World¡¨¡¡from¡¡the¡¡objective¡¡universe¡¡of¡¡which¡¡we¡¡have¡¡knowledge£»¡¡our¡¡line¡¡of¡¡demarcation¡¡would¡¡at¡¡least¡¡be¡¡drawn¡¡in¡¡the¡¡right¡¡place¡£¡¡The¡¡distinction¡¡between¡¡psychical¡¡and¡¡material¡¡phenomena¡¡is¡¡a¡¡distinction¡¡of¡¡a¡¡different¡¡order¡¡from¡¡all¡¡other¡¡distinctions¡¡known¡¡to¡¡philosophy£»¡¡and¡¡it¡¡immeasurably¡¡transcends¡¡all¡¡others¡£¡¡The¡¡progress¡¡of¡¡modern¡¡discovery¡¡has¡¡in¡¡no¡¡respect¡¡weakened¡¡the¡¡force¡¡of¡¡Descartes's¡¡remark£»¡¡that¡¡between¡¡that¡¡of¡¡which¡¡the¡¡differential¡¡attribute¡¡is¡¡Thought¡¡and¡¡that¡¡of¡¡which¡¡the¡¡differential¡¡attribute¡¡is¡¡Extension£»¡¡there¡¡can¡¡be¡¡no¡¡similarity£»¡¡no¡¡community¡¡of¡¡nature¡¡whatever¡£¡¡By¡¡no¡¡scientific¡¡cunning¡¡of¡¡experiment¡¡or¡¡deduction¡¡can¡¡Thought¡¡be¡¡weighed¡¡or¡¡measured¡¡or¡¡in¡¡any¡¡way¡¡assimilated¡¡to¡¡such¡¡things¡¡as¡¡may¡¡be¡¡made¡¡the¡¡actual¡¡or¡¡possible¡¡objects¡¡of¡¡sense¡­perception¡£¡¡Modern¡¡discovery£»¡¡so¡¡far¡¡from¡¡bridging¡¡over¡¡the¡¡chasm¡¡between¡¡Mind¡¡and¡¡Matter£»¡¡tends¡¡rather¡¡to¡¡exhibit¡¡the¡¡distinction¡¡between¡¡them¡¡as¡¡absolute¡£¡¡It¡¡has£»¡¡indeed£»¡¡been¡¡rendered¡¡highly¡¡probable¡¡that¡¡every¡¡act¡¡of¡¡consciousness¡¡is¡¡accompanied¡¡by¡¡a¡¡molecular¡¡motion¡¡in¡¡the¡¡cells¡¡and¡¡fibres¡¡of¡¡the¡¡brain£»¡¡and¡¡materialists¡¡have¡¡found¡¡great¡¡comfort¡¡in¡¡this¡¡fact£»¡¡while¡¡theologians¡¡and¡¡persons¡¡of

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨1£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ