history of the impeachment of andrew johnson-第42节

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！



That　the　President　at　a　meeting　of　the　Cabinet；　while　the　bill　was　before　the　President　for　his　approval；　laid　before　the　Cabinet　the　tenure…of…civil…office　bill　for　their　consideration　and　advice　to　the　President　respecting　his　approval　of　the　bill：　and　thereupon　the　members　of　the　Cabinet　then　present　gave　their　advice　to　the　President　that　the　bill　was　unconstitutional　and　should　be　returned　to　Congress　with　his　objections；　and　that　the　duty　of　preparing　a　message；　setting　forth　the　objections　to　the　constitutionality　of　the　bill；　was　devolved　on　Mr。　Seward　and　Mr。　Stanton；　to　be　followed　by　proof　as　to　what　was　done　by　the　President　and　Cabinet　up　to　the　time　of　sending　in　the　message。

After　argument　the　yeas　and　nays　were　taken：

YeasAnthony　Bayard；　Buckalew；　Davis；　Dixon；　Doolittle；　Fessenden；　Fowler；　Grimes；　Henderson；　Hendricks；　Johnson；　McCreery；　Patterson　of　Tennessee；　Ross；　Saulsbury；　Trumbull；　Van　Winkle；　Vickers；　and　Willey209　Republicans　and　11　Democrats。

NaysCameron；　Cattell；　Chandler；　Cole；　Conkling；　Conness；　Corbett；　Cragin；　Drake；　Edmunds；　Ferry；　Frelinghuysen；　Harlan；　Howard；　Howe；　Morgan；　Morrill　of　Maine；　Morrill　of　Vermont；　Patterson　of　New　Hampshire；　Pomeroy；　Ramsay　Sherman；　Sprague；　Stewart；　Thayer；　Tipton；　Williams；　Wilson；　and　Yates29all　Republicans。

So　this　testimony　was　rejected。

No。　21。

Counsel　for　Defense　offered　to　prove：

That　at　the　meetings　of　the　Cabinet　at　which　Mr。　Stanton　was　present；　held　while　the　tenure…of…civil…office　bill　was　before　the　President　for　approval；　the　advice　of　the　Cabinet　in　regard　to　the　same　was　asked　by　the　President　and　given　by　the　Cabinet；　and　thereupon　the　question　whether　Mr。　Stanton　and　the　other　Secretaries　who　had　received　their　appointment　from　Mr。　Lincoln　were　within　the　restrictions　upon　the　President's　power　of　removal　from　office　created　by　said　act　was　considered；　and　the　opinion　expressed　that　the　Secretaries　appointed　by　Mr。　Lincoln　were　not　within　such　restrictions。

The　yeas　and　nays　were　ordered；　and　the　vote　was：

YeasAnthony；　Bayard；　Buckalew；　Davis；　Dixon；　Doolittle；　Fessenden；　Fowler；　Grimes；　Henderson；　Hendricks；　Johnson；　McCreery；　Patterson　of　Tennessee；　Ross；　Saulsbury；　Sherman；　Sprague；　Trumbull；　Van　Winkle；　Vickers；　and　Willey2211　Republicans　and　11　Democrats。

NaysCameron；　Cattell；　Chandler；　Cole。　Conness。　Corbett；　Cragin；　Drake；　Edmunds；　Ferry；　Frelinghusen；　Harlan；　Howard；　Howe；　Morgan；　Morrill　of　Maine；　Morrill　of　Vermont；　Patterson　of　New　Hampshire；　Pomeroy；　Ramsay；　Stewart；　Thayer；　Tipton；　Williams；　Wilson；　and　Yates26all　Republicans。

So　this　testimony　was　rejected。

No。　25。

Counsel　for　defense　offered　to　prove：

That　at　the　Cabinet　meetings　between　the　passage　of　the　tenure…of…civil　office　bill　and　the　order　of　the　21st　of　February；　1868；　for　the　removal　of　Mr。　Stanton。　upon　occasions　when　the　condition　of　the　public　service；　as　affected　by　the　operation　of　that　bill；　came　up　for　the　consideration　and　advice　of　the　Cabinet；　it　was　considered　by　the　President　and　Cabinet　that　a　proper　regard　to　the　public　service　made　it　desirable　that　upon　some　proper　case　a　judicial　determination　of　the　constitutionality　of　the　law　should　be　obtained。

The　question　being　taken　by　yeas　and　nays；　resulted：

YeasAnthony；　Bayard；　Buckalew；　Davis；　Dixon；　Doolittle；　Fessenden；　Fowler；　Grimes；　Henderson；　Hendricks；　Johnson；　McCreery；　Patterson　of　Tennessee；　Ross；　Saulsbury　Trumbull；　Van　Winkle；　and　Vickers198　Republicans　and　11　Democrats。

NaysCameron；　Cattell；　Chandler；　Cole；　Conkling；　Conness；　Corbett；　Cragin；　Drake；　Edmunds；　Ferry；　Frelinghuysen；　Harlan；　Howard；　Howe；　Morgan；　Morrill　of　Maine；　Morrill　of　Vermont；　Patterson　of　New　Hampshire；　Pomeroy；　Ramsay；　Sherman；　Sprague；　Stewart；　Thayer；　Tipton；　Willey；　Williams；　Wilson　and　Yates30all　Republicans。

So　the　proffered　testimony　was　rejected。

No。　26。

Counsel　for　defense　put　this　question　to　witness；　（Mr。　Welles；　then　Secretary　of　the　Navy。）

Was　there；　within　the　period　embraced　in　the　inquiry　in　the　last　question；　and　at　any　discussions　or　deliberations　of　the　Cabinet　concerning　the　operation　of　the　tenure…of…civil…office　act　and　the　requirements　of　the　public　service　in　regard　to　the　service；　any　suggestion　or　intimation　whatever　touching　or　looking　to　the　vacation　of　any　office　by　force　or　getting　possession　of　the　same　by　force？

Counsel　for　prosecution　objected；　and　the　vote　was：

YeasAnthony；　Bayard；　Buckalew；　Davis；　Dixon；　Edmunds；　Fessenden；　Fowler；　Grimes；　Hendricks；　Johnson；　McCreery；　Patterson　of　Tennessee；　Ross；　Saulsbury；　Trumbull；　Van　Winkle；　and　Vickers188　Republicans　and　10　Democrats。

Nay…s…Cattell；　Chandler；　Cole；　Conkling；　Conness；　Corbett；　Cragin；　Ferry；　Frelinghuysen；　Harlan；　Howard；　Howe；　Morgan；　Morrill　of　Maine；　Morrill　of　Vermont；　Patterson　of　New　Hampshire；　Pomeroy；　Ramsay；　Sherman；　Stewart；　Thayer；　Tipton；　Willey；　Williams；　Wilson；　and　Yates26all　Republicans。

So　the　proffered　testimony　was　rejected。

No。　27。

Defense　offered　to　prove：

That　at　the　meetings　of　the　Cabinet　at　which　Stanton　was　present；　held　while　the　tenure…of…civil…office　bill　was　before　the　President　for　approval；　the　advice　of　the　Cabinet　in　regard　to　the　same　was　asked　by　the　President；　and　given　the　Cabinet；　and　thereupon　the　question　whether　Mr。　Stanton　and　the　other　Secretaries　who　had　received　their　appointments　from　　Mr。　Lincoln　were　within　the　restrictions　upon　the　President's　power　of　removal　from　office　created　by　said　act；　was　considered　and　the　opinion　expressed　that　the　Secretaries　appointed　by　Mr。　Lincoln　were　not　within　such　restrictions。

Mr。　Johnson：　I　ask　that　the　question　propounded　by　the　Senator　from　Ohio　（Mr。　Sherman）　shall　now　be　read。

The　Secretary　read　the　question　as　follows：

State　if；　after　the　2d　of　March；　1867；　the　date　of　the　passage　of　the　tenure…of…office　act；　the　question　whether　the　Secretaries　appointed　by　President　Lincoln　were　included　within　the　provisions　of　that　act　came　before　the　Cabinet　for　discussion；　and　if　so；　what　opinion　was　given　on　this　question　by　members　of　the　Cabinet　to　the　President。

The　yeas　and　nays　were　ordered；　and　being　taken　resulted：

YeasAnthony；　Bayard；　Buckalew；　Davis；　Dixon；　Doolittle；　Fessenden；　Fowler；　Grimes；　Hendricks；　Johnson；　McCreery；　Patterson　of　Tennessee；　Ross；　Saulsbury；　Sherman；　Trumbull；　Van　Winkle；　Vickers；　and　Willey209　Republican　and　11　Democrats。

NaysCameron；　Cattell；　Chandler；　Cole；　Conkling；　Conness；　Corbett；　Cragin；　Edmunds；　Ferry；　Frelinghuysen；　Harlan；　Howard；　Howe；　Morgan；　Morrill　of　Maine；　Morrill　of　Vermont；　Patterson　of　New　Hampshire；　Pomeroy；　Ramsay；　Stewart；　Thayer；　Tipton；　Williams；　Wilson；　and　Yates26all　Republicans。

So　the　proffered　testimony　was　rejected。

No。　28。

The　Prosecution　proposed　to　put　in　evidence　the　nomination　of　Lieutenant　General　Sherman；　to　be　General　by　brevet；　sent　to　the　Senate　on　the　13th　of　February；　1868；　also　the　nomination　of　Major　General　George　H。　Thomas　to　be　Lieutenant　General　by　brevet；　and　to　be　General　by　brevet；　sent　to　the　Senate　on　the　21st　of　February；　1868。

The　question　being　taken　by　yeas　and　nays；　resulted：　YeasAnthony；　Cole；　Fessenden；　Fowler；　Grimes；　Henderson；　Morton；　Ross；　Sumner；　Tipton；　Trumbull；　Van　Winkle；　Willey；　and　Yates14all　Republicans。

NaysBuckalew；　Cameron；　Cattell；　Chandler；　Conkling；　Conness；　Corbett；　Cragin；　Davis；　Dixon；　Doolittle；　Drake；　Edmunds；　Ferry；　Frelinghuysen；　Harlan；　Hendricks；　Howard；　Howe；　Johnson；　McCreery；　Morgan；　Morrill　of　Maine；　Morrill　of　Vermont；　Patterson　of　New　Hampshire；　Patterson　of　Tennessee；　Pomeroy；　Ramsay；　Sherman；　Sprague；　Stewart；　Thayer；　Vickers；　Williams；　and　Wilson3526　Republicans　and　9　Democrats。

So　the　proffered　testimony　was　refused。

GENERAL　EMORY'S　TESTIMONY。

The　Ninth　Article　of　the　Impeachment　was　based　upon　alleged　military　changes　in　the　City　of　Washington　whereby　the　number　of　troops　on　duty　there　was　rumored　to　have　been　largely　increased；　with　a　view　to　their　use　in　the　controversy　between　the　President　and　Congress；　and　more　especially　for　the　expulsion　of　Mr。　Stanton　from　the　War　Office　in　case　of　his　resistance　to　the　order　of　the　President　for　his　retirement。　The　wildest　rumors　of　that　character　prevailedthat　Mr。　Johnson　proposed　to　throw　off　all　disguise　and　assume　direct　military　control　and　the　establishment　of　practically　a　military　dictatorship。　Congress　had　some　months　previously　enacted　that　all　military　orders　from　the　President　should　be　issued　through　the　General　of　the　Armythe　Congress　thereby　assuming　to　practically　abrogate　a　constitutional　function　of　the　Chief　Executive。

There　was　considerable　confidence　among　the　supporters　of　the　impeachment　that　they　would　be　able　to　prove　these　allegations　by　General　Emory；　then　in　local　command　of　the　troops　and　Department　of　Washington。　General　Emory　was　called　by　the　prosecution；　and　the　following　was　his　testimony。

Examined　by　Mr。　Butler：

Question：　Will　you　have　the　kindness　to　state；　as　nearly　as　you　can　what　took　place　then？　（Referring　to　an　interview　with　the　President　at　the　Executive　Mansion。）

Answer：　I　will　try　and　state　the　substance　of　it；　but　the　words　I　can　not　undertake　to　state　exactly。　The　President　asked　me　if　I　recollected　a　conversation