the writings-3-第4节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
to…day that the people of a Territory have no right to exclude
slavery from a Territory; that if any one man chooses to take
slaves into a Territory; all the rest of the people have no right
to keep them out。 This being so; and this decision being made
one of the points that the Judge approved; and one in the
approval of which he says he means to keep me down;put me down
I should not say; for I have never been up;he says he is in
favor of it; and sticks to it; and expects to win his battle on
that decision; which says that there is no such thing as squatter
sovereignty; but that any one man may take slaves into a
Territory; and all the other men in the Territory may be opposed
to it; and yet by reason of the Constitution they cannot prohibit
it。 When that is so; how much is left of this vast matter of
squatter sovereignty; I should like to know?
When we get back; we get to the point of the right of the people
to make a constitution。 Kansas was settled; for example; in
1854。 It was a Territory yet; without having formed a
constitution; in a very regular way; for three years。 All this
time negro slavery could be taken in by any few individuals; and
by that decision of the Supreme Court; which the Judge approves;
all the rest of the people cannot keep it out; but when they come
to make a constitution; they may say they will not have slavery。
But it is there; they are obliged to tolerate it some way; and
all experience shows it will be so; for they will not take the
negro slaves and absolutely deprive the owners of them。 All
experience shows this to be so。 All that space of time that runs
from the beginning of the settlement of the Territory until there
is sufficiency of people to make a State constitution;all that
portion of time popular sovereignty is given up。 The seal is
absolutely put down upon it by the court decision; and Judge
Douglas puts his own upon the top of that; yet he is appealing to
the people to give him vast credit for his devotion to popular
sovereignty。
Again; when we get to the question of the right of the people to
form a State constitution as they please; to form it with slavery
or without slavery; if that is anything new; I confess I don't
know it。 Has there ever been a time when anybody said that any
other than the people of a Territory itself should form a
constitution? What is now in it that Judge Douglas should have
fought several years of his life; and pledge himself to fight all
the remaining years of his life for? Can Judge Douglas find
anybody on earth that said that anybody else should form a
constitution for a people? 'A voice; 〃Yes。〃' Well; I should like
you to name him; I should like to know who he was。 'Same voice;
〃John Calhoun。〃'
No; sir; I never heard of even John Calhoun saying such a thing。
He insisted on the same principle as Judge Douglas; but his mode
of applying it; in fact; was wrong。 It is enough for my purpose
to ask this crowd whenever a Republican said anything against it。
They never said anything against it; but they have constantly
spoken for it; and whoever will undertake to examine the
platform; and the speeches of responsible men of the party; and
of irresponsible men; too; if you please; will be unable to find
one word from anybody in the Republican ranks opposed to that
popular sovereignty which Judge Douglas thinks that he has
invented。 I suppose that Judge Douglas will claim; in a little
while; that he is the inventor of the idea that the people should
govern themselves; that nobody ever thought of such a thing until
he brought it forward。 We do not remember that in that old
Declaration of Independence it is said that:
〃We hold these truths to be self…evident; that all men are
created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with
certain inalienable rights; that among these are life; liberty;
and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights;
governments are instituted among men; deriving their just powers
from the consent of the governed。〃
There is the origin of popular sovereignty。 Who; then; shall
come in at this day and claim that he invented it?
The Lecompton Constitution connects itself with this question;
for it is in this matter of the Lecompton Constitution that our
friend Judge Douglas claims such vast credit。 I agree that in
opposing the Lecompton Constitution; so far as I can perceive; he
was right。 I do not deny that at all; and; gentlemen; you will
readily see why I could not deny it; even if I wanted to。 But I
do not wish to; for all the Republicans in the nation opposed it;
and they would have opposed it just as much without Judge
Douglas's aid as with it。 They had all taken ground against it
long before he did。 Why; the reason that he urges against that
constitution I urged against him a year before。 I have the
printed speech in my hand。 The argument that he makes; why that
constitution should not be adopted; that the people were not
fairly represented nor allowed to vote; I pointed out in a speech
a year ago; which I hold in my hand now; that no fair chance was
to be given to the people。 '〃Read it; Read it。〃' I shall not
waste your time by trying to read it。 '〃Read it; Read it。〃'
Gentlemen; reading from speeches is a very tedious business;
particularly for an old man that has to put on spectacles; and
more so if the man be so tall that he has to bend over to the
light。
A little more; now; as to this matter of popular sovereignty and
the Lecompton Constitution。 The Lecompton Constitution; as the
Judge tells us; was defeated。 The defeat of it was a good thing
or it was not。 He thinks the defeat of it was a good thing; and
so do I; and we agree in that。 Who defeated it?
'A voice: Judge Douglas。'
Yes; he furnished himself; and if you suppose he controlled the
other Democrats that went with him; he furnished three votes;
while the Republicans furnished twenty。
That is what he did to defeat it。 In the House of
Representatives he and his friends furnished some twenty votes;
and the Republicans furnished ninety odd。 Now; who was it that
did the work?
'A voice: Douglas。'
Why; yes; Douglas did it! To be sure he did。
Let us; however; put that proposition another way。 The
Republicans could not have done it without Judge Douglas。 Could
he have done it without them? Which could have come the nearest
to doing it without the other?
'A voice: Who killed the bill?'
'Another voice: Douglas。'
Ground was taken against it by the Republicans long before
Douglas did it。 The proportion of opposition to that measure is
about five to one。
'A voice: Why don't they come out on it?'
You don't know what you are talking about; my friend。 I am quite
willing to answer any gentleman in the crowd who asks an
intelligent question。
Now; who in all this country has ever found any of our friends of
Judge Douglas's way of thinking; and who have acted upon this
main question; that has ever thought of uttering a word in behalf
of Judge Trumbull?
'A voice: We have。'
I defy you to show a printed resolution passed in a Democratic
meetingI take it upon myself to defy any man to show a printed
resolution of a Democratic meeting; large or smallin favor of
Judge Trumbull; or any of the five to one Republicans who beat
that bill。 Everything must be for the Democrats! They did
everything; and the five to the one that really did the thing
they snub over; and they do not seem to remember that they have
an existence upon the face of the earth。
Gentlemen; I fear that I shall become tedious。 I leave this
branch of the subject to take hold of another。 I take up that
part of Judge Douglas's speech in which he respectfully attended
to me。
Judge Douglas made two points upon my recent speech at
Springfield。 He says they are to be the issues of this campaign。
The first one of these points he bases upon the language in a
speech which I delivered at Springfield; which I believe I can
quote correctly from memory。 I said there that 〃we are now far
into the fifth year since a policy was instituted for the avowed
object; and with the confident promise; of putting an end to
slavery agitation; under the operation of that policy; that
agitation has not only not ceased; but has constantly augmented。〃
〃I believe it will not cease until a crisis shall have been
reached and passed。 'A house divided against itself cannot
stand。' I believe this government cannot endure permanently half
slave and half free。〃 〃I do not expect the Union to be
dissolved;〃I am quoting from my speech; 〃I do not expect the
house to fall; but I do expect it will cease to be divided。 It
will become all one thing or all the other。 Either the opponents
of slavery will arrest the spread of it and place it where the
public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the cours