太子爷小说网 > 英语电子书 > the writings-3 >

第20节

the writings-3-第20节

小说: the writings-3 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!




constitution; and ask admission into the Union under it; before

they have the requisite number of inhabitants according to the

English bill;some ninety…three thousand;will you vote to

admit them?



Q。  2。Can the people of a United States Territory; in any

lawful way; against the wish of any citizen of the United States;

exclude slavery from its limits prior to the formation of a State

constitution?



Q。  3。  If the Supreme Court of the United States shall decide

that States cannot exclude slavery from their limits; are you in

favor of acquiescing in; adopting; and following such decision as

a rule of political action?



Q。  4。  Are you in favor of acquiring additional territory; in

disregard of how such acquisition may affect the nation on the

slavery question?



As introductory to these interrogatories which Judge Douglas

propounded to me at Ottawa; he read a set of resolutions which he

said Judge Trumbull and myself had participated in adopting; in

the first Republican State Convention; held at Springfield in

October; 1854。  He insisted that I and Judge Trumbull; and

perhaps the entire Republican party; were responsible for the

doctrines contained in the set of resolutions which he read; and

I understand that it was from that set of resolutions that he

deduced the interrogatories which he propounded to me; using

these resolutions as a sort of authority for propounding those

questions to me。  Now; I say here to…day that I do not answer his

interrogatories because of their springing at all from that set

of resolutions which he read。  I answered them because Judge

Douglas thought fit to ask them。  I do not now; nor ever did;

recognize any responsibility upon myself in that set of

resolutions。  When I replied to him on that occasion; I assured

him that I never had anything to do with them。  I repeat here to

today that I never in any possible form had anything to do with

that set of resolutions  It turns out; I believe; that those

resolutions were never passed in any convention held in

Springfield。



It turns out that they were never passed at any convention or any

public meeting that I had any part in。  I believe it turns out;

in addition to all this; that there was not; in the fall of 1854;

any convention holding a session in Springfield; calling itself a

Republican State Convention; yet it is true there was a

convention; or assemblage of men calling themselves a convention;

at Springfield; that did pass some resolutions。  But so little

did I really know of the proceedings of that convention; or what

set of resolutions they had passed; though having a general

knowledge that there had been such an assemblage of men there;

that when Judge Douglas read the resolutions; I really did not

know but they had been the resolutions passed then and there。  I

did not question that they were the resolutions adopted。  For I

could not bring myself to suppose that Judge Douglas could say

what he did upon this subject without knowing that it was true。

I contented myself; on that occasion; with denying; as I truly

could; all connection with them; not denying or affirming whether

they were passed at Springfield。  Now; it turns out that he had

got hold of some resolutions passed at some convention or public

meeting in Kane County。  I wish to say here; that I don't

conceive that in any fair and just mind this discovery relieves

me at all。  I had just as much to do with the convention in Kane

County as that at Springfield。  I am as much responsible for the

resolutions at Kane County as those at Springfield;the amount

of the responsibility being exactly nothing in either case; no

more than there would be in regard to a set of resolutions passed

in the moon。



I allude to this extraordinary matter in this canvass for some

further purpose than anything yet advanced。  Judge Douglas did

not make his statement upon that occasion as matters that he

believed to be true; but he stated them roundly as being true; in

such form as to pledge his veracity for their truth。  When the

whole matter turns out as it does; and when we consider who Judge

Douglas is; that he is a distinguished Senator of the United

States; that he has served nearly twelve years as such; that his

character is not at all limited as an ordinary Senator of the

United States; but that his name has become of world…wide

renown;it is most extraordinary that he should so far forget

all the suggestions of justice to an adversary; or of prudence to

himself; as to venture upon the assertion of that which the

slightest investigation would have shown him to be wholly false。

I can only account for his having done so upon the supposition

that that evil genius which has attended him through his life;

giving to him an apparent astonishing prosperity; such as to lead

very many good men to doubt there being any advantage in virtue

over vice;I say I can only account for it on the supposition

that that evil genius has as last made up its mind to forsake

him。



And I may add that another extraordinary feature of the Judge's

conduct in this canvassmade more extraordinary by this

incidentis; that he is in the habit; in almost all the speeches

he makes; of charging falsehood upon his adversaries; myself and

others。  I now ask whether he is able to find in anything that

Judge Trumbull; for instance; has said; or in anything that I

have said; a justification at all compared with what we have; in

this instance; for that sort of vulgarity。



I have been in the habit of charging as a matter of belief on my

part that; in the introduction of the Nebraska Bill into

Congress; there was a conspiracy to make slavery perpetual and

national。  I have arranged from time to time the evidence which

establishes and proves the truth of this charge。  I recurred to

this charge at Ottawa。  I shall not now have time to dwell upon

it at very great length; but inasmuch as Judge Douglas; in his

reply of half an hour; made some points upon me in relation to

it; I propose noticing a few of them。



The Judge insists that; in the first speech I made; in which I

very distinctly made that charge; he thought for a good while I

was in fun!  that I was playful; that I was not sincere about it;

and that he only grew angry and somewhat excited when he found

that I insisted upon it as a matter of earnestness。  He says he

characterized it as a falsehood so far as I implicated his moral

character in that transaction。  Well; I did not know; till he

presented that view; that I had implicated his moral character。

He is very much in the habit; when he argues me up into a

position I never thought of occupying; of very cosily saying he

has no doubt Lincoln is 〃conscientious〃 in saying so。  He should

remember that I did not know but what he was ALTOGETHER

〃CONSCIENTIOUS〃 in that matter。  I can conceive it possible for

men to conspire to do a good thing; and I really find nothing in

Judge Douglas's course of arguments that is contrary to or

inconsistent with his belief of a conspiracy to nationalize and

spread slavery as being a good and blessed thing; and so I hope

he will understand that I do not at all question but that in all

this matter he is entirely 〃conscientious。〃



But to draw your attention to one of the points I made in this

case; beginning at the beginning:  When the Nebraska Bill was

introduced; or a short time afterward; by an amendment; I

believe; it was provided that it must be considered 〃the true

intent and meaning of this Act not to legislate slavery into any

State or Territory; or to exclude it therefrom; but to leave the

people thereof perfectly free to form and regulate their own

domestic institutions in their own way; subject only to the

Constitution of the United States。〃  I have called his attention

to the fact that when he and some others began arguing that they

were giving an increased degree of liberty to the people in the

Territories over and above what they formerly had on the question

of slavery; a question was raised whether the law was enacted to

give such unconditional liberty to the people; and to test the

sincerity of this mode of argument; Mr。 Chase; of Ohio;

introduced an amendment; in which he made the lawif the

amendment were adoptedexpressly declare that the people of the

Territory should have the power to exclude slavery if they saw

fit。  I have asked attention also to the fact that Judge Douglas

and those who acted with him voted that amendment down;

notwithstanding it expressed exactly the thing they said was the

true intent and meaning of the law。  I have called attention to

the fact that in subsequent times a decision of the Supreme Court

has been made; in which it has been declared that a Territorial

Legislature has no constitutional right to exclude slavery。  And

I have argued and said that for men who did; intend that the

people of the Territory should have the right to exc

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的