the six enneads-第109节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
undeniable； but a full impression on the sense there need not be。 That one identical soul should be virtuous in me and vicious in someone else is not strange： it is only saying that an identical thing may be active here and inactive there。 We are not asserting the unity of soul in the sense of a complete negation of multiplicity… only of the Supreme can that be affirmed… we are thinking of soul as simultaneously one and many； participant in the nature divided in body； but at the same time a unity by virtue of belonging to that Order which suffers no division。 In myself some experience occurring in a part of the body may take no effect upon the entire man but anything occurring in the higher reaches would tell upon the partial： in the same way any influx from the All upon the individual will have manifest effect since the points of sympathetic contact are numerous… but as to any operation from ourselves upon the All there can be no certainty。 3。 Yet； looking at another set of facts； reflection tells us that we are in sympathetic relation to each other； suffering； overcome； at the sight of pain； naturally drawn to forming attachments； and all this can be due only to some unity among us。 Again； if spells and other forms of magic are efficient even at a distance to attract us into sympathetic relations； the agency can be no other than the one soul。 A quiet word induces changes in a remote object； and makes itself heard at vast distances… proof of the oneness of all things within the one soul。 But how reconcile this unity with the existence of a reasoning soul； an unreasoning； even a vegetal soul？ ＇It is a question of powers＇： the indivisible phase is classed as reasoning because it is not in division among bodies； but there is the later phase； divided among bodies； but still one thing and distinct only so as to secure sense…perception throughout； this is to be classed as yet another power； and there is the forming and making phase which again is a power。 But a variety of powers does not conflict with unity； seed contains many powers and yet it is one thing； and from that unity rises； again； a variety which is also a unity。 But why are not all the powers of this unity present everywhere？ The answer is that even in the case of the individual soul described； similarly； as permeating its body； sensation is not equally present in all the parts； reason does not operate at every point； the principle of growth is at work where there is no sensation… and yet all these powers join in the one soul when the body is laid aside。 The nourishing faculty as dependent from the All belongs also to the All…Soul： why then does it not come equally from ours？ Because what is nourished by the action of this power is a member of the All； which itself has sensation passively； but the perception； which is an intellectual judgement； is individual and has no need to create what already exists； though it would have done so had the power not been previously included； of necessity； in the nature of the All。 4。 These reflections should show that there is nothing strange in that reduction of all souls to one。 But it is still necessary to enquire into the mode and conditions of the unity。 Is it the unity of origin in a unity？ And if so； is the one divided or does it remain entire and yet produce variety？ and how can an essential being； while remaining its one self； bring forth others？ Invoking God to become our helper； let us assert； that the very existence of many souls makes certain that there is first one from which the many rise。 Let us suppose； even； the first soul to be corporeal。 Then ＇by the nature of body＇ the many souls could result only from the splitting up of that entity； each an entirely different substance： if this body…soul be uniform in kind； each of the resultant souls must be of the one kind； they will all carry the one Form undividedly and will differ only in their volumes。 Now； if their being souls depended upon their volumes they would be distinct； but if it is ideal…form that makes them souls； then all are； in virtue of this Idea； one。 But this is simply saying that there is one identical soul dispersed among many bodies； and that； preceding this； there is yet another not thus dispersed； the source of the soul in dispersion which may be thought of as a widely repeated image of the soul in unity… much as a multitude of seals bear the impression of one ring。 By that first mode the soul is a unit broken up into a variety of points： in the second mode it is incorporeal。 Similarly if the soul were a condition or modification of body； we could not wonder that this quality… this one thing from one source… should be present in many objects。 The same reasoning would apply if soul were an effect ＇or manifestation＇ of the Conjoint。 We； of course； hold it to be bodiless； an essential existence。 5。 How then can a multitude of essential beings be really one？ Obviously either the one essence will be entire in all； or the many will rise from a one which remains unaltered and yet includes the one… many in virtue of giving itself； without self…abandonment； to its own multiplication。 It is competent thus to give and remain； because while it penetrates all things it can never itself be sundered： this is an identity in variety。 There is no reason for dismissing this explanation： we may think of a science with its constituents standing as one total； the source of all those various elements： again； there is the seed； a whole； producing those new parts in which it comes to its division； each of the new growths is a whole while the whole remains undiminished： only the material element is under the mode of part； and all the multiplicity remains an entire identity still。 It may be objected that in the case of science the constituents are not each the whole。 But even in the science； while the constituent selected for handling to meet a particular need is present actually and takes the lead； still all the other constituents accompany it in a potential presence； so that the whole is in every part： only in this sense ＇of particular attention＇ is the whole science distinguished from the part： all； we may say； is here simultaneously effected： each part is at your disposal as you choose to take it； the part invites the immediate interest； but its value consists in its approach to the whole。 The detail cannot be considered as something separate from the entire body of speculation： so treated it would have no technical or scientific value； it would be childish divagation。 The one detail； when it is a matter of science； potentially includes all。 Grasping one such constituent of his science； the expert deduces the rest by force of sequence。 ＇As a further illustration of unity in plurality＇ the geometrician； in his analysis； shows that the single proposition includes all the items that go to constitute it and all the propositions which can be developed from it。 It is our feebleness that leads to doubt in these matters； the body obscures the truth； but There all stands out clear and separate。 THE FIFTH ENNEAD。
FIRST TRACTATE。
THE THREE INITIAL HYPOSTASES。
1。 What can it be that has brought the souls to forget the father； God； and； though members of the Divine and entirely of that world； to ignore at once themselves and It？ The evil that has overtaken them has its source in self…will； in the entry into the sphere of process； and in the primal differentiation with the desire for self ownership。 They conceived a pleasure in this freedom and largely indulged their own motion； thus they were hurried down the wrong path； and in the end； drifting further and further； they came to lose even the thought of their origin in the Divine。 A child wrenched young from home and brought up during many years at a distance will fail in knowledge of its father and of itself： the souls； in the same way； no longer discern either the divinity or their own nature； ignorance of their rank brings self…depreciation； they misplace their respect； honouring everything more than themselves； all their awe and admiration is for the alien； and； clinging to this； they have broken apart； as far as a soul may； and they make light of what they have deserted； their regard for the mundane and their disregard of themselves bring about their utter ignoring of the divine。 Admiring pursuit of the external is a confession of inferiority； and nothing thus holding itself inferior to things that rise and perish； nothing counting itself less honourable and less enduring than all else it admires could ever form any notion of either the nature or the power of God。 A double discipline must be applied if human beings in this pass are to be reclaimed； and brought back to their origins； lifted once more towards the Supreme and One and First。 There is the method； which we amply exhibit elsewhere； declaring the dishonour of the objects which the Soul holds here in honour； the second teaches or recalls to the soul its race and worth； this latter is the leading truth； and； clearly brought out； is the evidence of the other。 It must occupy us now f
