lecture09-第2节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
was influenced similar to the Apostles on the day of Pentecost
(with the exception of having power to give it to others; and
doing what they did)。 After breakfast I went round to converse
with my neighbors on religion; which I could not have been
hired to have done before this; and at their request I prayed
with them; though I had never prayed in public before。
〃I now feel as if I had discharged my duty by telling the truth;
and hope by the blessing of God; it may do some good to all who
shall read it。 He has fulfilled his promise in sending the Holy
Spirit down into our hearts; or mine at least; and I now defy all
the Deists and Atheists in the world to shake my faith in
Christ。〃
So much for Mr。 Bradley and his conversion; of the effect of
which upon his later life we gain no information。 Now for a
minuter survey of the constituent elements of the conversion
process。
If you open the chapter on Association; of any treatise on
Psychology; you will read that a man's ideas; aims; and objects
form diverse internal groups and systems; relatively independent
of one another。 Each 'aim' which he follows awakens a certain
specific kind of interested excitement; and gathers a certain
group of ideas together in subordination to it as its associates;
and if the aims and excitements are distinct in kind; their
groups of ideas may have little in common。 When one group is
present and engrosses the interest; all the ideas connected with
other groups may be excluded from the mental field。 The
President of the United States when; with paddle; gun; and
fishing…rod; he goes camping in the wilderness for a vacation;
changes his system of ideas from top to bottom。 The presidential
anxieties have lapsed into the background entirely; the official
habits are replaced by the habits of a son of nature; and those
who knew the man only as the strenuous magistrate would not 〃know
him for the same person〃 if they saw him as the camper。
If now he should never go back; and never again suffer political
interests to gain dominion over him; he would be for practical
intents and purposes a permanently transformed being。 Our
ordinary alterations of character; as we pass from one of our
aims to another; are not commonly called transformations; because
each of them is so rapidly succeeded by another in the reverse
direction; but whenever one aim grows so stable as to expel
definitively its previous rivals from the individual's life; we
tend to speak of the phenomenon; and perhaps to wonder at it; as
a 〃transformation。〃
These alternations are the completest of the ways in which a self
may be divided。 A less complete way is the simultaneous
coexistence of two or more different groups of aims; of which one
practically holds the right of way and instigates activity;
whilst the others are only pious wishes; and never practically
come to anything。 Saint Augustine's aspirations to a purer life;
in our last lecture; were for a while an example。 Another would
be the President in his full pride of office; wondering whether
it were not all vanity; and whether the life of a wood…chopper
were not the wholesomer destiny。 Such fleeting aspirations are
mere velleitates; whimsies。 They exist on the remoter outskirts
of the mind; and the real self of the man; the centre of his
energies; is occupied with an entirely different system。 As life
goes on; there is a constant change of our interests; and a
consequent change of place in our systems of ideas; from more
central to more peripheral; and from more peripheral to more
central parts of consciousness。 I remember; for instance; that
one evening when I was a youth; my father read aloud from a
Boston newspaper that part of Lord Gifford's will which founded
these four lectureships。 At that time I did not think of being a
teacher of philosophy; and what I listened to was as remote from
my own life as if it related to the planet Mars。 Yet here I am;
with the Gifford system part and parcel of my very self; and all
my energies; for the time being; devoted to successfully
identifying myself with it。 My soul stands now planted in what
once was for it a practically unreal object; and speaks from it
as from its proper habitat and centre。
When I say 〃Soul;〃 you need not take me in the ontological sense
unless you prefer to; for although ontological language is
instinctive in such matters; yet Buddhists or Humians can
perfectly well describe the facts in the phenomenal terms which
are their favorites。 For them the soul is only a succession of
fields of consciousness: yet there is found in each field a
part; or sub…field; which figures as focal and contains the
excitement; and from which; as from a centre; the aim seems to be
taken。 Talking of this part; we involuntarily apply words of
perspective to distinguish it from the rest; words like 〃here;〃
〃this;〃 〃now;〃 〃mine;〃 or 〃me〃; and we ascribe to the other parts
the positions 〃there;〃 〃then;〃 〃that;〃 〃his〃 or 〃thine;〃 〃it;〃
〃not me。〃 But a 〃here〃 can change to a 〃there;〃 and a 〃there〃
become a 〃here;〃 and what was 〃mine〃 and what was 〃not mine〃
change their places。
What brings such changes about is the way in which emotional
excitement alters。 Things hot and vital to us to…day are cold
to…morrow。 It is as if seen from the hot parts of the field that
the other parts appear to us; and from these hot parts personal
desire and volition make their sallies。 They are in short the
centres of our dynamic energy; whereas the cold parts leave us
indifferent and passive in proportion to their coldness。
Whether such language be rigorously exact is for the present of
no importance。 It is exact enough; if you recognize from your
own experience the facts which I seek to designate by it。
Now there may be great oscillation in the emotional interest; and
the hot places may shift before one almost as rapidly as the
sparks that run through burnt…up paper。 Then we have the
wavering and divided self we heard so much of in the previous
lecture。 Or the focus of excitement and heat; the point of view
from which the aim is taken; may come to lie permanently within a
certain system; and then; if the change be a religious one; we
call it a CONVERSION; especially if it be by crisis; or sudden。
Let us hereafter; in speaking of the hot place in a man's
consciousness; the group of ideas to which he devotes himself;
and from which he works; call it THE HABITUAL CENTRE OF HIS
PERSONAL ENERGY。 It makes a great difference to a man whether
one set of his ideas; or another; be the centre of his energy;
and it makes a great difference; as regards any set of ideas
which he may possess; whether they become central or remain
peripheral in him。 To say that a man is 〃converted〃 means; in
these terms; that religious ideas; previously peripheral in his
consciousness; now take a central place; and that religious aims
form the habitual centre of his energy。
Now if you ask of psychology just HOW the excitement shifts in a
man's mental system; and WHY aims that were peripheral become at
a certain moment central; psychology has to reply that although
she can give a general description of what happens; she is unable
in a given case to account accurately for all the single forces
at work。 Neither an outside observer nor the Subject who
undergoes the process can explain fully how particular
experiences are able to change one's centre of energy so
decisively; or why they so often have to bide their hour to do
so。 We have a thought; or we perform an act; repeatedly; but on
a certain day the real meaning of the thought peals through us
for the first time; or the act has suddenly turned into a moral
impossibility。 All we know is that there are dead feelings; dead
ideas; and cold beliefs; and there are hot and live ones; and
when one grows hot and alive within us; everything has to
re…crystallize about it。 We may say that the heat and liveliness
mean only the 〃motor efficacy;〃 long deferred but now operative;
of the idea; but such talk itself is only circumlocution; for
whence the sudden motor efficacy? And our explanations then get
so vague and general that one realizes all the more the intense
individuality of the whole phenomenon。
In the end we fall back on the hackneyed symbolism of a
mechanical