the commonwealth of oceana-第24节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
or affection of her husband shall bequeath to her； to be divided in the first generation； wherein it is divisible according as has been shown。 〃Secondly； for lands lying and being within the territories of Marpesia； the agrarian shall hold in all parts as it is established in Oceana； except only in the standard or proportion of estates in land； which shall be set for Marpesia； at ？00。 And； 〃Thirdly； for Panopea； the agrarian shall hold in all parts； as in Oceana。 And whosoever possessing above the proportion allowed by these laws； shall be lawfully convicted of the same； shall forfeit the overplus to the use of the State。〃 Agrarian laws of all others have ever been the greatest bugbears； and so in the institution were these； at which time it was ridiculous to see how strange a fear appeared in everybody of that which； being good for all； could hurt nobody。 But instead of the proof of this order； I shall out of those many debates that happened ere it could be passed； insert two speeches that were made at the Council of legislators； the first by the Right Honorable Philautus de Garbo； a young man； being heir…apparent to a very noble family； and one of the councillors； who expressed himself as follows：
〃May it please your Highness； my Lord Archon of Oceana。 〃If I did not； to my capacity； know from how profound a councillor I dissent； it would certainly be no hard task to make it as light as the day。 First； that an agrarian is altogether unnecessary； secondly； that it is dangerous to a commonwealth； thirdly； that it is insufficient to keep out monarchy； fourthly； that it ruins families； fifthly； that it destroys industry； and last of all； that though it were indeed of any good use； it will be a matter of such difficulty to introduce in this nation； and so to settle that it may be lasting； as is altogether invincible。 〃First； that an agrarian is unnecessary to a commonwealth； what clearer testimony can there be than that the commonwealths which are our contemporaries （Venice； to which your Highness gives the upper hand of all antiquity； being one） have no such thing？ And there can be no reason why they have it not； seeing it is in the sovereign power at any time to establish such an order； but that they need it not； wherefore no wonder if Aristotle； who pretends to be a good commonwealths man； has long since derided Phaleas； to whom it was attributed by the Greeks； for his invention。 〃Secondly； that an agrarian is dangerous to a commonwealth is affirmed upon no slight authority seeing Machiavel is positive that it was the dissension which happened about the agrarian that caused the destruction of Rome； nor do I think that it did much better in Lacedaemon； as I shall show anon。 〃Thirdly； that it is insufficient to keep out monarchy cannot without impiety be denied； the holy Scriptures bearing witness that the Commonwealth of Israel； notwithstanding her agrarian； submitted her neck to the arbitrary yoke of her princes。 〃Fourthly； therefore； to come to my next assertion； that it is destructive to families： this also is so apparent； that it needs pity rather than proof。 Why alas； do you bind a nobility （which no generation shall deny to have been the first that freely sacrificed their blood to the ancient liberties of this people） on an unholy altar？ Why are the people taught that their liberty； which； except our noble ancestors had been born； must have long since been buried； cannot now be born except we be buried？ A commonwealth should have the innocence of the dove。 Let us leave this purchase of her birth to the serpent； which eats itself out of the womb of its mother。 〃Fifthly but it may be said； perhaps； that we are fallen from our first love； become proud and idle。 It is certain； my lords； that the hand of God is not upon us for nothing。 But take heed how you admit of such assaults and sallies upon men's estates； as may slacken the nerve of labor； and give others also reason to believe that their sweat is vain； or else； whatsoever be pretended； your agrarian （which is my fifth assertion） must indeed destroy industry。 For； that so it did in Lacedaemon is most apparent； as also that it could do no otherwise； where every man having his forty quarters of barley； with wine proportionable； supplied him out of his own lot by his laborer or helot； and being confined in that to the scantling above which he might not live； there was not any such thing as a trade； or other art； except that of war； in exercise。 Wherefore a Spartan； if he were not in arms； must sit and play with his Angers； whence ensued perpetual war； and； the estate of the city being as little capable of increase as that of the citizens； her inevitable ruin。 Now what better ends you can propose to yourselves in the like ways； I do not so well see as I perceive that there may be worse； for Lacedaemon yet was free from civil war： but if you employ your citizens no better than she did； I cannot promise you that you shall fare so well； because they are still desirous of war that hope that it may be profitable to them； and the strongest security you can give of peace； is to make it gainful。 Otherwise men will rather choose that whereby they may break your laws； than that whereby your laws may break them。 Which I speak not so much in relation to the nobility or such as would be holding； as to the people or them that would be getting； the passion in these being so much the stronger； as a man's felicity is weaker in the fruition of things； than in their prosecution and increase。 〃Truly； my lords； it is my fear； that by taking of more hands； and the best from industry； you will farther endamage it； than can be repaired by laying on a few； and the worst； while the nobility must be forced to send their sons to the plough； and； as if this were not enough； to marry their daughters also to farmers。 〃Sixthly； but I do not see （to come to the last point） how it is possible that this thing should be brought about； to your good I mean； though it may to the destruction of many。 For that the agrarian of Israel； or that of Lacedaemon； might stand； is no such miracle； the lands； without any consideration of the former proprietor； being surveyed and cast into equal lots； which could neither be bought； nor sold； nor multiplied： so that they knew whereabout to have a man。 But in this nation no such division can be introduced； the lands being already in the hands of proprietors； and such whose estates lie very rarely together； but mixed one with another being also of tenures in nature so different； that as there is no experience that an agrarian was ever introduced in such a case； so there is no appearance how or reason why it should： but that which is against reason and experience is impossible。〃
The case of my Lord Philautus was the most concerned in the whole nation； for he had four younger brothers； his father being yet living； to whom he was heir of ？0；000 a year。 Wherefore being a man both of good parts and esteem； his words wrought both upon men's reason and passions； and had borne a stroke at the head of the business； if my Lord Archon had not interposed the buckler in this oration：
〃MY LORDS； THE LEGISLATORS OF OCEANA： 〃My Lord Philautus has made a thing which is easy to seem hard； if the thanks were due to his eloquence； it would be worthy of less praise than that he owes it to his merit； and the love he has most deservedly purchased of all men： nor is it rationally to be feared that he who is so much beforehand in his private； should be in arrear in his public； capacity。 Wherefore； my lord's tenderness throughout his speech arising from no other principle than his solicitude lest the agrarian should be hurtful to his country； it is no less than my duty to give the best satisfaction I am able to so good a patriot； taking every one of his doubts in the order proposed。 And； 〃First； whereas my lord； upon observation of the modern commonwealths； is of opinion that an agrarian is not necessary： it must be confessed that at the first sight of them there is some appearance favoring his assertion； but upon accidents of no precedent to us。 For the commonwealths of Switzerland and Holland； I mean of those leagues； being situated in countries not alluring the inhabitants to wantonness； but obliging them to universal industry； have an implicit agrarian in the nature of them： and being not obnoxious to a growing nobility （which； as long as their former monarchies had spread the wing over them； could either not at all be hatched； or was soon broken） are of no example to us； whose experience in this point has been to the contrary。 But what if even in these governments there be indeed an explicit agrarian？ For when the law commands an equal or near equal distribution of a man's estate in land among his children； as it is done in those countries； a nobility cannot grow； and so there needs no agrarian； or rather there is one。 And for the growth of the nobility in Venice （if so it be； for Machiavel observes in that republic； as a cause of it； a great mediocrity of estates） it is not a point that she is to fear； but might study； seeing she consists of nothing else but nobility； by which； whatever their estates suck from the people； especially if it comes
