alexandria and her schools-第11节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
aiths extinct； the old reverence for the laws of family and national life； destroyed； yea even the natural instincts themselves perverted； that chaos whose darkness Juvenal； and Petronius； and Tacitus have proved； in their fearful pages； not to have been exaggerated by the more compassionate though more righteous Jew。
And now observe； that this selfishnessthis wholesome state of equilibriumthis philosophic calm； which is really only a lazy pride； was； as far as we can tell； the main object of all the schools from the time of Alexander to the Christian era。 We know very little of those Sceptics； Cynics； Epicureans； Academics； Peripatetics； Stoics； of whom there has been so much talk； except at second…hand； through the Romans； from whom Stoicism in after ages received a new and not ignoble life。 But this we do know of the later sets； that they gradually gave up the search for truth； and propounded to themselves as the great type for a philosopher； How shall a man save his own soul from this evil world？ They may have been right； it may have been the best thing to think about in those exhausted and decaying times： but it was a question of ethics； not of philosophy； in the sense which the old Greek sages put on that latter word。 Their object was； not to get at the laws of all things； but to fortify themselves against all things； each according to his scheme； and so to be self…sufficient and alone。 Even in the Stoics； who boldly and righteously asserted an immutable morality； this was the leading conception。 As has been well said of them：
〃If we reflect how deeply the feeling of an intercourse between men and a divine race superior to themselves had worked itself into the Greek characterwhat a number of fables； some beautiful； some impure； it had impregnated and procured credence forhow it sustained every form of polity and every system of laws； we may imagine what the effects must have been of its disappearance。 If it is possible for any man； it was not； certainly； possible for a Greek； to feel himself connected by any real bonds with his fellow…creatures around him； while he felt himself utterly separated from any being above his fellow…creatures。 But the sense of that isolation would affect different minds very differently。 It drove the Epicurean to consider how he might make a world in which he should live comfortably； without distracting visions of the past and future； and the dread of those upper powers who no longer awakened in him any feelings of sympathy。 It drove Zeno the Stoic to consider whether a man may not find enough in himself to satisfy him； though what is beyond him be ever so unfriendly。 。 。 。 We may trace in the productions which are attributed to Zone a very clear indication of the feeling which was at work in his mind。 He undertook； for instance； among other tasks； to answer Plato's 'Republic。' The truth that a man is a political being； which informs and pervades that book； was one which must have been particularly harassing to his mind； and which he felt must be got rid of； before he could hope to assert his doctrine of a man's solitary dignity。〃
Woe to the nation or the society in which this individualising and separating process is going on in the human mind！ Whether it take the form of a religion or of a philosophy； it is at once the sign and the cause of senility； decay； and death。 If man begins to forget that he is a social being； a member of a body； and that the only truths which can avail him anything； the only truths which are worthy objects of his philosophical search； are those which are equally true for every man； which will equally avail every man； which he must proclaim； as far as he can； to every man； from the proudest sage to the meanest outcast； he enters； I believe； into a lie； and helps forward the dissolution of that society of which he is a member。 I care little whether what he holds be true or not。 If it be true； he has made it a lie by appropriating it proudly and selfishly to himself； and by excluding others from it。 He has darkened his own power of vision by that act of self…appropriation； so that even if he sees a truth； he can only see it refractedly； discoloured by the medium of his own private likes and dislikes； and fulfils that great and truly philosophic law； that he who loveth not his brother is in darkness； and knoweth not whither he goeth。 And so it befell those old Greek schools。 It is out of our path to follow them to Italy； where sturdy old Roman patriots cursed them； and with good reason； as corrupting the morals of the young。 Our business is with Alexandria； and there； certainly； they did nothing for the elevation of humanity。 What culture they may have given； probably helped to make the Alexandrians； what Caesar calls them； the most ingenious of all nations： but righteous or valiant men it did not make them。 When； after the three great reigns of Soter； Philadelphus； and Euergetes； the race of the Ptolemies began to wear itself out； Alexandria fell morally； as its sovereigns fell； and during a miserable and shameful decline of a hundred and eighty years； sophists wrangled； pedants fought over accents and readings with the true odium gammaticum； and kings plunged deeper and deeper into the abysses of luxury and incest； laziness and cruelty； till the flood came； and swept them all away。 Cleopatra； the Helen of Egypt； betrayed her country to the Roman； and thenceforth the Alexandrians became slaves in all but name。
And now that Alexandria has become a tributary province； is it to share the usual lot of enslaved countries and lose all originality and vigour of thought？ Not so。 From this point； strangely enough； it begins to have a philosophy of its own。 Hitherto it has been importing Greek thought into Egypt and Syria； even to the furthest boundaries of Persia； and the whole East has become Greek： but it has received little in return。 The Indian Gymnosophists； or Brahmins； had little or no effect on Greek philosophy； except in the case of Pyrrho： the Persian Dualism still less。 The Egyptian symbolic nature…worship had been too gross to be regarded by the cultivated Alexandrian as anything but a barbaric superstition。 One eastern nation had intermingled closely with the Macedonian race； and from it Alexandrian thought received a new impulse。
I mentioned in my first lecture the conciliatory policy which the Ptolemies had pursued toward the Jews。 Soter had not only allowed but encouraged them to settle in Alexandria and Egypt； granting them the same political privileges with the Macedonians and other Greeks。 Soon they built themselves a temple there； in obedience to some supposed prophecy in their sacred writings； which seems most probably to have been a wilful interpolation。 Whatsoever value we may attach to the various myths concerning the translation of their Scriptures into Greek； there can be no doubt that they were translated in the reign of Soter； and that the exceedingly valuable Septuagint version is the work of that period。 Moreover； their numbers in Alexandria were very great。 When Amrou took Constantinople in A。D。 640； there were 40；000 Jews in it； and their numbers during the Ptolemaic and Roman periods； before their temporary expulsion by Cyril about 412； were probably greater； and Egypt altogether is said to have contained 200；000 Jews。 They had schools there； which were so esteemed by their whole nation throughout the East； that the Alexandrian Rabbis； the Light of Israel； as they were called； may be fairly considered as the centre of Jewish thought and learning for several centuries。
We are accustomed； and not without reason； to think with some contempt of these old Rabbis。 Rabbinism； Cabbalism； are become by…words in the mouths of men。 It may be instructive for usit is certainly necessary for us； if we wish to understand Alexandriato examine a little how they became so fallen。
Their philosophy took its stand； as you all know； on certain ancient books of their people； histories； laws； poems； philosophical treatises； which all have one element peculiar to themselves； namely； the assertion of a living personal Ruler and Teacher； not merely of the Jewish race； but of all the nations of the earth。 After the return of their race from Babylon； their own records give abundant evidence that this strange people became the most exclusive and sectarian which the world ever saw。 Into the causes of that exclusiveness I will not now enter； suffice it to say； that it was pardonable enough in a people asserting Monotheism in the midst of idolatrous nations； and who knew； from experience even more bitter than that which taught Plato and Socrates； how directly all those popular idolatries led to every form of baseness and immorality。 But we may trace in them； from the date of their return from Babylon； especially from their settlement in Alexandria； a singular change of opinion。 In proportion as they began to deny that their unseen personal Ruler had anything to do with the Gentilesthe nations of the earth； as they called themin proportion as they considered themselves as His only subjectsor rather； Him and His guidance as their own private propertyexactly in that proportion they began to lose all living or practical belief that He
