eminent victorians-第11节

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


number　of　persons。　In　the　first　place；　there　was　the　question　of

Baptismal　Regeneration　itself。　This　is　by　no　means　an　easy　one　to

disentangle；　but　it　may　be　noted　that　the　doctrine　of　Baptism

includes：　（1）　God's　intention；　that　is　to　say；　His　purpose　in

electing　certain　persons　to　eternal　lifean　abstruse　and　greatly

controverted　subject；　upon　which　the　Church　of　England　abstains

from　strict　definition；　（2）　God's　action；　whether　by　means　of

sacraments　or　otherwiseconcerning　which　the　Church　of　England

maintains　the　efficacy　of　sacraments；'　but　does　not　formally　deny

that　grace　may　be　given　by　other　means；　repentance　and　faith

being　present；　and　（3）　the　question　whether　sacramental　grace　is

given　instrumentally；　by　and　at　the　moment　of　the　act　of　baptism；

or　in　consequence　of　an　act　of　prevenient　grace　rendering　the

receiver　worthythat　is　to　say；　whether　sacramental　grace　in

baptism　is　given　absolutely　or　conditionally。



It　was　over　this　last　question　that　the　dispute　raged　hottest　in

the　Gorham　Case。　The　High　Church　party；　represented　by　Dr。

Phillpotts；　asserted　that　the　mere　act　of　baptism　conferred

regeneration　upon　the　recipient　and　washed　away　his　original　sin。

To　this　the　Evangelicals；　headed　by　Mr。　Gorham；　replied　that；

according　to　the　Articles；　regeneration　would　not　follow　unless

baptism　was　RIGHTLY　received。　What；　then；　was　the　meaning　of

'rightly'？　Clearly　it　implied　not　merely　lawful　administration；

but　worthy　reception；　worthiness；　therefore；　is　the　essence　of

the　sacrament；　and　worthiness　means　faith　and　repentance。　Now；

two　propositions　were　accepted　by　both　partiesthat　all　infants

are　born　in　original　sin；　and　that　original　sin　could　be　washed　

away　by　baptism。　But　how　could　both　these　propositions　be　true；

argued　Mr。　Gorham；　if　it　was　also　true　that　faith　and　repentance

were　necessary　before　baptism　could　come　into　operation　at　all？

How　could　an　infant　in　arms　be　said　to　be　in　a　state　of　faith　and

repentance？　How；　therefore；　could　its　original　sin　be　washed　away

by　baptism？　And　yet；　as　every　one　agreed；　washed　away　it　was。



The　only　solution　of　the　difficulty　lay　in　the　doctrine　of

prevenient　grace；　and　Mr。　Gorham　maintained　that　unless　God

performed　an　act　of　prevenient　grace　by　which　the　infant　was

endowed　with　faith　and　repentance；　no　act　of　baptism　could　be

effectual；　though　to　whom；　and　under　what　conditions；　prevenient

grace　was　given；　Mr。　Gorham　confessed　himself　unable　to　decide。

The　light　thrown　by　the　Bible　upon　the　whole　matter　seemed

somewhat　dubious；　for　whereas　the　baptism　of　St。　Peter's

disciples　at　Jerusalem　and　St。　Philip's　at　Samaria　was　followed

by　the　gift　of　the　Spirit；　in　the　case　of　Cornelius　the　sacrament

succeeded　the　gift。　St。　Paul　also　was　baptised；　and　as　for　the

language　of　St。　John　iii　5；　Rom。　vi　3；　4；　I　Peter　iii　21；　it

admits　of　more　than　one　interpretation。　There　could；　however；　be

no　doubt　that　the　Church　of　England　assented　to　Dr。　Phillpotts'

opinion；　the　question　was　whether　or　not　she　excluded　Mr。

Gorham's。　If　it　was　decided　that　she　did；　it　was　clear　that

henceforward；　there　would　be　very　little　peace　for　Evangelicals

within　her　fold。



But　there　was　another　issue；　even　more　fundamental　than　that　of

Baptismal　Regeneration　itself；　involved　in　the　Gorham　trial。　An

Act　passed　in　1833　had　constituted　the　Judicial　Committee　of　the

Privy　Council　the　supreme　court　of　appeal　for　such　cases；　and

this　Committee　was　a　body　composed　entirely　of　laymen。　It　was

thus　obvious　that　the　Royal　Supremacy　was　still　a　fact；　and　that

a　collection　of　lawyers　appointed　by　the　Crown　had　the　legal

right　to　formulate　the　religious　doctrine　of　the　Church　of

England。　In　1850　their　judgment　was　delivered；　they　reversed　the

decision　of　the　Court　of　Arches；　and　upheld　the　position　of　Mr。

Gorham。　Whether　his　views　were　theologically　correct　or　not；　they

said；　was　not　their　business；　it　was　their　business　to　decide

whether　the　opinions　under　consideration　were　contrary　or

repugnant　to　the　doctrine　of　the　Church　of　England　as　enjoined

upon　the　clergy　by　its　Articles；　Formularies；　and　Rubrics；　and

they　had　come　to　the　conclusion　that　they　were　not。　The　judgement

still　holds　good；　and　to　this　day；　a　clergyman　of　the　Church　of

England　is　quite　at　liberty　to　believe　that　Regeneration　does　not

invariably　take　place　when　an　infant　is　baptised。



The　blow　fell　upon　no　one　with　greater　violence　than　upon

Manning。　Not　only　was　the　supreme　efficacy　of　the　sign　of　the

cross　upon　a　baby's　forehead　one　of　his　favourite　doctrines；　but

up　to　that　moment　he　had　been　convinced　that　the　Royal　Supremacy

was　a　mere　accidenta　temporary　usurpation　which　left　the

spiritual　dominion　of　the　Church　essentially　untouched。　But　now

the　horrid　reality　rose　up　before　him；　crowned　and　triumphant；　it

was　all　too　clear　that　an　Act　of　Parliament；　passed　by　Jews；

Roman　Catholics；　and　Dissenters；　was　the　ultimate　authority　which

decided　upon　the　momentous　niceties　of　the　Anglican　faith。　Mr。

Gladstone　also；　was　deeply　perturbed。　It　was　absolutely

necessary；　he　wrote；　to　'rescue　and　defend　the　conscience　of　the

Church　from　the　present　hideous　system'。　An　agitation　was　set　on

foot；　and　several　influential　Anglicans；　with　Manning　at　their

head；　drew　up　and　signed　a　formal　protest　against　the　Gorham

judgment。　Mr。　Gladstone　however；　proposed　another　method　of

procedure：　precipitate　action；　he　declared；　must　be　avoided　at

all　costs；　and　he　elaborated　a　scheme　for　securing

procrastination；　by　which　a　covenant　was　to　bind　all　those　who

believed　that　an　article　of　the　creed　had　been　abolished　by　Act

of　Parliament　to　take　no　steps　in　any　direction；　nor　to　announce

their　intention　of　doing　so；　until　a　given　space　of　time　had

elapsed。　Mr。　Gladstone　was　hopeful　that　some　good　might　come　of

thisthough　indeed　he　could　not　be　sure。　'Among　others；'　he

wrote　to　Manning；　'I　have　consulted　Robert　Wilberforce　and　Wegg…

Prosser；　and　they　seemed　inclined　to　favour　my　proposal。　It

might；　perhaps；　have　kept　back　Lord　Feilding。　But　he　is　like　a

cork。'



The　proposal　was　certainly　not　favoured　by　Manning。　Protests　and

procrastinations；　approving　Wegg…Prossers　and　cork…like　Lord

Feildingsall　this　was　feeding　the　wind　and　folly；　the　time　for

action　had　come。　'I　can　no　longer　continue；'　he　wrote　to　Robert

Wilberforce；　'under　oath　and　subscription　binding　me　to　the　Royal

Supremacy　in　Ecclesiastical　causes；　being　convinced：



（1）　That　it　is　a　violation　of　the　Divine　Office　of　the　Church。



（2）　That　it　has　involved　the　Church　of　England　in　a　separation

from　the　Universal　Church；　which　separation　I　cannot　clear　of　the

character　of　schism。



（3）　That　it　has　thereby　suspended　and　prevented　the　functions　of

the　Church　of　England。'



It　was　in　vain　that　Robert　Wilberforce　pleaded；　in　vain　that　Mr。

Gladstone　urged　upon　his　mind　the　significance　of　John　iii　8。

＇'The　wind　bloweth　where　it　listeth；　and　thou　hearest　the　sound

thereof；　but　canst　not　tell　whence　it　cometh；　and　whither　it

goeth；　so　is　everyone　that　is　born　of　the　Spirit。'＇　'I　admit；'

Mr。　Gladstone　wrote；　'that　the　words　might　in　some　way　be

satisfied　by　supposing　our　Lord　simply　to　mean　〃the　facts　of

nature　are　unintelligible；　therefore；　be　not　afraid　if　revealed

truths　be　likewise　beyond　the　compass　of　the　understanding〃；　but

this　seems　to　me　a　meagre　meaning。'　Such　considerations　could

hold　him　no　longer；　and　Manning　executed　the　resignation　of　his

office　and　benefice　before　a　public　notary。　Soon　afterwards；　in

the　little　Chapel　off　Buckingham　Palace　Road；　kneeling　beside　Mr。

Gladstone；　he　worshipped　for　the　last　time　as　an　Anglican。　Thirty

years　later　the　Cardinal　told　how；　just　before　the　Communion

service　commenced；　he　turned　to　his　friends　with　the　words：　'I

can　no　longer　take　the　Communion　in　the　Church　of　England。'　'I

rose　up；　and　laying　my　hand　on　Mr。　Gladstone's　shoulder；　said

〃Come〃。　It　was　the　parting　of　the　ways。　Mr。　Gladstone　remained；

and　I　went　my　way。　Mr。　Gladstone　still　remains　where　I　left　him。'



On　April　6th；　1851；　the　final　step　was　taken：　Manning　was

received　into　the　Roman　Catholic　Church。　Now　at　last；　after　the

long　struggle；　his　mind　was　at　rest。　'I　know　what　you　mean；'　he

wrote　to　Robert　Wilberforce；　'by　saying　that　one　sometimes　feels

as　if　all　this　might　turn　out　to　be　only　another　〃Land　of

Shadows〃。　I　have　felt　it　in　time　past；　but　not　now。　The　theologia

from　Nice　to　St。　Thomas　Aquinas；　and　the　undivided　unity　suffused

throughout　the　world；　of　which　the　Cathedra　Petri　is　the　centre；

isnow　1800　years　old；　and　mightier　in　every　power　now　than　ever

in　intellect；　in　science；　in　separation　from　the　world；　and　purer

too；　refined　by　300　years　of　conflict　with　the　modern　infidel

civilisationall　of　this　is　a　fact　more　solid　than　the　earth。'



V。



WHEN　Manning　joined　the　Church　of　Rome；　he　acted　under　the

combined　impulse　of　the　two　dominating　forces　in　his　nature。