phenomenology of mind-第59节

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


form　of　the　organism。　This　free　detachment　is　at　the　same　time　a　freedom　of　the　moments
themselves；　it　is　the　possibility　of　their　appearing　and　of　being　apprehended　as　existent。　And　just　as
they　are　therein　detached　and　indifferent　in　regard　to　what　is　outer；　so　too　are　they　towards　one
another；　for　the　simplicity　of　this　freedom　is　being　or　is　their　simple　substance。　This　notion　or　pure
freedom　is　one　and　the　same　life；　no　matter　how　varied　and　diverse　the　ways　in　which　the　shape
assumed　by　the　organism；　its　〃being；　for　another〃；　may　disport　itself；　it　is　a　matter　of　indifference　to
this　stream　of　life　what　sort　of　mills　it　drives。　

In　the　first　place；　we　must　now　note　that　this　notion　is　not　to　be　taken　here；　as　it　was　formerly
when　we　were　considering　the　inner　proper；　in　its　character　as　the　process　or　development　of　its
moments；　we　must　take　it　in　its　form　as　simple　〃inner〃；　which　constitutes　the　purely　universal　aspect
as　against　the　concrete　living　reality；　it　is　the　element　in　which　the　existing　members　of　the　organic
shape　find　their　subsistence。　For　it　is　this　shape　we　are　considering　here；　and　in　it　the　essential
nature　of　life　appears　as　the　simple　fact　of　subsistence。　In　the　next　place；　the　existence　for　another；
the　specific　character　of　the　real　embodied　form；　is　taken　up　into　this　simple　universality；　in　which
its　nature　lies；　a　specificity　that　is　likewise　of　a　simple　universal　non…sensuous　kind；　and　can　only　be
that　which　finds　expression　in　number。　Number　is　the　middle　term　of　the　organic　form；　which　links
indeterminate　life　with　actual　concrete　life；　simple　like　the　former　and　determinate　like　the　latter。
That　which　in　the　case　of　the　former；　the　inner；　would　have　the　sense　of　number；　the　outer　would
require　to　express　after　its　manner　as　multiform　realitykinds　of　life；　colour；　and　so　on；　in　general
as　the　whole　host　of　differences　which　are　developed　as　phenomena　of　life。　

If　the　two　aspects　of　the　organic　whole…the　one　being　the　inner；　while　the　other　is　the　outer；　in　such
a　way　that　each　again　has　in　it　an　inner　and　an　outerare　compared　with　reference　to　the　inner
both　sides　have；　we　find　that　the　inner　of　the　first　is　the　notion；　in　the　sense　of　the　restless　activity
of　abstraction；　the　second　has　for　its　inner；　however；　inactive　universality；　which　involves　also　the
constant　characteristic…number。　Hence；　if　；　because　the　notion　develops　its　moments　in　the　former；
this　aspect　made　a　delusive　promise　of　laws　owing　to　the　semblance　of　necessity　in　the　relation；
the　latter　directly　disclaims　doing　so；　since　number　shows　itself　to　be　the。　determining　feature　of
one　aspect　of　its　laws。　For　number　is　just　that　entirely　inactive；　inert；　and　indifferent　characteristic
in　which　every　movement　and　relational　process　is　extinguished；　and　which　has　broken　the　bridge
leading　to　the　living　expression　of　impulses；　manner　of　life；　and　whatever　other　sensuous　existence
there　is。　

This　way　of　considering　the　embodied　organic　shape　as　such　and　the　inner　qua　inner　merely　of
that　embodied　form；　is；　however；　in　point　of　fact；　no　longer　a　consideration　of　organic　existence。
For　both　the　aspects；　which　were　to　be　related；　are　merely　taken　thereby　reflection　into　indifferent
to　one　another；　and　self；　the　essential　nature　of　organism；　is　done　away　with。　What　we　have　done
here　is　rather　to　transfer　that　attempted　comparison　of　inner　and　outer　to　the　sphere　of　inorganic
nature。　The　notion　with　its　infinity　is　here　merely　the　inner　essence；　which　lies　hidden　away　within
or　falls　outside　in　self…consciousness；　and　no　longer；　as　in　the　case　of　the　organism；　has　its
presence　in　an　object。　This　relation　of　inner　and　outer　has　thus　still　to　be　considered　in　its　own
proper　sphere。　

In　the　first　place；　that　inner　element　of　the　form；　being　the　simple　individual　existence　of　an
inorganic　thing；　is　the　specific　gravity。　As　a　simply　existing　fact；　this　can　be　observed　just　as　much
as　the　characteristic　of　number；　which　is　the　only　one　of　which　it　is　capable；　or　properly　speaking
can　be　found　by　comparing　observations；　and　it　seems　in　this　way　to　furnish　one　aspect　of　the　law。
The　embodied　form；　colour；　hardness；　toughness；　and　an　innumerable　host　of　other　properties；
would　together　constitute　the　outer　aspect；　and　would　have　to　give　expression　to　the　characteristic
of　the　inner；　number；　so　that　the　one　should　find　its　counterpart　in　the　other。　

Now　because　negativity　is　here　taken　not　in　the　sense　of　a　movement　of　the　process；　but　as　an
inoperative　unity；　or　as　simple　self…existence；　it　appears　really　as　that　by　which　the　thing　resists　the
process；　and　maintains　itself　within　itself；　and　in　a　condition　of　indifference　towards　it。　By　the　fact；
however；　that　this　simple　self　…existence　is　an　inactive　indifference　towards　an　other；　specific
gravity　appears　as　one　property　alongside　others；　and　therewith　all　necessary　relation　on　its　part　to
this　plurality；　or；　in　other　words；　all　conformity　to　law；　ceases。　

The　specific　gravity　in　the　sense　of　this　simple　inner　aspect　does　not　contain　difference　in　itself；　or
the　difference　it　has　is　merely　non…essential；　for　its　bare　simplicity　just　cancels　every　distinction　of
an　essential　kind。　This　non…essential　difference；　quantity；　was　thus　bound　to　find　its　other　or
counterpart　in　the　other　aspect；　the　plurality　of　properties；　since　it　is　only　by　doing　so　that　it　is
difference　at　all　。　If　this　plurality　itself　is　held　together　within　the　simple　form　of　opposition；　and　is
determined；　say；　as　cohesion；　so　that　this　cohesion　is　self…existence　in　otherness；　as　specific　gravity
is　pure　self…existence；　then　cohesion　here　is　in　the　first　place　this　pure　conceptually　constituted
characteristic　as　against　the　previous　characteristic。　The　mode　of　framing　the　law　would　thus　be
what　we　discussed　above；　in　dealing　with　the　relation　of　sensibility　to　irritability。　In　the　next　place；
cohesion；　qua　conception　of　selfexistence　in　otherness；　is　merely　the　abstraction　of　the　aspect
opposed　to　specific　gravity；　and　as　such　has　no　existential　reality。　For　self…existence　in　otherness　is
the　process　wherein　the　inorganic　would　have　to　express　its　self…existence　as　a　form　of
self…conservation；　which　on　the　other　hand　would　prevent　it　emerging　from　the　process　as　a
constituent　moment　of　a　product。　But　this　goes　directly　against　its　nature；　which　has　no　purpose　or
universality　in　it。　Rather；　its　process　is　simply　the　determinate　course　of　action　by　which　its
self…existence；　in　the　sense　of　its　specific　gravity；　cancels　itself。　This　determinate　action；　which　in
that　case　would　constitute　the　true　principle　implied　in　its　cohesion；　is　itself　however　entirely
indifferent　to　the　other　notion；　that　of　the　determinate　quantity　of　its　specific　gravity。　If　the　mode　of
action　were　left　entirely　out　of　account；　and　attention　confined　to　the　idea　of　quantity；　we　might　be
able　to　think　of　a　feature　like　this：　the　greater　specific　weight；　as　it　is　a　higher　intensiveness　of　being
（Insichseyn）；　would　resist　entering　into　the　process　more　than　a　less　specific　weight。　But　on　the
contrary；　freedom　of　self…existence　（Fürsichseyn）　shows　itself　only　in　facility　to　establish
connexion　with　everything；　and　maintain　itself　throughout　this　manifold　variety。　That　intensity
without　extension　of　relations　is　an　abstraction　with　no　substance　in　it；　for　extension　constitutes　the
existence　of　intensity。　The　self…conservation　of　the　inorganic　element　in　its　relation　lies　however；　as
already　mentioned；　outside　its　nature；　since　it　does　not　contain　the　principle　of　movement　within　it
or　because　its　being　is　not　absolute　negativity　and　not　a　notion。　

When　this　other　aspect　of　the　inorganic；　on　the　other　hand；　is　considered　not　as　a　process；　but　as
an　inactive　being；　it　is　ordinary　cohesion。　It　is　a　simple　sense　property　standing　on　one　side　over
against　the　free　and　detached　moment　of　otherness；　which　lies　dispersed　into　a　plurality　of
properties　indifferent　to　and　apart　from　one　another；　and　which　itself　comes　under　this　（cohesion）
as　does　specific　gravity。　The　multiplicity　of　properties　together；　then；　constitutes　the　other　side　to
cohesion。　In　its　case；　however；　as　in　the　case　of　the　multiplicity；　number　is　the　only　characteristic
feature。　which　not　merely　does　not　bring　out　a　relation　and　a　transition　from　one　to　another　of
these　properties；　but　consists　essentially　in　having　no　necessary　relation；　its　nature　is　rather　to
make　manifest　the　absence　of　all　conformity　to　law；　for　it　expresses　the　determinate　character　as
one　that　is　non…essential。　Thus　we　see　that　a　series　of　bodies；　whose　difference　is　expressed　as　a
numerical　difference　of　their　specific　weights；　by　no　means　runs　parallel　to　a　series　where　the
difference　is　constituted　by　the　other　properties；　even　if；　for　purposes　of　simplification；　we　select
merely　one　or　some　of　them。　For；　as　a　matter　of　fact；　it　could　only　be　the　tout　ensemble　of　the
properties　which　would　have　to　constitute　the　other　parallel　aspect　here。　To　bring　this　into　orderly
shape　and　to　make　it　a　connected　single　whole；　observation　finds　at　hand　the　quantitative
determinations　of　these　various　properties；　on　the　other　hand；　however；　t