north america-1-第68节

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


officers　who　come　home；　after　many　perils；　victorious　from　the　wars。　　His　health　was　drunk　with　great　applause；　and　thanks　were　voted　to　him　by　one　of　the　Houses　of　Congress。　　It　was　said　that　a　sword　was　to　be　given　to　him；　but　I　do　not　think　that　the　gift　was　consummated。　　Should　it　not　have　been　a　policeman's　truncheon？　　Had　he　at　the　best　done　any　thing　beyond　a　policeman's　work？　　Of　Captain　Wilkes　no　one　would　complain　for　doing　policeman's　duty。　If　his　country　were　satisfied　with　the　manner　in　which　he　did　it；　England；　if　she　quarreled　at　all；　would　not　quarrel　with　him。　　It　may　now　and　again　become　the　duty　of　a　brave　officer　to　do　work　of　so　low　a　caliber。　　It　is　a　pity　that　an　ambitious　sailor　should　find　himself　told　off　for　so　mean　a　task；　but　the　world　would　know　that　it　is　not　his　fault。　　No　one　could　blame　Captain　Wilkes　for　acting　policeman　on　the　seas。　　But　who　ever　before　heard　of　giving　a　man　glory　for　achievements　so　little　glorious？　　How　Captain　Wilkes　must　have　blushed　when　those　speeches　were　made　to　him；　when　that　talk　about　the　sword　came　up；　when　the　thanks　arrived　to　him　from　Congress！　　An　officer　receives　his　country's　thanks　when　he　has　been　in　great　peril；　and　has　borne　himself　gallantly　through　his　danger；　when　he　has　endured　the　brunt　of　war；　and　come　through　it　with　victory；　when　he　has　exposed　himself　on　behalf　of　his　country　and　singed　his　epaulets　with　an　enemy's　fire。　　Captain　Wilkes　tapped　a　merchantman　on　the　shoulder　in　the　high　seas；　and　told　him　that　his　passengers　were　wanted。　　In　doing　this　he　showed　no　lack　of　spirit；　for　it　might　be　his　duty；　but　where　was　his　spirit　when　he　submitted　to　be　thanked　for　such　work？　And　then　there　arose　a　clamor　of　justification　among　the　lawyers；　judges　and　ex…judges　flew　to　Wheaton；　Phillimore；　and　Lord　Stowell。　Before　twenty…four　hours　were　over；　every　man　and　every　woman　in　Boston　were　armed　with　precedents。　　Then　there　was　the　burning　of　the　〃Caroline。〃　　England　had　improperly　burned　the　〃Caroline〃　on　Lake　Erie；　or　rather　in　one　of　the　American　ports　on　Lake　Erie；　and　had　then　begged　pardon。　　If　the　States　had　been　wrong；　they　would　beg　pardon；　but　whether　wrong　or　right；　they　would　not　give　up　Slidell　and　Mason。　　But　the　lawyers　soon　waxed　stronger。　　The　men　were　manifestly　ambassadors；　and　as　such　contraband　of　war。　　Wilkes　was　quite　right；　only　he　should　have　seized　the　vessel　also。　　He　was　quite　right；　for　though　Slidell　and　Mason　might　not　be　ambassadors；　they　were　undoubtedly　carrying　dispatches。　　In　a　few　hours　there　began　to　be　a　doubt　whether　the　men　could　be　ambassadors；　because　if　called　ambassadors；　then　the　power　that　sent　the　embassy　must　be　presumed　to　be　recognized。　　That　Captain　Wilkes　had　taken　no　dispatches；　was　true；　but　the　captain　suggested　a　way　out　of　this　difficulty　by　declaring　that　he　had　regarded　the　two　men　themselves　as　an　incarnated　embodiment　of　dispatches。　　At　any　rate；　they　were　clearly　contraband　of　war。　　They　were　going　to　do　an　injury　to　the　North。　　It　was　pretty　to　hear　the　charming　women　of　Boston；　as　they　became　learned　in　the　law　of　nations：　〃Wheaton　is　quite　clear　about　it；〃　one　young　girl　said　to　me。　　It　was　the　first　I　had　ever　heard　of　Wheaton；　and　so　far　was　obliged　to　knock　under。　　All　the　world；　ladies　and　lawyers；　expressed　the　utmost　confidence　in　the　justice　of　the　seizure；　but　it　was　clear　that　all　the　world　was　in　a　state　of　the　profoundest　nervous　anxiety　on　the　subject。　　To　me　it　seemed　to　be　the　most　suicidal　act　that　any　party　in　a　life…and…death　struggle　ever　committed。　All　Americans　on　both　sides　had　felt；　from　the　beginning　of　the　war；　that　any　assistance　given　by　England　to　one　or　the　other　would　turn　the　scale。　　The　government　of　Mr。　Lincoln　must　have　learned　by　this　time　that　England　was　at　least　true　in　her　neutrality；　that　no　desire　for　cotton　would　compel　her　to　give　aid　to　the　South　as　long　as　she　herself　was　not　ill　treated　by　the　North。　　But　it　seemed　as　though　Mr。　Seward；　the　President's　Prime　Minister；　had　no　better　work　on　hand　than　that　of　showing　in　every　way　his　indifference　as　to　courtesy　with　England。　　Insults　offered　to　England　would；　he　seemed　to　think；　strengthen　his　hands。　　He　would　let　England　know　that　he　did　not　care　for　her。　　When　our　minister；　Lord　Lyons；　appealed　to　him　regarding　the　suspension　of　the　habeas　corpus；　Mr。　Seward　not　only　answered　him　with　insolence；　but　instantly　published　his　answer　in　the　papers。　　He　instituted　a　system　of　passports；　especially　constructed　so　as　to　incommode　Englishmen　proceeding　from　the　States　across　the　Atlantic。　　He　resolved　to　make　every　Englishman　in　America　feel　himself　in　some　way　punished；　because　England　had　not　assisted　the　North。　　And　now　came　the　arrest　of　Slidell　and　Mason　out　of　an　English　mail　steamer；　and　Mr。　Seward　took　care　to　let　it　be　understood　that；　happen　what　might；　those　two　men　should　not　be　given　up。　Nothing　during　all　this　time　astonished　me　so　much　as　the　estimation　in　which　Mr。　Seward　was　then　held　by　his　own　party。　　It　is；　perhaps；　the　worst　defect　in　the　constitution　of　the　States；　that　no　incapacity　on　the　part　of　a　minister；　no　amount　of　condemnation　expressed　against　him　by　the　people　or　by　Congress；　can　put　him　out　of　office　during　the　term　of　the　existing　Presidency。　　The　President　can　dismiss　him；　but　it　generally　happens　that　the　President　is　brought　in　on　a　〃platform〃　which　has　already　nominated　for　him　his　cabinet　as　thoroughly　as　they　have　nominated　him。　　Mr。　Seward　ran　Mr。　Lincoln　very　hard　for　the　position　of　candidate　for　the　Presidency　on　the　Republican　interest。　　On　the　second　voting　of　the　Republican　delegates　at　the　Convention　at　Chicago；　Mr。　Seward　polled　184　to　Mr。　Lincoln's　181。　But　as　a　clear　half　of　the　total　number　of　votes　was　necessary　that　is；　233　out　of　465there　was　necessarily　a　third　polling；　and　Mr。　Lincoln　won　the　day。　　On　that　occasion　Mr。　Chase　and　Mr。　Cameron；　both　of　whom　became　members　of　Mr。　Lincoln's　cabinet；　were　also　candidates　for　the　White　House　on　the　Republican　side。　　I　mention　this　here　to　show　that　though　the　President　can　in　fact　dismiss　his　ministers；　he　is　in　a　great　manner　bound　to　them；　and　that　a　minister　in　Mr。　Seward's　position　is　hardly　to　be　dismissed。　But　from　the　1st　of　November；　1861；　till　the　day　on　which　I　left　the　States；　I　do　not　think　that　I　heard　a　good　word　spoken　of　Mr。　Seward　as　a　minister；　even　by　one　of　his　own　party。　　The　Radical　or　Abolitionist　Republicans　all　abused　him。　　The　Conservative　or　Anti…　abolition　Republicans；　to　whose　party　he　would　consider　himself　as　belonging；　spoke　of　him　as　a　mistake。　　He　had　been　prominent　as　Senator　from　New　York；　and　had　been　Governor　of　the　State　of　New　York；　but　had　none　of　the　aptitudes　of　a　statesman。　　He　was　there；　and　it　was　a　pity。　　He　was　not　so　bad　as　Mr。　Cameron；　the　Minister　for　War；　that　was　the　best　his　own　party　could　say　for　him；　even　in　his　own　State　of　New　York。　　As　to　the　Democrats；　their　language　respecting　him　was　as　harsh　as　any　that　I　have　heard　used　toward　the　Southern　leaders。　　He　seemed　to　have　no　friends；　no　one　who　trusted　him；　and　yet　he　was　the　President's　chief　minister；　and　seemed　to　have　in　his　own　hands　the　power　of　mismanaging　all　foreign　relations　as　he　pleased。　　But；　in　truth；　the　States　of　America；　great　as　they　are；　and　much　as　they　have　done；　have　not　produced　statesmen。　　That　theory　of　governing　by　the　little　men　rather　than　by　the　great　has　not　been　found　to　answer；　and　such　follies　as　those　of　Mr。　Seward　have　been　the　consequence。　At　Boston；　and　indeed　elsewhere；　I　found　that　there　was　even　then　at　the　time　of　the　capture　of　these　two　menno　true　conception　of　the　neutrality　of　England　with　reference　to　the　two　parties。　　When　any　argument　was　made；　showing　that　England；　who　had　carried　these　messengers　from　the　South；　would　undoubtedly　have　also　carried　messengers　from　the　North；　the　answer　always　was〃But　the　Southerners　are　all　rebels。　　Will　England　regard　us　who　are　by　treaty　her　friend；　as　she　does　a　people　that　is　in　rebellion　against　its　own　government？〃　　That　was　the　old　story　over　again；　and　as　it　was　a　very　long　story；　it　was　hardly　of　use　to　go　back　through　all　its　details。　　But　the　fact　was　that　unless　there　had　been　such　absolute　neutralitysuch　equality　between　the　parties　in　the　eyes　of　Englandeven　Captain　Wilkes　would　not　have　thought　of　stopping　the　〃Trent；〃　or　the　government　at　Washington　of　justifying　such　a　proceeding。　　And　it　must　be　remembered　that　the　government　at　Washington　had　justified　that　proceeding。　　The　Secretary　of　the　Navy　had　distinctly　done　so　in　his　official　report；　and　that　report　had　been　submitted　to　the　President　and　published　by　his　order。　　It　was　because　England　was　neutral　between　the　North　and　South　that　Captain　Wilkes　claimed　to　have　the　right　of　seizing　those　two　men。　It　had　been　the　President's　intention；　some　month　or　so　before　this　affair；　to　send　Mr。　Everett　and　other　gentlemen　over　to　England　with　objects　as　regards　the　North　similar　to　those　which　had　caused　the　sending　of　Slidell　and　Mason　with　reference　to　the　South。　　What　would　Mr。　Everett　have　thought　had　he　been　refused　a　passage　from　Dover　to　Calais；　because　the　carrying　of　him　would　have　been　toward　the　South　a　breach　of　neutrality？　　It　would　never　have　oc