Ì«×ÓүС˵Íø > Ó¢Óïµç×ÓÊé > study of the king james bible(ÇÕÓ¡¡´Ê¥¾­¡µÑо¿) >

µÚ32½Ú

study of the king james bible(ÇÕÓ¡¡´Ê¥¾­¡µÑо¿)-µÚ32½Ú


°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡




as¡¡he¡¡has¡¡gotten¡¡farther¡¡from¡¡it£»¡¡and¡¡loyalty¡¡to¡¡it¡¡has¡¡strengthened¡¡any¡¡one¡¡

of¡¡them¡£¡¡

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Turn¡¡now¡¡to¡¡the¡¡American¡¡group¡¡of¡¡writers¡£¡¡If¡¡we¡¡except¡¡theological¡¡

writers¡¡¡¡¡¡with¡¡¡¡¡¡Jonathan¡¡¡¡¡¡Edwards£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Horace¡¡¡¡¡¡Bushnell£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Henry¡¡¡¡¡¡Ward¡¡¡¡¡¡Beecher£»¡¡

and¡¡their¡¡like£»¡¡and¡¡political¡¡writers¡¡with¡¡Jefferson£»¡¡Webster£»¡¡and¡¡their¡¡like£»¡¡

the¡¡list¡¡need¡¡not¡¡be¡¡a¡¡long¡¡one¡£¡¡Only¡¡one¡¡writer¡¡in¡¡our¡¡narrower¡¡sense¡¡of¡¡

literature¡¡¡¡¡¡must¡¡¡¡¡¡be¡¡¡¡¡¡named¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡earlier¡¡¡¡¡¡dayBenjamin¡¡¡¡¡¡Franklin¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡In¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡

period¡¡before¡¡the¡¡Civil¡¡War¡¡must¡¡be¡¡named¡¡Edgar¡¡Allan¡¡Poe¡¡£¨died¡¡1849£©¡¡

and¡¡Washington¡¡Irving¡¡£¨died¡¡1859£©¡£¡¡The¡¡Civil¡¡War¡¡group¡¡is¡¡the¡¡large¡¡one£»¡¡

and¡¡its¡¡names¡¡are¡¡those¡¡of¡¡the¡¡later¡¡group¡¡as¡¡well¡£¡¡Let¡¡them¡¡be¡¡alphabetical£»¡¡

for¡¡convenience£º¡¡William¡¡Cullen¡¡Bryant£»¡¡poet¡¡and¡¡critic£»¡¡George¡¡William¡¡

Curtis£»¡¡¡¡¡¡essayist¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡editor£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Emerson£»¡¡¡¡¡¡our¡¡¡¡¡¡noblest¡¡¡¡¡¡name¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡sphere¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡

pure¡¡essay¡¡¡¡literature£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Hawthorne£»¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡novelist¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡conscience£»¡¡¡¡¡¡as¡¡¡¡¡¡Socrates¡¡

was¡¡¡¡¡¡its¡¡¡¡¡¡philosopher£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Oliver¡¡¡¡¡¡Wendell¡¡¡¡¡¡Holmes£»¡¡¡¡¡¡whose¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨two¡¡¡¡¡¡chief¡¡¡¡¡¡hatreds¡¡

were¡¡¡¡¡¡orthodoxy¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡religion¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡heterodoxy¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡medicine¡¨£»¡¡¡¡¡¡James¡¡¡¡¡¡Russell¡¡

Lowell£»¡¡¡¡¡¡essayist¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡poet£»¡¡¡¡¡¡apt¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡live¡¡¡¡¡¡by¡¡¡¡¡¡his¡¡¡¡¡¡essays¡¡¡¡¡¡rather¡¡¡¡¡¡than¡¡¡¡¡¡by¡¡¡¡¡¡his¡¡

poetry£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Longfellow£»¡¡¡¡¡¡whose¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Psalm¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡Life¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Hiawatha¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡have¡¡¡¡¡¡lived¡¡

through¡¡as¡¡much¡¡parody¡¡and¡¡ridicule¡¡as¡¡any¡¡two¡¡bits¡¡of¡¡literature¡¡extant£»¡¡

and¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡have¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡lived¡¡¡¡¡¡because¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡they¡¡¡¡¡¡are¡¡¡¡¡¡predestined¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡live£»¡¡¡¡Thoreau£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡whose¡¡

Walden¡¡may¡¡show£»¡¡as¡¡Lowell¡¡said£»¡¡how¡¡much¡¡can¡¡be¡¡done¡¡on¡¡little¡¡capital£»¡¡

but¡¡¡¡¡¡which¡¡¡¡¡¡has¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡real¡¡¡¡¡¡literary¡¡¡¡¡¡tang¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡it£»¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡Whittier£»¡¡¡¡¡¡whose¡¡¡¡¡¡poetry¡¡¡¡¡¡is¡¡

sung¡¡the¡¡world¡¡around¡£¡¡

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡That¡¡makes¡¡only¡¡twelve¡¡names¡¡from¡¡Franklin¡¡to¡¡Whittier¡£¡¡Others¡¡could¡¡

be¡¡included£»¡¡but¡¡they¡¡are¡¡not¡¡so¡¡great¡¡as¡¡these¡£¡¡No¡¡one¡¡of¡¡these¡¡could¡¡be¡¡

taken¡¡out¡¡of¡¡our¡¡literature¡¡without¡¡affecting¡¡it¡¡and£»¡¡in¡¡some¡¡degree¡¡at¡¡least£»¡¡

changing¡¡the¡¡current¡¡of¡¡it¡£¡¡This¡¡is¡¡not¡¡to¡¡forget¡¡Bret¡¡Harte¡¡nor¡¡Samuel¡¡L¡£¡¡

Clemens¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡But¡¡¡¡¡¡each¡¡¡¡¡¡is¡¡¡¡¡¡dependent¡¡¡¡¡¡for¡¡¡¡¡¡his¡¡¡¡¡¡survival¡¡¡¡¡¡on¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡taste¡¡¡¡¡¡for¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡certain¡¡



¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡101¡¡


¡­¡¡Page¡¡102¡­

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Study¡¡of¡¡the¡¡King¡¡James¡¡Bible¡¡



kind¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡humor£»¡¡¡¡¡¡not¡¡¡¡¡¡delicate¡¡¡¡¡¡like¡¡¡¡¡¡Irving's¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡Holmes's£»¡¡¡¡¡¡but¡¡¡¡¡¡strong¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡

sudden¡¡and¡¡a¡¡bit¡¡sharp¡£¡¡If¡¡we¡¡should¡¡forget¡¡the¡¡¡¨Luck¡¡of¡¡Roaring¡¡Camp£»¡¨¡¡

¡¨Truthful¡¡¡¡¡¡James£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Heathen¡¡¡¡¡¡Chinee£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡we¡¡¡¡¡¡would¡¡¡¡¡¡also¡¡¡¡¡¡forget¡¡¡¡¡¡Bret¡¡

Harte¡£¡¡We¡¡are¡¡¡¡¡¡not¡¡apt¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡forget¡¡Tom¡¡¡¡Sawyer£»¡¡nor¡¡¡¡¡¡perhaps¡¡The¡¡¡¡¡¡Innocents¡¡

Abroad£»¡¡but¡¡we¡¡are¡¡forgetting¡¡much¡¡else¡¡of¡¡Mark¡¡Twain¡£¡¡Whitman¡¡is¡¡not¡¡

named¡£¡¡His¡¡claims¡¡are¡¡familiar£»¡¡but¡¡in¡¡spite¡¡of¡¡his¡¡admirers¡¡he¡¡seems¡¡so¡¡

charged¡¡¡¡¡¡with¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡sensuous¡¡¡¡¡¡egotism¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡he¡¡¡¡¡¡is¡¡¡¡¡¡not¡¡¡¡¡¡apt¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡be¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡formative¡¡

influence¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡literary¡¡¡¡history¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡It¡¡¡¡¡¡is¡¡¡¡¡¡still¡¡¡¡¡¡interesting£»¡¡¡¡¡¡however£»¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡remember¡¡

how¡¡frequently¡¡he¡¡reveals¡¡his¡¡reading¡¡of¡¡Scripture¡£¡¡

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Fortunately£»¡¡all¡¡these¡¡writers¡¡are¡¡so¡¡near£»¡¡and¡¡their¡¡work¡¡is¡¡so¡¡familiar£»¡¡

that¡¡details¡¡regarding¡¡them¡¡are¡¡not¡¡needed¡£¡¡Two¡¡or¡¡three¡¡general¡¡words¡¡can¡¡

be¡¡said¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡first¡¡place£»¡¡observe¡¡the¡¡high¡¡moral¡¡tone¡¡of¡¡all¡¡these¡¡first¡­¡¡

grade¡¡¡¡¡¡writers£»¡¡¡¡¡¡and£»¡¡¡¡¡¡indeed£»¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡others¡¡¡¡¡¡who¡¡¡¡¡¡may¡¡¡¡¡¡be¡¡¡¡¡¡spoken¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡as¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡

second¡¡rank¡£¡¡There¡¡is¡¡not¡¡a¡¡meretricious¡¡or¡¡humiliating¡¡book¡¡in¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡

collection¡£¡¡There¡¡is¡¡not¡¡one¡¡book¡¡which¡¡has¡¡lived¡¡in¡¡American¡¡literature¡¡

which¡¡has¡¡the¡¡tone¡¡of¡¡Fielding's¡¡Tom¡¡Jones¡£¡¡Whether¡¡it¡¡is¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Puritan¡¡

strain¡¡continues¡¡in¡¡us¡¡or¡¡not£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡true¡¡that¡¡the¡¡American¡¡literary¡¡public¡¡has¡¡

not¡¡¡¡¡¡taken¡¡¡¡¡¡happily¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡stories¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡would¡¡¡¡¡¡bring¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡blush¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡public¡¡¡¡¡¡reading¡£¡¡

Professor¡¡Richardson£»¡¡of¡¡Dartmouth£»¡¡gives¡¡some¡¡clue¡¡to¡¡the¡¡reason¡¡of¡¡that¡£¡¡

He¡¡¡¡¡¡says¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨since¡¡¡¡¡¡1870¡¡¡¡¡¡or¡¡¡¡¡¡1880¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡America¡¡¡¡¡¡there¡¡¡¡¡¡has¡¡¡¡¡¡been¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡marked¡¡

increase¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡strength¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡theistic¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡spiritual¡¡¡¡¡¡belief¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡argument¡¡¡¡¡¡among¡¡

scientific¡¡men£»¡¡students¡¡of¡¡philosophy£»¡¡religious¡¡'radicals£»'¡¡and¡¡others¡£¡¨¡¡He¡¡

adds¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡while¡¡¡¡¡¡much¡¡¡¡¡¡contemporary¡¡¡¡American¡¡¡¡¡¡literature¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡thought¡¡¡¡¡¡is¡¡

outside¡¡the¡¡accepted¡¡orthodox¡¡lines£»¡¡yet¡¡¡¨it¡¡is¡¡not¡¡hostile¡¡to¡¡Christianity£»¡¡to¡¡

the¡¡principles¡¡of¡¡its¡¡Founder¡¡it¡¡is¡¡for¡¡the¡¡most¡¡part¡¡sincerely¡¡attached¡£¡¡On¡¡

the¡¡other¡¡hand£»¡¡materialism¡¡has¡¡scarcely¡¡any¡¡hold¡¡upon¡¡it¡£¡¨¡¡Then¡¡follows¡¡a¡¡

very¡¡notable¡¡sentence¡¡which¡¡is¡¡sustained¡¡by¡¡the¡¡facts£º¡¡¡¨Not¡¡an¡¡American¡¡

book¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡first¡¡¡¡¡¡class¡¡¡¡¡¡has¡¡¡¡¡¡ever¡¡¡¡¡¡been¡¡¡¡¡¡written¡¡¡¡¡¡by¡¡¡¡¡¡an¡¡¡¡¡¡atheist¡¡¡¡¡¡or¡¡¡¡¡¡denier¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡

immortality¡£¡¨¡¡That¡¡sentence¡¡need¡¡not¡¡offend¡¡an¡¡admirer¡¡of¡¡Walt¡¡Whitman£»¡¡

for¡¡he¡¡¡¨accepts¡¡both¡¡theism¡¡and¡¡the¡¡doctrine¡¡of¡¡the¡¡future¡¡life¡£¡¨¡¡American¡¡

thought¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡has¡¡¡¡¡¡remained¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡loyal¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡great¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Trinity£»¡¡¡¡¡¡God£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Freedom£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡

Immortality¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡So¡¡¡¡¡¡it¡¡¡¡¡¡comes¡¡¡¡¡¡about¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡while¡¡¡¡¡¡there¡¡¡¡¡¡are¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡number¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡these¡¡

writers¡¡who¡¡could¡¡be¡¡put¡¡under¡¡the¡¡ban¡¡of¡¡the¡¡strongly¡¡orthodox¡¡in¡¡religion£»¡¡

every¡¡one¡¡of¡¡them¡¡shows¡¡the¡¡effect¡¡of¡¡early¡¡training¡¡in¡¡religion¡¡and¡¡in¡¡the¡¡



¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡102¡¡


¡­¡¡Page¡¡103¡­

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Study¡¡of¡¡the¡¡King¡¡James¡¡Bible¡¡



Scripture¡££§1£§¡¡

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§1£§¡¡¡¡¡¡This¡¡¡¡is¡¡¡¡fully¡¡¡¡¡¡worked¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡out¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡Professor¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Richardson's¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡American¡¡

Literature£»¡¡with¡¡ample¡¡illustration¡¡and¡¡argument¡£¡¡

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Another¡¡thing¡¡to¡¡be¡¡said¡¡is¡¡that¡¡America¡¡has¡¡a¡¡unique¡¡history¡¡among¡¡

great¡¡¡¡¡¡nations¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡it¡¡¡¡¡¡has¡¡¡¡¡¡never¡¡¡¡¡¡been¡¡¡¡¡¡affected¡¡¡¡¡¡by¡¡¡¡¡¡any¡¡¡¡¡¡great¡¡¡¡¡¡religious¡¡

influence¡¡except¡¡that¡¡which¡¡has¡¡issued¡¡from¡¡the¡¡Scriptures¡£¡¡No¡¡religion¡¡has¡¡

ever¡¡been¡¡influential¡¡in¡¡America¡¡except¡¡Christianity¡£¡¡For¡¡many¡¡years¡¡there¡¡

have¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡been¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡sporadic¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡spasmodic¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡efforts¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡extend¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡influence¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡

Buddhism¡¡or¡¡other¡¡Indian¡¡cults¡£¡¡They¡¡have¡¡never¡¡been¡¡successful£»¡¡because¡¡

the¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡American¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡spirit¡¡¡¡¡¡is¡¡¡¡practical£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡not¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡meditative¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡We¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡are¡¡¡¡¡¡not¡¡¡¡¡¡an¡¡

introspective¡¡¡¡¡¡people¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡We¡¡¡¡¡¡do¡¡¡¡¡¡not¡¡¡¡¡¡look¡¡¡¡¡¡within¡¡¡¡¡¡ourselves¡¡¡¡¡¡for¡¡¡¡¡¡our¡¡¡¡¡¡religion¡£¡¡

Whatever¡¡moral¡¡and¡¡religious¡¡influence¡¡our¡¡literature¡¡shows¡¡gets¡¡back¡¡first¡¡

or¡¡last¡¡to¡¡our¡¡Scriptures¡£¡¡The¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view¡¡of¡¡nature¡¡that¡¡is¡¡taken¡¡by¡¡our¡¡

writers¡¡like¡¡Bryant¡¡and¡¡Thoreau¡¡is¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Nineteenth¡¡Psalm¡£¡¡Moreover£»¡¡

we¡¡have¡¡been¡¡strongly¡¡under¡¡the¡¡English¡¡influence¡£¡¡Irving¡¡insisted¡¡that¡¡we¡¡

ought¡¡to¡¡be£»¡¡that¡¡we¡¡were¡¡a¡¡young¡¡nation£»¡¡that¡¡we¡¡ought¡¡frankly¡¡to¡¡follow¡¡

the¡¡¡¡¡¡leadership¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡more¡¡¡¡¡¡experienced¡¡¡¡¡¡writers¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Longfellow¡¡¡¡¡¡thought¡¡¡¡¡¡we¡¡¡¡¡¡had¡¡

gone¡¡¡¡¡¡too¡¡¡¡¡¡far¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡way£»¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡our¡¡¡¡¡¡poets£»¡¡¡¡¡¡at¡¡¡¡¡¡least£»¡¡¡¡¡¡ought¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡be¡¡¡¡¡¡more¡¡

independent£»¡¡ought¡¡to¡¡write¡¡in¡¡the¡¡spirit¡¡of¡¡America¡¡and¡¡not¡¡of¡¡traditional¡¡

poetry¡£¡¡Whether¡¡we¡¡ought¡¡to¡¡have¡¡yielded¡¡to¡¡it¡¡or¡¡not£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡true¡¡that¡¡English¡¡

influence¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡has¡¡¡¡¡¡told¡¡¡¡¡¡very¡¡¡¡¡¡strongly¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡upon¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡us£»¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡writers¡¡¡¡¡¡who¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡have¡¡

influenced¡¡¡¡¡¡our¡¡¡¡¡¡writers¡¡¡¡¡¡most¡¡¡¡¡¡have¡¡¡¡¡¡been¡¡¡¡¡¡those¡¡¡¡¡¡whom¡¡¡¡¡¡we¡¡¡¡¡¡have¡¡¡¡¡¡named¡¡¡¡¡¡as¡¡

being¡¡themselves¡¡under¡¡the¡¡Bible¡¡influence¡£¡¡

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡We¡¡need¡¡not¡¡go¡¡into¡¡detail¡¡about¡¡these¡¡writers£»¡¡though¡¡they¡¡are¡¡most¡¡

attractive¡£¡¡Bryant¡¡did¡¡for¡¡us¡¡what¡¡Wordsworth¡¡did¡¡for¡¡England¡£¡¡He¡¡made¡¡

nature¡¡¡¡¡¡seem¡¡¡¡vocal¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Thanatopsis¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡is¡¡¡¡¡¡not¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡Christian¡¡¡¡¡¡poem¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡narrow¡¡

sense¡¡of¡¡the¡¡word£»¡¡and¡¡yet¡¡it¡¡could¡¡hardly¡¡have¡¡been¡¡written¡¡except¡¡under¡¡

Christian¡¡influence¡£¡¡His¡¡own¡¡genial£»¡¡beautiful¡¡character¡¡was¡¡itself¡¡a¡¡tribute¡¡

to¡¡¡¡¡¡Christian¡¡¡¡¡¡civilization£»¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡his¡¡¡¡¡¡life£»¡¡¡¡¡¡as¡¡¡¡¡¡critic¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡essayist£»¡¡¡¡¡¡has¡¡¡¡¡¡left¡¡¡¡¡¡an¡¡

impression¡¡which¡¡we¡¡shall¡¡not¡¡soon¡¡lose¡£¡¡Professor¡¡Richardson¡¡thinks¡¡that¡¡

the¡¡¡¡¡¡three¡¡¡¡¡¡problematical¡¡¡¡¡¡characters¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡American¡¡¡¡¡¡literature¡¡¡¡¡¡are¡¡¡¡¡¡Emerson£»¡¡

Hawthorne£»¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡Poe¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡¡¡¡¡shrewdest¡¡¡¡¡¡estimate¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡Poe¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡has¡¡¡¡¡¡ever¡¡¡¡¡¡been¡¡

given¡¡us¡¡is¡¡in¡¡Lowell's¡¡Fable¡¡for¡¡Critics£º¡¡

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨There¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡comes¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Poe¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡with¡¡¡¡¡¡his¡¡¡¡¡¡raven¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡like¡¡¡¡¡¡Barnaby¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Rudge£»¡¡



¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡103¡¡


¡­¡¡Page¡¡104¡­

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Study¡¡of¡¡the¡¡King¡¡James¡¡Bible¡¡



Three¡­fifths¡¡of¡¡him¡¡genius£»¡¡and¡¡two¡­fifths¡¡sheer¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡fudge£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Who¡¡has¡¡

written¡¡¡¡¡¡some¡¡¡¡¡¡things¡¡¡¡¡¡quite¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡best¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡their¡¡¡¡¡¡kind£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡But¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡heart¡¡

somehow¡¡seems¡¡all¡¡squeezed¡¡out¡¡by¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡mind¡£¡¨¡¡

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡That¡¡says¡¡it¡¡exactly¡£¡¡Poe¡¡knew¡¡many¡¡horrible¡¡situations£»¡¡but¡¡he¡¡did¡¡not¡¡

know¡¡the¡¡way¡¡out£»¡¡and¡¡of¡¡all¡¡our¡¡American¡¡writers¡¡laying¡¡claim¡¡to¡¡place¡¡in¡¡

the¡¡first¡¡class¡¡Poe¡¡shows¡¡least¡¡influence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Bible£»¡¡and¡¡apparently¡¡needs¡¡

it¡¡most¡£¡¡

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Irving¡¡was¡¡the¡¡first¡¡American¡¡writer¡¡who¡¡stood¡¡high¡¡enough¡¡to¡¡be¡¡seen¡¡

across¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡water¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Thackeray's¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡most¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡beautiful¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡essay¡¡¡¡¡¡is¡¡¡¡on¡¡¡¡¡¡Irving¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡

Macaulay£»¡¡who¡¡died¡¡just¡¡one¡¡month¡¡apart¡£¡¡In¡¡it¡¡he¡¡describes¡¡Irving¡¡as¡¡the¡¡

best¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡intermediary¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡between¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡nations£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡telling¡¡¡¡¡¡us¡¡¡¡Americans¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡

English¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡are¡¡¡¡¡¡still¡¡¡¡human£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡assuring¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡English¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡Americans¡¡¡¡

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ