war of the classes-第18节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
rash intrepidity of the capitalists who fight the labor unions; for
by such rashness he greatly fears that labor will be driven to
express its aims and strength in political terms; which terms will
inevitably be socialistic terms。
To keep down the rising tide of socialism; he preaches greater
meekness and benevolence to the capitalists。 No longer may they
claim the right to run their own business; to beat down the
laborer's standard of living for the sake of increased profits; to
dictate terms of employment to individual workers; to wax
righteously indignant when organized labor takes a hand in their
business。 No longer may the capitalist say 〃my〃 business; or even
think 〃my〃 business; he must say 〃our〃 business; and think 〃our〃
business as well; accepting labor as a partner whose voice must be
heard。 And if the capitalists do not become more meek and
benevolent in their dealings with labor; labor will be antagonized
and will proceed to wreak terrible political vengeance; and the
present social flux will harden into a status of socialism。
Mr。 Brooks dreams of a society at which Mr。 Ghent sneers as 〃a
slightly modified individualism; wherein each unit secures the just
reward of his capacity and service。〃 To attain this happy state;
Mr。 Brooks imposes circumspection upon the capitalists in their
relations with labor。 〃If the socialistic spirit is to be held in
abeyance in this country; businesses of this character (anthracite
coal mining) must be handled with extraordinary caution。〃 Which is
to say; that to withstand the advance of socialism; a great and
greater measure of Mr。 Ghent's BENEVOLENCE will be required。
Again and again; Mr。 Brooks reiterates the danger he sees in harshly
treating labor。 〃It is not probable that employers can destroy
unionism in the United States。 Adroit and desperate attempts will;
however; be made; if we mean by unionism the undisciplined and
aggressive fact of vigorous and determined organizations。 If
capital should prove too strong in this struggle; the result is easy
to predict。 The employers have only to convince organized labor
that it cannot hold its own against the capitalist manager; and the
whole energy that now goes to the union will turn to an aggressive
political socialism。 It will not be the harmless sympathy with
increased city and state functions which trade unions already feel;
it will become a turbulent political force bent upon using every
weapon of taxation against the rich。〃
〃The most concrete impulse that now favors socialism in this country
is the insane purpose to deprive labor organizations of the full and
complete rights that go with federated unionism。〃
〃That which teaches a union that it cannot succeed as a union turns
it toward socialism。 In long strikes in towns like Marlboro and
Brookfield strong unions are defeated。 Hundreds of men leave these
towns for shoe…centres like Brockton; where they are now voting the
socialist ticket。 The socialist mayor of this city tells me; 'The
men who come to us now from towns where they have been thoroughly
whipped in a strike are among our most active working socialists。'
The bitterness engendered by this sense of defeat is turned to
politics; as it will throughout the whole country; if organization
of labor is deprived of its rights。〃
〃This enmity of capital to the trade union is watched with glee by
every intelligent socialist in our midst。 Every union that is
beaten or discouraged in its struggle is ripening fruit for
socialism。〃
〃The real peril which we now face is the threat of a class conflict。
If capitalism insists upon the policy of outraging the saving
aspiration of the American workman to raise his standard of comfort
and leisure; every element of class conflict will strengthen among
us。〃
〃We have only to humiliate what is best in the trade union; and then
every worst feature of socialism is fastened upon us。〃
This strong tendency in the ranks of the workers toward socialism is
what Mr。 Brooks characterizes the 〃social unrest〃; and he hopes to
see the Republican; the Cleveland Democrat; and the conservative and
large property interests 〃band together against this common foe;〃
which is socialism。 And he is not above feeling grave and well…
contained satisfaction wherever the socialist doctrinaire has been
contradicted by men attempting to practise cooperation in the midst
of the competitive system; as in Belgium。
Nevertheless; he catches fleeting glimpses of an extreme and
tyrannically benevolent feudalism very like to Mr。 Ghent's; as
witness the following:
〃I asked one of the largest employers of labor in the South if he
feared the coming of the trade union。 'No;' he said; 'it is one
good result of race prejudice; that the negro will enable us in the
long run to weaken the trade union so that it cannot harm us。 We
can keep wages down with the negro and we can prevent too much
organization。'
〃It is in this spirit that the lower standards are to be used。 If
this purpose should succeed; it has but one issue;the immense
strengthening of a plutocratic administration at the top; served by
an army of high…salaried helpers; with an elite of skilled and well…
paid workmen; but all resting on what would essentially be a serf
class of low…paid labor and this mass kept in order by an increased
use of military force。〃
In brief summary of these two notable books; it may be said that Mr。
Ghent is alarmed; (though he does not flatly say so); at the too
great social restfulness in the community; which is permitting the
capitalists to form the new society to their liking; and that Mr。
Brooks is alarmed; (and he flatly says so); at the social unrest
which threatens the modified individualism into which he would like
to see society evolve。 Mr。 Ghent beholds the capitalist class
rising to dominate the state and the working class; Mr。 Brooks
beholds the working class rising to dominate the state and the
capitalist class。 One fears the paternalism of a class; the other;
the tyranny of the mass。
WANTED: A NEW LAW OF DEVELOPMENT
Evolution is no longer a mere tentative hypothesis。 One by one;
step by step; each division and subdivision of science has
contributed its evidence; until now the case is complete and the
verdict rendered。 While there is still discussion as to the method
of evolution; none the less; as a process sufficient to explain all
biological phenomena; all differentiations of life into widely
diverse species; families; and even kingdoms; evolution is flatly
accepted。 Likewise has been accepted its law of development: THAT;
IN THE STRUGGLE FOR EXISTENCE; THE STRONG AND FIT AND THE PROGENY OF
THE STRONG AND FIT HAVE A BETTER OPPORTUNITY FOR SURVIVAL THAN THE
WEAK AND LESS FIT AND THE PROGENY OF THE WEAK AND LESS FIT。
It is in the struggle of the species with other species and against
all other hostile forces in the environment; that this law operates;
also in the struggle between the individuals of the same species。
In this struggle; which is for food and shelter; the weak
individuals must obviously win less food and shelter than the
strong。 Because of this; their hold on life relaxes and they are
eliminated。 And for the same reason that they may not win for
themselves adequate food and shelter; the weak cannot give to their
progeny the chance for survival that the strong give。 And thus;
since the weak are prone to beget weakness; the species is
constantly purged of its inefficient members。
Because of this; a premium is placed upon strength; and so long as
the struggle for food and shelter obtains; just so long will the
average strength of each generation increase。 On the other hand;
should conditions so change that all; and the progeny of all; the
weak as well as the strong; have an equal chance for survival; then;
at once; the average strength of each generation will begin to
diminish。 Never yet; however; in animal life; has there been such a
state of affairs。 Natural selection has always obtained。 The
strong and their progeny; at the expense of the weak; have always
survived。 This law of development has operated down all the past
upon all life; it so operates today; and it is not rash to say that
it will continue to operate in the futureat least upon all life
existing in a state of nature。
Man; preeminent though he is in the animal kingdom; capable of
reacting upon and making suitable an unsuitable environment;
nevertheless remains the creature of this same law of development。
The social selection to which he is subject is merely another form
of natural selection。 True; within certain narrow limits he
modifies the struggle for existence and renders less precarious the
tenure of life for the weak。 The extremely weak; diseased; and
inefficient are housed in hospitals and asylums。 The strength of
the vicious