letters on literature-第13节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
American books that are likely to rise in value。 I would try; were
I you; to collect first editions of Longfellow; Bryant; Whittier;
Poe; and Hawthorne。
As to Poe; you probably will never have a chance。 Outside of the
British Museum; where they have the 〃Tamerlane〃 of 1827; I have only
seen one early example of Poe's poems。 It is 〃Al Aaraaf; Tamerlane;
and Minor Poems; by Edgar A。 Poe。 Baltimore: Hatch and Dunning;
1829; 8vo; pp。 71。〃 The book 〃came to Mr。 Locker (Mr。 Frederick
Locker…Lampson); through Mr。 R。 H。 Stoddard; the American poet。〃 So
says Mr。 Locker…Lampson's Catalogue。 He also has the New York
edition of 1831。
These books are extraordinarily rare; you are more likely to find
them in some collection of twopenny rubbish than to buy them in the
regular market。 Bryant's 〃Poems〃 (Cambridge; 1821) must also be
very rare; and Emerson's of 1847; and Dr。 Oliver Wendell Holmes's of
1836; and Longfellow's 〃Voices of the Night;〃 1839; and Mr。 Lowell's
〃A Year's Life;〃 none of these can be common; and all are desirable;
as are Mr。 Whittier's 〃Legends of New England (1831); and 〃Poems〃
(1838)。
Perhaps you may never be lucky enough to come across them cheap; no
doubt they are greatly sought for by amateurs。 Indeed; all American
books of a certain age or of a special interest are exorbitantly
dear。 Men like Mr。 James Lenox used to keep the market up。 One
cannot get the Jesuit 〃Relations〃shabby little missionary reports
from Canada; in dirty vellum。
Cartier; Perrot; Champlain; and the other early explorers' books are
beyond the means of a working student who needs them。 May you come
across them in a garret of a farmhouse; or in some dusty lane of the
city。 Why are they not reprinted; as Mr。 Arber has reprinted
〃Captain John Smith's Voyages; and Reports on Virginia〃? The very
reprints; when they have been made; are rare and hard to come by。
There are certain modern books; new books; that 〃go up〃 rapidly in
value and interest。 Mr。 Swinburne's 〃Atalanta〃 of 1865; the quarto
in white cloth; is valued at twenty dollars。 Twenty years ago one
dollar would have purchased it。 Mr。 Austin Dobson's 〃Proverbs in
Porcelain〃 is also in demand among the curious。 Nay; even I may say
about the first edition of 〃Ballades in Blue China〃 (1880); as
Gibbon said of his 〃Essay on the Study of Literature:〃 〃The
primitive value of half a crown has risen to the fanciful price of a
guinea or thirty shillings;〃 or even more。 I wish I had a copy
myself; for old sake's sake。
Certain modern books; 〃on large paper;〃 are safe investments。 The
〃Badminton Library;〃 an English series of books on sport; is at a
huge premium already; when on 〃large paper。〃 But one should never
buy the book unless; as in the case of Dr。 John Hill Burton's 〃Book…
Hunter〃 (first edition); it is not only on large paper; and not only
rare (twenty…five copies); but also readable and interesting。 {7} A
collector should have the taste to see when a new book is in itself
valuable and charming; and when its author is likely to succeed; so
that his early attempts (as in the case of Mr。 Matthew Arnold; Lord
Tennyson; and a few others of the moderns) are certain to become
things of curious interest。
You can hardly ever get a novel of Jane Austen's in the first
edition。 She is rarer than Fielding or Smollett。 Some day it may
be the same in Miss Broughton's case。 Cling to the fair and witty
Jane; if you get a chance。 Beware of illustrated modern books in
which 〃processes〃 are employed。 Amateurs will never really value
mechanical reproductions; which can be copied to any extent。 The
old French copper…plate engravings and the best English mezzo…tints
are so valuable because good impressions are necessarily so rare。
One more piece of advice。 Never (or 〃hardly ever〃) buy an imperfect
book。 It is a constant source of regret; an eyesore。 Here have I
Lovelace's 〃Lucasta;〃 1649; without the engraving。 It is
deplorable; but I never had a chance of another 〃Lucasta。〃 This is
not a case of invenies aliam。 However you fare; you will have the
pleasure of Hope and the consolation of books quietem inveniendam in
abditis recessibus et libellulis。
ROCHEFOUCAULD
To the Lady Violet Lebas。
Dear Lady Violet;I am not sure that I agree with you in your
admiration of Rochefoucauldof the Reflexions; ou Sentences et
Maximes Morales; I mean。 At least; I hardly agree when I have read
many of them at a stretch。 It is not fair to read them in that way;
of course; for there are more than five hundred pensees; and so much
esprit becomes fatiguing。 I doubt if people study them much。 Five
or six of them have become known even to writers in the newspapers;
and we all copy them from each other。
Rochefoucauld says that a man may be too dull to be duped by a very
clever person。 He himself was so clever that he was often duped;
first by the general honest dulness of mankind; and then by his own
acuteness。 He thought he saw more than he did see; and he said even
more than he thought he saw。 If the true motive of all our actions
is self…love; or vanity; no man is a better proof of the truth than
the great maxim…maker。 His self…love took the shape of a brilliancy
that is sometimes false。 He is tricked out in paste for diamonds;
now and then; like a vain; provincial beauty at a ball。 〃A clever
man would frequently be much at a loss;〃 he says; 〃in stupid
company。〃 One has seen this embarrassment of a wit in a company of
dullards。 It is Rochefoucauld's own position in this world of men
and women。 We are all; in the mass; dullards compared with his
cleverness; and so he fails to understand us; is much at a loss
among us。 〃People only praise others in hopes of being praised in
turn;〃 he says。 Mankind is not such a company of 〃log…rollers〃 as
he avers。
There is more truth in a line of Tennyson's about
〃The praise of those we love;
Dearer to true young hearts than their own praise。〃
I venture to think we need not be young to prefer to hear the praise
of others rather than our own。 It is not embarrassing in the first
place; as all praise of ourselves must be。 I doubt if any man or
woman can flatter so discreetly as not to make us uncomfortable。
Besides; if our own performances be lauded; we are uneasy as to
whether the honour is deserved。 An artist has usually his own
doubts about his own doings; or rather he has his own certainties。
About our friends' work we need have no such misgivings。 And our
self…love is more delicately caressed by the success of our friends
than by our own。 It is still self…love; but it is filtered; so to
speak; through our affection for another。
What are human motives; according to Rochefoucauld? Temperament;
vanity; fear; indolence; self…love; and a grain of natural
perversity; which somehow delights in evil for itself。 He neglects
that other element; a grain of natural worth; which somehow delights
in good for itself。 This taste; I think; is quite as innate; and as
active in us; as that other taste for evil which causes there to be
something not wholly displeasing in the misfortunes of our friends。
There is a story which always appears to me a touching proof of this
grain of goodness; as involuntary; as fatal as its opposite。 I do
not remember in what book of travels I found this trait of native
excellence。 The black fellows of Australia are very fond of sugar;
and no wonder; if it be true that it has on them an intoxicating
effect。 Well; a certain black fellow had a small parcel of brown
sugar which was pilfered from his lair in the camp。 He detected the
thief; who was condemned to be punished according to tribal law;
that is to say; the injured man was allowed to have a whack at his
enemy's head with a waddy; a short club of heavy hard wood。 The
whack was duly given; and then the black who had suffered the loss
threw down his club; burst into tears; embraced the thief and
displayed every sign of a lively regret for his revenge。
That seems to me an example of the human touch that Rochefoucauld
never allows for; the natural goodness; pity; kindness; which can
assert itself in contempt of the love of self; and the love of
revenge。 This is that true clemency which is a real virtue; and not
〃the child of Vanity; Fear; Indolence; or of all three together。〃
Nor is it so true that 〃we have all fortitude enough to endure the
misfortunes of others。〃 Everybody has witnessed another's grief
that came as near him as his own。
How much more true; and how greatly poetical is that famous maxim:
〃Death and the Sun are two things not to be looked on with a steady
eye。〃 This version is from the earliest English translation of
1698。 The Maximes were first published in Paris in 1665。 {8} 〃Our
tardy apish nation〃 took thirty…three years in finding them out and
appropriating