Ì«×ÓүС˵Íø > Ó¢Óïµç×ÓÊé > the sequel of appomattox >

µÚ22½Ú

the sequel of appomattox-µÚ22½Ú

С˵£º the sequel of appomattox ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



ourt¡¡declared¡¡invalid£»¡¡because¡¡ex¡¡post¡¡facto£»¡¡the¡¡state¡¡laws¡¡designed¡¡to¡¡punish¡¡former¡¡Confederates¡£

But¡¡the¡¡first¡¡attempts¡¡to¡¡get¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡acts¡¡before¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court¡¡failed¡£¡¡The¡¡State¡¡of¡¡Mississippi£»¡¡in¡¡April¡¡1867£»¡¡brought¡¡suit¡¡to¡¡restrain¡¡the¡¡President¡¡from¡¡executing¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡acts¡£¡¡The¡¡Court¡¡refused¡¡to¡¡interfere¡¡with¡¡the¡¡executive¡£¡¡A¡¡similar¡¡suit¡¡was¡¡then¡¡brought¡¡against¡¡Secretary¡¡Stanton¡¡by¡¡Georgia¡¡with¡¡a¡¡like¡¡result¡£¡¡But¡¡in¡¡1868£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡ex¡¡parte¡¡McCardle£»¡¡it¡¡appeared¡¡that¡¡the¡¡question¡¡of¡¡the¡¡constitutionality¡¡of¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡acts¡¡would¡¡be¡¡passed¡¡upon¡£¡¡McCardle£»¡¡a¡¡Mississippi¡¡editor¡¡arrested¡¡for¡¡opposition¡¡to¡¡reconstruction¡¡and¡¡convicted¡¡by¡¡military¡¡commission£»¡¡appealed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court£»¡¡which¡¡asserted¡¡its¡¡jurisdiction¡£¡¡But¡¡the¡¡radicals¡¡in¡¡alarm¡¡rushed¡¡through¡¡Congress¡¡an¡¡act¡¡£¨March¡¡27£»¡¡1868£©¡¡which¡¡took¡¡away¡¡from¡¡the¡¡Court¡¡its¡¡jurisdiction¡¡in¡¡cases¡¡arising¡¡under¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡acts¡£¡¡The¡¡highest¡¡court¡¡was¡¡thus¡¡silenced¡£

The¡¡attempt¡¡to¡¡remove¡¡the¡¡President¡¡from¡¡office¡¡was¡¡the¡¡only¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radical¡¡program¡¡that¡¡failed£»¡¡and¡¡this¡¡by¡¡the¡¡narrowest¡¡of¡¡margins¡£¡¡During¡¡the¡¡spring¡¡and¡¡summer¡¡of¡¡1866£»¡¡there¡¡was¡¡some¡¡talk¡¡among¡¡politicians¡¡of¡¡impeaching¡¡President¡¡Johnson£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡December¡¡a¡¡resolution¡¡was¡¡introduced¡¡by¡¡Representative¡¡Ashley¡¡of¡¡Ohio¡¡looking¡¡toward¡¡impeachment¡£¡¡Though¡¡the¡¡committee¡¡charged¡¡with¡¡the¡¡investigation¡¡of¡¡¡¨the¡¡official¡¡conduct¡¡of¡¡Andrew¡¡Johnson¡¨¡¡reported¡¡that¡¡enough¡¡testimony¡¡had¡¡been¡¡taken¡¡to¡¡justify¡¡further¡¡inquiry£»¡¡the¡¡House¡¡took¡¡no¡¡action¡£¡¡There¡¡were¡¡no¡¡less¡¡than¡¡five¡¡attempts¡¡at¡¡impeachment¡¡during¡¡the¡¡next¡¡year¡£¡¡Stevens£»¡¡Butler£»¡¡and¡¡others¡¡were¡¡anxious¡¡to¡¡get¡¡the¡¡President¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡way£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡majority¡¡were¡¡as¡¡yet¡¡unwilling¡¡to¡¡impeach¡¡for¡¡merely¡¡political¡¡reasons¡£¡¡There¡¡were¡¡some¡¡who¡¡thought¡¡that¡¡the¡¡radicals¡¡had¡¡sufficient¡¡majorities¡¡to¡¡ensure¡¡all¡¡needed¡¡legislation¡¡and¡¡did¡¡not¡¡relish¡¡the¡¡thought¡¡of¡¡Ben¡¡Wade¡¡in¡¡the¡¡presidency¡£*¡¡Others¡¡considered¡¡that¡¡no¡¡just¡¡grounds¡¡for¡¡action¡¡had¡¡been¡¡found¡¡in¡¡the¡¡several¡¡investigations¡¡of¡¡Johnson's¡¡record¡£¡¡Besides£»¡¡the¡¡President's¡¡authority¡¡and¡¡influence¡¡had¡¡been¡¡much¡¡curtailed¡¡by¡¡the¡¡legislation¡¡relating¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Freedmen's¡¡Bureau£»¡¡tenure¡¡of¡¡office£»¡¡reconstruction£»¡¡and¡¡command¡¡of¡¡the¡¡army£»¡¡and¡¡Congress¡¡had¡¡also¡¡refused¡¡to¡¡recognize¡¡his¡¡amnesty¡¡and¡¡pardoning¡¡powers¡£

*¡¡Senator¡¡Wade¡¡of¡¡Ohio¡¡was¡¡President¡¡pro¡¡tempore¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Senate¡¡and¡¡by¡¡the¡¡act¡¡of¡¡1791¡¡would¡¡succeed¡¡President¡¡Johnson¡¡if¡¡he¡¡were¡¡removed¡¡from¡¡office¡£

But¡¡the¡¡desire¡¡to¡¡impeach¡¡the¡¡President¡¡was¡¡increasing¡¡in¡¡power£»¡¡and¡¡very¡¡little¡¡was¡¡needed¡¡to¡¡provoke¡¡a¡¡trial¡¡of¡¡strength¡¡between¡¡the¡¡radicals¡¡and¡¡the¡¡President¡£¡¡The¡¡drift¡¡toward¡¡impeachment¡¡was¡¡due¡¡in¡¡part¡¡to¡¡the¡¡legislative¡¡reaction¡¡against¡¡the¡¡executive£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡part¡¡to¡¡Johnson's¡¡own¡¡opposition¡¡to¡¡reconstruction¡¡and¡¡to¡¡his¡¡use¡¡of¡¡the¡¡patronage¡¡against¡¡the¡¡radicals¡£¡¡Specific¡¡grievances¡¡were¡¡found¡¡in¡¡his¡¡vetoes¡¡of¡¡the¡¡various¡¡reconstruction¡¡bills£»¡¡in¡¡his¡¡criticisms¡¡of¡¡Congress¡¡and¡¡the¡¡radical¡¡leaders£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡the¡¡fact£»¡¡as¡¡Stevens¡¡asserted£»¡¡that¡¡he¡¡was¡¡a¡¡¡¨radical¡¡renegade¡£¡¨¡¡Johnson¡¡was¡¡a¡¡Southern¡¡man£»¡¡an¡¡old¡­line¡¡State¡¡Rights¡¡Democrat£»¡¡somewhat¡¡anti¡­Negro¡¡in¡¡feeling¡£¡¡He¡¡knew¡¡no¡¡book¡¡except¡¡the¡¡Constitution£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡he¡¡loved¡¡with¡¡all¡¡his¡¡soul¡£¡¡Sure¡¡of¡¡the¡¡correctness¡¡of¡¡his¡¡position£»¡¡he¡¡was¡¡too¡¡stubborn¡¡to¡¡change¡¡or¡¡to¡¡compromise¡£¡¡He¡¡was¡¡no¡¡more¡¡to¡¡be¡¡moved¡¡than¡¡Stevens¡¡or¡¡Sumner¡£¡¡To¡¡overcome¡¡Johnson's¡¡vetoes¡¡required¡¡two¡­thirds¡¡of¡¡each¡¡House¡¡of¡¡Congress£»¡¡to¡¡impeach¡¡and¡¡remove¡¡him¡¡would¡¡require¡¡only¡¡a¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡the¡¡House¡¡and¡¡two¡­thirds¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Senate¡£

The¡¡desired¡¡occasion¡¡for¡¡impeachment¡¡was¡¡furnished¡¡by¡¡Johnson's¡¡attempt¡¡to¡¡get¡¡Edwin¡¡M¡£¡¡Stanton£»¡¡the¡¡Secretary¡¡of¡¡War£»¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Cabinet¡£¡¡Stanton¡¡held¡¡radical¡¡views¡¡and¡¡was¡¡at¡¡no¡¡time¡¡sympathetic¡¡with¡¡or¡¡loyal¡¡to¡¡Johnson£»¡¡but¡¡he¡¡loved¡¡office¡¡too¡¡well¡¡to¡¡resign¡¡along¡¡with¡¡those¡¡cabinet¡¡members¡¡who¡¡could¡¡not¡¡follow¡¡the¡¡President¡¡in¡¡his¡¡struggle¡¡with¡¡Congress¡£¡¡He¡¡was¡¡seldom¡¡frank¡¡and¡¡sincere¡¡in¡¡his¡¡dealings¡¡with¡¡the¡¡President£»¡¡and¡¡kept¡¡up¡¡an¡¡underhand¡¡correspondence¡¡with¡¡the¡¡radical¡¡leaders£»¡¡even¡¡assisting¡¡in¡¡framing¡¡some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡legislation¡¡which¡¡was¡¡designed¡¡to¡¡render¡¡Johnson¡¡powerless¡£¡¡In¡¡him¡¡the¡¡radicals¡¡had¡¡a¡¡representative¡¡within¡¡the¡¡President's¡¡Cabinet¡£


Wearied¡¡of¡¡Stanton's¡¡disloyalty£»¡¡Johnson¡¡asked¡¡him¡¡to¡¡resign¡¡and£»¡¡upon¡¡a¡¡refusal£»¡¡suspended¡¡him¡¡in¡¡August¡¡1867£»¡¡and¡¡placed¡¡General¡¡Grant¡¡in¡¡temporary¡¡charge¡¡of¡¡the¡¡War¡¡Department¡£¡¡General¡¡Grant£»¡¡Chief¡¡Justice¡¡Chase£»¡¡and¡¡Secretary¡¡McCulloch£»¡¡though¡¡they¡¡all¡¡disliked¡¡Stanton£»¡¡advised¡¡the¡¡President¡¡against¡¡suspending¡¡him¡£¡¡But¡¡Johnson¡¡was¡¡determined¡£¡¡About¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡he¡¡exercised¡¡his¡¡power¡¡in¡¡removing¡¡Sheridan¡¡and¡¡Sickles¡¡from¡¡their¡¡commands¡¡in¡¡the¡¡South¡¡and¡¡replaced¡¡them¡¡with¡¡Hancock¡¡and¡¡Canby¡£¡¡The¡¡radicals¡¡were¡¡furious£»¡¡but¡¡Johnson¡¡had¡¡secured¡¡at¡¡least¡¡the¡¡support¡¡of¡¡a¡¡loyal¡¡Cabinet¡£

The¡¡suspension¡¡of¡¡Stanton¡¡was¡¡reported¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Senate¡¡in¡¡December¡¡1867£»¡¡and¡¡on¡¡January¡¡13£»¡¡1868£»¡¡the¡¡Senate¡¡voted¡¡not¡¡to¡¡concur¡¡in¡¡the¡¡President's¡¡action¡£¡¡Upon¡¡receiving¡¡notice¡¡of¡¡the¡¡vote¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Senate£»¡¡Grant¡¡at¡¡once¡¡left¡¡the¡¡War¡¡Department¡¡and¡¡Stanton¡¡again¡¡took¡¡possession¡£¡¡Johnson¡¡now¡¡charged¡¡Grant¡¡with¡¡failing¡¡to¡¡keep¡¡a¡¡promise¡¡either¡¡to¡¡hold¡¡on¡¡himself¡¡or¡¡to¡¡make¡¡it¡¡possible¡¡to¡¡appoint¡¡some¡¡one¡¡else¡¡who¡¡would¡¡hold¡¡on¡¡until¡¡the¡¡matter¡¡might¡¡be¡¡brought¡¡into¡¡the¡¡courts¡£¡¡The¡¡President¡¡by¡¡this¡¡accusation¡¡angered¡¡Grant¡¡and¡¡threw¡¡him¡¡with¡¡his¡¡great¡¡influence¡¡into¡¡the¡¡arms¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radicals¡£¡¡Against¡¡the¡¡advice¡¡of¡¡his¡¡leading¡¡counselors£»¡¡Johnson¡¡persisted¡¡in¡¡his¡¡intention¡¡to¡¡keep¡¡Stanton¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Cabinet¡£¡¡Accordingly¡¡on¡¡the¡¡21st¡¡of¡¡February¡¡he¡¡dismissed¡¡Stanton¡¡from¡¡office¡¡and¡¡appointed¡¡Lorenzo¡¡Thomas£»¡¡the¡¡Adjutant¡¡General£»¡¡as¡¡acting¡¡Secretary¡¡of¡¡War¡£¡¡Stanton£»¡¡advised¡¡by¡¡the¡¡radicals¡¡in¡¡Congress¡¡to¡¡¡¨stick£»¡¨¡¡refused¡¡to¡¡yield¡¡possession¡¡to¡¡Thomas¡¡and¡¡had¡¡him¡¡arrested¡¡for¡¡violation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Tenure¡¡of¡¡Office¡¡Act¡£¡¡The¡¡matter¡¡now¡¡was¡¡in¡¡the¡¡courts¡¡where¡¡Johnson¡¡wanted¡¡it£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡radical¡¡leaders£»¡¡fearing¡¡that¡¡the¡¡courts¡¡would¡¡decide¡¡against¡¡Stanton¡¡and¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡acts£»¡¡had¡¡the¡¡charges¡¡against¡¡Thomas¡¡withdrawn¡£¡¡Thus¡¡failed¡¡the¡¡last¡¡attempt¡¡to¡¡get¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡laws¡¡before¡¡the¡¡courts¡£¡¡On¡¡the¡¡22nd¡¡of¡¡February£»¡¡the¡¡President¡¡sent¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Senate¡¡the¡¡name¡¡of¡¡Thomas¡¡Ewing£»¡¡General¡¡Sherman's¡¡father¡­in¡­law£»¡¡as¡¡Secretary¡¡of¡¡War£»¡¡but¡¡no¡¡attention¡¡was¡¡paid¡¡to¡¡the¡¡nomination¡£

On¡¡February¡¡24£»¡¡1868£»¡¡the¡¡House¡¡voted£»¡¡128¡¡to¡¡47£»¡¡to¡¡impeach¡¡the¡¡President¡¡¡¨of¡¡high¡¡crimes¡¡and¡¡misdemeanors¡¡in¡¡office¡£¡¨¡¡The¡¡Senate¡¡was¡¡formally¡¡notified¡¡the¡¡next¡¡day£»¡¡and¡¡on¡¡the¡¡4th¡¡of¡¡March¡¡the¡¡seven¡¡managers¡¡selected¡¡by¡¡the¡¡House¡¡appeared¡¡before¡¡the¡¡Senate¡¡with¡¡the¡¡eleven¡¡articles¡¡of¡¡impeachment¡£¡¡At¡¡first¡¡it¡¡seemed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡public¡¡that¡¡the¡¡impeachment¡¡proceedings¡¡were¡¡merely¡¡the¡¡culmination¡¡of¡¡a¡¡struggle¡¡for¡¡the¡¡control¡¡of¡¡the¡¡army¡£¡¡There¡¡were¡¡rumors¡¡that¡¡Johnson¡¡had¡¡plans¡¡to¡¡use¡¡the¡¡army¡¡against¡¡Congress¡¡and¡¡against¡¡reconstruction¡£¡¡General¡¡Grant£»¡¡directed¡¡by¡¡Johnson¡¡to¡¡accept¡¡orders¡¡from¡¡Stanton¡¡only¡¡if¡¡he¡¡were¡¡satisfied¡¡that¡¡they¡¡came¡¡from¡¡the¡¡President£»¡¡refused¡¡to¡¡follow¡¡these¡¡instructions¡£¡¡Stanton£»¡¡professing¡¡to¡¡fear¡¡violence£»¡¡barricaded¡¡himself¡¡in¡¡the¡¡War¡¡Department¡¡and¡¡was¡¡furnished¡¡with¡¡a¡¡guard¡¡of¡¡soldiers¡¡by¡¡General¡¡Grant£»¡¡who¡¡from¡¡this¡¡time¡¡used¡¡his¡¡influence¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡impeachment¡£¡¡Excited¡¡by¡¡the¡¡most¡¡sensational¡¡rumors£»¡¡some¡¡people¡¡even¡¡believed¡¡a¡¡new¡¡rebellion¡¡to¡¡be¡¡imminent¡£

The¡¡impeachment¡¡was¡¡rushed¡¡to¡¡trial¡¡by¡¡the¡¡House¡¡managers¡¡and¡¡was¡¡not¡¡ended¡¡until¡¡the¡¡decision¡¡was¡¡taken¡¡by¡¡the¡¡votes¡¡of¡¡the¡¡16th¡¡and¡¡26th¡¡of¡¡May¡£¡¡The¡¡eleven¡¡articles¡¡of¡¡impeachment¡¡consisted¡¡of¡¡summaries¡¡of¡¡all¡¡that¡¡had¡¡been¡¡charged¡¡against¡¡Johnson£»¡¡except¡¡the¡¡charge¡¡that¡¡he¡¡had¡¡been¡¡an¡¡accomplice¡¡in¡¡the¡¡murder¡¡of¡¡Lincoln¡£¡¡The¡¡only¡¡one¡¡which¡¡had¡¡any¡¡real¡¡basis¡¡was¡¡the¡¡first£»¡¡which¡¡asserted¡¡that¡¡he¡¡had¡¡violated¡¡the¡¡Tenure¡¡of¡¡Office¡¡Act¡¡in¡¡trying¡¡to¡¡remove¡¡Stanton¡£¡¡The¡¡other¡¡articles¡¡were¡¡merely¡¡expansions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡first¡¡or¡¡were¡¡based¡¡upon¡¡Johnson's¡¡opposition¡¡to¡¡reconstruction¡¡or¡¡upon¡¡his¡¡speeches¡¡in¡¡criticism¡¡of¡¡Congress¡£¡¡Nothing¡¡could¡¡be¡¡said¡¡about¡¡his¡¡control¡¡of¡¡the¡¡patronage£»¡¡though¡¡this¡¡was¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡unwritten¡¡charges¡£¡¡J¡£¡¡W¡£¡¡Schuckers£»¡¡in¡¡his¡¡life¡¡of¡¡Chase£»¡¡says¡¡that¡¡the¡¡radical¡¡leaders¡¡¡¨felt¡¡the¡¡vast¡¡importance¡¡of¡¡the¡¡presidential¡¡patronage£»¡¡many¡¡of¡¡them¡¡felt£»¡¡too£»¡¡that£»¡¡according¡¡to¡¡the¡¡maxim¡¡that¡¡to¡¡the¡¡victors¡¡belong¡¡the¡¡spoils£»¡¡the¡¡Republican¡¡party¡¡was¡¡rightfully¡¡entitled¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Federal¡¡patronage£»¡¡and¡¡they¡¡determined¡¡to¡¡get¡¡possession¡¡of¡¡it¡£¡¡There¡¡was¡¡but¡¡one¡¡method¡¡and¡¡that¡¡was¡¡by¡¡impeachment¡¡and¡¡removal¡¡of¡¡the¡¡President¡£¡¨

The¡¡leading¡¡House¡¡managers¡¡were¡¡Stevens£»¡¡Butler£»¡¡Bingham£»¡¡and¡¡Boutwell£»¡¡all¡¡better¡¡known¡¡as¡¡politicians¡¡than¡¡as¡¡lawyers¡£¡¡The¡¡President¡¡was¡¡represented¡¡by¡¡an¡¡abler¡¡legal¡¡array£º¡¡Curtis£»¡¡Evarts£»¡¡Stanbery£»¡¡Nelson£»¡¡and¡¡Groesbeck¡£¡¡Jeremiah¡¡Black¡¡was¡¡at¡¡first¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡counsel¡¡for¡¡the¡¡President¡¡but¡¡withdrew¡¡under¡¡conditions¡¡not¡¡entirely¡¡creditable¡¡to¡¡himself¡£

The¡¡trial¡¡was¡¡a¡¡one¡­sided¡¡affair¡£¡¡The¡¡President's¡¡counsel¡¡were¡¡refused¡¡more¡¡than¡¡six¡¡days¡¡for¡¡the¡¡preparation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡case¡£¡¡Chief¡¡Justice¡¡Chase£»¡¡who¡¡presided¡¡over¡¡the¡¡trial£»¡¡insisted¡¡upon¡¡regarding¡¡the¡¡Senate¡¡as¡¡a¡¡judicial¡¡and¡¡not¡¡a¡¡political¡¡body£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡accordingly¡¡ruled¡¡that¡¡only¡¡legal¡¡evidence¡¡should¡¡be¡¡admitted£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡Senate¡¡majority¡¡preferred¡¡to¡¡assume¡¡that¡¡they¡¡were¡¡settling¡¡a¡¡political¡¡question¡£¡¡Much¡¡evidence¡¡favorable¡¡to¡¡the¡¡President¡¡was¡¡excluded£»¡¡but¡¡everything¡¡els

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ