the sequel of appomattox-µÚ21½Ú
°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
¡¡continued¡¡until¡¡October¡¡1£»¡¡1867£»¡¡and¡¡an¡¡active¡¡campaign¡¡of¡¡education¡¡and¡¡organization¡¡carried¡¡on¡£
At¡¡the¡¡close¡¡of¡¡the¡¡registration£»¡¡703£»000¡¡black¡¡voters¡¡were¡¡on¡¡the¡¡rolls¡¡and¡¡627£»000¡¡whites¡£¡¡In¡¡Alabama£»¡¡Louisiana£»¡¡South¡¡Carolina£»¡¡Florida£»¡¡and¡¡Mississippi¡¡there¡¡were¡¡black¡¡majorities£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡the¡¡other¡¡States¡¡the¡¡blacks¡¡and¡¡the¡¡radical¡¡whites¡¡together¡¡formed¡¡majorities¡£¡¡The¡¡white¡¡minorities¡¡included¡¡several¡¡thousand¡¡who¡¡had¡¡been¡¡rejected¡¡by¡¡the¡¡registrars¡¡but¡¡restored¡¡by¡¡the¡¡military¡¡commanders¡£¡¡Though¡¡large¡¡numbers¡¡of¡¡blacks¡¡were¡¡dropped¡¡from¡¡the¡¡revised¡¡rolls¡¡as¡¡fraudulently¡¡registered£»¡¡the¡¡registration¡¡statistics£»¡¡nevertheless£»¡¡bore¡¡clear¡¡witness¡¡to¡¡the¡¡political¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡those¡¡who¡¡compiled¡¡them¡£
Next¡¡followed¡¡a¡¡vote¡¡on¡¡the¡¡question¡¡of¡¡holding¡¡a¡¡state¡¡convention¡¡and¡¡the¡¡election¡¡of¡¡delegates¡¡to¡¡such¡¡a¡¡convention¡¡if¡¡helda¡¡double¡¡election¡£¡¡The¡¡whites£»¡¡who¡¡had¡¡been¡¡harassed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡registration¡¡and¡¡who¡¡feared¡¡race¡¡conflicts¡¡at¡¡the¡¡elections£»¡¡considered¡¡whether¡¡they¡¡ought¡¡not¡¡to¡¡abstain¡¡from¡¡voting¡£¡¡By¡¡staying¡¡away¡¡from¡¡the¡¡polls£»¡¡they¡¡might¡¡bring¡¡the¡¡vote¡¡cast¡¡in¡¡each¡¡State¡¡below¡¡a¡¡majority¡¡and¡¡thus¡¡defeat¡¡the¡¡proposed¡¡conventions¡¡for£»¡¡unless¡¡a¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡the¡¡registered¡¡voters¡¡actually¡¡cast¡¡ballots¡¡either¡¡for¡¡or¡¡against¡¡a¡¡convention£»¡¡no¡¡convention¡¡could¡¡be¡¡held¡£¡¡Nowhere£»¡¡however£»¡¡was¡¡this¡¡plan¡¡of¡¡not¡¡voting¡¡fully¡¡carried¡¡out£»¡¡for£»¡¡though¡¡most¡¡whites¡¡abstained£»¡¡enough¡¡of¡¡them¡¡voted¡¡£¨against¡¡the¡¡conventions£»¡¡of¡¡course£©¡¡to¡¡make¡¡the¡¡necessary¡¡majority¡¡in¡¡each¡¡State¡£¡¡The¡¡effect¡¡of¡¡the¡¡abstention¡¡policy¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡personnel¡¡of¡¡the¡¡conventions¡¡was¡¡unfortunate¡£¡¡In¡¡every¡¡convention¡¡there¡¡was¡¡a¡¡radical¡¡majority¡¡with¡¡a¡¡conservative¡¡and¡¡all¡¡but¡¡negligible¡¡minority¡£¡¡In¡¡South¡¡Carolina¡¡and¡¡Louisiana£»¡¡there¡¡were¡¡Negro¡¡majorities¡£¡¡In¡¡every¡¡State¡¡except¡¡North¡¡Carolina£»¡¡Texas£»¡¡and¡¡Virginia£»¡¡the¡¡Negroes¡¡and¡¡the¡¡carpetbaggers¡¡together¡¡were¡¡in¡¡the¡¡majority¡¡over¡¡native¡¡whites¡£
The¡¡conservative¡¡whites¡¡were¡¡of¡¡fair¡¡ability£»¡¡the¡¡carpetbaggers¡¡and¡¡scalawags¡¡produced¡¡in¡¡each¡¡convention¡¡a¡¡few¡¡able¡¡leaders£»¡¡but¡¡most¡¡of¡¡them¡¡were¡¡conscienceless¡¡political¡¡soldiers¡¡of¡¡fortune£»¡¡the¡¡Negro¡¡members¡¡were¡¡inexperienced£»¡¡and¡¡most¡¡of¡¡them¡¡were¡¡quite¡¡ignorant£»¡¡though¡¡a¡¡few¡¡leaders¡¡of¡¡ability¡¡did¡¡appear¡¡among¡¡them¡£¡¡In¡¡Alabama£»¡¡for¡¡example£»¡¡only¡¡two¡¡Negro¡¡members¡¡could¡¡write£»¡¡though¡¡half¡¡had¡¡been¡¡taught¡¡to¡¡sign¡¡their¡¡names¡£¡¡They¡¡were¡¡barbers£»¡¡field¡¡hands£»¡¡hack¡¡drivers£»¡¡and¡¡servants¡£¡¡A¡¡Negro¡¡chaplain¡¡was¡¡elected¡¡who¡¡invoked¡¡divine¡¡blessings¡¡on¡¡¡¨unioners¡¡and¡¡cusses¡¡on¡¡rebels¡£¡¨¡¡It¡¡was¡¡a¡¡sign¡¡of¡¡the¡¡new¡¡era¡¡when¡¡the¡¡convention¡¡specially¡¡invited¡¡the¡¡¡¨ladies¡¡of¡¡colored¡¡members¡¨¡¡to¡¡seats¡¡in¡¡the¡¡gallery¡£
The¡¡work¡¡of¡¡the¡¡conventions¡¡was¡¡for¡¡the¡¡most¡¡part¡¡cut¡¡and¡¡dried£»¡¡the¡¡abler¡¡members¡¡having¡¡reached¡¡a¡¡general¡¡agreement¡¡before¡¡they¡¡met¡£¡¡The¡¡constitutions£»¡¡mosaics¡¡of¡¡those¡¡of¡¡other¡¡states£»¡¡were¡¡noteworthy¡¡only¡¡for¡¡the¡¡provisions¡¡made¡¡to¡¡keep¡¡the¡¡whites¡¡out¡¡of¡¡power¡¡and¡¡to¡¡regulate¡¡the¡¡relations¡¡of¡¡the¡¡races¡¡in¡¡social¡¡matters¡£¡¡The¡¡Texas¡¡constitution¡¡alone¡¡contained¡¡no¡¡proscriptive¡¡clauses¡¡beyond¡¡those¡¡required¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Fourteenth¡¡Amendment¡£¡¡The¡¡most¡¡thoroughgoing¡¡proscription¡¡of¡¡Confederates¡¡was¡¡found¡¡in¡¡the¡¡constitutions¡¡of¡¡Mississippi£»¡¡Alabama£»¡¡and¡¡Virginia£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡these¡¡states¡¡the¡¡voter¡¡must¡¡also¡¡purge¡¡himself¡¡of¡¡guilt¡¡by¡¡agreeing¡¡to¡¡accept¡¡the¡¡¡¨civil¡¡and¡¡political¡¡equality¡¡of¡¡all¡¡men¡¨¡¡or¡¡by¡¡supporting¡¡reconstruction¡£¡¡Only¡¡in¡¡South¡¡Carolina¡¡and¡¡Louisiana¡¡were¡¡race¡¡lines¡¡abolished¡¡by¡¡law¡£
The¡¡legislative¡¡work¡¡of¡¡the¡¡conventions¡¡was¡¡more¡¡interesting¡¡than¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡making¡£¡¡By¡¡ordinance¡¡the¡¡legality¡¡of¡¡Negro¡¡marriages¡¡was¡¡dated¡¡from¡¡November¡¡1867£»¡¡or¡¡some¡¡date¡¡later¡¡than¡¡had¡¡been¡¡fixed¡¡by¡¡the¡¡white¡¡conventions¡¡of¡¡1865¡£¡¡Mixed¡¡schools¡¡were¡¡provided¡¡in¡¡some¡¡States£»¡¡militia¡¡for¡¡the¡¡black¡¡districts¡¡but¡¡not¡¡for¡¡the¡¡white¡¡was¡¡to¡¡be¡¡raised£»¡¡while¡¡in¡¡South¡¡Carolina¡¡it¡¡was¡¡made¡¡a¡¡penal¡¡offense¡¡to¡¡call¡¡a¡¡person¡¡a¡¡¡¨Yankee¡¨¡¡or¡¡a¡¡¡¨nigger¡£¡¨¡¡Few¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Negro¡¡delegates¡¡demanded¡¡proscription¡¡of¡¡whites¡¡or¡¡social¡¡equality£»¡¡they¡¡wanted¡¡schools¡¡and¡¡the¡¡vote¡£¡¡The¡¡white¡¡radicals¡¡were¡¡more¡¡anxious¡¡to¡¡keep¡¡the¡¡former¡¡Confederates¡¡from¡¡holding¡¡office¡¡than¡¡from¡¡voting¡£¡¡The¡¡generals¡¡in¡¡command¡¡everywhere¡¡used¡¡their¡¡influence¡¡to¡¡secure¡¡moderate¡¡action¡¡by¡¡the¡¡conventions£»¡¡and¡¡for¡¡this¡¡they¡¡were¡¡showered¡¡with¡¡abuse¡£
As¡¡provided¡¡by¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡acts£»¡¡the¡¡new¡¡constitutions¡¡were¡¡submitted¡¡to¡¡the¡¡electorate¡¡created¡¡by¡¡those¡¡instruments¡£¡¡Unless¡¡a¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡the¡¡registered¡¡voters¡¡in¡¡a¡¡State¡¡should¡¡take¡¡part¡¡in¡¡the¡¡election£»¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡would¡¡fail¡¡and¡¡the¡¡State¡¡would¡¡remain¡¡under¡¡military¡¡rule¡£¡¡The¡¡whites¡¡now¡¡inaugurated¡¡a¡¡more¡¡systematic¡¡policy¡¡of¡¡abstention¡¡and¡¡in¡¡Alabama£»¡¡on¡¡February¡¡4£»¡¡1868£»¡¡succeeded¡¡in¡¡holding¡¡the¡¡total¡¡vote¡¡below¡¡a¡¡majority¡£¡¡Congress¡¡then¡¡rushed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡rescue¡¡of¡¡radicalism¡¡with¡¡the¡¡act¡¡of¡¡the¡¡11th¡¡of¡¡March£»¡¡which¡¡provided¡¡that¡¡a¡¡mere¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡those¡¡voting¡¡in¡¡the¡¡State¡¡was¡¡sufficient¡¡to¡¡inaugurate¡¡reconstruction¡£¡¡Arkansas¡¡had¡¡followed¡¡the¡¡lead¡¡of¡¡Alabama£»¡¡but¡¡too¡¡late£»¡¡in¡¡Mississippi¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡was¡¡defeated¡¡by¡¡a¡¡majority¡¡vote£»¡¡in¡¡Texas¡¡the¡¡convention¡¡had¡¡made¡¡no¡¡provision¡¡for¡¡a¡¡vote£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡Virginia¡¡the¡¡commanding¡¡general£»¡¡disapproving¡¡of¡¡the¡¡work¡¡of¡¡the¡¡convention£»¡¡refused¡¡to¡¡pay¡¡the¡¡expenses¡¡of¡¡an¡¡election¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡other¡¡six¡¡States¡¡the¡¡constitutions¡¡were¡¡adopted¡£*
*¡¡Except¡¡in¡¡Texas£»¡¡the¡¡work¡¡of¡¡constitution¡¡making¡¡was¡¡completed¡¡between¡¡November¡¡5£»¡¡1867£»¡¡and¡¡May¡¡18£»¡¡1868¡£
These¡¡elections¡¡gave¡¡rise¡¡to¡¡more¡¡violent¡¡contests¡¡than¡¡before¡£¡¡They¡¡also¡¡were¡¡double¡¡elections£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡voters¡¡cast¡¡ballots¡¡for¡¡state¡¡and¡¡local¡¡officials¡¡and¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡for¡¡or¡¡against¡¡the¡¡constitution¡£¡¡The¡¡radical¡¡nominations¡¡were¡¡made¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Union¡¡League¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Freedmen's¡¡Bureau£»¡¡and¡¡nearly¡¡all¡¡radicals¡¡who¡¡had¡¡been¡¡members¡¡of¡¡conventions¡¡were¡¡nominated¡¡and¡¡elected¡¡to¡¡office¡£¡¡The¡¡Negroes£»¡¡expecting¡¡now¡¡to¡¡reap¡¡some¡¡benefits¡¡of¡¡reconstruction£»¡¡frequently¡¡brought¡¡sacks¡¡to¡¡the¡¡polls¡¡to¡¡¡¨put¡¡the¡¡franchise¡¡in¡£¡¨¡¡The¡¡elections¡¡were¡¡all¡¡over¡¡by¡¡June¡¡1868£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡newly¡¡elected¡¡legislatures¡¡promptly¡¡ratified¡¡the¡¡Fourteenth¡¡Amendment¡£
It¡¡now¡¡remained¡¡for¡¡Congress¡¡to¡¡approve¡¡the¡¡work¡¡done¡¡in¡¡the¡¡South¡¡and¡¡to¡¡readmit¡¡the¡¡reorganized¡¡states¡£¡¡The¡¡case¡¡of¡¡Alabama¡¡gave¡¡some¡¡trouble¡£¡¡Even¡¡Stevens£»¡¡for¡¡a¡¡time£»¡¡thought¡¡that¡¡this¡¡state¡¡should¡¡stay¡¡out£»¡¡but¡¡there¡¡was¡¡danger¡¡in¡¡delay¡£¡¡The¡¡success¡¡of¡¡the¡¡abstention¡¡policy¡¡in¡¡Alabama¡¡and¡¡Arkansas¡¡and¡¡the¡¡reviving¡¡interest¡¡of¡¡the¡¡whites¡¡foreshadowed¡¡white¡¡majorities¡¡in¡¡some¡¡places£»¡¡the¡¡scalawags¡¡began¡¡to¡¡forsake¡¡the¡¡radical¡¡party¡¡for¡¡the¡¡conservatives£»¡¡and¡¡there¡¡were¡¡Democratic¡¡gains¡¡in¡¡the¡¡North¡¡in¡¡1867¡£¡¡Only¡¡six¡¡states£»¡¡New¡¡York¡¡and¡¡five¡¡New¡¡England¡¡States£»¡¡allowed¡¡the¡¡Negro¡¡to¡¡vote£»¡¡while¡¡four¡¡states£»¡¡Minnesota£»¡¡Michigan£»¡¡Kansas£»¡¡and¡¡Ohio£»¡¡voted¡¡down¡¡Negro¡¡suffrage¡¡after¡¡the¡¡passage¡¡of¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡acts¡£¡¡The¡¡ascendancy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radicals¡¡in¡¡Congress¡¡was¡¡menaced¡£¡¡The¡¡radicals¡¡needed¡¡the¡¡support¡¡of¡¡their¡¡radical¡¡brethren¡¡in¡¡Southern¡¡States¡¡and¡¡they¡¡could¡¡not¡¡afford¡¡to¡¡wait¡¡for¡¡the¡¡Fourteenth¡¡Amendment¡¡to¡¡become¡¡a¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Constitution¡¡or¡¡to¡¡tolerate¡¡other¡¡delay¡£¡¡On¡¡the¡¡22d¡¡and¡¡the¡¡25th¡¡of¡¡June£»¡¡acts¡¡were¡¡therefore¡¡passed¡¡admitting¡¡seven¡¡states£»¡¡Alabama¡¡included£»¡¡to¡¡representation¡¡in¡¡Congress¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡¡¨fundamental¡¡condition¡¨¡¡that¡¡¡¨the¡¡constitutions¡¡of¡¡neither¡¡of¡¡said¡¡States¡¡shall¡¡ever¡¡be¡¡so¡¡amended¡¡or¡¡changed¡¡as¡¡to¡¡deprive¡¡any¡¡citizens¡¡or¡¡class¡¡of¡¡citizens¡¡of¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡of¡¡the¡¡right¡¡to¡¡vote¡¡in¡¡said¡¡State£»¡¡who¡¡are¡¡entitled¡¡to¡¡vote¡¡by¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡thereof¡¡herein¡¡recognized¡£¡¨
The¡¡generals¡¡now¡¡turned¡¡over¡¡the¡¡government¡¡to¡¡the¡¡recently¡¡elected¡¡radical¡¡officials¡¡and¡¡retired¡¡into¡¡the¡¡background¡£¡¡Military¡¡reconstruction¡¡was¡¡thus¡¡accomplished¡¡in¡¡all¡¡the¡¡States¡¡except¡¡Virginia£»¡¡Mississippi£»¡¡and¡¡Texas¡£
CHAPTER¡¡VII¡£¡¡THE¡¡TRIAL¡¡OF¡¡PRESIDENT¡¡JOHNSON
While¡¡the¡¡radical¡¡program¡¡was¡¡being¡¡executed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡South£»¡¡Congress¡¡was¡¡engaged¡¡not¡¡only¡¡in¡¡supervising¡¡reconstruction¡¡but¡¡in¡¡subduing¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court¡¡and¡¡in¡¡¡¨conquering¡¨¡¡President¡¡Johnson¡£¡¡One¡¡must¡¡admire¡¡the¡¡efficiency¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radical¡¡machine¡£¡¡When¡¡the¡¡Southerners¡¡showed¡¡that¡¡they¡¡preferred¡¡military¡¡rule¡¡as¡¡permitted¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Act¡¡of¡¡the¡¡2nd¡¡of¡¡March£»¡¡Congress¡¡passed¡¡the¡¡Act¡¡of¡¡the¡¡23d¡¡of¡¡March¡¡which¡¡forced¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡£¡¡When¡¡the¡¡President¡¡ventured¡¡to¡¡assert¡¡his¡¡power¡¡in¡¡behalf¡¡of¡¡a¡¡considerate¡¡administration¡¡of¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡acts£»¡¡Congress¡¡took¡¡the¡¡power¡¡out¡¡of¡¡his¡¡hands¡¡by¡¡the¡¡law¡¡of¡¡the¡¡19th¡¡of¡¡July¡£¡¡The¡¡Southern¡¡plan¡¡to¡¡defeat¡¡the¡¡new¡¡state¡¡constitutions¡¡by¡¡abstention¡¡was¡¡no¡¡sooner¡¡made¡¡clear¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡Alabama¡¡than¡¡Congress¡¡came¡¡to¡¡the¡¡rescue¡¡with¡¡the¡¡Act¡¡of¡¡March¡¡11£»¡¡1868¡£
Had¡¡it¡¡seemed¡¡necessary£»¡¡Congress¡¡would¡¡have¡¡handled¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court¡¡as¡¡it¡¡did¡¡the¡¡Southerners¡£¡¡The¡¡opponents¡¡of¡¡radical¡¡reconstruction¡¡were¡¡anxious¡¡to¡¡get¡¡the¡¡reconstruction¡¡laws¡¡of¡¡March¡¡1867£»¡¡before¡¡the¡¡Court¡£¡¡Chief¡¡Justice¡¡Chase¡¡was¡¡known¡¡to¡¡be¡¡opposed¡¡to¡¡military¡¡reconstruction£»¡¡and¡¡four¡¡other¡¡justices¡¡were£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡believed£»¡¡doubtful¡¡of¡¡the¡¡constitutionality¡¡of¡¡the¡¡laws¡£¡¡A¡¡series¡¡of¡¡conservative¡¡decisions¡¡gave¡¡hope¡¡to¡¡those¡¡who¡¡looked¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Court¡¡for¡¡relief¡£¡¡The¡¡first¡¡decision£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡ex¡¡parte¡¡Milligan£»¡¡declared¡¡unconstitutional¡¡the¡¡trials¡¡of¡¡civilians¡¡by¡¡military¡¡commissions¡¡when¡¡civil¡¡courts¡¡were¡¡open¡£¡¡A¡¡few¡¡months¡¡later£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡cases¡¡of¡¡Cummings¡¡vs¡£¡¡Missouri¡¡and¡¡ex¡¡parte¡¡Garland£»¡¡the¡¡Court¡¡declared¡¡invalid£»¡¡because¡¡ex¡¡post¡¡facto£»¡¡the¡¡state¡¡laws¡¡designed¡¡to¡¡punish¡¡former¡¡Confederates¡£