太子爷小说网 > 英语电子书 > list2 >

第1节

list2-第1节

小说: list2 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!












Second Book







The Theory











Chapter 11







Political and Cosmopolitical Economy







    Before Quesnay and the French economists there existed only a



practice of political economy which was exercised by the State



officials; administrators; and authors who wrote about matters of



administration; occupied themselves exclusively with the



agriculture; manufactures; commerce; and navigation of those



countries to which they belonged; without analysing the causes of



wealth; or taking at all into consideration the interests of the



whole human race。



    Quesnay (from whom the idea of universal free trade originated)



was the first who extended his investigations to the whole human



race; without taking into consideration the idea of the nation。 He



calls his work 'Physiocratie; ou du Gouvernement le plus avantageux



au Genre Humain;' his demands being that we must imagine that the



merchants of all nations formed one commercial republic。 Quesnay



undoubtedly speaks of cosmopolitical economy; i。e。 of that science



which teaches how the entire human race may attain prosperity; in



opposition to political economy; or that science which limits its



teaching to the inquiry how a given nation can obtain (under the



existing conditions of the world) prosperity; civilisation; and



power; by means of agriculture; industry; and commerce。



    Adam Smith(1*) treats his doctrine in a similarly extended



sense; by making it his task to indicate the cosmopolitical idea of



the absolute freedom of the commerce of the whole world in spite of



the gross mistakes made by the physiocrates against the very nature



of things and against logic。 Adam Smith concerned himself as little



as Quesnay did with true political economy; i。e。 that policy which



each separate nation had to obey in order to make progress in its



economical conditions。 He entitles his work; 'The Nature and Causes



of the Wealth of Nations' (i。e。 of all nations of the whole human



race)。 He speaks of the various systems of Political economy in a



separate part of his work solely for the purpose of demonstrating



their non…efficiency; and of proving that 'political' or national



economy must be replaced by 'cosmopolitical or world…wide economy。'



Although here and there he speaks of wars; this only occurs



incidentally。 The idea of a perpetual state of peace forms the



foundation of all his arguments。 Moreover; according to the



explicit remarks of his biographer; Dugald Stewart; his



investigations from the commencement are based upon the principle



that 'most of the State regulations for the promotion of public



prosperity are unnecessary; and a nation in order to be transformed



from the lowest state of barbarism into a state of the highest



possible prosperity needs nothing but bearable taxation; fair



administration of justice; and peace。' Adam Smith naturally



understood under the word 'peace' the 'perpetual universal peace'



of the Abb椤t。 Pierre。



    J。 B。 Say openly demands that we should imagine the existence



of a universal republic in order to comprehend the idea of general



free trade。 This writer; whose efforts were mainly restricted to



the formation of a system out of the materials which Adam Smith had



brought to light; says explicitly in the sixth volume (p。 288) of



his 'Economie politique pratique'。 'We may take into our



consideration the economical interests of the family with the



father at its head; the principles and observations referring



thereto will constitute private economy。 Those principles; however;



which have reference to the interests of whole nations; whether in



themselves or in relation to other nations; form public economy



(l'閏onomie publique)。 Political economy; lastly; relates to the



interests of all nations; to human society in general。'



    It must be remarked here; that in the first place Say



recognises the existence of a national economy or political



economy; under the name '閏onomie publique;' but that he nowhere



treats of the latter in his works; secondly; that he attributes the



name political economy to a doctrine which is evidently of



cosmopolitical nature; and that in this doctrine he invariably



merely speaks of an economy which has for its sole object the



interests of the whole human society; without regard to the



separate interests of distinct nations。



    This substitution of terms might be passed over if Say; after



having explained what he calls political economy (which; however;



is nothing else but cosmopolitical or world…wide economy; or



economy of the whole human race); had acquainted us with the



principles of the doctrine which he calls '閏onomie publique;'



which however is; properly speaking; nothing else but the economy



of given nations; or true political economy。



    In defining and developing this doctrine he could scarcely



forbear to proceed from the idea and the nature of the nation; and



to show what material modifications the 'economy of the whole human



race' must undergo by the fact that at present that race is still



separated into distinct nationalities each held together by common



powers and interests; and distinct from other societies of the same



kind which in the exercise of their natural liberty are opposed to



one another。 However; by giving his cosmopolitical economy the name



political; he dispenses with this explanation; effects by means of



a transposition of terms also a transposition of meaning; and



thereby masks a series of the gravest theoretical errors。



    All later writers have participated in this error。 Sismondi



also calls political economy explicitly 'La science qui se charge



du bonheur de l'esp鑓e humaine。' Adam Smith and his followers teach



us from this mainly nothing more than what Quesnay and his



followers had taught us already; for the article of the 'Revue



M閠hodique' treating of the physiocratic school states; in almost



the same words: 'The well…being of the individual is dependent



altogether on the well…being of the whole human race。'



    The first of the North American advocates of free trade; as



understood by Adam Smith  Thomas Cooper; President of Columbia



College  denies even the existence of nationality; he calls the



nation 'a grammatical invention;' created only to save periphrases;



a nonentity; which has no actual existence save in the heads of



politicians。 Cooper is moreover perfectly consistent with respect



to this; in fact much more consistent than his predecessors and



instructors; for it is evident that as soon as the existence of



nations with their distinct nature and interests is recognised; it



becomes necessary to modify the economy of human society in



accordance with these special interests; and that if Cooper



intended to represent these modifications as errors; it was very



wise on his part from the beginning to disown the very existence of



nations。



    For our own part; we are far from rejecting the theory of



cosmopolitical economy; as it has been perfected by the prevailing



school; we are; however; of opinion that political economy; or as



Say calls it '閏onomie publique;' should also be developed



scientifically; and that it is always better to call things by



their proper names than to give them significations which stand



opposed to the true import of words。



    If we wish to remain true to the laws of logic and of the



nature of things; we must set the economy of individuals against



the economy of societies; and discriminate in respect to the latter



between true political or national economy (which; emanating from



the idea and nature of the nation; teaches how a given nation in



the present state of the world and its own special national



relations can maintain and improve its economical conditions) and



cosmopolitical economy; which originates in the assumption that all



nations of the earth form but one society living in a perpetual



state of peace。



    If; as the prevailing school requites; we assume a universal



union or confederation of all nations as the guarantee for an



everlasting peace; the principle of international free trade seems



to be perfectly justified。 The less every individual is restrained



in pursuing his own individual prosperity; the greater the number



and wealth of those with whom he has free intercourse; the greater



the area over which his individual activity can exercise itself;



the easier it will be for him to utilise for the increase of his



p

返回目录 下一页 回到顶部 0 0

你可能喜欢的