Ì«×ÓүС˵Íø > Ó¢Óïµç×ÓÊé > the.world.is.flat >

µÚ65½Ú

the.world.is.flat-µÚ65½Ú

С˵£º the.world.is.flat ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



China¡£¡¡¡¨Remember£»¡¡in¡¡China¡¡when¡¡you¡¡are¡¡one¡¡in¡¡a¡¡million¡­there¡¡are¡¡1£»300¡¡other¡¡people¡¡
just¡¡like¡¡you¡£¡¨¡¡
The¡¡brainpower¡¡that¡¡rises¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Microsoft¡¡research¡¡center¡¡in¡¡Beijing¡¡is¡¡already¡¡one¡¡
in¡¡a¡¡million¡£¡¡

Consider¡¡the¡¡annual¡¡worldwide¡¡IntelInternational¡¡Science¡¡and¡¡Engineering¡¡Fair¡£¡¡About¡¡
forty¡¡countries¡¡participate¡¡by¡¡nominating¡¡talent¡¡through¡¡local¡¡affiliate¡¡affairs¡£¡¡
In¡¡2004£»¡¡the¡¡Intel¡¡Fair¡¡attracted¡¡around¡¡sixty¡­five¡¡thousand¡¡American¡¡kids£»¡¡according¡¡
to¡¡Intel¡£¡¡How¡¡about¡¡in¡¡China£¿¡¡I¡¡asked¡¡Wee¡¡Theng¡¡Tan£»¡¡the¡¡president¡¡of¡¡Intel¡¡China£»¡¡
during¡¡a¡¡visit¡¡to¡¡Beijing¡£¡¡In¡¡China£»¡¡he¡¡told¡¡me£»¡¡there¡¡is¡¡a¡¡national¡¡affiliate¡¡science¡¡
fair£»¡¡which¡¡acts¡¡as¡¡a¡¡feeder¡¡system¡¡to¡¡select¡¡kids¡¡for¡¡the¡¡global¡¡Intel¡¡fair¡£¡¡¡¨Almost¡¡
every¡¡single¡¡province¡¡has¡¡students¡¡going¡¡to¡¡one¡¡of¡¡these¡¡affiliate¡¡fairs£»¡¨¡¡said¡¡Tan¡£¡¡
¡¨We¡¡have¡¡as¡¡many¡¡as¡¡six¡¡million¡¡kids¡¡competing£»¡¡although¡¡not¡¡all¡¡are¡¡competing¡¡for¡¡
the¡¡top¡¡levels¡¡¡£¡¡¡£¡¡¡£¡¡£§But£§¡¡you¡¡know¡¡how¡¡seriously¡¡they¡¡take¡¡it¡£¡¡Those¡¡selected¡¡to¡¡
go¡¡to¡¡the¡¡international¡¡£§Intel£§¡¡fair¡¡are¡¡immediately¡¡exempted¡¡from¡¡college¡¡entrance¡¡
exams¡¨¡¡and¡¡basically¡¡get¡¡their¡¡choice¡¡of¡¡any¡¡top¡¡university¡¡in¡¡China¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡2004¡¡
Intel¡¡Science¡¡Fair£»¡¡China¡¡came¡¡home¡¡with¡¡thirty¡­five¡¡awards£»¡¡more¡¡than¡¡any¡¡other¡¡
country¡¡in¡¡Asia£»¡¡including¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡top¡¡three¡¡global¡¡awards¡£¡¡
Microsoft¡¡has¡¡three¡¡research¡¡centers¡¡in¡¡the¡¡world£º¡¡in¡¡Cambridge£»¡¡England£»¡¡in¡¡Redmond£»¡¡
Washington£»¡¡its¡¡headquarters£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡Beijing¡£¡¡Bill¡¡Gates¡¡told¡¡me¡¡that¡¡within¡¡just¡¡
a¡¡couple¡¡of¡¡years¡¡of¡¡its¡¡opening¡¡in¡¡1998£»¡¡Microsoft¡¡Research¡¡Asia£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡center¡¡in¡¡
Beijing¡¡is¡¡known£»¡¡had¡¡become¡¡the¡¡most¡¡productive¡¡research¡¡arm¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Microsoft¡¡system¡¡
¡¨in¡¡terms¡¡of¡¡the¡¡quality¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ideas¡¡that¡¡they¡¡are¡¡turning¡¡out¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡mind¡­blowing¡£¡¨¡¡


Kai¡­Fu¡¡Li¡¡is¡¡the¡¡Microsoft¡¡executive¡¡who¡¡was¡¡assigned¡¡by¡¡Gates¡¡to¡¡open¡¡the¡¡Microsoft¡¡
research¡¡center¡¡in¡¡Beijing¡£¡¡My¡¡first¡¡question¡¡to¡¡him¡¡was£»¡¡¡¨How¡¡did¡¡you¡¡go¡¡about¡¡
recruiting¡¡the¡¡staff£¿¡¨¡¡Li¡¡said¡¡his¡¡team¡¡went¡¡to¡¡universities¡¡all¡¡over¡¡China¡¡and¡¡simply¡¡
administered¡¡math£»¡¡IQ£»¡¡and¡¡programming¡¡tests¡¡to¡¡Ph¡£D¡£¡­level¡¡students¡¡or¡¡scientists¡£¡¡
¡¨In¡¡the¡¡first¡¡year£»¡¡we¡¡gave¡¡about¡¡2£»000¡¡tests¡¡all¡¡around£»¡¨¡¡he¡¡said¡£¡¡From¡¡the¡¡2£»000£»¡¡
they¡¡winnowed¡¡the¡¡group¡¡down¡¡to¡¡400¡¡with¡¡more¡¡tests£»¡¡then¡¡150£»¡¡¡¨and¡¡then¡¡we¡¡hired¡¡
20¡£¡¨¡¡They¡¡were¡¡given¡¡two¡­year¡¡contracts¡¡and¡¡told¡¡that¡¡at¡¡the¡¡end¡¡of¡¡two¡¡years£»¡¡
depending¡¡on¡¡the¡¡quality¡¡of¡¡their¡¡work£»¡¡they¡¡would¡¡either¡¡be¡¡given¡¡a¡¡longer¡­term¡¡
contract¡¡or¡¡granted¡¡a¡¡postdoctoral¡¡degree¡¡by¡¡Microsoft¡¡Research¡¡Asia¡£¡¡Yes£»¡¡you¡¡read¡¡
that¡¡right¡£¡¡The¡¡Chinese¡¡government¡¡gave¡¡Microsoft¡¡the¡¡right¡¡to¡¡grant¡¡postdocs¡£¡¡Of¡¡
the¡¡original¡¡twenty¡¡who¡¡were¡¡hired£»¡¡twelve¡¡survived¡¡the¡¡cut¡£¡¡The¡¡next¡¡year£»¡¡nearly¡¡
four¡¡thousand¡¡people¡¡were¡¡tested¡£¡¡After¡¡that£»¡¡said¡¡Li£»¡¡¡¨we¡¡stopped¡¡
267¡¡
doing¡¡the¡¡test¡£¡¡By¡¡that¡¡time¡¡we¡¡became¡¡known¡¡as¡¡the¡¡number¡¡one¡¡place¡¡to¡¡work£»¡¡where¡¡
all¡¡the¡¡smart¡¡computer¡¡and¡¡math¡¡people¡¡wanted¡¡to¡¡work¡¡¡£¡¡¡£¡¡¡£¡¡We¡¡got¡¡to¡¡know¡¡all¡¡the¡¡
students¡¡and¡¡professors¡£¡¡The¡¡professors¡¡would¡¡send¡¡their¡¡best¡¡people¡¡there£»¡¡knowing¡¡
that¡¡if¡¡the¡¡people¡¡did¡¡not¡¡work¡¡out£»¡¡it¡¡would¡¡be¡¡their¡¡credibility¡¡£§on¡¡the¡¡line£§¡£¡¡
Now¡¡we¡¡have¡¡the¡¡top¡¡professors¡¡at¡¡the¡¡top¡¡schools¡¡recommending¡¡their¡¡top¡¡students¡£¡¡
A¡¡lot¡¡of¡¡students¡¡want¡¡to¡¡go¡¡to¡¡Stanford¡¡or¡¡MIT£»¡¡but¡¡they¡¡want¡¡to¡¡spend¡¡two¡¡years¡¡
at¡¡Microsoft¡¡first£»¡¡as¡¡interns£»¡¡so¡¡they¡¡can¡¡get¡¡a¡¡nice¡¡recommendation¡¡letter¡¡that¡¡
says¡¡these¡¡are¡¡MIT¡¡quality¡£¡¨¡¡Today¡¡Microsoft¡¡has¡¡more¡¡than¡¡two¡¡hundred¡¡researchers¡¡
in¡¡its¡¡China¡¡lab¡¡and¡¡some¡¡four¡¡hundred¡¡students¡¡who¡¡come¡¡in¡¡and¡¡out¡¡on¡¡projects¡¡and¡¡
become¡¡recruiting¡¡material¡¡for¡¡Microsoft¡£¡¡
¡¨They¡¡view¡¡this¡¡as¡¡a¡¡once¡­in¡­a¡­lifetime¡¡income¡¡opportunity/'¡¡said¡¡Li¡¡of¡¡the¡¡team¡¡at¡¡
Microsoft¡¡Research¡¡Asia¡£¡¡¡¨They¡¡saw¡¡their¡¡parents¡¡going¡¡through¡¡the¡¡Cultural¡¡
Revolution¡£¡¡The¡¡best¡¡they¡¡could¡¡do¡¡was¡¡become¡¡a¡¡professor£»¡¡do¡¡a¡¡little¡¡project¡¡on¡¡
the¡¡side¡¡because¡¡a¡¡professor's¡¡pay¡¡is¡¡horrible£»¡¡and¡¡maybe¡¡get¡¡one¡¡paper¡¡published¡£¡¡
Now¡¡they¡¡have¡¡this¡¡place¡¡where¡¡all¡¡they¡¡do¡¡is¡¡research£»¡¡with¡¡great¡¡computers¡¡and¡¡lots¡¡
of¡¡resources¡£¡¡They¡¡have¡¡administrators¡­we¡¡hire¡¡people¡¡to¡¡do¡¡the¡¡dirty¡¡work¡£¡¡They¡¡just¡¡
could¡¡not¡¡believe¡¡it¡£¡¡They¡¡voluntarily¡¡work¡¡fifteen¡¡to¡¡eighteen¡¡hours¡¡a¡¡day¡¡and¡¡come¡¡
in¡¡on¡¡weekends¡£¡¡They¡¡work¡¡through¡¡holidays£»¡¡because¡¡their¡¡dream¡¡is¡¡to¡¡get¡¡to¡¡
Microsoft¡£¡¨¡¡Li£»¡¡who¡¡had¡¡worked¡¡for¡¡other¡¡American¡¡high¡­tech¡¡firms¡¡before¡¡coming¡¡to¡¡
Microsoft£»¡¡said¡¡that¡¡until¡¡starting¡¡Microsoft¡¡Research¡¡Asia£»¡¡he¡¡had¡¡never¡¡seen¡¡a¡¡
research¡¡lab¡¡with¡¡the¡¡enthusiasm¡¡of¡¡a¡¡start¡­up¡¡company¡£¡¡
¡¨If¡¡you¡¡go¡¡in¡¡at¡¡two¡¡a¡£m¡£¡¡it¡¡is¡¡full£»¡¡and¡¡at¡¡eight¡¡a¡£m¡£¡¡it¡¡is¡¡full£»¡¨¡¡he¡¡said¡£¡¡
Microsoft¡¡is¡¡a¡¡stronger¡¡American¡¡company¡¡for¡¡being¡¡able¡¡to¡¡attract¡¡all¡¡this¡¡talent£»¡¡
said¡¡Li¡£¡¡¡¨Now¡¡we¡¡have¡¡two¡¡hundred¡¡more¡¡brilliant¡¡people¡¡building¡¡£§intellectual¡¡
property£§¡¡and¡¡patents¡£¡¡These¡¡two¡¡hundred¡¡people¡¡are¡¡not¡¡replacing¡¡people¡¡in¡¡Redmond¡£¡¡
They¡¡are¡¡doing¡¡new¡¡research¡¡in¡¡areas¡¡applicable¡¡worldwide¡£¡¨¡¡
Microsoft¡¡Research¡¡Asia¡¡has¡¡already¡¡developed¡¡a¡¡worldwide¡¡reputation¡¡for¡¡producing¡¡
cutting¡­edge¡¡papers¡¡for¡¡the¡¡most¡¡important¡¡scientific¡¡journals¡¡and¡¡conferences¡£¡¡¡¨This¡¡
is¡¡the¡¡culture¡¡that¡¡built¡¡the¡¡Great¡¡Wall£»¡¨¡¡he¡¡added£»¡¡¡¨because¡¡it¡¡is¡¡a¡¡dedicated¡¡and¡¡
direction¡­following¡¡culture¡£¡¨¡¡
268¡¡


Chinese¡¡people£»¡¡explained¡¡Li£»¡¡have¡¡both¡¡a¡¡superiority¡¡and¡¡an¡¡inferiority¡¡complex¡¡at¡¡
the¡¡same¡¡time£»¡¡which¡¡helps¡¡explain¡¡why¡¡they¡¡are¡¡racing¡¡America¡¡to¡¡the¡¡top£»¡¡not¡¡the¡¡
bottom¡£¡¡There¡¡is¡¡a¡¡deep¡¡and¡¡widely¡¡shared¡¡view¡¡that¡¡China¡¡was¡¡once¡¡great£»¡¡that¡¡it¡¡
succeeded¡¡in¡¡the¡¡past¡¡but¡¡now¡¡is¡¡far¡¡behind¡¡and¡¡must¡¡catch¡¡up¡¡again¡£¡¡¡¨So¡¡there¡¡is¡¡
a¡¡patriotic¡¡desire£»¡¨¡¡he¡¡said¡£¡¡¡¨If¡¡our¡¡lab¡¡can¡¡do¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡the¡¡Redmond¡¡lab£»¡¡that¡¡
could¡¡be¡¡really¡¡exciting¡£¡¨¡¡
That¡¡sort¡¡of¡¡inspired¡¡leadership¡¡in¡¡science¡¡and¡¡engineering¡¡education¡¡is¡¡now¡¡totally¡¡
missing¡¡in¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡£¡¡
Said¡¡Intel¡¡chairman¡¡Craig¡¡Barrett£»¡¡¡¨U¡£S¡£¡¡technological¡¡leadership£»¡¡innovation£»¡¡and¡¡
jobs¡¡of¡¡tomorrow¡¡require¡¡a¡¡commitment¡¡to¡¡basic¡¡research¡¡funding¡¡today¡£¡¨¡¡According¡¡
to¡¡a¡¡2004¡¡study¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Task¡¡Force¡¡on¡¡the¡¡Future¡¡of¡¡American¡¡Innovation£»¡¡an¡¡
industry¡­academic¡¡coalition£»¡¡basic¡¡research¡¡performed¡¡at¡¡leading¡¡U¡£S¡£¡¡
universities¡­research¡¡in¡¡chemistry£»¡¡physics£»¡¡nanotechnology£»¡¡genomics£»¡¡and¡¡
semiconductor¡¡manufacturing¡­has¡¡created¡¡four¡¡thousand¡¡spin¡­off¡¡companies¡¡that¡¡hired¡¡

1¡£1¡¡million¡¡employees¡¡and¡¡have¡¡annual¡¡world¡¡sales¡¡of¡¡232¡¡billion¡£¡¡But¡¡to¡¡keep¡¡moving¡¡
ahead£»¡¡the¡¡study¡¡said£»¡¡there¡¡must¡¡be¡¡a¡¡10¡¡to¡¡12¡¡percent¡¡increase¡¡each¡¡year¡¡for¡¡the¡¡
next¡¡five¡¡to¡¡seven¡¡years¡¡in¡¡the¡¡budgets¡¡of¡¡key¡¡research¡­funding¡¡agencies£º¡¡the¡¡National¡¡
Institute¡¡for¡¡Science¡¡and¡¡Technology£»¡¡the¡¡National¡¡Science¡¡Foundation£»¡¡the¡¡Department¡¡
of¡¡Energy's¡¡Office¡¡of¡¡Science£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Department¡¡of¡¡Defense¡¡research¡¡accounts¡£¡¡
Unfortunately£»¡¡federal¡¡funding¡¡for¡¡research¡¡in¡¡physical¡¡and¡¡mathematical¡¡sciences¡¡
and¡¡engineering£»¡¡as¡¡a¡¡share¡¡of¡¡GDP£»¡¡actually¡¡declined¡¡by¡¡37¡¡percent¡¡between¡¡1970¡¡and¡¡
2004£»¡¡the¡¡task¡¡force¡¡found¡£¡¡At¡¡a¡¡time¡¡when¡¡we¡¡need¡¡to¡¡be¡¡doubling¡¡our¡¡investments¡¡
in¡¡basic¡¡research¡¡to¡¡overcome¡¡the¡¡ambition¡¡and¡¡education¡¡gaps£»¡¡we¡¡are¡¡actually¡¡cutting¡¡
that¡¡funding¡£¡¡
In¡¡the¡¡wake¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Bush¡¡administration¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Republican¡¡Congress's¡¡decision¡¡to¡¡cut¡¡
the¡¡National¡¡Science¡¡Foundation¡¡funding¡¡for¡¡2005£»¡¡Republican¡¡congressman¡¡Vern¡¡Ehlers¡¡
of¡¡Missouri£»¡¡a¡¡voice¡¡in¡¡the¡¡wilderness£»¡¡made¡¡the¡¡following¡¡statement£º¡¡¡¨While¡¡I¡¡
understand¡¡the¡¡need¡¡to¡¡make¡¡hard¡¡choices¡¡in¡¡the¡¡face¡¡of¡¡fiscal¡¡constraint£»¡¡I¡¡do¡¡not¡¡
see¡¡the¡¡wisdom¡¡in¡¡putting¡¡science¡¡funding¡¡behind¡¡other¡¡priorities¡£¡¡We¡¡have¡¡cut¡¡NSF¡¡
despite¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡this¡¡omnibus¡¡bill¡¡increases¡¡spending¡¡for¡¡the¡¡
2005¡¡fiscal¡¡year£»¡¡so¡¡clearly¡¡we¡¡could¡¡find¡¡room¡¡to¡¡grow¡¡basic¡¡research¡¡while¡¡
maintaining¡¡fiscal¡¡constraint¡£¡¡But¡¡not¡¡only¡¡are¡¡we¡¡not¡¡keeping¡¡pace¡¡with¡¡inflationary¡¡
growth£»¡¡we¡¡are¡¡actually¡¡cutting¡¡the¡¡portion¡¡basic¡¡research¡¡receives¡¡in¡¡the¡¡overall¡¡
budget¡£¡¡This¡¡decision¡¡shows¡¡dangerous¡¡disregard¡¡for¡¡our¡¡nation's¡¡future£»¡¡and¡¡I¡¡am¡¡
both¡¡concerned¡¡and¡¡astonished¡¡that¡¡we¡¡would¡¡make¡¡this¡¡decision¡¡at¡¡a¡¡time¡¡when¡¡other¡¡
nations¡¡continue¡¡to¡¡surpass¡¡our¡¡students¡¡inmath¡¡and¡¡science¡¡and¡¡consistently¡¡increase¡¡
their¡¡funding¡¡of¡¡basic¡¡research¡£¡¡We¡¡cannot¡¡hope¡¡to¡¡fight¡¡jobs¡¡lost¡¡to¡¡international¡¡
competition¡¡without¡¡a¡¡well¡­trained¡¡and¡¡educated¡¡workforce¡£¡¨¡¡
No£»¡¡we¡¡cannot£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡effects¡¡are¡¡starting¡¡to¡¡show¡£¡¡According¡¡to¡¡the¡¡National¡¡Science¡¡
Board£»¡¡the¡¡percentage¡¡of¡¡scientific¡¡papers¡¡written¡¡by¡¡Americans¡¡has¡¡fallen¡¡10¡¡percent¡¡
since¡¡1992¡£¡¡The¡¡percentage¡¡of¡¡American¡¡papers¡¡published¡¡in¡¡the¡¡top¡¡physics¡¡journal£»¡¡
Physical¡¡Review£»¡¡has¡¡fallen¡¡from¡¡61¡¡percent¡¡to¡¡29¡¡percent¡¡since¡¡1983¡£¡¡And¡¡now¡¡we¡¡are¡¡
starting¡¡to¡¡see¡¡a¡¡surge¡¡in¡¡patents¡¡awarded¡¡to¡¡Asian¡¡countries¡£¡¡From¡¡1980¡¡to¡¡2003£»¡¡


Japan's¡¡share¡¡of¡¡world¡¡industrial¡¡patents¡¡rose¡¡from¡¡12¡¡percent¡¡to¡¡21¡¡percent£»¡¡and¡¡
Taiwan's¡¡from¡¡0¡¡percent¡¡to¡¡3¡¡percent¡£¡¡By¡¡contrast£»¡¡the¡¡U¡£S¡£¡¡share¡¡of¡¡patents¡¡has¡¡fallen¡¡
from¡¡60¡¡percent¡¡to¡¡52¡¡percent¡¡since¡¡1980¡£¡¡
Any¡¡honest¡¡analysis¡¡of¡¡this¡¡problem¡¡should¡¡note¡¡that¡¡there¡¡are¡¡some¡¡skeptics¡¡who¡¡
believe¡¡that¡¡the¡¡sky¡¡is¡¡not¡¡falling¡¡and¡¡that¡¡scientists¡¡and¡¡the¡¡technology¡¡industry¡¡
might¡¡be¡¡hyping¡¡some¡¡of¡¡this¡¡data£»¡¡just¡¡to¡¡get¡¡more¡¡funding¡£¡¡A¡¡May¡¡10£»¡¡2004£»¡¡article¡¡
in¡¡the¡¡San¡¡Francisco¡¡Chronicle¡¡quoted¡¡Daniel¡¡S¡£¡¡Greenberg£»¡¡former¡¡news¡¡editor¡¡of¡¡the¡¡
journal¡¡Science¡¡and¡¡author¡¡of¡¡the¡¡book¡¡Science£»¡¡Money¡¡and¡¡Politics£»¡¡who¡¡argues¡¡that¡¡
¡¨inside¡­the¡­Beltway¡¡science¡¡£¨lobbying£©¡¡has¡¡always¡¡been¡¡insatiable¡£¡¡If¡¡

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ