the conquest of new france-第5节

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！



England　sternly；　fanatically　Protestant。　In　their　suspicion　of

the　system　which　France　accepted；　Englishmen　had　sent　a　king　to

the　scaffold；　had　overthrown　the　monarchy；　and　had　created　a

military　republic。　This　republic；　indeed；　had　fallen；　but　the

distrust　of　the　aims　of　the　Roman　Catholic　Church　remained

intense　and　burst　into　passionate　fury　the　moment　an

understanding　of　the　aims　of　France　gained　currency。



There　are　indeed　few　passages　in　English　history　less　creditable

than　the　panic　fear　of　Roman　Catholic　plots　which　swept　the

country　in　the　days　when　Frontenac　at　Quebec　was　working　to

destroy　English　and　Protestant　influence　in　America。　In　1678；

Titus　Oates；　a　clergyman　of　the　Church　of　England　who　had　turned

Roman　Catholic；　declared　that；　while　in　the　secrets　of　his　new

church；　he　had　found　on　foot　a　plot　to　restore　Roman　Catholic

dominance　in　England　by　means　of　the　murder　of　Charles　II　and　of

any　other　crimes　necessary　for　that　purpose。　Oates　said　that　he

had　left　the　Church　and　returned　to　his　former　faith　because　of

the　terrible　character　of　the　conspiracy　which　he　had　discovered。

His　story　was　not　even　plausible；　he　was　known　to　be　a　man　of

vicious　life；　moreover；　Catholic　plotters　would　hardly　murder　a

king　who　was　at　heart　devoted　to　Catholic　policy。　England；

however；　was　in　a　nervous　state　of　mind；　Charles　II　was　known　to

be　intriguing　with　France；　and　a　cruel　fury　surged　through　the

nation。　For　a　share　in　the　supposed　plots；　a　score　of　people；

among　them　one　of　the　great　nobles　of　England；　the　venerable　and

innocent　Earl　of　Stafford；　were　condemned　to　death　and　executed。

Whatever　Charles　II　himself　might　have　thought；　he　was　obliged

for　his　own　safety　to　acquiesce　in　the　policy　of　persecution。



Catholic　France　was　not　less　malignant　than　Protestant　England。

Though　cruel　severity　had　long　been　shown　to　Protestants；　they

seemed　to　be　secure　under　the　law　of　France　in　certain　limited

rights　and　in　a　restricted　toleration。　In　1685；　however；　Louis

XIV　revoked　the　Edict　of　Nantes　by　which　Henry　IV　a　century

earlier　had　guaranteed　this　toleration。　All　over　France　there　had

already　burst　out　terrible　persecution；　and　the　act　of　Louis　XIV

brought　a　fiery　climax。　Unhappy　heretics　who　would　not　accept

Roman　Catholic　doctrine　found　life　intolerable。　Tens　of　thousands

escaped　from　France　in　spite　of　a　law　which；　though　it　exiled　the

Protestant　ministers；　forbade　other　Protestants　to　leave　the

country。　Stories　of　plots　were　made　the　excuse　to　seize　the

property　of　Protestants。　Regiments　of　soldiers；　charged　with　the

task；　could　boast　of　many　enforced　〃conversions。〃　Quartered　on

Protestant　households；　they　made　the　life　of　the　inmates　a　burden

until　they　abandoned　their　religion。　Among　the　means　used　were

torture　before　a　slow　fire；　the　tearing　off　of　the　finger　nails；

the　driving　of　the　whole　families　naked　into　the　streets　and　the

forbidding　of　any　one　to　give　them　shelter；　the　violation　of

women；　and　the　crowding　of　the　heretics　in　loathsome　prisons。　By

such　means　it　took　a　regiment　of　soldiers　in　Rouen　only　a　few

days　to　〃convert〃　to　the　old　faith　some　six　hundred　families。

Protestant　ministers　caught　in　France　were　sent　to　the　galleys

for　life。　The　persecutions　which　followed　the　revocation　of　the

Edict　of　Nantes　outdid　even　Titus　Oates。



Charles　II　died　in　1685　and　the　scene　at　his　deathbed　encouraged

in　England　suspicions　of　Catholic　policy　and　in　France　hope　that

this　policy　was　near　its　climax　of　success。　Though　indolent　and

dissolute；　Charles　yet　possessed　striking　mental　capacity　and

insight。　He　knew　well　that　to　preserve　his　throne　he　must　remain

outwardly　a　Protestant　and　must　also　respect　the　liberties　of　the

English　nation。　He　cherished；　however；　the　Roman　Catholic　faith

and　the　despotic　ideals　of　his　Bourbon　mother。　On　his　deathbed　he

avowed　his　real　belief。　With　great　precautions　for　secrecy；　he

was　received　into　the　Roman　Catholic　Church　and　comforted　with

the　consolations　which　it　offers　to　the　dying。　While　this　secret

was　suspected　by　the　English　people；　one　further　fact　was

perfectly　clear。　Their　new　King；　James　II；　was　a　zealous　Roman

Catholic；　who　would　use　all　his　influence　to　bring　England　back

to　the　Roman　communion。　Suspicion　of　the　King's　designs　soon

became　certainty　and；　after　four　years　of　bitter　conflict　with

James；　the　inevitable　happened。　The　Roman　Catholic　Stuart　King

was　driven　from　his　throne　and　his　daughter　Mary　and　her

Protestant　husband；　William　of　Orange；　became　the　sovereigns　of

England　by　choice　of　the　English　Parliament。　Again　had　the

struggle　between　Roman　Catholic　and　Protestant　brought　revolution

in　England；　and　the　politics　of　Europe　dominated　America。　The

revolution　in　London　was　followed　by　revolution　in　Boston　and　New

York。　The　authority　of　James　II　was　repudiated。　His　chief　agent

in　New　England；　Sir　Edmund　Andros；　was　seized　and　imprisoned；　and

William　and　Mary　reigned　over　the　English　colonies　in　America　as

they　reigned　over　the　motherland。



To　the　loyal　Catholics　of　France　the　English；　who　had　driven　out

a　Catholic　king　and　dethroned　an　ancient　line；　were　guilty　of　the

double　sin　of　heresy　and　of　treason。　To　the　Jesuit　enthusiast　in

Canada　not　only　were　they　infidel　devils　in　human　shape　upon

whose　plans　must　rest　the　curse　of　God；　they　were　also　rebels；

republican　successors　of　the　accursed　Cromwell；　who　had　sent　an

anointed　king　to　the　block。　It　would　be　a　holy　thing　to　destroy

this　lawless　power　which　ruled　from　London。　The　Puritans　of

Boston　were；　in　turn；　not　less　convinced　that　theirs　was　the

cause　of　God；　and　that　Satan；　enthroned　in　the　French　dominance

at　Quebec；　must　soon　fall。　The　smaller　the　pit　the　fiercer　the

rats。　Passions　raged　in　the　petty　colonial　capitals　more　bitterly

than　even　in　London　and　Paris。　This　intensity　of　religious

differences　embittered　the　struggle　for　the　mastery　of　the　new

continent。



The　English　colonies　had　twenty　white　men　to　one　in　Canada。　Yet

Canada　was　long　able　to　wage　war　on　something　like　equal　terms。

She　had　the　supreme　advantage　of　a　single　control。　There　was　no

trouble　at　Quebec　about　getting　a　reluctant　legislature　to　vote

money　for　war　purposes。　No　semblance　of　an　elected　legislature

existed　and　the　money　for　war　came　not　from　the　Canadians；　but

from　the　capacious；　if　now　usually　depleted；　coffers　of　the

French　court　at　Versailles。　In　the　English　colonies　the

legislatures

preferred；　of　all　political　struggles；　one　about　money　with　the

Governor；　the　representative　of　the　King。　At　least　one　of　the

English　colonies；　Pennsylvania；　believing　that　evil　is　best

conquered　by　non…resistance；　was　resolutely　against　war　for　any

reason；　good　or　bad。　Other　colonies　often　raised　the　more　sordid

objection　that　they　were　too　poor　to　help　in　war。　The　colonial

legislatures；　indeed；　with　their　eternal　demand　for　the

privileges　and　rights　which　the　British　House　of　Commons　had　won

in　the　long　centuries　of　its　history；　constitute　the　most

striking　of　all　the　contrasts　with　Canada。　In　them　were　always

the　sparks　of　an　independent　temper。　The　English　diarist；　Evelyn；

wrote；　in　1671；　that　New　England　was　in　〃a　peevish　and　touchy

humour。〃　Colonists　who　go　out　to　found　a　new　state　will　always

demand　rights　like　those　which　they　have　enjoyed　at　home。　It　was

unthinkable　that　men　of　Boston；　who；　themselves；　or　whose　party

in　England；　had　fought　against　a　despotic　king；　had　sent　him　to

the　block　and　driven　his　son　from　the　throne；　would　be　content

with　anything　short　of　controlling　the　taxes　which　they　paid；

making　the　laws　which　they　obeyed；　and　carrying　on　their　affairs

in　their　own　way。　When　obliged　to　accept　a　governor　from　England；

they　were　resolved　as　far　as　possible　to　remain　his　paymaster。　In

a　majority　of　the　colonies　they　insisted　that　the　salary　of　the

Governor　should　be　voted　each　year　by　their　representatives；　in

order　that　they　might　be　able　always　to　use　against　him　the

cogent　logic　of　financial　need。　On　questions　of　this　kind　Quebec

had　nothing　to　say。　To　the　King　in　France　and　to　him　alone　went

all　demands　for　pay　and　honors。　If；　in　such　things；　the　people　of

Canada　had　no　remote　voice；　they　were　still　as　well　off　as

Frenchmen　in　France。　New　England　was　a　copy　of　Old　England　and

New　France　a　copy　of　Old　France。　There　was；　as　yet；　no　〃peevish

and　touchy　humour〃　at　either　Quebec　or　Versailles　in　respect　to

political　rights。



Canada；　in　spite　of　its　scanty　population；　was　better　equipped

for　war　than　was　any　of　the　English　colonies。　The　French　were

largely　explorers　and　hunters；　familiar　with　hardship　and　danger

and　led　by　men　with　a　love　of　adventure。　The　English；　on　the

other　hand；　were　chiefly　traders　and　farmers　who　disliked　and

dreaded　the　horrors　of　war。　There　was　not　to　be　found　in　all　the

English　colonies　a　family　of　the　type　of　the　Canadian　family　of

Le　Moyne。　Charles　Le　Moyne；　of　Montreal；　a　membe