democracy in america-1-第89节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
nterests。 Despotism may govern without faith； but liberty cannot。 Religion is much more necessary in the republic which they set forth in glowing colors than in the monarchy which they attack； and it is more needed in democratic republics than in any others。 How is it possible that society should escape destruction if the moral tie be not strengthened in proportion as the political tie is relaxed？ and what can be done with a people which is its own master； if it be not submissive to the Divinity？
Chapter XVII： Principal Causes Maintaining The Democratic Republic … Part III
Principal Causes Which Render Religion Powerful In America Care taken by the Americans to separate the Church from the State … The laws； public opinion； and even the exertions of the clergy concur to promote this end … Influence of religion upon the mind in the United States attributable to this cause … Reason of this … What is the natural state of men with regard to religion at the present time … What are the peculiar and incidental causes which prevent men； in certain countries； from arriving at this state。
The philosophers of the eighteenth century explained the gradual decay of religious faith in a very simple manner。 Religious zeal； said they； must necessarily fail； the more generally liberty is established and knowledge diffused。 Unfortunately； facts are by no means in accordance with their theory。 There are certain populations in Europe whose unbelief is only equalled by their ignorance and their debasement； whilst in America one of the freest and most enlightened nations in the world fulfils all the outward duties of religious fervor。
Upon my arrival in the United States； the religious aspect of the country was the first thing that struck my attention； and the longer I stayed there the more did I perceive the great political consequences resulting from this state of things； to which I was unaccustomed。 In France I had almost always seen the spirit of religion and the spirit of freedom pursuing courses diametrically opposed to each other； but in America I found that they were intimately united； and that they reigned in common over the same country。 My desire to discover the causes of this phenomenon increased from day to day。 In order to satisfy it I questioned the members of all the different sects； and I more especially sought the society of the clergy； who are the depositaries of the different persuasions； and who are more especially interested in their duration。 As a member of the Roman Catholic Church I was more particularly brought into contact with several of its priests； with whom I became intimately acquainted。 To each of these men I expressed my astonishment and I explained my doubts； I found that they differed upon matters of detail alone； and that they mainly attributed the peaceful dominion of religion in their country to the separation of Church and State。 I do not hesitate to affirm that during my stay in America I did not meet with a single individual； of the clergy or of the laity； who was not of the same opinion upon this point。
This led me to examine more attentively than I had hitherto done； the station which the American clergy occupy in political society。 I learned with surprise that they filled no public appointments； *f not one of them is to be met with in the administration； and they are not even represented in the legislative assemblies。 In several States *g the law excludes them from political life； public opinion in all。 And when I came to inquire into the prevailing spirit of the clergy I found that most of its members seemed to retire of their own accord from the exercise of power； and that they made it the pride of their profession to abstain from politics。
＇Footnote f： Unless this term be applied to the functions which many of them fill in the schools。 Almost all education is entrusted to the clergy。＇
＇Footnote g： See the Constitution of New York； art。 7； Section 4： … 〃And whereas the ministers of the gospel are； by their profession； dedicated to the service of God and the care of souls； and ought not to be diverted from the great duties of their functions： therefore no minister of the gospel； or priest of any denomination whatsoever； shall at any time hereafter； under any pretence or description whatever； be eligible to； or capable of holding； any civil or military office or place within this State。〃
See also the constitutions of North Carolina； art。 31； Virginia； South Carolina； art。 I； Section 23； Kentucky； art。 2； Section 26； Tennessee； art。 8； Section I； Louisiana； art。 2； Section 22。＇
I heard them inveigh against ambition and deceit； under whatever political opinions these vices might chance to lurk； but I learned from their discourses that men are not guilty in the eye of God for any opinions concerning political government which they may profess with sincerity； any more than they are for their mistakes in building a house or in driving a furrow。 I perceived that these ministers of the gospel eschewed all parties with the anxiety attendant upon personal interest。 These facts convinced me that what I had been told was true； and it then became my object to investigate their causes； and to inquire how it happened that the real authority of religion was increased by a state of things which diminished its apparent force： these causes did not long escape my researches。
The short space of threescore years can never content the imagination of man； nor can the imperfect joys of this world satisfy his heart。 Man alone； of all created beings； displays a natural contempt of existence； and yet a boundless desire to exist； he scorns life； but he dreads annihilation。 These different feelings incessantly urge his soul to the contemplation of a future state； and religion directs his musings thither。 Religion； then； is simply another form of hope； and it is no less natural to the human heart than hope itself。 Men cannot abandon their religious faith without a kind of aberration of intellect； and a sort of violent distortion of their true natures； but they are invincibly brought back to more pious sentiments； for unbelief is an accident； and faith is the only permanent state of mankind。 If we only consider religious institutions in a purely human point of view； they may be said to derive an inexhaustible element of strength from man himself； since they belong to one of the constituent principles of human nature。
I am aware that at certain times religion may strengthen this influence； which originates in itself； by the artificial power of the laws； and by the support of those temporal institutions which direct society。 Religions； intimately united to the governments of the earth； have been known to exercise a sovereign authority derived from the twofold source of terror and of faith； but when a religion contracts an alliance of this nature； I do not hesitate to affirm that it commits the same error as a man who should sacrifice his future to his present welfare； and in obtaining a power to which it has no claim； it risks that authority which is rightfully its own。 When a religion founds its empire upon the desire of immortality which lives in every human heart； it may aspire to universal dominion； but when it connects itself with a government； it must necessarily adopt maxims which are only applicable to certain nations。 Thus； in forming an alliance with a political power； religion augments its authority over a few； and forfeits the hope of reigning over all。
As long as a religion rests upon those sentiments which are the consolation of all affliction； it may attract the affections of mankind。 But if it be mixed up with the bitter passions of the world； it may be constrained to defend allies whom its interests； and not the principle of love； have given to it； or to repel as antagonists men who are still attached to its own spirit； however opposed they may be to the powers to which it is allied。 The Church cannot share the temporal power of the State without being the object of a portion of that animosity which the latter excites。
The political powers which seem to be most firmly established have frequently no better guarantee for their duration than the opinions of a generation； the interests of the time； or the life of an individual。 A law may modify the social condition which seems to be most fixed and determinate； and with the social condition everything else must change。 The powers of society are more or less fugitive； like the years which we spend upon the earth； they succeed each other with rapidity； like the fleeting cares of life； and no government has ever yet been founded upon an invariable disposition of the human heart； or upon an imperishable interest。
As long as a religion is sustained by those feelings； propensities； and passions which are found to occur under the same forms； at all the different periods of history； it may defy the efforts of time； or at least it can only be destroyed by another religion。 But when religion clings to the interests of the world； it becomes almost as fragile a thing as the powers of earth。 It is the only one of them all which can hope for immortality； but if it be connected with their ephemeral authority； it shares their fo
