democracy in america-1-第70节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
not the case with democracies； whose laws are almost always ineffective or inopportune。 The means of democracy are therefore more imperfect than those of aristocracy； and the measures which it unwittingly adopts are frequently opposed to its own cause； but the object it has in view is more useful。
Let us now imagine a community so organized by nature； or by its constitution； that it can support the transitory action of bad laws； and that it can await； without destruction； the general tendency of the legislation： we shall then be able to conceive that a democratic government； notwithstanding its defects； will be most fitted to conduce to the prosperity of this community。 This is precisely what has occurred in the United States； and I repeat； what I have before remarked； that the great advantage of the Americans consists in their being able to commit faults which they may afterward repair。
An analogous observation may be made respecting public officers。 It is easy to perceive that the American democracy frequently errs in the choice of the individuals to whom it entrusts the power of the administration； but it is more difficult to say why the State prospers under their rule。 In the first place it is to be remarked； that if in a democratic State the governors have less honesty and less capacity than elsewhere； the governed； on the other hand； are more enlightened and more attentive to their interests。 As the people in democracies is more incessantly vigilant in its affairs and more jealous of its rights； it prevents its representatives from abandoning that general line of conduct which its own interest prescribes。 In the second place； it must be remembered that if the democratic magistrate is more apt to misuse his power； he possesses it for a shorter period of time。 But there is yet another reason which is still more general and conclusive。 It is no doubt of importance to the welfare of nations that they should be governed by men of talents and virtue； but it is perhaps still more important that the interests of those men should not differ from the interests of the community at large； for； if such were the case； virtues of a high order might become useless； and talents might be turned to a bad account。 I say that it is important that the interests of the persons in authority should not conflict with or oppose the interests of the community at large； but I do not insist upon their having the same interests as the whole population； because I am not aware that such a state of things ever existed in any country。
No political form has hitherto been discovered which is equally favorable to the prosperity and the development of all the classes into which society is divided。 These classes continue to form； as it were； a certain number of distinct nations in the same nation； and experience has shown that it is no less dangerous to place the fate of these classes exclusively in the hands of any one of them than it is to make one people the arbiter of the destiny of another。 When the rich alone govern； the interest of the poor is always endangered； and when the poor make the laws； that of the rich incurs very serious risks。 The advantage of democracy does not consist； therefore； as has sometimes been asserted； in favoring the prosperity of all； but simply in contributing to the well…being of the greatest possible number。
The men who are entrusted with the direction of public affairs in the United States are frequently inferior； both in point of capacity and of morality； to those whom aristocratic institutions would raise to power。 But their interest is identified and confounded with that of the majority of their fellow…citizens。 They may frequently be faithless and frequently mistaken； but they will never systematically adopt a line of conduct opposed to the will of the majority； and it is impossible that they should give a dangerous or an exclusive tendency to the government。
The mal…administration of a democratic magistrate is a mere isolated fact； which only occurs during the short period for which he is elected。 Corruption and incapacity do not act as common interests； which may connect men permanently with one another。 A corrupt or an incapable magistrate will not concert his measures with another magistrate； simply because that individual is as corrupt and as incapable as himself； and these two men will never unite their endeavors to promote the corruption and inaptitude of their remote posterity。 The ambition and the manoeuvres of the one will serve； on the contrary； to unmask the other。 The vices of a magistrate； in democratic states； are usually peculiar to his own person。
But under aristocratic governments public men are swayed by the interest of their order； which； if it is sometimes confounded with the interests of the majority； is very frequently distinct from them。 This interest is the common and lasting bond which unites them together； it induces them to coalesce； and to combine their efforts in order to attain an end which does not always ensure the greatest happiness of the greatest number； and it serves not only to connect the persons in authority； but to unite them to a considerable portion of the community； since a numerous body of citizens belongs to the aristocracy； without being invested with official functions。 The aristocratic magistrate is therefore constantly supported by a portion of the community； as well as by the Government of which he is a member。
The common purpose which connects the interest of the magistrates in aristocracies with that of a portion of their contemporaries identifies it with that of future generations； their influence belongs to the future as much as to the present。 The aristocratic magistrate is urged at the same time toward the same point by the passions of the community； by his own； and I may almost add by those of his posterity。 Is it； then； wonderful that he does not resist such repeated impulses？ And indeed aristocracies are often carried away by the spirit of their order without being corrupted by it； and they unconsciously fashion society to their own ends； and prepare it for their own descendants。
The English aristocracy is perhaps the most liberal which ever existed； and no body of men has ever； uninterruptedly； furnished so many honorable and enlightened individuals to the government of a country。 It cannot； however； escape observation that in the legislation of England the good of the poor has been sacrificed to the advantage of the rich； and the rights of the majority to the privileges of the few。 The consequence is； that England； at the present day； combines the extremes of fortune in the bosom of her society； and her perils and calamities are almost equal to her power and her renown。 *a
＇Footnote a： ＇The legislation of England for the forty years is certainly not fairly open to this criticism； which was written before the Reform Bill of 1832； and accordingly Great Britain has thus far escaped and surmounted the perils and calamities to which she seemed to be exposed。＇＇
In the United States； where the public officers have no interests to promote connected with their caste； the general and constant influence of the Government is beneficial； although the individuals who conduct it are frequently unskilful and sometimes contemptible。 There is indeed a secret tendency in democratic institutions to render the exertions of the citizens subservient to the prosperity of the community； notwithstanding their private vices and mistakes； whilst in aristocratic institutions there is a secret propensity which； notwithstanding the talents and the virtues of those who conduct the government； leads them to contribute to the evils which oppress their fellow…creatures。 In aristocratic governments public men may frequently do injuries which they do not intend； and in democratic states they produce advantages which they never thought of。
Public Spirit In The United States
Patriotism of instinct … Patriotism of reflection … Their different characteristics … Nations ought to strive to acquire the second when the first has disappeared … Efforts of the Americans to it … Interest of the individual intimately connected with that of the country。
There is one sort of patriotic attachment which principally arises from that instinctive； disinterested； and undefinable feeling which connects the affections of man with his birthplace。 This natural fondness is united to a taste for ancient customs； and to a reverence for ancestral traditions of the past； those who cherish it love their country as they love the mansions of their fathers。 They enjoy the tranquillity which it affords them； they cling to the peaceful habits which they have contracted within its bosom； they are attached to the reminiscences which it awakens； and they are even pleased by the state of obedience in which they are placed。 This patriotism is sometimes stimulated by religious enthusiasm； and then it is capable of making the most prodigious efforts。 It is in itself a kind of religion； it does not reason； but it acts from the impulse of faith and of sentiment。 By some nations the monarch has been regarded as a personification of the country； and the fervor of patriotism being conver
