democracy in america-1-第110节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
community in which that legislation has been promulgated。 The Americans of this portion of the Union have not； indeed； augmented the hardships of slavery； they have； on the contrary； bettered the physical condition of the slaves。 The only means by which the ancients maintained slavery were fetters and death； the Americans of the South of the Union have discovered more intellectual securities for the duration of their power。 They have employed their despotism and their violence against the human mind。 In antiquity； precautions were taken to prevent the slave from breaking his chains； at the present day measures are adopted to deprive him even of the desire of freedom。 The ancients kept the bodies of their slaves in bondage； but they placed no restraint upon the mind and no check upon education； and they acted consistently with their established principle； since a natural termination of slavery then existed； and one day or other the slave might be set free； and become the equal of his master。 But the Americans of the South； who do not admit that the negroes can ever be commingled with themselves； have forbidden them to be taught to read or to write； under severe penalties； and as they will not raise them to their own level； they sink them as nearly as possible to that of the brutes。
The hope of liberty had always been allowed to the slave to cheer the hardships of his condition。 But the Americans of the South are well aware that emancipation cannot but be dangerous； when the freed man can never be assimilated to his former master。 To give a man his freedom； and to leave him in wretchedness and ignominy； is nothing less than to prepare a future chief for a revolt of the slaves。 Moreover； it has long been remarked that the presence of a free negro vaguely agitates the minds of his less fortunate brethren； and conveys to them a dim notion of their rights。 The Americans of the South have consequently taken measures to prevent slave…owners from emancipating their slaves in most cases； not indeed by a positive prohibition； but by subjecting that step to various forms which it is difficult to comply with。 I happened to meet with an old man； in the South of the Union； who had lived in illicit intercourse with one of his negresses； and had had several children by her； who were born the slaves of their father。 He had indeed frequently thought of bequeathing to them at least their liberty； but years had elapsed without his being able to surmount the legal obstacles to their emancipation； and in the mean while his old age was come； and he was about to die。 He pictured to himself his sons dragged from market to market； and passing from the authority of a parent to the rod of the stranger； until these horrid anticipations worked his expiring imagination into frenzy。 When I saw him he was a prey to all the anguish of despair； and he made me feel how awful is the retribution of nature upon those who have broken her laws。
These evils are unquestionably great； but they are the necessary and foreseen consequence of the very principle of modern slavery。 When the Europeans chose their slaves from a race differing from their own； which many of them considered as inferior to the other races of mankind； and which they all repelled with horror from any notion of intimate connection； they must have believed that slavery would last forever； since there is no intermediate state which can be durable between the excessive inequality produced by servitude and the complete equality which originates in independence。 The Europeans did imperfectly feel this truth； but without acknowledging it even to themselves。 Whenever they have had to do with negroes； their conduct has either been dictated by their interest and their pride； or by their compassion。 They first violated every right of humanity by their treatment of the negro and they afterwards informed him that those rights were precious and inviolable。 They affected to open their ranks to the slaves； but the negroes who attempted to penetrate into the community were driven back with scorn； and they have incautiously and involuntarily been led to admit of freedom instead of slavery； without having the courage to be wholly iniquitous； or wholly just。
If it be impossible to anticipate a period at which the Americans of the South will mingle their blood with that of the negroes； can they allow their slaves to become free without compromising their own security？ And if they are obliged to keep that race in bondage in order to save their own families； may they not be excused for availing themselves of the means best adapted to that end？ The events which are taking place in the Southern States of the Union appear to me to be at once the most horrible and the most natural results of slavery。 When I see the order of nature overthrown； and when I hear the cry of humanity in its vain struggle against the laws； my indignation does not light upon the men of our own time who are the instruments of these outrages； but I reserve my execration for those who； after a thousand years of freedom； brought back slavery into the world once more。
Whatever may be the efforts of the Americans of the South to maintain slavery； they will not always succeed。 Slavery； which is now confined to a single tract of the civilized earth； which is attacked by Christianity as unjust； and by political economy as prejudicial； and which is now contrasted with democratic liberties and the information of our age； cannot survive。 By the choice of the master； or by the will of the slave； it will cease； and in either case great calamities may be expected to ensue。 If liberty be refused to the negroes of the South； they will in the end seize it for themselves by force； if it be given； they will abuse it ere long。 *x
＇Footnote x： ＇This chapter is no longer applicable to the condition of the negro race in the United States； since the abolition of slavery was the result； though not the object； of the great Civil War； and the negroes have been raised to the condition not only of freedmen； but of citizens； and in some States they exercise a preponderating political power by reason of their numerical majority。 Thus； in South Carolina there were in 1870； 289；667 whites and 415；814 blacks。 But the emancipation of the slaves has not solved the problem； how two races so different and so hostile are to live together in peace in one country on equal terms。 That problem is as difficult； perhaps more difficult than ever； and to this difficulty the author's remarks are still perfectly applicable。＇＇
Chapter XVIII： Future Condition Of Three Races … Part VI
What Are The Chances In Favor Of The Duration Of The American Union； And What Dangers Threaten It *y
＇Footnote y： ＇This chapter is one of the most curious and interesting portions of the work； because it embraces almost all the constitutional and social questions which were raised by the great secession of the South and decided by the results of the Civil War。 But it must be confessed that the sagacity of the author is sometimes at fault in these speculations； and did not save him from considerable errors； which the course of events has since made apparent。 He held that 〃the legislators of the Constitution of 1789 were not appointed to constitute the government of a single people； but to regulate the association of several States； that the Union was formed by the voluntary agreement of the States； and in uniting together they have not forfeited their nationality； nor have they been reduced to the condition of one and the same people。〃 Whence he inferred that 〃if one of the States chose to withdraw its name from the contract； it would be difficult to disprove its right of doing so； and that the Federal Government would have no means of maintaining its claims directly； either by force or by right。〃 This is the Southern theory of the Constitution； and the whole case of the South in favor of secession。 To many Europeans； and to some American （Northern） jurists； this view appeared to be sound； but it was vigorously resisted by the North； and crushed by force of arms。
The author of this book was mistaken in supposing that the 〃Union was a vast body which presents no definite object to patriotic feeling。〃 When the day of trial came； millions of men were ready to lay down their lives for it。 He was also mistaken in supposing that the Federal Executive is so weak that it requires the free consent of the governed to enable it to subsist； and that it would be defeated in a struggle to maintain the Union against one or more separate States。 In 1861 nine States； with a population of 8；753；000； seceded； and maintained for four years a resolute but unequal contest for independence； but they were defeated。
Lastly； the author was mistaken in supposing that a community of interests would always prevail between North and South sufficiently powerful to bind them together。 He overlooked the influence which the question of slavery must have on the Union the moment that the majority of the people of the North declared against it。 In 1831； when the author visited America； the anti…slavery agitation had scarcely begun； and the fact of Southern slavery was accepted by men of all parties； even in t
