Ì«×ÓүС˵Íø > Ó¢Óïµç×ÓÊé > the american republic >

µÚ37½Ú

the american republic-µÚ37½Ú

С˵£º the american republic ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



ted¡¡States£»¡¡are¡¡the¡¡¡¡people¡¡of¡¡the¡¡particular¡¡States¡¡united¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡solidarity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡¡¡members¡¡constitutes¡¡the¡¡unity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡body¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡difference¡¡¡¡between¡¡this¡¡view¡¡and¡¡Mr¡£¡¡Madison's¡¡is£»¡¡that¡¡while¡¡his¡¡view¡¡¡¡supposes¡¡the¡¡solidarity¡¡to¡¡be¡¡conventional£»¡¡originating¡¡and¡¡¡¡existing¡¡in¡¡compact£»¡¡or¡¡agreement£»¡¡this¡¡supposes¡¡it¡¡to¡¡be¡¡real£»¡¡¡¡living£»¡¡and¡¡prior¡¡to¡¡the¡¡convention£»¡¡as¡¡much¡¡the¡¡work¡¡of¡¡¡¡Providence¡¡as¡¡the¡¡existence¡¡in¡¡the¡¡human¡¡body¡¡of¡¡the¡¡living¡¡¡¡solidarity¡¡of¡¡its¡¡members¡£¡¡¡¡One¡¡law£»¡¡one¡¡life£»¡¡circulates¡¡¡¡through¡¡all¡¡the¡¡members£»¡¡constituting¡¡them¡¡a¡¡living¡¡organism£»¡¡¡¡binding¡¡them¡¡in¡¡living¡¡union£»¡¡all¡¡to¡¡each¡¡and¡¡each¡¡to¡¡all¡£

Such¡¡is¡¡the¡¡sovereign¡¡people£»¡¡and¡¡so¡¡far¡¡the¡¡original¡¡unwritten¡¡¡¡constitution¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡sovereign£»¡¡¡¡247¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡live¡¡and¡¡act£»¡¡must¡¡¡¡have¡¡an¡¡organ¡¡through¡¡which¡¡be¡¡expresses¡¡his¡¡will¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡organ¡¡¡¡under¡¡the¡¡American¡¡system£»¡¡is¡¡primarily¡¡the¡¡Convention¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡¡¡convention¡¡is¡¡the¡¡supreme¡¡political¡¡body£»¡¡the¡¡concrete¡¡sovereign¡¡¡¡authority£»¡¡and¡¡exercises¡¡practically¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡sovereign¡¡power¡¡¡¡of¡¡the¡¡people¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡convention¡¡persists¡¡always£»¡¡although¡¡not¡¡in¡¡¡¡permanent¡¡session¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡can¡¡at¡¡any¡¡time¡¡be¡¡convened¡¡by¡¡the¡¡¡¡ordinary¡¡authority¡¡of¡¡the¡¡government£»¡¡or£»¡¡in¡¡its¡¡failure£»¡¡by¡¡a¡¡¡¡plebiscitum¡£

Next¡¡follows¡¡the¡¡Government¡¡created¡¡and¡¡constituted¡¡by¡¡the¡¡¡¡convention¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡government¡¡is¡¡constituted¡¡in¡¡such¡¡manner£»¡¡and¡¡¡¡has¡¡such¡¡and¡¡only¡¡such¡¡powers£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡convention¡¡ordains¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡¡¡government¡¡has£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡strict¡¡sense£»¡¡no¡¡political¡¡authority¡¡¡¡under¡¡the¡¡American¡¡system£»¡¡which¡¡separates¡¡the¡¡government¡¡from¡¡¡¡the¡¡convention¡£¡¡¡¡All¡¡political¡¡questions¡¡proper£»¡¡such¡¡as¡¡the¡¡¡¡elective¡¡franchise£»¡¡eligibility£»¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡of¡¡the¡¡several¡¡¡¡departments¡¡of¡¡government£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡legislative£»¡¡the¡¡judicial£»¡¡and¡¡¡¡the¡¡executive£»¡¡changing£»¡¡altering£»¡¡or¡¡amending¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡¡¡of¡¡government£»¡¡enlarging£»¡¡or¡¡contracting¡¡its¡¡powers£»¡¡in¡¡a¡¡word£»¡¡¡¡all¡¡those¡¡questions¡¡that¡¡arise¡¡on¡¡which¡¡it¡¡is¡¡necessary¡¡to¡¡take¡¡¡¡the¡¡immediate¡¡orders¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sovereign£»¡¡belong¡¡not¡¡to¡¡the¡¡¡¡government£»¡¡but¡¡to¡¡the¡¡convention£»¡¡and¡¡where¡¡the¡¡will¡¡of¡¡the¡¡¡¡sover¡­¡¡248¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡eign¡¡is¡¡not¡¡sufficiently¡¡expressed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡constitution£»¡¡a¡¡¡¡new¡¡appeal¡¡to¡¡the¡¡convention¡¡is¡¡necessary£»¡¡and¡¡may¡¡always¡¡be¡¡had¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡constitution¡¡of¡¡Great¡¡Britain¡¡makes¡¡no¡¡distinction¡¡between¡¡¡¡the¡¡convention¡¡and¡¡the¡¡government¡£¡¡¡¡Theoretically¡¡the¡¡¡¡constitution¡¡of¡¡Great¡¡Britain¡¡is¡¡feudal£»¡¡and¡¡there¡¡is£»¡¡properly¡¡¡¡speaking£»¡¡no¡¡British¡¡state£»¡¡there¡¡are¡¡only¡¡the¡¡estates£»¡¡king£»¡¡¡¡lords£»¡¡and¡¡commons£»¡¡and¡¡these¡¡three¡¡estates¡¡constitute¡¡the¡¡¡¡Parliament£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡held¡¡to¡¡be¡¡omnipotent£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡has¡¡the¡¡¡¡plenitude¡¡of¡¡political¡¡sovereignty¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡British¡¡Parliament£»¡¡¡¡composed¡¡of¡¡the¡¡three¡¡estates£»¡¡possesses¡¡in¡¡itself¡¡all¡¡the¡¡¡¡powers¡¡of¡¡the¡¡convention¡¡in¡¡the¡¡American¡¡constitution£»¡¡and¡¡is¡¡at¡¡¡¡once¡¡the¡¡convention¡¡and¡¡the¡¡government¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡imperial¡¡¡¡constitution¡¡of¡¡France¡¡recognizes¡¡no¡¡convention£»¡¡but¡¡clothes¡¡the¡¡¡¡senate¡¡with¡¡certain¡¡political¡¡functions£»¡¡which£»¡¡in¡¡some¡¡¡¡respects£»¡¡subjects¡¡theoretically¡¡the¡¡sovereign¡¡to¡¡his¡¡creature¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡emperor¡¡confessedly¡¡holds¡¡his¡¡power¡¡by¡¡the¡¡grace¡¡of¡¡God¡¡and¡¡¡¡the¡¡will¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nation£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡a¡¡clear¡¡acknowledgment¡¡that¡¡the¡¡¡¡sovereignty¡¡vests¡¡in¡¡the¡¡French¡¡people¡¡as¡¡the¡¡French¡¡state£»¡¡but¡¡¡¡the¡¡imperial¡¡constitution£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡of¡¡the¡¡¡¡government£»¡¡not¡¡of¡¡the¡¡state£»¡¡studies£»¡¡while¡¡acknowledging¡¡the¡¡¡¡sovereignty¡¡of¡¡the¡¡people£»¡¡to¡¡render¡¡it¡¡nugatory£»¡¡by¡¡¡¡249¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡transferring¡¡¡¡it£»¡¡under¡¡various¡¡subtle¡¡disguises£»¡¡to¡¡the¡¡government£»¡¡and¡¡¡¡practically¡¡to¡¡the¡¡emperor¡¡as¡¡chief¡¡of¡¡the¡¡government¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡¡¡senate£»¡¡the¡¡council¡¡of¡¡state£»¡¡the¡¡legislative¡¡body£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡¡¡emperor£»¡¡are¡¡all¡¡creatures¡¡of¡¡the¡¡French¡¡state£»¡¡and¡¡have¡¡properly¡¡¡¡no¡¡political¡¡functions£»¡¡and¡¡to¡¡give¡¡them¡¡such¡¡functions¡¡is¡¡to¡¡¡¡place¡¡the¡¡sovereign¡¡under¡¡his¡¡own¡¡subjects£¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡real¡¡aim¡¡of¡¡the¡¡¡¡imperial¡¡constitution¡¡is¡¡to¡¡secure¡¡despotic¡¡power¡¡under¡¡the¡¡¡¡guise¡¡of¡¡republicanism¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡leaves¡¡and¡¡is¡¡intended¡¡to¡¡leave¡¡the¡¡¡¡nation¡¡no¡¡way¡¡of¡¡practically¡¡asserting¡¡its¡¡sovereignty¡¡but¡¡by¡¡¡¡either¡¡a¡¡revolution¡¡or¡¡a¡¡plebiscitum£»¡¡and¡¡a¡¡plebiscitum¡¡is¡¡¡¡permissible¡¡only¡¡where¡¡there¡¡is¡¡no¡¡regular¡¡government¡£

The¡¡British¡¡constitution¡¡is¡¡consistent¡¡with¡¡itself£»¡¡but¡¡imposes¡¡¡¡no¡¡restriction¡¡on¡¡the¡¡power¡¡of¡¡the¡¡government¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡French¡¡¡¡imperial¡¡constitution¡¡is¡¡illogical£»¡¡inconsistent¡¡with¡¡itself¡¡as¡¡¡¡well¡¡as¡¡with¡¡the¡¡free¡¡action¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nation¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡American¡¡¡¡constitution¡¡has¡¡all¡¡the¡¡advantages¡¡of¡¡both£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡¡¡disadvantages¡¡of¡¡neither¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡convention¡¡is¡¡not¡¡the¡¡government¡¡¡¡like¡¡the¡¡British¡¡Parliament£»¡¡nor¡¡a¡¡creature¡¡of¡¡the¡¡state¡¡like¡¡¡¡the¡¡French¡¡senate£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡sovereign¡¡state¡¡itself£»¡¡in¡¡a¡¡¡¡practical¡¡form¡£¡¡¡¡By¡¡means¡¡of¡¡the¡¡convention¡¡the¡¡government¡¡is¡¡¡¡restricted¡¡to¡¡its¡¡delegated¡¡powers£»¡¡and¡¡these£»¡¡if¡¡found¡¡in¡¡¡¡practice¡¡either¡¡¡¡250¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡too¡¡great¡¡or¡¡too¡¡small£»¡¡can¡¡be¡¡enlarged¡¡or¡¡¡¡contracted¡¡in¡¡a¡¡regular£»¡¡orderly¡¡way£»¡¡without¡¡resorting¡¡to¡¡a¡¡¡¡revolution¡¡or¡¡to¡¡a¡¡plebiscitum¡£¡¡¡¡Whatever¡¡political¡¡grievances¡¡¡¡there¡¡may¡¡be£»¡¡there¡¡is¡¡always¡¡present¡¡the¡¡sovereign¡¡convention¡¡¡¡competent¡¡to¡¡redress¡¡them¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡efficiency¡¡of¡¡power¡¡is¡¡thus¡¡¡¡secured¡¡without¡¡danger¡¡to¡¡liberty£»¡¡and¡¡freedom¡¡without¡¡danger¡¡to¡¡¡¡power¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡recognition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡convention£»¡¡the¡¡real¡¡political¡¡¡¡sovereign¡¡of¡¡the¡¡country¡¡and¡¡its¡¡separation¡¡from¡¡and¡¡¡¡independence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ordinary¡¡government£»¡¡is¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡most¡¡¡¡striking¡¡features¡¡of¡¡the¡¡American¡¡constitution¡£

The¡¡next¡¡thing¡¡to¡¡be¡¡noted£»¡¡after¡¡the¡¡convention£»¡¡is¡¡the¡¡¡¡constitution¡¡by¡¡the¡¡convention¡¡of¡¡the¡¡government¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡¡¡constitution£»¡¡as¡¡Mr¡£¡¡Madison¡¡well¡¡observes£»¡¡divides¡¡the¡¡powers¡¡¡¡conceded¡¡by¡¡the¡¡convention¡¡to¡¡government¡¡between¡¡the¡¡General¡¡¡¡Government¡¡and¡¡the¡¡particular¡¡State¡¡governments¡£¡¡¡¡Strictly¡¡¡¡speaking£»¡¡the¡¡government¡¡is¡¡one£»¡¡and¡¡its¡¡powers¡¡only¡¡are¡¡divided¡¡¡¡and¡¡exercised¡¡by¡¡two¡¡sets¡¡of¡¡agents¡¡or¡¡ministries¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡¡¡division¡¡of¡¡the¡¡powers¡¡of¡¡government¡¡could¡¡never¡¡have¡¡been¡¡¡¡established¡¡by¡¡the¡¡convention¡¡if¡¡the¡¡American¡¡people¡¡had¡¡not¡¡¡¡been¡¡providentially¡¡constituted¡¡one¡¡people£»¡¡existing¡¡and¡¡acting¡¡¡¡through¡¡particular¡¡State¡¡organizations¡£¡¡¡¡Here¡¡the¡¡unwritten¡¡¡¡constitution£»¡¡or¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡¡¡251¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡written¡¡in¡¡the¡¡people¡¡¡¡themselves£»¡¡rendered¡¡practicable¡¡and¡¡dictated¡¡the¡¡written¡¡¡¡constitution£»¡¡or¡¡constitution¡¡ordained¡¡by¡¡the¡¡convention¡¡and¡¡¡¡engrossed¡¡on¡¡parchment¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡only¡¡expresses¡¡in¡¡the¡¡government¡¡the¡¡¡¡fact¡¡which¡¡pre¡­existed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡national¡¡organization¡¡and¡¡life¡£

This¡¡division¡¡of¡¡the¡¡powers¡¡of¡¡government¡¡is¡¡peculiar¡¡to¡¡the¡¡¡¡United¡¡States£»¡¡and¡¡is¡¡an¡¡effective¡¡safeguard¡¡against¡¡both¡¡feudal¡¡¡¡disintegration¡¡and¡¡Roman¡¡centralism¡£¡¡¡¡Misled¡¡by¡¡their¡¡prejudices¡¡¡¡and¡¡peculiar¡¡interests£»¡¡a¡¡portion¡¡of¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡the¡¡United¡¡¡¡States£»¡¡pleading¡¡in¡¡their¡¡justification¡¡the¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡State¡¡¡¡sovereignty£»¡¡attempted¡¡disintegration£»¡¡secession£»¡¡and¡¡national¡¡¡¡independence¡¡separate¡¡from¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡¡¡central¡¡force¡¡of¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡was¡¡too¡¡strong¡¡for¡¡them¡¡to¡¡¡¡succeed¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡unity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nation¡¡was¡¡too¡¡strong¡¡to¡¡be¡¡¡¡effectually¡¡broken¡£¡¡¡¡No¡¡doubt¡¡the¡¡reaction¡¡against¡¡secession¡¡and¡¡¡¡disintegration¡¡will¡¡strengthen¡¡the¡¡tendency¡¡to¡¡centralism£»¡¡but¡¡¡¡centralism¡¡can¡¡succeed¡¡no¡¡better¡¡than¡¡disintegration¡¡has¡¡¡¡succeeded¡¡because¡¡the¡¡General¡¡government¡¡has¡¡no¡¡subsistentia£»¡¡no¡¡¡¡suppositum£»¡¡to¡¡borrow¡¡a¡¡theological¡¡term£»¡¡outside¡¡or¡¡independent¡¡¡¡of¡¡the¡¡States¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡particular¡¡governments¡¡are¡¡stronger£»¡¡if¡¡¡¡there¡¡be¡¡any¡¡difference£»¡¡to¡¡protect¡¡the¡¡States¡¡against¡¡¡¡centralism¡¡than¡¡the¡¡General¡¡government¡¡is¡¡to¡¡protect¡¡the¡¡252¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Union¡¡¡¡against¡¡disintegration£»¡¡and¡¡after¡¡swinging¡¡for¡¡a¡¡time¡¡too¡¡far¡¡¡¡toward¡¡one¡¡extreme¡¡and¡¡then¡¡too¡¡far¡¡toward¡¡the¡¡other£»¡¡the¡¡public¡¡¡¡mind¡¡will¡¡recover¡¡its¡¡equilibrium£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡government¡¡move¡¡on¡¡in¡¡¡¡its¡¡constitutional¡¡path¡£

Republican¡¡Rome¡¡attempted¡¡to¡¡guard¡¡against¡¡excessive¡¡centralism¡¡¡¡by¡¡the¡¡tribunitial¡¡veto£»¡¡or¡¡by¡¡the¡¡organization¡¡of¡¡a¡¡negative¡¡or¡¡¡¡obstructive¡¡power¡£¡¡¡¡Mr¡£¡¡Calhoun¡¡thought¡¡this¡¡admirable£»¡¡and¡¡¡¡wished¡¡to¡¡effect¡¡the¡¡same¡¡end¡¡here£»¡¡where¡¡it¡¡is¡¡secured¡¡by¡¡¡¡other£»¡¡more¡¡effective£»¡¡and¡¡less¡¡objectionable¡¡means£»¡¡by¡¡a¡¡State¡¡¡¡veto¡¡on¡¡the¡¡acts¡¡of¡¡Congress£»¡¡by¡¡a¡¡dual¡¡executive£»¡¡and¡¡by¡¡¡¡substituting¡¡concurrent¡¡for¡¡numerical¡¡majorities¡£¡¡¡¡Imperial¡¡Rome¡¡¡¡gradually¡¡swept¡¡away¡¡the¡¡tribunitial¡¡veto£»¡¡concentrated¡¡all¡¡¡¡power¡¡in¡¡the¡¡hands¡¡of¡¡the¡¡emperor£»¡¡became¡¡completely¡¡¡¡centralized£»¡¡and¡¡fell¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡British¡¡constitution¡¡seeks¡¡the¡¡same¡¡¡¡end¡¡by¡¡substituting¡¡estates¡¡for¡¡the¡¡state£»¡¡and¡¡establishing¡¡a¡¡¡¡mixed¡¡government£»¡¡in¡¡which¡¡monarchy£»¡¡aristocracy£»¡¡and¡¡democracy¡¡¡¡temper£»¡¡check£»¡¡or¡¡balance¡¡each¡¡other£»¡¡but¡¡practically¡¡the¡¡¡¡commons¡¡estate¡¡has¡¡become¡¡supreme£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡nobility¡¡govern¡¡not¡¡¡¡in¡¡the¡¡house¡¡of¡¡lords£»¡¡and¡¡can¡¡really¡¡influence¡¡public¡¡affairs¡¡¡¡only¡¡through¡¡the¡¡house¡¡of¡¡commons¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡the¡¡British¡¡¡¡constitution¡¡is¡¡not¡¡the¡¡division¡¡of¡¡the¡¡powers¡¡of¡¡government£»¡¡¡¡but¡¡the¡¡an¡­¡¡253¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡tagonism¡¡of¡¡estates£»¡¡or¡¡rather¡¡of¡¡interests£»¡¡trusting¡¡¡¡to¡¡the¡¡obstructive¡¡influence¡¡of¡¡that¡¡antagonism¡¡to¡¡preserve¡¡the¡¡¡¡government¡¡from¡¡pure¡¡centralism¡£¡¡¡¡Hence¡¡the¡¡study¡¡of¡¡the¡¡British¡¡¡¡statesman¡¡is¡¡to¡¡manage¡¡diverse¡¡and¡¡antagonistic¡¡parties¡¡and¡¡¡¡interests¡¡so¡¡as¡¡to¡¡gain¡¡the¡¡ability¡¡to¡¡act£»¡¡which¡¡he¡¡can¡¡do¡¡only¡¡¡¡by¡¡intrigue£»¡¡cajolery£»¡¡bribery¡¡in¡¡one¡¡form¡¡or¡¡another£»¡¡and¡¡¡¡corruption¡¡of¡¡every¡¡sort¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡British¡¡government¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡¡¡carried¡¡on¡¡by¡¡fair£»¡¡honest£»¡¡a

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ