the american republic-第23节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
Provinces revolt and become independent states or nations； but only when they have previously existed as such； and have retained the tradition of their old constitution and independence； or when the administration has erected them into real though dependent political communities。 A portion of the people of a state not so erected or organized； that has in no sense had a distinct political existence of its own； has never separated from the national body and formed a new and independent nation。 It cannot revolt； it may rise up against the government； and either revolutionize and take possession of the state； or be put down by the government as an insurrection。 The amalgamation of the conquering and the conquered forms a new people； and modifies the institutions of both； but does not necessarily form a 147 new nation or political community。 The English of to…day are very different from both the Normans and the Saxons； or Dano…Saxons； of the time of Richard Coeur de Lion； but they constitute the same state or political community。 England is still England。
The Roman empire； conquered by the Northern barbarians； has been cut up into several separate and independent nations； but because its several provinces had； prior to their conquest by the Roman arms； been independent nations or tribes； and more especially because the conquerors themselves were divided into several distinct nations or confederacies。 If the barbarians had been united in a single nation or state； the Roman empire most likely would have changed masters； indeed； but have retained its unity and its constitution； for the Germanic nations that finally seated themselves on its ruins had no wish to destroy its name or nationality； for they were themselves more than half Romanized before conquering Rome。 But the new nations into which the empire has been divided have never been； at any moment； without political or governmental organization； continued from the constitution of the conquering tribe or nation； modified more or less by what was retained from the empire。
148 It is not pretended that the constitutions of states cannot be altered； or that every people starts with a constitution fully developed； as would seem to be the doctrine of De Maistre。 The constitution of the family is rather economical than political； and the tribe is far from being a fully developed state。 Strictly speaking； the state； the modern equivalent for the city of the Greeks and Romans； was not fully formed till men began to build and live in cities； and became fixed to a national territory。 But in the first place； the eldest born of the human race； we are told； built a city； and even in cities we find traces of the family and tribal organization long after their municipal existencein Athens down to the Macedonian conquest； and in Rome down to the establishment of the Empire； and； in the second place； the pastoral nations； though they have not precisely the city or state organization； yet have a national organization； and obey a national authority。 Strictly speaking； no pastoral nation has a civil or political constitution； but they have what in our modern tongues can be expressed by no other term。 The feudal regime； which was in full vigor even in Europe from the tenth to the close of the fourteenth century； had nothing to do with cities； and really recognized no state 149 proper； yet who hesitates to speak of it as a civil or political system； though a very imperfect one？
The civil order； as it now exists； was not fully developed in the early ages。 For a long time the national organizations bore unmistakable traces of having been developed from the patriarchal； and modelled from the family or tribe； as they do still in all the non…Christian world。 Religion itself； before the Incarnation； bore traces of the same organization。 Even with the Jews； religion was transmitted and disused； not as under Christianity by conversion； but by natural generation or family adoption。 With all the Gentile tribes or nations； it was the same。 At first the father was both priest and king； an when the two offices were separated； the priests formed a distinct and hereditary class or caste； rejected by Christianity； which； as we have seen； admits priests only after the order of Melchisedech。 The Jews had the synagogue； and preserved the primitive revelation in its purity and integrity； but the Greeks and Romans； more fully than any other ancient nations； preserved or developed the political order that best conforms to the Christian religion； and Christianity； it is worthy of remark； followed in the track of the Roman armies； and it gains 150 a permanent establishment only where was planted； or where it is able to plant； the Graeco…Roman civilization。 The Graeco…Roman republics were hardly less a schoolmaster to bring the world to Christ in the civil order； than the Jewish nation was to bring it to Him in the spiritual order； or in faith and worship。 In the Christian order nothing is by hereditary descent； but every thing is by election of grace。 The Christian dispensation is teleological； palingenesiac； and the whole order； prior to the Incarnation； was initial； genesiac； and continued by natural generation； as it is still in all nations and tribes outside of Christendom。 No non…Christian people is a civilized people； and； indeed； the human race seems not anywhere； prior to the Incarnation； to have attained to its majority： and it is； perhaps； because the race were not prepared for it； that the Word was not sooner incarnated。 He came only in the fulness of time； when the world was ready to receive him。
The providential constitution is； in fact； that with which the nation is born； and is； as long as the nation exists； the real living and efficient constitution of the state。 It is the source of the vitality of the state； that which controls or governs its action； and determines its destiny。 151 The constitution which a nation is said to give itself； is never the constitution of the state； but is the law ordained by the state for the government instituted under it。 Thomas Paine would admit nothing to be the constitution but a written document which he could fold up and put in his pocket； or file away in a pigeon…hole。 The Abbe Sieyes pronounced politics a science which he had finished； and he was ready to turn you out constitutions to order； with no other defect than that they had； as Carlyle wittily says； no feet； and could not go。 Many in the last century； and some； perhaps； in the present； for folly as well as wisdom has her heirs； confounded the written instrument with the constitution itself。 No constitution can be written on paper or engrossed on parchment。 What the convention may agree upon； draw up； and the people ratify by their votes； is no constitution； for it is extrinsic to the nation； not inherent and living in itis； at best； legislative instead of constitutive。 The famous Magna Charta drawn up by Cardinal Langton； and wrung from John Lackland by the English barons at Runnymede； was no constitution of England till long after the date of its concession； and even then was no constitution of the state； but a set of restrictions on power。 The constitution is 152 the intrinsic or inherent and actual constitution of the people or political community itself； that which makes the nation what it is； and distinguishes it from every other nation； and varies as nations themselves vary from one another。
The constitution of the state is not a theory； nor is it drawn up and established in accordance with any preconceived theory。 What is theoretic in a constitution is unreal。 The constitutions conceived by philosophers in their closets are constitutions only of Utopia or Dreamland。 This world is not governed by abstractions； for abstractions are nullities。 Only the concrete is real； and only the real or actual has vitality or force。 The French people adopted constitution after constitution of the most approved pattern； and amid bonfires； beating of drums； sound of trumpets； roar of musketry； and thunder of artillery； swore； no doubt； sincerely as well as enthusiastically； to observe them； but all to no effect； for they had no authority for the nation； no hold on its affections； and formed no element of its life。 The English are great constitution…mongersfor other nations。 They fancy that a constitution fashioned after their own will fit any nation that can be persuaded； wheedled； or bullied into 153 trying it on； but； unhappily； all that have tried it on have found it only an embarrassment or encumbrance。 The doctor might as well attempt to give an individual a new constitution； or the constitution of another man； as the statesman to give a nation any other constitution than that which it has； and with which it is born。
The whole history of Europe； since the fall of the Roman empire； proves this thesis。 The barbarian conquest of
