湊徨勵弌傍利 > 哂囂窮徨慕 > on some fossil remains of man >

及4准

on some fossil remains of man-及4准

弌傍 on some fossil remains of man 忖方 耽匈4000忖

梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ● 辛指欺云匈競何
!!!!隆堋響頼紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響



right side察and the same part of a rib of the left side察the hinder
part of a rib of the right side察and lastly察two hinder portions and one
middle portion of ribs察which from their unusually rounded shape察and
abrupt curvature察more resemble the ribs of a carnivorous animal than
those of a man。  Dr。 H。 v。 Meyer察however察to whose judgment I defer
will not venture to declare them to be ribs of any animal察and it only
remains to suppose that this abnormal condition has arisen from an
unusually powerful development of the thoracic muscles。

;The bones adhere strongly to the tongue察although察as proved by the use
of hydrochloric acid察the greater part of the cartilage is still
retained in them察which appears察however察to have undergone that
transformation into gelatine which has been observed by v。 Bibra in
fossil bones。  The surface of all the bones is in many spots covered
with minute black specks察which察more especially under a lens察are seen
to be formed of very delicate 'dendrites'。  These deposits察which were
first observed on the bones by Dr。 Meyer察are most distinct on the
inner surface of the cranial bones。  They consist of a ferruginous
compound察and察from their black colour察may be supposed to contain
manganese。  Similar dendritic formations also occur察not unfrequently
on laminated rocks察and are usually found in minute fissures and cracks。
At the meeting of the Lower Rhine Society at Bonn察on the 1st April
1857察Prof。 Meyer stated that he had noticed in the museum of
Poppelsdorf similar dendritic crystallizations on several fossil bones
of animals察and particularly on those of 'Ursus spelaeus'察but still
more abundantly and beautifully displayed on the fossil bones and teeth
of 'Equus adamiticus'察'Elephas primigenius'察etc。察from the caves of
Bolve and Sundwig。  Faint indications of similar 'dendrites' were
visible in a Roman skull from Siegburg察whilst other ancient skulls
which had lain for centuries in the earth察presented no trace of them。*

    footnoteА*'Verh。 des Naturhist'。 Vereins in Bonn察xiv。
    1857。  I am indebted to H。 v。 Meyer for the following
    remarks on this subject

'The incipient formation of dendritic deposits察which were formerly
regarded as a sign of a truly fossil condition察is interesting。  It has
even been supposed that in diluvial deposits the presence of
'dendrites' might be regarded as affording a certain mark of distinction
between bones mixed with the diluvium at a somewhat later period and
the true diluvial relics察to which alone it was supposed that these
deposits were confined。  But I have long been convinced that neither
can the absence of 'dendrites' be regarded as indicative of recent age
nor their presence as sufficient to establish the great antiquity of
the objects upon which they occur。  I have myself noticed upon paper
which could scarcely be more than a year old察dendritic deposits察which
could not be distinguished from those on fossil bones。  Thus I possess a
dog's skull from the Roman colony of the neighbouring Heddersheim
'Castrum Hadrianum'察which is in no way distinguishable from the fossil
bones from the Frankish caves察it presents the same colour察and adheres
to the tongue just as they do察so that this character also察which察at a
former meeting of German naturalists at Bonn察gave rise to amusing
scenes between Buckland and Schmerling察is no longer of any value。  In
disputed cases察therefore察the condition of the bone can scarcely
afford the means for determining with certainty whether it be fossil
that is to say察whether it belong to geological antiquity or to the
historical period。'

;As we cannot now look upon the primitive world as representing a wholly
different condition of things察from which no transition exists to the
organic life of the present time察the designation of 'fossil'察as
applied to 'a bone'察has no longer the sense it conveyed in the time of
Cuvier。  Sufficient grounds exist for the assumption that man coexisted
with the animals found in the 'diluvium'察and many a barbarous race
may察before all historical time察have disappeared察together with the
animals of the ancient world察whilst the races whose organization is
improved have continued the genus。  The bones which form the subject of
this paper present characters which察although not decisive as regards a
geological epoch察are察nevertheless察such as indicate a very high
antiquity。  It may also be remarked that察common as is the occurrence
of diluvial animal bones in the muddy deposits of caverns察such remains
have not hitherto been met with in the caves of the Neanderthal察and
that the bones察which were covered by a deposit of mud not more than
four or five feet thick察and without any protective covering of
stalagmite察have retained the greatest part of their organic substance。

;These circumstances might be adduced against the probability of a
geological antiquity。  Nor should we be justified in regarding the
cranial conformation as perhaps representing the most savage primitive
type of the human race察since crania exist among living savages察which
though not exhibiting察such a remarkable conformation of the forehead
which gives the skull somewhat the aspect of that of the large apes
still in other respects察as for instance in the greater depth of the
temporal fossae察the crest´like察prominent temporal ridges察and a
generally less capacious cranial cavity察exhibit an equally low stage
of development。  There is no reason for supposing that the deep frontal
hollow is due to any artificial flattening察such as is practised in
various modes by barbarous nations in the Old and New World。  The skull
is quite symmetrical察and shows no indication of counter´pressure at
the occiput察whilst察according to Morton察in the Flat´heads of the
Columbia察the frontal and parietal bones are always unsymmetrical。  Its
conformation exhibits the sparing development of the anterior part of
the head which has been so often observed in very ancient crania察and
affords one of the most striking proofs of the influence of culture and
civilization on the form of the human skull。;

In a subsequent passage察Dr。 Schaaffhausen remarks

;There is no reason whatever for regarding the unusual development of
the frontal sinuses in the remarkable skull from the Neanderthal as an
individual or pathological deformity察it is unquestionably a typical
race´character察and is physiologically connected with the uncommon
thickness of the other bones of the skeleton察which exceeds by about
one´half the usual proportions。  This expansion of the frontal sinuses
which are appendages of the air´passages察also indicates an unusual
force and power of endurance in the movements of the body察as may be
concluded from the size of all the ridges and processes for the
attachment of the muscles or bones。  That this conclusion may be drawn
from the existence of large frontal sinuses察and a prominence of the
lower frontal region察is confirmed in many ways by other observations。
By the same characters察according to Pallas察the wild horse is
distinguished from the domesticated察and察according to Cuvier察the
fossil cave´bear from every recent species of bear察whilst察according
to Roulin察the pig察which has become wild in America察and regained a
resemblance to the wild boar察is thus distinguished from the same animal
in the domesticated state察as is the chamois from the goat察and
lastly察the bull´dog察which is characterised by its large bones and
strongly´developed muscles from every other kind of dog。  The estimation
of the facial angle察the determination of which察according to Professor
Owen察is also difficult in the great apes察owing to the very prominent
supra´orbital ridges察in the present case is rendered still more
difficult from the absence both of the auditory opening and of the
nasal spine。  But if the proper horizontal position of the skull be
taken from the remaining portions of the orbital plates察and the
ascending line made to touch the surface of the frontal bone behind the
prominent supra´orbital ridges察the facial angle is not found to exceed
56 degrees。* Unfortunately察no portions of the facial bones察whose
conformation is so decisive as regards the form and expression of the
head察have been preserved。  The cranial capacity察compared with the
uncommon strength of the corporeal frame察would seem to indicate a small
cerebral development。  The skull察as it is察holds about 31 ounces of
millet´seed察and as察from the proportionate size of the wanting bones
the whole cranial cavity should have about 6 ounces more added察the
contents察were it perfect察may be taken at 37 ounces。  Tiedemann
assigns察as the cranial contents in the Negro察40察38察and 35 ounces。
The cranium holds rather more than 36 ounces of water察which
corresponds to a capacity of 1033。24 cubic centimetres。  Huschke
estimates the cranial contents of a Negress at 1127 cubic centimetres
of an old Negro at 1146 cubic centimetres。  The capacity of the Malay
skulls察estimated by water察equalled 36察33 ounces察whilst in the
diminutive Hindoos it falls to as little as 27 ounces。;

    footnoteА*Estimating the facial angle in the way
    suggest

卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 0 0

低辛嬬浪散議