symposium-第7节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
； for he suffers not by force if he suffers； force comes not near him； neither when he acts does he act by force。 For all men in all things serve him of their own free will； and where there is voluntary agreement； there； as the laws which are the lords of the city say； is justice。 And not only is he just but exceedingly temperate； for Temperance is the acknowledged ruler of the pleasures and desires； and no pleasure ever masters Love； he is their master and they are his servants； and if he conquers them he must be temperate indeed。 As to courage； even the God of War is no match for him； he is the captive and Love is the lord； for love； the love of Aphrodite； masters him； as the tale runs； and the master is stronger than the servant。 And if he conquers the bravest of all others； he must be himself the bravest。 Of his courage and justice and temperance I have spoken； but I have yet to speak of his wisdom…and according to the measure of my ability I must try to do my best。 In the first place he is a poet （and here； like Eryximachus； I magnify my art）； and he is also the source of poesy in others； which he could not be if he were not himself a poet。 And at the touch of him every one becomes a poet； even though he had no music in him before； this also is a proof that Love is a good poet and accomplished in all the fine arts； for no one can give to another that which he has not himself； or teach that of which he has no knowledge。 Who will deny that the creation of the animals is his doing？ Are they not all the works his wisdom； born and begotten of him？ And as to the artists； do we not know that he only of them whom love inspires has the light of fame？…he whom Love touches riot walks in darkness。 The arts of medicine and archery and divination were discovered by Apollo； under the guidance of love and desire； so that he too is a disciple of Love。 Also the melody of the Muses； the metallurgy of Hephaestus； the weaving of Athene； the empire of Zeus over gods and men； are all due to Love； who was the inventor of them。 And so Love set in order the empire of the gods…the love of beauty； as is evident； for with deformity Love has no concern。 In the days of old； as I began by saying； dreadful deeds were done among the gods； for they were ruled by Necessity； but now since the birth of Love； and from the Love of the beautiful； has sprung every good in heaven and earth。 Therefore； Phaedrus； I say of Love that he is the fairest and best in himself； and the cause of what is fairest and best in all other things。 And there comes into my mind a line of poetry in which he is said to be the god who
Gives peace on earth and calms the stormy deep； Who stills the winds and bids the sufferer sleep。
This is he who empties men of disaffection and fills them with affection； who makes them to meet together at banquets such as these： in sacrifices； feasts； dances； he is our lord…who sends courtesy and sends away discourtesy； who gives kindness ever and never gives unkindness； the friend of the good； the wonder of the wise； the amazement of the gods； desired by those who have no part in him； and precious to those who have the better part in him； parent of delicacy； luxury； desire； fondness； softness； grace； regardful of the good； regardless of the evil： in every word； work； wish； fear…saviour； pilot； comrade； helper； glory of gods and men； leader best and brightest： in whose footsteps let every man follow； sweetly singing in his honour and joining in that sweet strain with which love charms the souls of gods and men。 Such is the speech； Phaedrus； half…playful； yet having a certain measure of seriousness； which； according to my ability； I dedicate to the god。 When Agathon had done speaking； Aristodemus said that there was a general cheer； the young man was thought to have spoken in a manner worthy of himself； and of the god。 And Socrates； looking at Eryximachus； said： Tell me； son of Acumenus； was there not reason in my fears？ and was I not a true prophet when I said that Agathon would make a wonderful oration； and that I should be in a strait？ The part of the prophecy which concerns Agathon； replied Eryximachus； appears to me to be true； but； not the other part…that you will be in a strait。 Why； my dear friend； said Socrates； must not I or any one be in a strait who has to speak after he has heard such a rich and varied discourse？ I am especially struck with the beauty of the concluding words…who could listen to them without amazement？ When I reflected on the immeasurable inferiority of my own powers； I was ready to run away for shame； if there had been a possibility of escape。 For I was reminded of Gorgias； and at the end of his speech I fancied that Agathon was shaking at me the Gorginian or Gorgonian head of the great master of rhetoric； which was simply to turn me and my speech； into stone； as Homer says； and strike me dumb。 And then I perceived how foolish I had been in consenting to take my turn with you in praising love； and saying that I too was a master of the art； when I really had no conception how anything ought to be praised。 For in my simplicity I imagined that the topics of praise should be true； and that this being presupposed； out of the true the speaker was to choose the best and set them forth in the best manner。 And I felt quite proud； thinking that I knew the nature of true praise； and should speak well。 Whereas I now see that the intention was to attribute to Love every species of greatness and glory； whether really belonging to him not； without regard to truth or falsehood…that was no matter； for the original； proposal seems to have been not that each of you should really praise Love； but only that you should appear to praise him。 And so you attribute to Love every imaginable form of praise which can be gathered anywhere； and you say that 〃he is all this；〃 and 〃the cause of all that；〃 making him appear the fairest and best of all to those who know him not； for you cannot impose upon those who know him。 And a noble and solemn hymn of praise have you rehearsed。 But as I misunderstood the nature of the praise when I said that I would take my turn； I must beg to be absolved from the promise which I made in ignorance； and which （as Euripides would say） was a promise of the lips and not of the mind。 Farewell then to such a strain： for I do not praise in that way； no； indeed； I cannot。 But if you like to here the truth about love； I am ready to speak in my own manner； though I will not make myself ridiculous by entering into any rivalry with you。 Say then； Phaedrus； whether you would like； to have the truth about love； spoken in any words and in any order which may happen to come into my mind at the time。 Will that be agreeable to you？ Aristodemus said that Phaedrus and the company bid him speak in any manner which he thought best。 Then； he added； let me have your permission first to ask Agathon a few more questions； in order that I may take his admissions as the premisses of my discourse。 I grant the permission； said Phaedrus： put your questions。 Socrates then proceeded as follows：… In the magnificent oration which you have just uttered； I think that you were right； my dear Agathon； in proposing to speak of the nature of Love first and afterwards of his works…that is a way of beginning which I very much approve。 And as you have spoken so eloquently of his nature； may I ask you further； Whether love is the love of something or of nothing？ And here I must explain myself： I do not want you to say that love is the love of a father or the love of a mother…that would be ridiculous； but to answer as you would； if I asked is a father a father of something？ to which you would find no difficulty in replying； of a son or daughter： and the answer would be right。 Very true； said Agathon。 And you would say the same of a mother？ He assented。 Yet let me ask you one more question in order to illustrate my meaning： Is not a brother to be regarded essentially as a brother of something？ Certainly； he replied。 That is； of a brother or sister？ Yes； he said。 And now； said Socrates； I will ask about Love：…Is Love of something or of nothing？ Of something； surely； he replied。 Keep in mind what this is； and tell me what I want to know…whether Love desires that of which love is。 Yes； surely。 And does he possess； or does he not possess； that which he loves and desires？ Probably not； I should say。 Nay； replied Socrates； I would have you consider whether 〃necessarily〃 is not rather the word。 The inference that he who desires something is in want of something； and that he who desires nothing is in want of nothing； is in my judgment； Agathon absolutely and necessarily true。 What do you think？ I agree with you； said Agathon。 Very good。 Would he who is great； desire to be great； or he who is strong； desire to be strong？ That would be inconsistent with our previous admissions。 True。 For he who is anything cannot want to be that which he is？ Very true。 And yet； added Socrates； if a man being strong desired to be strong； or being swift desired to be swift； or being healthy desired to be healthy； in that case he might be thought to desire something which he already has or is。 I give the example in order that we may avoid mis
