the higher learning in america-第5节

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！





in　such　enterprises　as　professional　training；　undergraduate



instruction；　supervision　and　guidance　of。　the　secondary　school



system；　edification　of　the　unlearned　by　〃university　extension〃



and　similar　excursions　into　the　field　of　public　amusement；



training　of　secondary　school　teachers；　encouragement　of　amateurs



by　〃correspondence；〃　etc。　What　and　how　much　of　these　extraneous



activities　the　university　should　allow　itself　is　a　matter　on



which　there　is　no　general　agreement　even　among　those　whose



inclinations　go　far　in　that　direction；　but　what　is　taken　for



granted　throughout　all　this　advocacy　of　outlying　detail　is　the



secure　premise　that　the　university　is　in　the　first　place　a



seminary　of　the　higher　learning；　and　that　no　school　can　make　good



its　pretensions　to　university　standing　except　by　proving　its



fitness　in　this　respect。（4*）



　　　　The　conservation　and　advancement　of　the　higher　learning



involves　two　lines　of　work；　distinct　but　closely　bound　together：



（a）　scientific　and　scholarly　inquiry；　and　（b）　the　instruction　of



students。（5*）　The　former　of　these　is　primary　and　indispensable。



It　is　this　work　of　intellectual　enterprise　that　gives　its



character　to　the　university　and　marks　it　off　from　the　lower



schools。　The　work　of　teaching　properly　belongs　in　the　university



only　because　and　in　so　far　as　it　incites　and　facilitates　the



university　man's　work　of　inquiry；　　and　the　extent　to　which　such



teaching　furthers　the　work　of　inquiry　is　scarcely　to　be



appreciated　without　a　somewhat　extended　experience。　By　and　large；



there　are　but　few　and　inconsequential　exceptions　to　the　rule　that



teaching；　as　a　concomitant　of　investigation；　is　distinctly



advantageous　to　the　investigator；　particularly　in　so　far　as　his



work　is　of　the　nature　of　theoretical　inquiry。　The　instruction



necessarily　involved　in　university　work；　therefore；　is　only　such



as　can　readily　be　combined　with　the　work　of　inquiry；　at　the　same



time　that　it　goes　directly　to　further　the　higher　learning　in　that



it　trains　the　incoming　generation　of　scholars　and　scientists　for



the　further　pursuit　of　knowledge。　Training　for　other　purposes　is



necessarily　of　a　different　kind　and　is　best　done　elsewhere；　and



it　does　not　become　university　work　by　calling　it　so　and　imposing



its　burden　on　the　men　and　equipment　whose　only　concern　should　be



the　higher　learning。



　　　　University　teaching；　having　a　particular　and　special　purpose



　the　pursuit　of　knowledge　　it　has　also　a　particular　and



special　character；　such　as　to　differentiate　it　from　other



teaching　and　at　the　same　time　leave　it　relatively　ineffective　for



other　purposes。　Its　aim　is　to　equip　the　student　for　the　work　of



inquiry；　not　to　give　him　facility　in　that　conduct　of　affairs　that



turns　such　knowledge　to　〃practical　account。〃　Hence　the



instruction　that　falls　legitimately　under　the　hand　of　the



university　man　is　necessarily　subsidiary　and　incidental　to　the



work　of　inquiry；　and　it　can　effectually　be　carried　on　only　by



such　a　teacher　as　is　himself　occupied　with　the　scrutiny　of　what



knowledge　is　already　in　hand　and　with　pushing　the　inquiry　to



further　gains。　And　it　can　be　carried　on　by　such　a　teacher　only　by



drawing　his　students　into　his　own　work　of　inquiry。　The　student's



relation　to　his　teacher　necessarily　becomes　that　of　an　apprentice



to　his　master；　rather　than　that　of　a　pupil　to　his　schoolmaster。



　　　　A　university　is　a　body　of　mature　scholars　and　scientists；　the



〃faculty；〃　　with　whatever　plant　and　other　equipment　may



incidentally　serve　as　appliances　for　their　work　in　any　given



case。　The　necessary　material　equipment　may　under　modern



conditions　be　very　considerable；　as　may　also　the　number　of



care…takers；　assistants；　etc。；　but　all　that　is　not　the



university；　but　merely　its　equipment。　And　the　university　man's



work　is　the　pursuit　of　knowledge；　together　with　whatever　advisory



surveillance　and　guidance　he　may　consistently　afford　such



students　as　are　entering　on　the　career　of　learning　at　a　point



where　his　outlook　and　methods　of　work　may　be　of　effect　for　them。



No　man　whose　energies　are　not　habitually　bent　on　increasing　and



proving　up　the　domain　of　learning　belongs　legitimately　on　the



university　staff。　The　university　man　is；　properly；　a　student；　not



a　schoolmaster。　Such　is　the　unmistakable　drift　of　sentiment　and



professed　endeavour；　in　so　far　as　it　is　guided　by　the　cultural



aspirations　of　civilized　mankind　rather　than　by　the　emulative



strategy　of　individuals　seeking　their　own　preferment。（6*）



　　　　All　this；　of　course；　implies　no　undervaluing　of　the　work　of



those　men　who　aim　to　prepare　the　youth　for　citizenship　and　a



practical　career。　It　is　only　a　question　of　distinguishing　between



things　that　belong　apart。　The　scientist　and　the　scholar　on　the



one　hand；　and　the　schoolmaster　on　the　other　hand；　both　belong



within　the　later　growth　of　civilization；　but　a　differentiation　of



the　two　classes；　and　a　division　of　their　work；　is　indispensable



if　they　are　to　do　their　work　as　it　should　be　done；　and　as　the



modern　community　thoughtfully　intends　that　it　should　be　done。　And



while　such　a　division　of　labour　has　hitherto　not　been　carried



through　with　any　degree　of　consistency；　it　is　at　least　under　way；



and　there　is　nothing　but　the　presumption　of　outworn　usage　that



continues　to　hold　the　two　lines　of　work　together；　to　the



detriment　of　both；　backed；　it　is　true；　by　ambitions　of



self…aggrandizement　on　the　part　of　many　schools　and　many　of　their



directorates。



　　　　The　schoolmaster　and　his　work　may　be　equally；　or　more；



valuable　to　the　community　at　large　　presumably　more　rather　than



less　　but　in　so　far　as　his　chief　interest　is　of　the　pedagogical



sort　his　place　is　not　in　the　university。　Exposition；　instruction



and　drill　belong　in　and　professional　schools。　The　consistent　aim



there　is；　and　should　be；　to　instruct；　to　inculcate　a　knowledge　of



results；　and　to　give　the　pupil　a　working　facility　in　applying　it。



On　the　university　level　such　information　and　training　is　（should



be）　incidental　to　the　work　of　research。　The　university　man　is



almost　unavoidably　a　teacher；　by　precept　and　example；　but　he　can



not　without　detriment　to　his　work　as　scientist　or　scholar　serve



as　a　taskmaster　or　a　vehicle　of　indoctrination。　The　student　who



comes　up　to　the　university　for　the　pursuit　of　knowledge　is



expected　to　know　what　he　wants　and　to　want　it；　without



compulsion。　If　he　falls　short　in　these　respects；　if　he　has　not



the　requisite　interest　and　initiative；　it　is　his　own　misfortune；



not　the　fault　of　his　teacher。　What　he　has　a　legitimate　claim　to



is　an　opportunity　for　such　personal　contact　and　guidance　as　will



give　him　familiarity　with　the　ways　and　means　of　the　higher



learning；　　any　information　imparted　to　him　being　incidental　to



this　main　work　of　habituation。　He　gets　a　chance　to　make　himself　a



scholar；　and　what　he　will　do　with　his　opportunities　in　this　way



lies　in　his　own　discretion。



　　　　The　difference　between　the　modern　university　and　the　lower



and　professional　schools　is　broad　and　simple；　not　so　much　a



difference　of　degree　as　of　kind。　There　is　no　difficulty　about



apprehending　or　appreciating　this　difference；　the　dispute　turns



not　on　the　practicability　of　distinguishing　between　the　two；　but



on　the　desirability　of　letting　such　a　distinction　go　into　effect。



It　is　a　controversy　between　those　who　wish　to　hold　fast　that



which　once　was　good　and　those　who　look　to　make　use　of　the　means



in　hand　for　new　ends　and　meet　new　exigencies。



　　　　The　lower　schools　（including　the　professional　schools）　are；



in　the　ideal　scheme；　designed　to　fit　the　incoming　generation　for



civil　life；　they　are　therefore　occupied　with　instilling　such



knowledge　and　habits　as　will　make　their　pupils　fit　citizens　of



the　world　in　whatever　position　in　the　fabric　of　workday　life　they



may　fall。　The　university　on　the　other　hand　is　specialized　to　fit



men　for　a　life　of　science　and　scholarship；　and　it　is　accordingly



concerned；　with　such　discipline　only　as　will　give　efficiency　in



the　pursuit　of　knowledge　and　fit　its　students　for　the　increase



and　diffusion　of　learning。　It　follows　that　while　the　lower



schools　necessarily　take　over　the　surveillance　of　their　pupils'



everyday　life；　and　exercise　a　large　measure　of　authority　and



responsible　interference　in　that　behalf；　the　university　assumes



（or　should　assume）　no　responsibility　for　its　students'　fortunes



in　the　moral；　religious；　pecuniary；　domestic；　or　hygienic



respect。



　　　　Doubtless　the　larger　and　more　serious　responsibility　in　t