posterior analytics-第24节
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
knowledge are not innate but come to be in us; or are innate but at
first unnoticed。 Now it is strange if we possess them from birth;
for it means that we possess apprehensions more accurate than
demonstration and fail to notice them。 If on the other hand we acquire
them and do not previously possess them; how could we apprehend and
learn without a basis of pre…existent knowledge? For that is
impossible; as we used to find in the case of demonstration。 So it
emerges that neither can we possess them from birth; nor can they come
to be in us if we are without knowledge of them to the extent of
having no such developed state at all。 Therefore we must possess a
capacity of some sort; but not such as to rank higher in accuracy than
these developed states。 And this at least is an obvious characteristic
of all animals; for they possess a congenital discriminative
capacity which is called sense…perception。 But though sense…perception
is innate in all animals; in some the sense…impression comes to
persist; in others it does not。 So animals in which this persistence
does not come to be have either no knowledge at all outside the act of
perceiving; or no knowledge of objects of which no impression
persists; animals in which it does come into being have perception and
can continue to retain the sense…impression in the soul: and when such
persistence is frequently repeated a further distinction at once
arises between those which out of the persistence of such
sense…impressions develop a power of systematizing them and those
which do not。 So out of sense…perception comes to be what we call
memory; and out of frequently repeated memories of the same thing
develops experience; for a number of memories constitute a single
experience。 From experience again…i。e。 from the universal now
stabilized in its entirety within the soul; the one beside the many
which is a single identity within them all…originate the skill of
the craftsman and the knowledge of the man of science; skill in the
sphere of coming to be and science in the sphere of being。
We conclude that these states of knowledge are neither innate in a
determinate form; nor developed from other higher states of knowledge;
but from sense…perception。 It is like a rout in battle stopped by
first one man making a stand and then another; until the original
formation has been restored。 The soul is so constituted as to be
capable of this process。
Let us now restate the account given already; though with
insufficient clearness。 When one of a number of logically
indiscriminable particulars has made a stand; the earliest universal
is present in the soul: for though the act of sense…perception is of
the particular; its content is universal…is man; for example; not
the man Callias。 A fresh stand is made among these rudimentary
universals; and the process does not cease until the indivisible
concepts; the true universals; are established: e。g。 such and such a
species of animal is a step towards the genus animal; which by the
same process is a step towards a further generalization。
Thus it is clear that we must get to know the primary premisses by
induction; for the method by which even sense…perception implants
the universal is inductive。 Now of the thinking states by which we
grasp truth; some are unfailingly true; others admit of error…opinion;
for instance; and calculation; whereas scientific knowing and
intuition are always true: further; no other kind of thought except
intuition is more accurate than scientific knowledge; whereas
primary premisses are more knowable than demonstrations; and all
scientific knowledge is discursive。 From these considerations it
follows that there will be no scientific knowledge of the primary
premisses; and since except intuition nothing can be truer than
scientific knowledge; it will be intuition that apprehends the primary
premisses…a result which also follows from the fact that demonstration
cannot be the originative source of demonstration; nor;
consequently; scientific knowledge of scientific knowledge。If;
therefore; it is the only other kind of true thinking except
scientific knowing; intuition will be the originative source of
scientific knowledge。 And the originative source of science grasps the
original basic premiss; while science as a whole is similarly
related as originative source to the whole body of fact。
…THE END…
。