Ì«×ÓүС˵Íø > Ó¢Óïµç×ÓÊé > posterior analytics >

µÚ23½Ú

posterior analytics-µÚ23½Ú

С˵£º posterior analytics ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡






deciduous¡£¡¡Thus£»¡¡let¡¡D¡¡be¡¡broad¡­leaved£»¡¡E¡¡deciduous£»¡¡F¡¡vine¡£¡¡Then¡¡E



inheres¡¡in¡¡F¡¡£¨since¡¡every¡¡vine¡¡is¡¡deciduous£©£»¡¡and¡¡D¡¡in¡¡E¡¡£¨for¡¡every



deciduous¡¡plant¡¡has¡¡broad¡¡leaves£©£º¡¡therefore¡¡every¡¡vine¡¡has¡¡broad



leaves£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡is¡¡its¡¡deciduous¡¡character¡£¡¡If£»¡¡however£»¡¡they



cannot¡¡each¡¡be¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡of¡¡the¡¡other¡¡£¨for¡¡cause¡¡is¡¡prior¡¡to¡¡effect£»



and¡¡the¡¡earth's¡¡interposition¡¡is¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡of¡¡the¡¡moon's¡¡eclipse¡¡and



not¡¡the¡¡eclipse¡¡of¡¡the¡¡interposition£©¡­if£»¡¡then£»¡¡demonstration



through¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡is¡¡of¡¡the¡¡reasoned¡¡fact¡¡and¡¡demonstration¡¡not



through¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡is¡¡of¡¡the¡¡bare¡¡fact£»¡¡one¡¡who¡¡knows¡¡it¡¡through¡¡the



eclipse¡¡knows¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡of¡¡the¡¡earth's¡¡interposition¡¡but¡¡not¡¡the



reasoned¡¡fact¡£¡¡Moreover£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡eclipse¡¡is¡¡not¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡of¡¡the



interposition£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡interposition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡eclipse£»¡¡is¡¡obvious



because¡¡the¡¡interposition¡¡is¡¡an¡¡element¡¡in¡¡the¡¡definition¡¡of



eclipse£»¡¡which¡¡shows¡¡that¡¡the¡¡eclipse¡¡is¡¡known¡¡through¡¡the



interposition¡¡and¡¡not¡¡vice¡¡versa¡£



¡¡¡¡On¡¡the¡¡other¡¡hand£»¡¡can¡¡a¡¡single¡¡effect¡¡have¡¡more¡¡than¡¡one¡¡cause£¿¡¡One



might¡¡argue¡¡as¡¡follows£º¡¡if¡¡the¡¡same¡¡attribute¡¡is¡¡predicable¡¡of¡¡more



than¡¡one¡¡thing¡¡as¡¡its¡¡primary¡¡subject£»¡¡let¡¡B¡¡be¡¡a¡¡primary¡¡subject¡¡in



which¡¡A¡¡inheres£»¡¡and¡¡C¡¡another¡¡primary¡¡subject¡¡of¡¡A£»¡¡and¡¡D¡¡and¡¡E



primary¡¡subjects¡¡of¡¡B¡¡and¡¡C¡¡respectively¡£¡¡A¡¡will¡¡then¡¡inhere¡¡in¡¡D



and¡¡E£»¡¡and¡¡B¡¡will¡¡be¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡of¡¡A's¡¡inherence¡¡in¡¡D£»¡¡C¡¡of¡¡A's



inherence¡¡in¡¡E¡£¡¡The¡¡presence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡thus¡¡necessitates¡¡that¡¡of



the¡¡effect£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡presence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡effect¡¡necessitates¡¡the¡¡presence



not¡¡of¡¡all¡¡that¡¡may¡¡cause¡¡it¡¡but¡¡only¡¡of¡¡a¡¡cause¡¡which¡¡yet¡¡need¡¡not¡¡be



the¡¡whole¡¡cause¡£¡¡We¡¡may£»¡¡however£»¡¡suggest¡¡that¡¡if¡¡the¡¡connexion¡¡to



be¡¡proved¡¡is¡¡always¡¡universal¡¡and¡¡commensurate£»¡¡not¡¡only¡¡will¡¡the



cause¡¡be¡¡a¡¡whole¡¡but¡¡also¡¡the¡¡effect¡¡will¡¡be¡¡universal¡¡and



commensurate¡£¡¡For¡¡instance£»¡¡deciduous¡¡character¡¡will¡¡belong



exclusively¡¡to¡¡a¡¡subject¡¡which¡¡is¡¡a¡¡whole£»¡¡and£»¡¡if¡¡this¡¡whole¡¡has



species£»¡¡universally¡¡and¡¡commensurately¡¡to¡¡those¡¡species¡­i¡£e¡£¡¡either



to¡¡all¡¡species¡¡of¡¡plant¡¡or¡¡to¡¡a¡¡single¡¡species¡£¡¡So¡¡in¡¡these



universal¡¡and¡¡commensurate¡¡connexions¡¡the¡¡'middle'¡¡and¡¡its¡¡effect¡¡must



reciprocate£»¡¡i¡£e¡£¡¡be¡¡convertible¡£¡¡Supposing£»¡¡for¡¡example£»¡¡that¡¡the



reason¡¡why¡¡trees¡¡are¡¡deciduous¡¡is¡¡the¡¡coagulation¡¡of¡¡sap£»¡¡then¡¡if¡¡a



tree¡¡is¡¡deciduous£»¡¡coagulation¡¡must¡¡be¡¡present£»¡¡and¡¡if¡¡coagulation



is¡¡present¡­not¡¡in¡¡any¡¡subject¡¡but¡¡in¡¡a¡¡tree¡­then¡¡that¡¡tree¡¡must¡¡be



deciduous¡£







¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡17







¡¡¡¡Can¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡of¡¡an¡¡identical¡¡effect¡¡be¡¡not¡¡identical¡¡in¡¡every



instance¡¡of¡¡the¡¡effect¡¡but¡¡different£¿¡¡Or¡¡is¡¡that¡¡impossible£¿¡¡Perhaps



it¡¡is¡¡impossible¡¡if¡¡the¡¡effect¡¡is¡¡demonstrated¡¡as¡¡essential¡¡and¡¡not¡¡as



inhering¡¡in¡¡virtue¡¡of¡¡a¡¡symptom¡¡or¡¡an¡¡accident¡­because¡¡the¡¡middle¡¡is



then¡¡the¡¡definition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡major¡¡term¡­though¡¡possible¡¡if¡¡the



demonstration¡¡is¡¡not¡¡essential¡£¡¡Now¡¡it¡¡is¡¡possible¡¡to¡¡consider¡¡the



effect¡¡and¡¡its¡¡subject¡¡as¡¡an¡¡accidental¡¡conjunction£»¡¡though¡¡such



conjunctions¡¡would¡¡not¡¡be¡¡regarded¡¡as¡¡connexions¡¡demanding



scientific¡¡proof¡£¡¡But¡¡if¡¡they¡¡are¡¡accepted¡¡as¡¡such£»¡¡the¡¡middle¡¡will



correspond¡¡to¡¡the¡¡extremes£»¡¡and¡¡be¡¡equivocal¡¡if¡¡they¡¡are¡¡equivocal£»



generically¡¡one¡¡if¡¡they¡¡are¡¡generically¡¡one¡£¡¡Take¡¡the¡¡question¡¡why



proportionals¡¡alternate¡£¡¡The¡¡cause¡¡when¡¡they¡¡are¡¡lines£»¡¡and¡¡when



they¡¡are¡¡numbers£»¡¡is¡¡both¡¡different¡¡and¡¡identical£»¡¡different¡¡in¡¡so¡¡far



as¡¡lines¡¡are¡¡lines¡¡and¡¡not¡¡numbers£»¡¡identical¡¡as¡¡involving¡¡a¡¡given



determinate¡¡increment¡£¡¡In¡¡all¡¡proportionals¡¡this¡¡is¡¡so¡£¡¡Again£»¡¡the



cause¡¡of¡¡likeness¡¡between¡¡colour¡¡and¡¡colour¡¡is¡¡other¡¡than¡¡that¡¡between



figure¡¡and¡¡figure£»¡¡for¡¡likeness¡¡here¡¡is¡¡equivocal£»¡¡meaning¡¡perhaps



in¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡case¡¡equality¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ratios¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sides¡¡and¡¡equality¡¡of



the¡¡angles£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡colours¡¡identity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡act¡¡of¡¡perceiving



them£»¡¡or¡¡something¡¡else¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sort¡£¡¡Again£»¡¡connexions¡¡requiring¡¡proof



which¡¡are¡¡identical¡¡by¡¡analogy¡¡middles¡¡also¡¡analogous¡£



¡¡¡¡The¡¡truth¡¡is¡¡that¡¡cause£»¡¡effect£»¡¡and¡¡subject¡¡are¡¡reciprocally



predicable¡¡in¡¡the¡¡following¡¡way¡£¡¡If¡¡the¡¡species¡¡are¡¡taken¡¡severally£»



the¡¡effect¡¡is¡¡wider¡¡than¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡£¨e¡£g¡£¡¡the¡¡possession¡¡of



external¡¡angles¡¡equal¡¡to¡¡four¡¡right¡¡angles¡¡is¡¡an¡¡attribute¡¡wider



than¡¡triangle¡¡or¡¡are£©£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡is¡¡coextensive¡¡with¡¡the¡¡species¡¡taken



collectively¡¡£¨in¡¡this¡¡instance¡¡with¡¡all¡¡figures¡¡whose¡¡external



angles¡¡are¡¡equal¡¡to¡¡four¡¡right¡¡angles£©¡£¡¡And¡¡the¡¡middle¡¡likewise



reciprocates£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡middle¡¡is¡¡a¡¡definition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡major£»¡¡which¡¡is



incidentally¡¡the¡¡reason¡¡why¡¡all¡¡the¡¡sciences¡¡are¡¡built¡¡up¡¡through



definition¡£



¡¡¡¡We¡¡may¡¡illustrate¡¡as¡¡follows¡£¡¡Deciduous¡¡is¡¡a¡¡universal¡¡attribute



of¡¡vine£»¡¡and¡¡is¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡of¡¡wider¡¡extent¡¡than¡¡vine£»¡¡and¡¡of



fig£»¡¡and¡¡is¡¡of¡¡wider¡¡extent¡¡than¡¡fig£º¡¡but¡¡it¡¡is¡¡not¡¡wider¡¡than¡¡but



coextensive¡¡with¡¡the¡¡totality¡¡of¡¡the¡¡species¡£¡¡Then¡¡if¡¡you¡¡take¡¡the



middle¡¡which¡¡is¡¡proximate£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡a¡¡definition¡¡of¡¡deciduous¡£¡¡I¡¡say



that£»¡¡because¡¡you¡¡will¡¡first¡¡reach¡¡a¡¡middle¡¡next¡¡the¡¡subject£»¡¡and¡¡a



premiss¡¡asserting¡¡it¡¡of¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡subject£»¡¡and¡¡after¡¡that¡¡a¡¡middle¡­the



coagulation¡¡of¡¡sap¡¡or¡¡something¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sort¡­proving¡¡the¡¡connexion¡¡of



the¡¡first¡¡middle¡¡with¡¡the¡¡major£º¡¡but¡¡it¡¡is¡¡the¡¡coagulation¡¡of¡¡sap¡¡at



the¡¡junction¡¡of¡¡leaf¡­stalk¡¡and¡¡stem¡¡which¡¡defines¡¡deciduous¡£



¡¡¡¡If¡¡an¡¡explanation¡¡in¡¡formal¡¡terms¡¡of¡¡the¡¡inter¡­relation¡¡of¡¡cause¡¡and



effect¡¡is¡¡demanded£»¡¡we¡¡shall¡¡offer¡¡the¡¡following¡£¡¡Let¡¡A¡¡be¡¡an



attribute¡¡of¡¡all¡¡B£»¡¡and¡¡B¡¡of¡¡every¡¡species¡¡of¡¡D£»¡¡but¡¡so¡¡that¡¡both¡¡A



and¡¡B¡¡are¡¡wider¡¡than¡¡their¡¡respective¡¡subjects¡£¡¡Then¡¡B¡¡will¡¡be¡¡a



universal¡¡attribute¡¡of¡¡each¡¡species¡¡of¡¡D¡¡£¨since¡¡I¡¡call¡¡such¡¡an



attribute¡¡universal¡¡even¡¡if¡¡it¡¡is¡¡not¡¡commensurate£»¡¡and¡¡I¡¡call¡¡an



attribute¡¡primary¡¡universal¡¡if¡¡it¡¡is¡¡commensurate£»¡¡not¡¡with¡¡each



species¡¡severally¡¡but¡¡with¡¡their¡¡totality£©£»¡¡and¡¡it¡¡extends¡¡beyond¡¡each



of¡¡them¡¡taken¡¡separately¡£



¡¡¡¡Thus£»¡¡B¡¡is¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡of¡¡A's¡¡inherence¡¡in¡¡the¡¡species¡¡of¡¡D£º



consequently¡¡A¡¡must¡¡be¡¡of¡¡wider¡¡extent¡¡than¡¡B£»¡¡otherwise¡¡why¡¡should



B¡¡be¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡of¡¡A's¡¡inherence¡¡in¡¡D¡¡any¡¡more¡¡than¡¡A¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡of



B's¡¡inherence¡¡in¡¡D£¿¡¡Now¡¡if¡¡A¡¡is¡¡an¡¡attribute¡¡of¡¡all¡¡the¡¡species¡¡of



E£»¡¡all¡¡the¡¡species¡¡of¡¡E¡¡will¡¡be¡¡united¡¡by¡¡possessing¡¡some¡¡common¡¡cause



other¡¡than¡¡B£º¡¡otherwise¡¡how¡¡shall¡¡we¡¡be¡¡able¡¡to¡¡say¡¡that¡¡A¡¡is



predicable¡¡of¡¡all¡¡of¡¡which¡¡E¡¡is¡¡predicable£»¡¡while¡¡E¡¡is¡¡not



predicable¡¡of¡¡all¡¡of¡¡which¡¡A¡¡can¡¡be¡¡predicated£¿¡¡I¡¡mean¡¡how¡¡can¡¡there



fail¡¡to¡¡be¡¡some¡¡special¡¡cause¡¡of¡¡A's¡¡inherence¡¡in¡¡E£»¡¡as¡¡there¡¡was¡¡of



A's¡¡inherence¡¡in¡¡all¡¡the¡¡species¡¡of¡¡D£¿¡¡Then¡¡are¡¡the¡¡species¡¡of¡¡E£»¡¡too£»



united¡¡by¡¡possessing¡¡some¡¡common¡¡cause£¿¡¡This¡¡cause¡¡we¡¡must¡¡look¡¡for¡£



Let¡¡us¡¡call¡¡it¡¡C¡£



¡¡¡¡We¡¡conclude£»¡¡then£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡same¡¡effect¡¡may¡¡have¡¡more¡¡than¡¡one



cause£»¡¡but¡¡not¡¡in¡¡subjects¡¡specifically¡¡identical¡£¡¡For¡¡instance£»¡¡the



cause¡¡of¡¡longevity¡¡in¡¡quadrupeds¡¡is¡¡lack¡¡of¡¡bile£»¡¡in¡¡birds¡¡a¡¡dry



constitution¡­or¡¡certainly¡¡something¡¡different¡£







¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡18







¡¡¡¡If¡¡immediate¡¡premisses¡¡are¡¡not¡¡reached¡¡at¡¡once£»¡¡and¡¡there¡¡is¡¡not



merely¡¡one¡¡middle¡¡but¡¡several¡¡middles£»¡¡i¡£e¡£¡¡several¡¡causes£»¡¡is¡¡the



cause¡¡of¡¡the¡¡property's¡¡inherence¡¡in¡¡the¡¡several¡¡species¡¡the¡¡middle



which¡¡is¡¡proximate¡¡to¡¡the¡¡primary¡¡universal£»¡¡or¡¡the¡¡middle¡¡which¡¡is



proximate¡¡to¡¡the¡¡species£¿¡¡Clearly¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡is¡¡that¡¡nearest¡¡to¡¡each



species¡¡severally¡¡in¡¡which¡¡it¡¡is¡¡manifested£»¡¡for¡¡that¡¡is¡¡the¡¡cause



of¡¡the¡¡subject's¡¡falling¡¡under¡¡the¡¡universal¡£¡¡To¡¡illustrate



formally£º¡¡C¡¡is¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡of¡¡B's¡¡inherence¡¡in¡¡D£»¡¡hence¡¡C¡¡is¡¡the¡¡cause



of¡¡A's¡¡inherence¡¡in¡¡D£»¡¡B¡¡of¡¡A's¡¡inherence¡¡in¡¡C£»¡¡while¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡of¡¡A's



inherence¡¡in¡¡B¡¡is¡¡B¡¡itself¡£







¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡19







¡¡¡¡As¡¡regards¡¡syllogism¡¡and¡¡demonstration£»¡¡the¡¡definition¡¡of£»¡¡and¡¡the



conditions¡¡required¡¡to¡¡produce¡¡each¡¡of¡¡them£»¡¡are¡¡now¡¡clear£»¡¡and¡¡with



that¡¡also¡¡the¡¡definition¡¡of£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡conditions¡¡required¡¡to¡¡produce£»



demonstrative¡¡knowledge£»¡¡since¡¡it¡¡is¡¡the¡¡same¡¡as¡¡demonstration¡£¡¡As



to¡¡the¡¡basic¡¡premisses£»¡¡how¡¡they¡¡become¡¡known¡¡and¡¡what¡¡is¡¡the



developed¡¡state¡¡of¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡them¡¡is¡¡made¡¡clear¡¡by¡¡raising¡¡some



preliminary¡¡problems¡£



¡¡¡¡We¡¡have¡¡already¡¡said¡¡that¡¡scientific¡¡knowledge¡¡through¡¡demonstration



is¡¡impossible¡¡unless¡¡a¡¡man¡¡knows¡¡the¡¡primary¡¡immediate¡¡premisses¡£



But¡¡there¡¡are¡¡questions¡¡which¡¡might¡¡be¡¡raised¡¡in¡¡respect¡¡of¡¡the



apprehension¡¡of¡¡these¡¡immediate¡¡premisses£º¡¡one¡¡might¡¡not¡¡only¡¡ask



whether¡¡it¡¡is¡¡of¡¡the¡¡same¡¡kind¡¡as¡¡the¡¡apprehension¡¡of¡¡the¡¡conclusions£»



but¡¡also¡¡whether¡¡there¡¡is¡¡or¡¡is¡¡not¡¡scientific¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡both£»¡¡or



scientific¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡the¡¡latter£»¡¡and¡¡of¡¡the¡¡former¡¡a¡¡different¡¡kind



of¡¡knowledge£»¡¡and£»¡¡further£»¡¡whether¡¡the¡¡developed¡¡states¡¡of



knowledge¡¡are¡¡not¡¡innate¡¡but¡¡come¡¡to¡¡be¡¡in¡¡us£»¡¡or¡¡are¡¡inna

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨1£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ