posterior analytics-µÚ17½Ú
°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
the¡¡fact¡¡of¡¡a¡¡connexion¡£¡¡Now¡¡definition¡¡reveals¡¡essential¡¡nature£»
demonstration¡¡reveals¡¡that¡¡a¡¡given¡¡attribute¡¡attaches¡¡or¡¡does¡¡not
attach¡¡to¡¡a¡¡given¡¡subject£»¡¡but¡¡different¡¡things¡¡require¡¡different
demonstrations¡unless¡¡the¡¡one¡¡demonstration¡¡is¡¡related¡¡to¡¡the¡¡other¡¡as
part¡¡to¡¡whole¡£¡¡I¡¡add¡¡this¡¡because¡¡if¡¡all¡¡triangles¡¡have¡¡been¡¡proved¡¡to
possess¡¡angles¡¡equal¡¡to¡¡two¡¡right¡¡angles£»¡¡then¡¡this¡¡attribute¡¡has¡¡been
proved¡¡to¡¡attach¡¡to¡¡isosceles£»¡¡for¡¡isosceles¡¡is¡¡a¡¡part¡¡of¡¡which¡¡all
triangles¡¡constitute¡¡the¡¡whole¡£¡¡But¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡before¡¡us¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡and
the¡¡essential¡¡nature¡¡are¡¡not¡¡so¡¡related¡¡to¡¡one¡¡another£»¡¡since¡¡the
one¡¡is¡¡not¡¡a¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡other¡£
¡¡¡¡So¡¡it¡¡emerges¡¡that¡¡not¡¡all¡¡the¡¡definable¡¡is¡¡demonstrable¡¡nor¡¡all¡¡the
demonstrable¡¡definable£»¡¡and¡¡we¡¡may¡¡draw¡¡the¡¡general¡¡conclusion¡¡that
there¡¡is¡¡no¡¡identical¡¡object¡¡of¡¡which¡¡it¡¡is¡¡possible¡¡to¡¡possess¡¡both¡¡a
definition¡¡and¡¡a¡¡demonstration¡£¡¡It¡¡follows¡¡obviously¡¡that¡¡definition
and¡¡demonstration¡¡are¡¡neither¡¡identical¡¡nor¡¡contained¡¡either¡¡within
the¡¡other£º¡¡if¡¡they¡¡were£»¡¡their¡¡objects¡¡would¡¡be¡¡related¡¡either¡¡as
identical¡¡or¡¡as¡¡whole¡¡and¡¡part¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡4
¡¡¡¡So¡¡much£»¡¡then£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡first¡¡stage¡¡of¡¡our¡¡problem¡£¡¡The¡¡next¡¡step
is¡¡to¡¡raise¡¡the¡¡question¡¡whether¡¡syllogism¡i¡£e¡£¡¡demonstration¡of¡¡the
definable¡¡nature¡¡is¡¡possible¡¡or£»¡¡as¡¡our¡¡recent¡¡argument¡¡assumed£»
impossible¡£
¡¡¡¡We¡¡might¡¡argue¡¡it¡¡impossible¡¡on¡¡the¡¡following¡¡grounds£º¡£¨a£©¡¡syllogism
proves¡¡an¡¡attribute¡¡of¡¡a¡¡subject¡¡through¡¡the¡¡middle¡¡term£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡other
hand¡¡£¨b£©¡¡its¡¡definable¡¡nature¡¡is¡¡both¡¡'peculiar'¡¡to¡¡a¡¡subject¡¡and
predicated¡¡of¡¡it¡¡as¡¡belonging¡¡to¡¡its¡¡essence¡£¡¡But¡¡in¡¡that¡¡case¡¡£¨1£©¡¡the
subject£»¡¡its¡¡definition£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡middle¡¡term¡¡connecting¡¡them¡¡must¡¡be
reciprocally¡¡predicable¡¡of¡¡one¡¡another£»¡¡for¡¡if¡¡A¡¡is¡¡to¡¡C£»¡¡obviously
A¡¡is¡¡'peculiar'¡¡to¡¡B¡¡and¡¡B¡¡to¡¡C¡in¡¡fact¡¡all¡¡three¡¡terms¡¡are¡¡'peculiar'
to¡¡one¡¡another£º¡¡and¡¡further¡¡£¨2£©¡¡if¡¡A¡¡inheres¡¡in¡¡the¡¡essence¡¡of¡¡all¡¡B
and¡¡B¡¡is¡¡predicated¡¡universally¡¡of¡¡all¡¡C¡¡as¡¡belonging¡¡to¡¡C's
essence£»¡¡A¡¡also¡¡must¡¡be¡¡predicated¡¡of¡¡C¡¡as¡¡belonging¡¡to¡¡its¡¡essence¡£
¡¡¡¡If¡¡one¡¡does¡¡not¡¡take¡¡this¡¡relation¡¡as¡¡thus¡¡duplicated¡if£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡A
is¡¡predicated¡¡as¡¡being¡¡of¡¡the¡¡essence¡¡of¡¡B£»¡¡but¡¡B¡¡is¡¡not¡¡of¡¡the
essence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡subjects¡¡of¡¡which¡¡it¡¡is¡¡predicated¡A¡¡will¡¡not
necessarily¡¡be¡¡predicated¡¡of¡¡C¡¡as¡¡belonging¡¡to¡¡its¡¡essence¡£¡¡So¡¡both
premisses¡¡will¡¡predicate¡¡essence£»¡¡and¡¡consequently¡¡B¡¡also¡¡will¡¡be
predicated¡¡of¡¡C¡¡as¡¡its¡¡essence¡£¡¡Since£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡both¡¡premisses¡¡do
predicate¡¡essence¡i¡£e¡£¡¡definable¡¡form¡C's¡¡definable¡¡form¡¡will¡¡appear
in¡¡the¡¡middle¡¡term¡¡before¡¡the¡¡conclusion¡¡is¡¡drawn¡£
¡¡¡¡We¡¡may¡¡generalize¡¡by¡¡supposing¡¡that¡¡it¡¡is¡¡possible¡¡to¡¡prove¡¡the
essential¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡man¡£¡¡Let¡¡C¡¡be¡¡man£»¡¡A¡¡man's¡¡essential
naturetwo¡footed¡¡animal£»¡¡or¡¡aught¡¡else¡¡it¡¡may¡¡be¡£¡¡Then£»¡¡if¡¡we¡¡are¡¡to
syllogize£»¡¡A¡¡must¡¡be¡¡predicated¡¡of¡¡all¡¡B¡£¡¡But¡¡this¡¡premiss¡¡will¡¡be
mediated¡¡by¡¡a¡¡fresh¡¡definition£»¡¡which¡¡consequently¡¡will¡¡also¡¡be¡¡the
essential¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡man¡£¡¡Therefore¡¡the¡¡argument¡¡assumes¡¡what¡¡it¡¡has¡¡to
prove£»¡¡since¡¡B¡¡too¡¡is¡¡the¡¡essential¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡man¡£¡¡It¡¡is£»¡¡however£»¡¡the
case¡¡in¡¡which¡¡there¡¡are¡¡only¡¡the¡¡two¡¡premisses¡i¡£e¡£¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the
premisses¡¡are¡¡primary¡¡and¡¡immediate¡which¡¡we¡¡ought¡¡to¡¡investigate£»
because¡¡it¡¡best¡¡illustrates¡¡the¡¡point¡¡under¡¡discussion¡£
¡¡¡¡Thus¡¡they¡¡who¡¡prove¡¡the¡¡essential¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡soul¡¡or¡¡man¡¡or
anything¡¡else¡¡through¡¡reciprocating¡¡terms¡¡beg¡¡the¡¡question¡£¡¡It¡¡would
be¡¡begging¡¡the¡¡question£»¡¡for¡¡example£»¡¡to¡¡contend¡¡that¡¡the¡¡soul¡¡is¡¡that
which¡¡causes¡¡its¡¡own¡¡life£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡what¡¡causes¡¡its¡¡own¡¡life¡¡is¡¡a
self¡moving¡¡number£»¡¡for¡¡one¡¡would¡¡have¡¡to¡¡postulate¡¡that¡¡the¡¡soul¡¡is¡¡a
self¡moving¡¡number¡¡in¡¡the¡¡sense¡¡of¡¡being¡¡identical¡¡with¡¡it¡£¡¡For¡¡if¡¡A
is¡¡predicable¡¡as¡¡a¡¡mere¡¡consequent¡¡of¡¡B¡¡and¡¡B¡¡of¡¡C£»¡¡A¡¡will¡¡not¡¡on¡¡that
account¡¡be¡¡the¡¡definable¡¡form¡¡of¡¡C£º¡¡A¡¡will¡¡merely¡¡be¡¡what¡¡it¡¡was
true¡¡to¡¡say¡¡of¡¡C¡£¡¡Even¡¡if¡¡A¡¡is¡¡predicated¡¡of¡¡all¡¡B¡¡inasmuch¡¡as¡¡B¡¡is
identical¡¡with¡¡a¡¡species¡¡of¡¡A£»¡¡still¡¡it¡¡will¡¡not¡¡follow£º¡¡being¡¡an
animal¡¡is¡¡predicated¡¡of¡¡being¡¡a¡¡man¡since¡¡it¡¡is¡¡true¡¡that¡¡in¡¡all
instances¡¡to¡¡be¡¡human¡¡is¡¡to¡¡be¡¡animal£»¡¡just¡¡as¡¡it¡¡is¡¡also¡¡true¡¡that
every¡¡man¡¡is¡¡an¡¡animal¡but¡¡not¡¡as¡¡identical¡¡with¡¡being¡¡man¡£
¡¡¡¡We¡¡conclude£»¡¡then£»¡¡that¡¡unless¡¡one¡¡takes¡¡both¡¡the¡¡premisses¡¡as
predicating¡¡essence£»¡¡one¡¡cannot¡¡infer¡¡that¡¡A¡¡is¡¡the¡¡definable¡¡form¡¡and
essence¡¡of¡¡C£º¡¡but¡¡if¡¡one¡¡does¡¡so¡¡take¡¡them£»¡¡in¡¡assuming¡¡B¡¡one¡¡will
have¡¡assumed£»¡¡before¡¡drawing¡¡the¡¡conclusion£»¡¡what¡¡the¡¡definable¡¡form
of¡¡C¡¡is£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡there¡¡has¡¡been¡¡no¡¡inference£»¡¡for¡¡one¡¡has¡¡begged¡¡the
question¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡5
¡¡¡¡Nor£»¡¡as¡¡was¡¡said¡¡in¡¡my¡¡formal¡¡logic£»¡¡is¡¡the¡¡method¡¡of¡¡division¡¡a
process¡¡of¡¡inference¡¡at¡¡all£»¡¡since¡¡at¡¡no¡¡point¡¡does¡¡the
characterization¡¡of¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡follow¡¡necessarily¡¡from¡¡the
premising¡¡of¡¡certain¡¡other¡¡facts£º¡¡division¡¡demonstrates¡¡as¡¡little¡¡as
does¡¡induction¡£¡¡For¡¡in¡¡a¡¡genuine¡¡demonstration¡¡the¡¡conclusion¡¡must¡¡not
be¡¡put¡¡as¡¡a¡¡question¡¡nor¡¡depend¡¡on¡¡a¡¡concession£»¡¡but¡¡must¡¡follow
necessarily¡¡from¡¡its¡¡premisses£»¡¡even¡¡if¡¡the¡¡respondent¡¡deny¡¡it¡£¡¡The
definer¡¡asks¡¡'Is¡¡man¡¡animal¡¡or¡¡inanimate£¿'¡¡and¡¡then¡¡assumes¡he¡¡has¡¡not
inferred¡that¡¡man¡¡is¡¡animal¡£¡¡Next£»¡¡when¡¡presented¡¡with¡¡an¡¡exhaustive
division¡¡of¡¡animal¡¡into¡¡terrestrial¡¡and¡¡aquatic£»¡¡he¡¡assumes¡¡that¡¡man
is¡¡terrestrial¡£¡¡Moreover£»¡¡that¡¡man¡¡is¡¡the¡¡complete¡¡formula£»
terrestrial¡animal£»¡¡does¡¡not¡¡follow¡¡necessarily¡¡from¡¡the¡¡premisses£º
this¡¡too¡¡is¡¡an¡¡assumption£»¡¡and¡¡equally¡¡an¡¡assumption¡¡whether¡¡the
division¡¡comprises¡¡many¡¡differentiae¡¡or¡¡few¡£¡¡£¨Indeed¡¡as¡¡this¡¡method¡¡of
division¡¡is¡¡used¡¡by¡¡those¡¡who¡¡proceed¡¡by¡¡it£»¡¡even¡¡truths¡¡that¡¡can¡¡be
inferred¡¡actually¡¡fail¡¡to¡¡appear¡¡as¡¡such¡££©¡¡For¡¡why¡¡should¡¡not¡¡the
whole¡¡of¡¡this¡¡formula¡¡be¡¡true¡¡of¡¡man£»¡¡and¡¡yet¡¡not¡¡exhibit¡¡his
essential¡¡nature¡¡or¡¡definable¡¡form£¿¡¡Again£»¡¡what¡¡guarantee¡¡is¡¡there
against¡¡an¡¡unessential¡¡addition£»¡¡or¡¡against¡¡the¡¡omission¡¡of¡¡the
final¡¡or¡¡of¡¡an¡¡intermediate¡¡determinant¡¡of¡¡the¡¡substantial¡¡being£¿
¡¡¡¡The¡¡champion¡¡of¡¡division¡¡might¡¡here¡¡urge¡¡that¡¡though¡¡these¡¡lapses¡¡do
occur£»¡¡yet¡¡we¡¡can¡¡solve¡¡that¡¡difficulty¡¡if¡¡all¡¡the¡¡attributes¡¡we
assume¡¡are¡¡constituents¡¡of¡¡the¡¡definable¡¡form£»¡¡and¡¡if£»¡¡postulating¡¡the
genus£»¡¡we¡¡produce¡¡by¡¡division¡¡the¡¡requisite¡¡uninterrupted¡¡sequence
of¡¡terms£»¡¡and¡¡omit¡¡nothing£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡indeed¡¡we¡¡cannot¡¡fail¡¡to¡¡fulfil
these¡¡conditions¡¡if¡¡what¡¡is¡¡to¡¡be¡¡divided¡¡falls¡¡whole¡¡into¡¡the
division¡¡at¡¡each¡¡stage£»¡¡and¡¡none¡¡of¡¡it¡¡is¡¡omitted£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡this¡the
dividendum¡must¡¡without¡¡further¡¡question¡¡be¡¡£¨ultimately£©¡¡incapable
of¡¡fresh¡¡specific¡¡division¡£¡¡Nevertheless£»¡¡we¡¡reply£»¡¡division¡¡does
not¡¡involve¡¡inference£»¡¡if¡¡it¡¡gives¡¡knowledge£»¡¡it¡¡gives¡¡it¡¡in¡¡another
way¡£¡¡Nor¡¡is¡¡there¡¡any¡¡absurdity¡¡in¡¡this£º¡¡induction£»¡¡perhaps£»¡¡is¡¡not
demonstration¡¡any¡¡more¡¡than¡¡is¡¡division£»¡¡et¡¡it¡¡does¡¡make¡¡evident
some¡¡truth¡£¡¡Yet¡¡to¡¡state¡¡a¡¡definition¡¡reached¡¡by¡¡division¡¡is¡¡not¡¡to
state¡¡a¡¡conclusion£º¡¡as£»¡¡when¡¡conclusions¡¡are¡¡drawn¡¡without¡¡their
appropriate¡¡middles£»¡¡the¡¡alleged¡¡necessity¡¡by¡¡which¡¡the¡¡inference
follows¡¡from¡¡the¡¡premisses¡¡is¡¡open¡¡to¡¡a¡¡question¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡reason
for¡¡it£»¡¡so¡¡definitions¡¡reached¡¡by¡¡division¡¡invite¡¡the¡¡same¡¡question¡£
¡¡¡¡Thus¡¡to¡¡the¡¡question¡¡'What¡¡is¡¡the¡¡essential¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡man£¿'¡¡the
divider¡¡replies¡¡'Animal£»¡¡mortal£»¡¡footed£»¡¡biped£»¡¡wingless'£»¡¡and¡¡when¡¡at
each¡¡step¡¡he¡¡is¡¡asked¡¡'Why£¿'£»¡¡he¡¡will¡¡say£»¡¡and£»¡¡as¡¡he¡¡thinks£»¡¡proves
by¡¡division£»¡¡that¡¡all¡¡animal¡¡is¡¡mortal¡¡or¡¡immortal£º¡¡but¡¡such¡¡a¡¡formula
taken¡¡in¡¡its¡¡entirety¡¡is¡¡not¡¡definition£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡even¡¡if¡¡division¡¡does
demonstrate¡¡its¡¡formula£»¡¡definition¡¡at¡¡any¡¡rate¡¡does¡¡not¡¡turn¡¡out¡¡to
be¡¡a¡¡conclusion¡¡of¡¡inference¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡6
¡¡¡¡Can¡¡we¡¡nevertheless¡¡actually¡¡demonstrate¡¡what¡¡a¡¡thing¡¡essentially
and¡¡substantially¡¡is£»¡¡but¡¡hypothetically£»¡¡i¡£e¡£¡¡by¡¡premising¡¡£¨1£©¡¡that
its¡¡definable¡¡form¡¡is¡¡constituted¡¡by¡¡the¡¡'peculiar'¡¡attributes¡¡of
its¡¡essential¡¡nature£»¡¡£¨2£©¡¡that¡¡such¡¡and¡¡such¡¡are¡¡the¡¡only¡¡attributes
of¡¡its¡¡essential¡¡nature£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡the¡¡complete¡¡synthesis¡¡of¡¡them¡¡is
peculiar¡¡to¡¡the¡¡thing£»¡¡and¡¡thus¡since¡¡in¡¡this¡¡synthesis¡¡consists¡¡the
being¡¡of¡¡the¡¡thing¡obtaining¡¡our¡¡conclusion£¿¡¡Or¡¡is¡¡the¡¡truth¡¡that£»
since¡¡proof¡¡must¡¡be¡¡through¡¡the¡¡middle¡¡term£»¡¡the¡¡definable¡¡form¡¡is
once¡¡more¡¡assumed¡¡in¡¡this¡¡minor¡¡premiss¡¡too£¿
¡¡¡¡Further£»¡¡just¡¡as¡¡in¡¡syllogizing¡¡we¡¡do¡¡not¡¡premise¡¡what¡¡syllogistic
inference¡¡is¡¡£¨since¡¡the¡¡premisses¡¡from¡¡which¡¡we¡¡conclude¡¡must¡¡be
related¡¡as¡¡whole¡¡and¡¡part£©£»¡¡so¡¡the¡¡definable¡¡form¡¡must¡¡not¡¡fall¡¡within
the¡¡syllogism¡¡but¡¡remain¡¡outside¡¡the¡¡premisses¡¡posited¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡only
against¡¡a¡¡doubt¡¡as¡¡to¡¡its¡¡having¡¡been¡¡a¡¡syllogistic¡¡inference¡¡at¡¡all
that¡¡we¡¡have¡¡to¡¡defend¡¡