Ì«×ÓүС˵Íø > Ó¢Óïµç×ÓÊé > theodore roosevelt >

µÚ44½Ú

theodore roosevelt-µÚ44½Ú

С˵£º theodore roosevelt ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



derful¡¡spokesman¡¡of¡¡Federalism£»¡¡the¡¡champion¡¡of¡¡a¡¡strong¡¡Government¡¡which¡¡should¡¡be¡¡beneficent¡¡because¡¡it¡¡was¡¡unselfish¡¡and¡¡enlightened£»¡¡captivated¡¡and¡¡filled¡¡him¡£¡¡In¡¡1886£»¡¡in¡¡his¡¡Life¡¡of¡¡Benton£»¡¡he¡¡wrote£º¡¡¡¨Free¡¡traders¡¡are¡¡apt¡¡to¡¡look¡¡at¡¡the¡¡tariff¡¡from¡¡a¡¡sentimental¡¡standpoint£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡is¡¡in¡¡reality¡¡a¡¡purely¡¡business¡¡matter¡¡and¡¡should¡¡be¡¡decided¡¡solely¡¡on¡¡grounds¡¡of¡¡expediency¡£¡¡Political¡¡economists¡¡have¡¡pretty¡¡generally¡¡agreed¡¡that¡¡protection¡¡is¡¡vicious¡¡in¡¡theory¡¡and¡¡harmful¡¡in¡¡practice£»¡¡but¡¡if¡¡the¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡the¡¡people¡¡in¡¡interest¡¡wish¡¡it£»¡¡and¡¡it¡¡affects¡¡only¡¡themselves£»¡¡there¡¡is¡¡no¡¡earthly¡¡reason¡¡why¡¡they¡¡should¡¡not¡¡be¡¡allowed¡¡to¡¡try¡¡the¡¡experiment¡¡to¡¡their¡¡heart's¡¡content¡£¡¨¡¡*

*¡¡Roosevelt£º¡¡Thomas¡¡H¡£¡¡Benton£»¡¡67¡£¡¡American¡¡Statesmen¡¡Series¡£


Perhaps¡¡we¡¡ought¡¡to¡¡infer¡¡from¡¡this¡¡extract¡¡that¡¡Roosevelt£»¡¡as¡¡an¡¡historical¡¡critic£»¡¡strove¡¡to¡¡preserve¡¡an¡¡open¡¡mind£»¡¡as¡¡an¡¡ardent¡¡Republican£»¡¡however£»¡¡he¡¡never¡¡wavered¡¡in¡¡his¡¡support¡¡of¡¡the¡¡tariff¡£¡¡Even¡¡his¡¡sense¡¡of¡¡humor¡¡permitted¡¡him¡¡to¡¡swallow¡¡with¡¡out¡¡a¡¡smile¡¡the¡¡demagogue's¡¡cant¡¡about¡¡¡¨infant¡¡industries£»¡¨¡¡or¡¡the¡¡raising¡¡of¡¡the¡¡tariff¡¡after¡¡election¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Republicans¡¡who¡¡had¡¡promised¡¡to¡¡reduce¡¡it¡£¡¡To¡¡those¡¡of¡¡us¡¡who¡¡for¡¡many¡¡years¡¡regarded¡¡the¡¡tariff¡¡as¡¡the¡¡dividing¡¡line¡¡between¡¡the¡¡parties£»¡¡his¡¡stand¡¡was¡¡most¡¡disappointing¡£¡¡And¡¡when¡¡the¡¡head¡¡of¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡chief¡¡Trusts¡¡in¡¡America¡¡cynically¡¡blurted¡¡out£»¡¡¡¨The¡¡Tariff¡¡is¡¡the¡¡mother¡¡of¡¡Trusts£»¡¨¡¡we¡¡hoped¡¡that¡¡Roosevelt£»¡¡who¡¡had¡¡then¡¡begun¡¡his¡¡stupendous¡¡battle¡¡with¡¡the¡¡Trusts£»¡¡would¡¡deal¡¡them¡¡a¡¡staggering¡¡blow¡¡by¡¡shattering¡¡the¡¡tariff¡£¡¡But£»¡¡greatly¡¡to¡¡our¡¡chagrin£»¡¡he¡¡did¡¡nothing¡£

His¡¡enemies¡¡tried¡¡to¡¡explain¡¡his¡¡callousness¡¡to¡¡this¡¡reform¡¡by¡¡hinting¡¡that¡¡he¡¡had¡¡some¡¡personal¡¡interest¡¡at¡¡stake£»¡¡or¡¡that¡¡he¡¡was¡¡under¡¡obligations¡¡to¡¡tariff¡¡magnates¡£¡¡Nothing¡¡could¡¡be¡¡more¡¡absurd¡¡than¡¡these¡¡innuendoes£»¡¡from¡¡the¡¡first¡¡of¡¡his¡¡career¡¡to¡¡the¡¡last£»¡¡no¡¡man¡¡ever¡¡brought¡¡proof¡¡that¡¡he¡¡had¡¡directly¡¡or¡¡indirectly¡¡secured¡¡Roosevelt's¡¡backing¡¡by¡¡question¡¡able¡¡means¡£¡¡And¡¡there¡¡were¡¡times¡¡enough¡¡when¡¡passions¡¡ran¡¡so¡¡high¡¡that¡¡any¡¡one¡¡who¡¡could¡¡produce¡¡an¡¡iota¡¡of¡¡such¡¡testimony¡¡would¡¡have¡¡done¡¡so¡£¡¡The¡¡simple¡¡fact¡¡is£»¡¡that¡¡in¡¡looking¡¡over¡¡the¡¡field¡¡of¡¡important¡¡questions¡¡which¡¡Roosevelt¡¡believed¡¡must¡¡be¡¡met¡¡by¡¡new¡¡legislation£»¡¡he¡¡looked¡¡on¡¡the¡¡tariff¡¡as¡¡unimportant¡¡in¡¡comparison¡¡with¡¡railroads£»¡¡and¡¡conservation£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡measures¡¡for¡¡public¡¡health¡£¡¡I¡¡think£»¡¡also£»¡¡that¡¡he¡¡never¡¡studied¡¡the¡¡question¡¡thoroughly£»¡¡he¡¡threw¡¡over¡¡Mill's¡¡Individualism¡¡early¡¡in¡¡his¡¡public¡¡career¡¡and¡¡with¡¡it¡¡went¡¡Mill's¡¡political¡¡economy¡£¡¡As¡¡late¡¡as¡¡December£»¡¡1912£»¡¡after¡¡the¡¡affronting¡¡Payne¡¡Aldrich¡¡Tariff¡¡Act¡¡had¡¡been¡¡passed¡¡under¡¡his¡¡Republican¡¡successor£»¡¡I¡¡reminded¡¡Roosevelt¡¡that¡¡I¡¡had¡¡never¡¡voted¡¡for¡¡him¡¡because¡¡I¡¡did¡¡not¡¡approve¡¡of¡¡his¡¡tariff¡¡policy¡£¡¡To¡¡which¡¡he¡¡replied£»¡¡almost¡¡in¡¡the¡¡words¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Benton¡¡extract¡¡in¡¡1886£»¡¡¡¨My¡¡dear¡¡boy£»¡¡the¡¡tariff¡¡is¡¡only¡¡a¡¡question¡¡of¡¡expediency¡£¡¨

In¡¡this¡¡field¡¡also¡¡I¡¡fear¡¡that¡¡we¡¡must¡¡score¡¡a¡¡miss¡¡against¡¡him¡£

Cavour¡¡used¡¡to¡¡say¡¡that¡¡he¡¡did¡¡not¡¡need¡¡to¡¡resort¡¡to¡¡craft£»¡¡which¡¡was¡¡supposed¡¡to¡¡be¡¡a¡¡statesman's¡¡favorite¡¡instrument£»¡¡he¡¡simply¡¡told¡¡the¡¡truth¡¡and¡¡everybody¡¡was¡¡deceived¡£¡¡Roosevelt¡¡might¡¡have¡¡said¡¡the¡¡same¡¡thing¡£¡¡His¡¡critics¡¡were¡¡always¡¡on¡¡the¡¡look¡¡out¡¡for¡¡some¡¡ulterior¡¡motive£»¡¡some¡¡trick£»¡¡or¡¡cunning¡¡thrust£»¡¡in¡¡what¡¡he¡¡did£»¡¡consequently¡¡they¡¡misjudged¡¡him£»¡¡for¡¡he¡¡usually¡¡did¡¡the¡¡most¡¡direct¡¡thing¡¡in¡¡the¡¡most¡¡direct¡¡way¡£

The¡¡Brownsville¡¡Affair¡¡proved¡¡this¡£¡¡On¡¡the¡¡night¡¡of¡¡August¡¡13£»¡¡1906£»¡¡several¡¡colored¡¡soldiers¡¡stationed¡¡at¡¡Fort¡¡Brown£»¡¡Texas£»¡¡stole¡¡from¡¡their¡¡quarters¡¡into¡¡the¡¡near¡­by¡¡town¡¡of¡¡Brownsville¡¡and¡¡shot¡¡up¡¡the¡¡inhabitants£»¡¡against¡¡whom¡¡they¡¡had¡¡a¡¡grudge¡£¡¡As¡¡soon¡¡as¡¡the¡¡news¡¡of¡¡the¡¡outbreak¡¡reached¡¡the¡¡fort£»¡¡the¡¡rest¡¡of¡¡the¡¡colored¡¡garrison¡¡was¡¡called¡¡out¡¡to¡¡quell¡¡it£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡guilty¡¡soldiers£»¡¡under¡¡cover¡¡of¡¡darkness£»¡¡joined¡¡their¡¡companions¡¡and¡¡were¡¡undiscovered¡£¡¡Next¡¡day¡¡the¡¡commander¡¡began¡¡an¡¡investigation£»¡¡but¡¡as¡¡none¡¡of¡¡the¡¡culprits¡¡confessed£»¡¡the¡¡President¡¡discharged¡¡nearly¡¡all¡¡of¡¡the¡¡three¡¡companies¡£¡¡There¡¡upon¡¡his¡¡critics¡¡insinuated¡¡that¡¡Roosevelt¡¡had¡¡indulged¡¡his¡¡race¡¡hatred¡¡of¡¡the¡¡blacks£»¡¡a¡¡few¡¡years¡¡before£»¡¡many¡¡of¡¡these¡¡same¡¡critics¡¡had¡¡accused¡¡him¡¡of¡¡wishing¡¡to¡¡insult¡¡the¡¡Southern¡¡whites¡¡by¡¡inviting¡¡Booker¡¡Washington¡¡to¡¡lunch¡£¡¡The¡¡reason¡¡for¡¡his¡¡action¡¡with¡¡the¡¡Brownsville¡¡criminals¡¡was¡¡so¡¡clear¡¡that¡¡it¡¡did¡¡not¡¡need¡¡to¡¡be¡¡stated¡£¡¡He¡¡intended¡¡that¡¡every¡¡soldier¡¡or¡¡sailor¡¡who¡¡wore¡¡the¡¡uniform¡¡of¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States£»¡¡be¡¡he¡¡white£»¡¡yellow£»¡¡or¡¡black£»¡¡should¡¡not¡¡be¡¡allowed¡¡to¡¡sully¡¡that¡¡uniform¡¡and¡¡go¡¡unpunished¡£¡¡He¡¡felt¡¡the¡¡stain¡¡on¡¡the¡¡service¡¡keenly£»¡¡in¡¡spite¡¡of¡¡denunciation¡¡he¡¡trusted¡¡that¡¡the¡¡common¡¡sense¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Nation¡¡would¡¡eventually¡¡uphold¡¡him£»¡¡as¡¡it¡¡did¡£

A¡¡few¡¡months¡¡later¡¡he¡¡came¡¡to¡¡Cambridge¡¡to¡¡make¡¡his¡¡famous¡¡¡¨Mollycoddle¡¡Speech£»¡¨¡¡and¡¡in¡¡greeting¡¡him£»¡¡three¡¡or¡¡four¡¡of¡¡us¡¡asked¡¡him¡¡jokingly£»¡¡¡¨How¡¡about¡¡Brownsville£¿¡¨¡¡¡¨Brownsville£¿¡¨¡¡he¡¡replied£»¡¡laughing£»¡¡¡¨Brownsville¡¡will¡¡soon¡¡be¡¡forgotten£»¡¡but¡¡'Dear¡¡Maria'¡¡will¡¡stick¡¡to¡¡me¡¡all¡¡my¡¡life¡£¡¨¡¡This¡¡referred¡¡to¡¡another¡¡annoyance¡¡which¡¡had¡¡recently¡¡bothered¡¡him¡£¡¡He¡¡had¡¡always¡¡been¡¡used¡¡to¡¡talk¡¡among¡¡friends¡¡about¡¡public¡¡matters¡¡and¡¡persons¡¡with¡¡amazing¡¡unreserve¡£¡¡He¡¡took¡¡it¡¡for¡¡granted¡¡that¡¡those¡¡to¡¡whom¡¡he¡¡spoke¡¡would¡¡regard¡¡his¡¡frank¡¡remarks¡¡as¡¡confidential£»¡¡being¡¡honorable¡¡himself£»¡¡he¡¡assumed¡¡a¡¡similar¡¡sense¡¡of¡¡honor¡¡in¡¡his¡¡listeners¡£¡¡In¡¡one¡¡instance£»¡¡however£»¡¡he¡¡was¡¡deceived¡£¡¡Among¡¡the¡¡guests¡¡at¡¡the¡¡White¡¡House¡¡were¡¡a¡¡gentleman¡¡and¡¡his¡¡wife¡£¡¡The¡¡latter¡¡was¡¡a¡¡convert¡¡to¡¡Roman¡¡Catholicism£»¡¡and¡¡she¡¡had¡¡not¡¡only¡¡all¡¡the¡¡proverbial¡¡zeal¡¡of¡¡a¡¡convert£»¡¡but¡¡an¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡indiscretion¡¡which¡¡seems¡¡incredible¡¡in¡¡any¡¡one¡£¡¡She¡¡often¡¡led¡¡the¡¡conversation¡¡to¡¡Roman¡¡Catholic¡¡subjects£»¡¡and¡¡especially¡¡to¡¡the¡¡discussion¡¡of¡¡who¡¡was¡¡likely¡¡to¡¡be¡¡the¡¡next¡¡American¡¡Cardinal¡£¡¡President¡¡Roosevelt¡¡had¡¡great¡¡respect¡¡for¡¡Archbishop¡¡Ireland£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡said£»¡¡frankly£»¡¡that¡¡he¡¡should¡¡be¡¡glad¡¡to¡¡see¡¡the¡¡red¡¡hat¡¡go¡¡to¡¡him¡£¡¡The¡¡lady's¡¡husband¡¡was¡¡appointed¡¡to¡¡a¡¡foreign¡¡Embassy£»¡¡and¡¡they¡¡were¡¡both¡¡soon¡¡thrown¡¡into¡¡an¡¡Ultramontane¡¡atmosphere£»¡¡where¡¡clerical¡¡intrigues¡¡had¡¡long¡¡furnished¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡chief¡¡amusements¡¡of¡¡a¡¡vapid¡¡and¡¡corrupt¡¡Court¡£¡¡The¡¡lady£»¡¡who£»¡¡of¡¡course£»¡¡could¡¡not¡¡have¡¡realized¡¡the¡¡impropriety£»¡¡made¡¡known¡¡the¡¡President's¡¡regard¡¡for¡¡Archbishop¡¡Ireland¡£¡¡She¡¡even¡¡had¡¡letters¡¡to¡¡herself¡¡beginning¡¡¡¨Dear¡¡Maria£»¡¨¡¡to¡¡prove¡¡the¡¡intimate¡¡terms¡¡on¡¡which¡¡she¡¡and¡¡her¡¡husband¡¡stood¡¡with¡¡Mr¡£¡¡Roosevelt£»¡¡and¡¡to¡¡suggest¡¡how¡¡important¡¡a¡¡personage¡¡she¡¡was¡¡in¡¡his¡¡estimation¡£¡¡Assured£»¡¡as¡¡she¡¡thought£»¡¡of¡¡her¡¡influence¡¡in¡¡Washington£»¡¡she¡¡seems¡¡also¡¡to¡¡have¡¡aspired¡¡to¡¡equal¡¡influence¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Vatican¡£¡¡That¡¡would¡¡not¡¡be¡¡the¡¡first¡¡occasion¡¡on¡¡which¡¡Cardinals'¡¡hats¡¡had¡¡been¡¡bestowed¡¡through¡¡the¡¡benign¡¡feminine¡¡intercession¡£¡¡Reports¡¡from¡¡Rome¡¡were¡¡favorable£»¡¡Archbishop¡¡Ireland's¡¡prospects¡¡looked¡¡rosy¡£

But¡¡the¡¡post¡¡of¡¡Cardinal¡¡is¡¡so¡¡eminent¡¡that¡¡there¡¡are¡¡always¡¡several¡¡candidates¡¡for¡¡each¡¡vacancy¡£¡¡I¡¡do¡¡not¡¡know¡¡whether¡¡or¡¡not¡¡it¡¡came¡¡about¡¡through¡¡one¡¡of¡¡Archbishop¡¡Ireland's¡¡rivals£»¡¡or¡¡through¡¡¡¨Dear¡¡Maria's¡¨¡¡own¡¡indiscretion£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡leaked¡¡out¡¡that¡¡President¡¡Roosevelt¡¡was¡¡personally¡¡interested¡¡in¡¡Archbishop¡¡Ireland's¡¡success¡£¡¡That¡¡settled¡¡the¡¡Archbishop¡£¡¡The¡¡Hierarchy¡¡would¡¡never¡¡consent¡¡to¡¡be¡¡influenced¡¡by¡¡an¡¡American¡¡President£»¡¡who¡¡was¡¡also¡¡a¡¡Protestant¡£¡¡It¡¡might¡¡take¡¡instructions¡¡from¡¡the¡¡Emperor¡¡of¡¡Austria¡¡or¡¡the¡¡King¡¡of¡¡Spain£»¡¡it¡¡had¡¡even¡¡allowed¡¡the¡¡German¡¡Kaiser£»¡¡also¡¡a¡¡Protestant£»¡¡indirectly¡¡but¡¡effectually¡¡to¡¡block¡¡the¡¡election¡¡of¡¡Cardinal¡¡Rampolla¡¡to¡¡be¡¡Pope¡¡in¡¡1903£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡hint¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Archbishop¡¡of¡¡St¡£¡¡Paul£»¡¡Minnesota£»¡¡might¡¡be¡¡made¡¡Cardinal¡¡because¡¡the¡¡American¡¡President¡¡respected¡¡him£»¡¡could¡¡not¡¡be¡¡tolerated¡£¡¡The¡¡President's¡¡letters¡¡beginning¡¡¡¨Dear¡¡Maria¡¨¡¡went¡¡gayly¡¡through¡¡the¡¡newspapers¡¡of¡¡the¡¡world£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡man¡¡in¡¡the¡¡street¡¡everywhere¡¡wondered¡¡how¡¡Roosevelt¡¡could¡¡have¡¡been¡¡so¡¡indiscreet¡¡as¡¡to¡¡have¡¡trusted¡¡so¡¡imprudent¡¡a¡¡zealot¡£¡¡¡¨Dear¡¡Maria¡¨¡¡and¡¡her¡¡husband¡¡were¡¡recalled¡¡from¡¡their¡¡Embassy¡¡and¡¡put¡¡out¡¡of¡¡reach¡¡of¡¡committing¡¡further¡¡indiscretions¡¡of¡¡that¡¡sort¡£¡¡Archbishop¡¡Ireland¡¡never¡¡became¡¡Cardinal¡£¡¡In¡¡spite¡¡of¡¡the¡¡President's¡¡forebodings£»¡¡the¡¡¡¨Dear¡¡Maria¡¨¡¡incident¡¡did¡¡not¡¡cling¡¡to¡¡him¡¡all¡¡his¡¡life£»¡¡but¡¡sank¡¡into¡¡oblivion£»¡¡while¡¡the¡¡world£»¡¡busied¡¡with¡¡matters¡¡of¡¡real¡¡importance£»¡¡rushed¡¡on¡¡towards¡¡a¡¡great¡¡catastrophe¡£¡¡Proofs¡¡that¡¡a¡¡man¡¡or¡¡a¡¡woman¡¡can¡¡do¡¡very¡¡foolish¡¡things¡¡are¡¡so¡¡common¡¡that¡¡¡¨Dear¡¡Maria¡¨¡¡could¡¡not¡¡win¡¡lasting¡¡fame¡¡by¡¡hers¡£¡¡I¡¡do¡¡not¡¡think£»¡¡however£»¡¡that¡¡this¡¡experience¡¡taught¡¡Roosevelt¡¡reticence¡£¡¡He¡¡did¡¡not¡¡lose¡¡his¡¡faith¡¡that¡¡a¡¡sense¡¡of¡¡honor¡¡was¡¡widespread£»¡¡and¡¡would¡¡silence¡¡the¡¡tongues¡¡of¡¡the¡¡persons¡¡whom¡¡he¡¡talked¡¡to¡¡in¡¡confidence¡£

No¡¡President¡¡ever¡¡spoke¡¡so¡¡openly¡¡to¡¡newspaper¡¡men¡¡as¡¡he¡¡did¡£¡¡He¡¡told¡¡them¡¡many¡¡a¡¡secret¡¡with¡¡only¡¡the¡¡warning£»¡¡¡¨Mind£»¡¡this¡¡is¡¡private£»¡¨¡¡and¡¡none¡¡of¡¡them¡¡betrayed¡¡him¡£¡¡When¡¡he¡¡entered¡¡the¡¡White¡¡House¡¡he¡¡gathered¡¡all¡¡the¡¡newspaper¡¡men¡¡round¡¡him£»¡¡and¡¡said¡¡that¡¡no¡¡mention¡¡was¡¡to¡¡be¡¡made¡¡of¡¡Mrs¡£¡¡Roosevelt£»¡¡or¡¡of¡¡any¡¡detail¡¡of¡¡their¡¡family¡¡life£»¡¡while¡¡they¡¡lived¡¡there¡£¡¡If¡¡this¡¡rule¡¡were¡¡broken£»¡¡he¡¡would¡¡refuse¡¡for¡¡the¡¡rest¡¡of¡¡his¡¡term¡¡to¡¡allow¡¡the¡¡representative¡¡of¡¡the¡¡paper¡¡which¡¡published¡¡the¡¡unwarranted¡¡report¡¡to¡¡enter¡¡the¡¡White¡¡House£»¡¡or¡¡to¡¡receive¡¡any¡¡of¡¡the¡¡President's¡¡communications¡£¡¡This¡¡rule¡¡also¡¡was¡¡religiously¡¡observed£»¡¡with¡¡the¡¡result¡¡that¡¡Mrs¡£¡¡Roosevelt¡¡was¡¡spared¡¡the¡¡disgust¡¡and¡¡indignity¡¡of¡¡a¡¡vulgar¡¡publicity£»¡¡which¡¡had¡¡thrown¡¡its¡¡luri

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ