Ì«×ÓүС˵Íø > Ó¢Óïµç×ÓÊé > theodore roosevelt >

µÚ27½Ú

theodore roosevelt-µÚ27½Ú

С˵£º theodore roosevelt ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



of¡¡twelve¡¡grievances¡¡which¡¡varied¡¡greatly¡¡in¡¡importance£»¡¡and¡¡this¡¡method¡¡favored¡¡trading¡¡one¡¡claim¡¡against¡¡another¡£¡¡The¡¡result¡¡was¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Commission£»¡¡failing¡¡to¡¡agree£»¡¡disbanded¡£¡¡Nevertheless£»¡¡the¡¡irritation¡¡continued£»¡¡and¡¡Roosevelt£»¡¡having¡¡become¡¡President£»¡¡and¡¡being¡¡a¡¡person¡¡who¡¡was¡¡constitutionally¡¡opposed¡¡to¡¡shilly¡­shally£»¡¡suggested¡¡to¡¡the¡¡State¡¡Department¡¡that¡¡a¡¡new¡¡Commission¡¡be¡¡appointed¡¡under¡¡conditions¡¡which¡¡would¡¡make¡¡a¡¡decision¡¡certain¡£¡¡He¡¡even¡¡went¡¡farther£»¡¡he¡¡took¡¡precautions¡¡to¡¡assure¡¡a¡¡verdict¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡£¡¡He¡¡appointed¡¡three¡¡CommissionersSenators¡¡Lodge£»¡¡Root£»¡¡and¡¡Turner£»¡¡the¡¡Canadians¡¡appointed¡¡two£»¡¡Sir¡¡A¡£¡¡L¡£¡¡Jette¡¡and¡¡A¡£¡¡B¡£¡¡Aylesworth£»¡¡the¡¡English¡¡representative¡¡was¡¡Alverstone£»¡¡the¡¡Lord¡¡Chief¡¡Justice¡£

The¡¡President¡¡gave¡¡to¡¡Justice¡¡Oliver¡¡Wendell¡¡Holmes£»¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court£»¡¡who¡¡was¡¡going¡¡abroad¡¡for¡¡the¡¡summer£»¡¡a¡¡letter¡¡which¡¡he¡¡was¡¡¡¨indiscreetly¡¨¡¡to¡¡show¡¡Mr¡£¡¡Chamberlain£»¡¡Mr¡£¡¡Balfour£»¡¡and¡¡two¡¡or¡¡three¡¡other¡¡prominent¡¡Englishmen¡£¡¡In¡¡this¡¡letter¡¡he¡¡wrote£º

'The¡¡claims¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Canadians¡¡for¡¡access¡¡to¡¡deep¡¡water¡¡along¡¡any¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Alaskan¡¡Coast¡¡is¡¡just¡¡exactly¡¡as¡¡indefensible¡¡as¡¡if¡¡they¡¡should¡¡now¡¡suddenly¡¡claim¡¡the¡¡Island¡¡of¡¡Nantucket¡¡¡£¡£¡£¡£

'I¡¡believe¡¡that¡¡no¡¡three¡¡men¡¡£§the¡¡President¡¡said£§¡¡in¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡could¡¡be¡¡found¡¡who¡¡would¡¡be¡¡more¡¡anxious¡¡than¡¡our¡¡own¡¡delegates¡¡to¡¡do¡¡justice¡¡to¡¡the¡¡British¡¡claim¡¡on¡¡all¡¡points¡¡where¡¡there¡¡is¡¡even¡¡a¡¡color¡¡of¡¡right¡¡on¡¡the¡¡British¡¡side¡£¡¡But¡¡the¡¡objection¡¡raised¡¡by¡¡certain¡¡Canadian¡¡authorities¡¡to¡¡Lodge£»¡¡Root£»¡¡and¡¡Turner£»¡¡and¡¡especially¡¡to¡¡Lodge¡¡and¡¡Root£»¡¡was¡¡that¡¡they¡¡had¡¡committed¡¡themselves¡¡on¡¡the¡¡general¡¡proposition¡£¡¡No¡¡man¡¡in¡¡public¡¡life¡¡in¡¡any¡¡position¡¡of¡¡prominence¡¡could¡¡have¡¡possibly¡¡avoided¡¡committing¡¡himself¡¡on¡¡the¡¡proposition£»¡¡any¡¡more¡¡than¡¡Mr¡£¡¡Chamberlain¡¡could¡¡avoid¡¡committing¡¡himself¡¡on¡¡the¡¡question¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ownership¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Orkneys¡¡if¡¡some¡¡Scandinavian¡¡country¡¡suddenly¡¡claimed¡¡them¡£¡¡If¡¡this¡¡claim¡¡embodied¡¡other¡¡points¡¡as¡¡to¡¡which¡¡there¡¡was¡¡legitimate¡¡doubt£»¡¡I¡¡believe¡¡Mr¡£¡¡Chamberlain¡¡would¡¡act¡¡fairly¡¡and¡¡squarely¡¡in¡¡deciding¡¡the¡¡matter£»¡¡but¡¡if¡¡he¡¡appointed¡¡a¡¡commission¡¡to¡¡settle¡¡up¡¡all¡¡these¡¡questions£»¡¡I¡¡certainly¡¡should¡¡not¡¡expect¡¡him¡¡to¡¡appoint¡¡three¡¡men£»¡¡if¡¡he¡¡could¡¡find¡¡them£»¡¡who¡¡believed¡¡that¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Orkneys¡¡the¡¡question¡¡was¡¡an¡¡open¡¡one¡£

'I¡¡wish¡¡to¡¡make¡¡one¡¡last¡¡effort¡¡to¡¡bring¡¡about¡¡an¡¡agreement¡¡through¡¡the¡¡Commission¡¡£§he¡¡said¡¡in¡¡closing£§¡¡which¡¡will¡¡enable¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡both¡¡countries¡¡to¡¡say¡¡that¡¡the¡¡result¡¡represents¡¡the¡¡feeling¡¡of¡¡the¡¡representatives¡¡of¡¡both¡¡countries¡£¡¡But¡¡if¡¡there¡¡is¡¡a¡¡disagreement£»¡¡I¡¡wish¡¡it¡¡distinctly¡¡understood£»¡¡not¡¡only¡¡that¡¡there¡¡will¡¡be¡¡no¡¡arbitration¡¡of¡¡the¡¡matter£»¡¡but¡¡that¡¡in¡¡my¡¡message¡¡to¡¡Congress¡¡I¡¡shall¡¡take¡¡a¡¡position¡¡which¡¡will¡¡prevent¡¡any¡¡possibility¡¡of¡¡arbitration¡¡hereafter£»¡¡a¡¡position¡¡¡£¡¡¡£¡¡¡£¡¡which¡¡will¡¡render¡¡it¡¡necessary¡¡for¡¡Congress¡¡to¡¡give¡¡me¡¡the¡¡authority¡¡to¡¡run¡¡the¡¡line¡¡as¡¡we¡¡claim¡¡it£»¡¡by¡¡our¡¡own¡¡people£»¡¡without¡¡any¡¡further¡¡regard¡¡to¡¡the¡¡attitude¡¡of¡¡England¡¡and¡¡Canada¡£¡¡If¡¡I¡¡paid¡¡attention¡¡to¡¡mere¡¡abstract¡¡rights£»¡¡that¡¡is¡¡the¡¡position¡¡I¡¡ought¡¡to¡¡take¡¡anyhow¡£¡¡I¡¡have¡¡not¡¡taken¡¡it¡¡because¡¡I¡¡wish¡¡to¡¡exhaust¡¡every¡¡effort¡¡to¡¡have¡¡the¡¡affair¡¡settled¡¡peacefully¡¡and¡¡with¡¡due¡¡regard¡¡to¡¡England's¡¡honor¡£'*

*¡¡W¡£¡¡R¡£¡¡Thayer£º¡¡John¡¡Hay£»¡¡II£»¡¡209£»¡¡210¡£


In¡¡due¡¡time¡¡the¡¡Commission¡¡gave¡¡a¡¡decision¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡the¡¡American¡¡contention¡£¡¡Lord¡¡Alverstone£»¡¡who¡¡voted¡¡with¡¡the¡¡Americans£»¡¡was¡¡suspected¡¡of¡¡having¡¡been¡¡chosen¡¡by¡¡the¡¡British¡¡Government¡¡because¡¡they¡¡knew¡¡his¡¡opinion£»¡¡but¡¡I¡¡do¡¡not¡¡believe¡¡that¡¡this¡¡was¡¡true¡£¡¡A¡¡man¡¡of¡¡his¡¡honor£»¡¡sitting¡¡in¡¡such¡¡a¡¡tribunal£»¡¡would¡¡not¡¡have¡¡voted¡¡according¡¡to¡¡instructions¡¡from¡¡anybody¡£

Roosevelt's¡¡brusque¡¡way¡¡of¡¡bringing¡¡the¡¡Alaska¡¡Boundary¡¡Question¡¡to¡¡a¡¡quick¡¡decision£»¡¡may¡¡be¡¡criticised¡¡as¡¡not¡¡being¡¡judicial¡£¡¡He¡¡took¡¡the¡¡short¡¡cut£»¡¡just¡¡as¡¡he¡¡did¡¡years¡¡before¡¡in¡¡securing¡¡a¡¡witness¡¡against¡¡the¡¡New¡¡York¡¡saloon¡­keepers¡¡who¡¡destroyed¡¡the¡¡lives¡¡of¡¡thousands¡¡of¡¡boys¡¡and¡¡girls¡¡by¡¡making¡¡them¡¡drunkards¡£¡¡Strictly£»¡¡of¡¡course£»¡¡if¡¡the¡¡boundary¡¡dispute¡¡was¡¡to¡¡be¡¡submitted¡¡to¡¡a¡¡commission£»¡¡he¡¡ought¡¡to¡¡have¡¡allowed¡¡the¡¡other¡¡party¡¡to¡¡appoint¡¡its¡¡own¡¡commissioners¡¡without¡¡any¡¡suggestion¡¡from¡¡him¡£¡¡But¡¡as¡¡the¡¡case¡¡had¡¡dragged¡¡on¡¡interminably£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡believed£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡world¡¡believed£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Canadians¡¡themselves¡¡knew£»¡¡that¡¡they¡¡intended¡¡to¡¡filibuster¡¡and¡¡postpone¡¡as¡¡long¡¡as¡¡possible£»¡¡he¡¡took¡¡the¡¡common¡­sense¡¡way¡¡to¡¡a¡¡settlement¡£¡¡If¡¡he¡¡had¡¡resolved£»¡¡as¡¡he¡¡had£»¡¡to¡¡draw¡¡the¡¡boundary¡¡line¡¡¡¨on¡¡his¡¡own¡¡hook£»¡¨¡¡in¡¡case¡¡there¡¡was¡¡further¡¡pettifogging¡¡he¡¡committed¡¡no¡¡impropriety¡¡in¡¡warning¡¡the¡¡British¡¡statesmen¡¡of¡¡his¡¡purpose¡£¡¡In¡¡judging¡¡these¡¡Rooseveltian¡¡short¡¡cuts£»¡¡the¡¡reader¡¡must¡¡decide¡¡whether¡¡they¡¡were¡¡justified¡¡by¡¡the¡¡good¡¡which¡¡they¡¡achieved¡£

Of¡¡even¡¡greater¡¡importance¡¡was¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡reached£»¡¡under¡¡Roosevelt's¡¡direction£»¡¡with¡¡the¡¡British¡¡Government¡¡in¡¡regard¡¡to¡¡the¡¡construction¡¡of¡¡a¡¡canal¡¡across¡¡the¡¡Isthmus¡¡of¡¡Panama¡£¡¡By¡¡the¡¡Clayton¡­Bulwer¡¡Treaty¡¡of¡¡1850£»¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡and¡¡Great¡¡Britain¡¡agreed¡¡to¡¡maintain¡¡free¡¡and¡¡uninterrupted¡¡passage¡¡across¡¡the¡¡Isthmus£»¡¡and£»¡¡further£»¡¡that¡¡neither¡¡country¡¡should¡¡¡¨obtain¡¡or¡¡maintain¡¡to¡¡itself¡¡any¡¡control¡¡over¡¡the¡¡said¡¡ship¡­canal£»¡¨¡¡or¡¡¡¨assume¡¡or¡¡exercise¡¡any¡¡dominion¡¡¡£¡¡¡£¡¡¡£¡¡over¡¡any¡¡part¡¡of¡¡Central¡¡America¡£¡¨¡¡The¡¡ship¡¡canal¡¡talked¡¡about¡¡as¡¡a¡¡probability¡¡in¡¡1850¡¡had¡¡become¡¡a¡¡necessity¡¡by¡¡1900¡£¡¡During¡¡the¡¡Spanish¡­American¡¡War£»¡¡the¡¡American¡¡battleship¡¡Oregon¡¡had¡¡been¡¡obliged¡£¡¡to¡¡make¡¡the¡¡voyage¡¡round¡¡Cape¡¡Horn£»¡¡from¡¡San¡¡Francisco¡¡to¡¡Cuba£»¡¡and¡¡this¡¡served¡¡to¡¡impress¡¡on¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡the¡¡really¡¡acute¡¡need¡¡of¡¡a¡¡canal¡¡across¡¡the¡¡Isthmus£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡in¡¡time¡¡of¡¡war¡¡with¡¡a¡¡powerful¡¡enemy£»¡¡our¡¡Atlantic¡¡fleet¡¡and¡¡our¡¡Pacific¡¡fleet¡¡might¡¡quickly¡¡pass¡¡from¡¡one¡¡coast¡¡to¡¡another¡£¡¡It¡¡would¡¡obviously¡¡be¡¡impossible¡¡for¡¡us¡¡to¡¡play¡¡the¡¡role¡¡of¡¡a¡¡World¡¡Power¡¡unless¡¡we¡¡had¡¡this¡¡short¡¡line¡¡of¡¡communication¡£¡¡But¡¡the¡¡conditions¡¡of¡¡peace£»¡¡not¡¡less¡¡than¡¡the¡¡emergencies¡¡of¡¡war£»¡¡called¡¡for¡¡a¡¡canal¡£¡¡International¡¡commerce£»¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡our¡¡own£»¡¡required¡¡the¡¡saving¡¡of¡¡thousands¡¡of¡¡miles¡¡of¡¡distance¡£

About¡¡1880£»¡¡the¡¡French¡¡under¡¡Count¡¡De¡¡Lesseps¡¡undertook¡¡to¡¡construct¡¡a¡¡canal¡¡from¡¡Panama¡¡to¡¡Aspinwall£»¡¡but¡¡after¡¡half¡¡a¡¡dozen¡¡years¡¡the¡¡French¡¡company¡¡suspended¡¡work£»¡¡partly¡¡for¡¡financial¡¡reasons£»¡¡and¡¡partly¡¡on¡¡account¡¡of¡¡the¡¡enormous¡¡loss¡¡of¡¡life¡¡among¡¡the¡¡diggers¡¡from¡¡the¡¡pestilent¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡the¡¡climate¡¡and¡¡the¡¡country¡£¡¡Then¡¡followed¡¡a¡¡period¡¡of¡¡waiting£»¡¡until¡¡it¡¡seemed¡¡certain¡¡that¡¡the¡¡French¡¡would¡¡never¡¡resume¡¡operations¡£¡¡American¡¡promoters¡¡pressed¡¡the¡¡claims¡¡of¡¡a¡¡route¡¡through¡¡Nicaragua¡¡where¡¡they¡¡could¡¡secure¡¡concessions¡£¡¡But¡¡it¡¡became¡¡clear¡¡that¡¡an¡¡enterprise¡¡of¡¡such¡¡far¡¡reaching¡¡political¡¡importance¡¡as¡¡a¡¡trans¡­Isthmian¡¡canal£»¡¡should¡¡be¡¡under¡¡governmental¡¡control¡£¡¡John¡¡Hay¡¡had¡¡been¡¡less¡¡than¡¡a¡¡year¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Department¡¡of¡¡State¡¡when¡¡he¡¡set¡¡about¡¡negotiating¡¡with¡¡England¡¡a¡¡treaty¡¡which¡¡should¡¡embody¡¡his¡¡ideas¡£¡¡In¡¡Sir¡¡Julian¡¡Pauncefote£»¡¡the¡¡British¡¡Ambassador¡¡at¡¡Washington£»¡¡he¡¡had¡¡a¡¡most¡¡congenial¡¡man¡¡to¡¡deal¡¡with¡£¡¡Both¡¡were¡¡gentlemen£»¡¡both¡¡were¡¡firmly¡¡convinced¡¡that¡¡a¡¡canal¡¡must¡¡be¡¡constructed¡¡for¡¡the¡¡good¡¡of¡¡civilization£»¡¡both¡¡held¡¡that¡¡to¡¡assure¡¡the¡¡friendship¡¡of¡¡the¡¡two¡¡great¡¡branches¡¡of¡¡the¡¡English¡­speaking¡¡race¡¡should¡¡be¡¡the¡¡transcendent¡¡aim¡¡of¡¡each¡£¡¡They¡¡soon¡¡made¡¡a¡¡draft¡¡of¡¡a¡¡treaty¡¡which¡¡was¡¡submitted¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Senate£»£»but¡¡the¡¡Senators¡¡so¡¡amended¡¡it¡¡that¡¡the¡¡British¡¡Government¡¡refused¡¡to¡¡accept¡¡their¡¡amendments£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡project¡¡failed¡£¡¡Hay¡¡was¡¡so¡¡terribly¡¡chagrined¡¡at¡¡the¡¡Senate's¡¡interference¡¡that¡¡he¡¡wished¡¡to¡¡resign¡£¡¡There¡¡could¡¡be¡¡no¡¡doubt¡¡now£»¡¡however£»¡¡that¡¡if¡¡the¡¡canal¡¡had¡¡been¡¡undertaken¡¡on¡¡the¡¡terms¡¡of¡¡his¡¡first¡¡treaty£»¡¡it¡¡would¡¡never¡¡have¡¡satisfied¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡and¡¡it¡¡would¡¡probably¡¡have¡¡been¡¡a¡¡continual¡¡source¡¡of¡¡international¡¡irritation¡£¡¡Roosevelt¡¡was¡¡at¡¡that¡¡time¡¡Governor¡¡of¡¡New¡¡York£»¡¡and¡¡I¡¡quote¡¡the¡¡following¡¡letter¡¡from¡¡him¡¡to¡¡Hay¡¡because¡¡it¡¡shows¡¡how¡¡clearly¡¡he¡¡saw¡¡the¡¡objections¡¡to¡¡the¡¡treaty£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡fundamental¡¡principles¡¡for¡¡the¡¡control¡¡of¡¡an¡¡Isthmian¡¡canal£º

Albany£»¡¡Feb¡£¡¡18£»¡¡1900

'I¡¡hesitated¡¡long¡¡before¡¡I¡¡said¡¡anything¡¡about¡¡the¡¡treaty¡¡through¡¡sheer¡¡dread¡¡of¡¡two¡¡momentsthat¡¡in¡¡which¡¡I¡¡should¡¡receive¡¡your¡¡note£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡in¡¡which¡¡I¡¡should¡¡receive¡¡Cabot's¡£*¡¡But¡¡I¡¡made¡¡up¡¡my¡¡mind¡¡that¡¡at¡¡least¡¡I¡¡wished¡¡to¡¡be¡¡on¡¡record£»¡¡for¡¡to¡¡my¡¡mind¡¡this¡¡step¡¡is¡¡one¡¡backward£»¡¡and¡¡it¡¡may¡¡be¡¡fraught¡¡with¡¡very¡¡great¡¡mischief¡£¡¡You¡¡have¡¡been¡¡the¡¡greatest¡¡Secretary¡¡of¡¡State¡¡I¡¡have¡¡seen¡¡in¡¡my¡¡timeOlney¡¡comes¡¡secondbut¡¡at¡¡this¡¡moment¡¡I¡¡can¡¡not£»¡¡try¡¡as¡¡I¡¡may£»¡¡see¡¡that¡¡you¡¡are¡¡right¡£¡¡Understand¡¡me¡£¡¡When¡¡the¡¡treaty¡¡is¡¡adopted£»¡¡as¡¡I¡¡suppose¡¡it¡¡will¡¡be£»¡¡I¡¡shall¡¡put¡¡the¡¡best¡¡face¡¡possible¡¡on¡¡it£»¡¡and¡¡shall¡¡back¡¡the¡¡Administration¡¡as¡¡heartily¡¡as¡¡ever£»¡¡but¡¡oh£»¡¡how¡¡I¡¡wish¡¡you¡¡and¡¡the¡¡President¡¡would¡¡drop¡¡the¡¡treaty¡¡and¡¡push¡¡through¡¡a¡¡bill¡¡to¡¡build¡¡AND¡¡FORTIFY¡¡our¡¡own¡¡canal¡£

*¡¡Senator¡¡Henry¡¡Cabot¡¡Lodge£»¡¡who¡¡also¡¡opposed¡¡the¡¡first¡¡treaty¡£


'My¡¡objections¡¡are¡¡twofold¡£¡¡First£»¡¡as¡¡to¡¡naval¡¡policy¡£¡¡If¡¡the¡¡proposed¡¡canal¡¡had¡¡been¡¡in¡¡existence¡¡in¡¡'98£»¡¡the¡¡Oregon¡¡could¡¡have¡¡come¡¡more¡¡quickly¡¡through¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Atlantic£»¡¡but¡¡this¡¡fact¡¡would¡¡have¡¡been¡¡far¡¡outweighed¡¡by¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡Cervera's¡¡fleet¡¡would¡¡have¡¡had¡¡open¡¡to¡¡it¡¡the¡¡chance¡¡of¡¡itself¡¡going¡¡through¡¡the¡¡canal£»¡¡and¡¡thence¡¡sailing¡¡to¡¡attack¡¡Dewey¡¡or¡¡to¡¡menace¡¡our¡¡stripped¡¡Pacific¡¡Coast¡£¡¡If¡¡that¡¡canal¡¡is¡¡open¡¡to¡¡the¡¡warships¡¡of¡¡an¡¡enemy£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡a¡¡menace¡¡to¡¡us¡¡in¡¡time¡¡of¡¡war£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡an¡¡added¡¡burden£»¡¡an¡¡additional¡¡strategic¡¡poin

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ