Ì«×ÓүС˵Íø > Ó¢Óïµç×ÓÊé > the anti-slavery crusade >

µÚ3½Ú

the anti-slavery crusade-µÚ3½Ú

С˵£º the anti-slavery crusade ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



to¡¡restore¡¡the¡¡balance£»¡¡Maine¡¡was¡¡separated¡¡from¡¡Massachusetts¡¡and¡¡was¡¡admitted¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Union¡¡as¡¡a¡¡State¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡further¡¡enacted¡¡that¡¡slavery¡¡should¡¡be¡¡forever¡¡prohibited¡¡from¡¡all¡¡territory¡¡of¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡north¡¡of¡¡the¡¡parallel¡¡36¡¡degrees¡¡30'£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡north¡¡of¡¡the¡¡southern¡¡boundary¡¡of¡¡Missouri¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡this¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡act¡¡which¡¡is¡¡known¡¡as¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Compromise¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡accepted¡¡as¡¡a¡¡permanent¡¡limitation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡institution¡¡of¡¡slavery¡£¡¡By¡¡this¡¡act¡¡Mason¡¡and¡¡Dixon's¡¡Line¡¡was¡¡extended¡¡through¡¡the¡¡Louisiana¡¡Purchase¡£¡¡As¡¡the¡¡western¡¡boundary¡¡was¡¡then¡¡defined£»¡¡slavery¡¡could¡¡still¡¡be¡¡extended¡¡into¡¡Arkansas¡¡and¡¡into¡¡a¡¡part¡¡of¡¡what¡¡is¡¡now¡¡Oklahoma£»¡¡while¡¡a¡¡great¡¡empire¡¡to¡¡the¡¡northwest¡¡was¡¡reserved¡¡for¡¡the¡¡formation¡¡of¡¡free¡¡States¡£¡¡Arkansas¡¡became¡¡a¡¡slave¡¡State¡¡in¡¡1836¡¡and¡¡Michigan¡¡was¡¡admitted¡¡as¡¡a¡¡free¡¡State¡¡in¡¡the¡¡following¡¡year¡£¡¡With¡¡the¡¡admission¡¡of¡¡Arkansas¡¡and¡¡Michigan£»¡¡thirteen¡¡slave¡¡States¡¡were¡¡balanced¡¡by¡¡a¡¡like¡¡number¡¡of¡¡free¡¡States¡£¡¡The¡¡South¡¡still¡¡had¡¡Florida£»¡¡which¡¡would¡¡in¡¡time¡¡become¡¡a¡¡slave¡¡State¡£¡¡Against¡¡this¡¡single¡¡Territory¡¡there¡¡was¡¡an¡¡immense¡¡region¡¡to¡¡the¡¡northwest£»¡¡equal¡¡in¡¡area¡¡to¡¡all¡¡the¡¡slave¡¡States¡¡combined£»¡¡which£»¡¡according¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Ordinance¡¡of¡¡1787¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Compromise£»¡¡had¡¡been¡¡consecrated¡¡to¡¡freedom¡£¡¡Foreseeing¡¡this¡¡condition£»¡¡a¡¡few¡¡Southern¡¡planters¡¡began¡¡a¡¡movement¡¡for¡¡the¡¡extension¡¡of¡¡territory¡¡to¡¡the¡¡south¡¡and¡¡west¡¡immediately¡¡after¡¡the¡¡adoption¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Missouri¡¡Compromise¡£¡¡When¡¡Arkansas¡¡was¡¡admitted¡¡in¡¡1836£»¡¡there¡¡was¡¡a¡¡prospect¡¡of¡¡the¡¡immediate¡¡annexation¡¡of¡¡Texas¡¡as¡¡a¡¡slave¡¡State¡£¡¡This¡¡did¡¡not¡¡take¡¡place¡¡until¡¡nine¡¡years¡¡later£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡propaganda£»¡¡the¡¡object¡¡of¡¡which¡¡was¡¡the¡¡extension¡¡of¡¡slave¡¡territory£»¡¡could¡¡not¡¡be¡¡maintained¡¡by¡¡those¡¡Who¡¡contended¡¡that¡¡slavery¡¡was¡¡a¡¡curse¡¡to¡¡the¡¡country¡£¡¡Virginia£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡and¡¡other¡¡border¡¡slave¡¡States£»¡¡as¡¡they¡¡became¡¡committed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡policy¡¡of¡¡expansion£»¡¡ceased¡¡to¡¡tolerate¡¡official¡¡public¡¡utterances¡¡against¡¡slavery¡£¡¡Three¡¡more¡¡or¡¡less¡¡clearly¡¡defined¡¡sections¡¡appear¡¡in¡¡the¡¡later¡¡development¡¡of¡¡the¡¡crusade¡£¡¡These¡¡are¡¡the¡¡New¡¡England¡¡States£»¡¡the¡¡Middle¡¡States£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡States¡¡south¡¡of¡¡North¡¡Carolina¡¡and¡¡Tennessee¡£¡¡In¡¡New¡¡England£»¡¡few¡¡negroes¡¡were¡¡ever¡¡held¡¡as¡¡slaves£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡institution¡¡disappeared¡¡during¡¡the¡¡first¡¡years¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Republic¡£¡¡The¡¡inhabitants¡¡had¡¡little¡¡experience¡¡arising¡¡from¡¡actual¡¡contact¡¡with¡¡slavery¡£¡¡When¡¡slavery¡¡disappeared¡¡from¡¡New¡¡England¡¡and¡¡before¡¡there¡¡had¡¡been¡¡developed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡country¡¡at¡¡large¡¡a¡¡national¡¡feeling¡¡of¡¡responsibility¡¡for¡¡its¡¡continued¡¡existence£»¡¡interest¡¡in¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡declined¡£¡¡For¡¡twenty¡¡years¡¡previous¡¡to¡¡the¡¡founding¡¡of¡¡Garrison's¡¡Liberator¡¡in¡¡1831£»¡¡organized¡¡abolition¡¡movements¡¡had¡¡been¡¡almost¡¡unknown¡¡in¡¡New¡¡England¡£¡¡In¡¡various¡¡ways¡¡the¡¡people¡¡were¡¡isolated£»¡¡separated¡¡from¡¡contact¡¡with¡¡slavery¡£¡¡Their¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡this¡¡subject¡¡of¡¡discussion¡¡was¡¡academic£»¡¡theoretical£»¡¡acquired¡¡at¡¡second¡­hand¡£¡¡In¡¡New¡¡York¡¡and¡¡New¡¡Jersey¡¡slaves¡¡were¡¡much¡¡more¡¡numerous¡¡than¡¡in¡¡New¡¡England¡£¡¡There¡¡were¡¡still¡¡slaves¡¡in¡¡considerable¡¡numbers¡¡until¡¡about¡¡1825¡£¡¡The¡¡people¡¡had¡¡a¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡the¡¡institution¡¡from¡¡experience¡¡and¡¡observation£»¡¡and¡¡there¡¡was¡¡no¡¡break¡¡in¡¡the¡¡continuity¡¡of¡¡their¡¡organized¡¡abolition¡¡societies¡£¡¡Chief¡¡among¡¡the¡¡objects¡¡of¡¡these¡¡societies¡¡was¡¡the¡¡effort¡¡to¡¡prevent¡¡kidnapping¡¡and¡¡to¡¡guard¡¡the¡¡rights¡¡of¡¡free¡¡negroes¡£¡¡For¡¡both¡¡of¡¡these¡¡purposes¡¡there¡¡was¡¡a¡¡continuous¡¡call¡¡for¡¡activity¡£¡¡Pennsylvania¡¡also¡¡had¡¡freedmen¡¡of¡¡her¡¡own¡¡whose¡¡rights¡¡called¡¡for¡¡guardianship£»¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡many¡¡freedmen¡¡from¡¡farther¡¡south¡¡who¡¡had¡¡come¡¡into¡¡the¡¡State¡£¡¡The¡¡movement¡¡of¡¡protest¡¡and¡¡protection¡¡did¡¡not¡¡stop¡¡at¡¡Mason¡¡and¡¡Dixon's¡¡Line£»¡¡but¡¡extended¡¡far¡¡into¡¡the¡¡South¡£¡¡In¡¡both¡¡North¡¡Carolina¡¡and¡¡Tennessee¡¡an¡¡active¡¡protest¡¡against¡¡slavery¡¡was¡¡at¡¡all¡¡times¡¡maintained¡£¡¡In¡¡this¡¡great¡¡middle¡¡section¡¡of¡¡the¡¡country£»¡¡between¡¡New¡¡England¡¡and¡¡South¡¡Carolina£»¡¡there¡¡was¡¡no¡¡cessation¡¡in¡¡the¡¡conflict¡¡between¡¡free¡¡and¡¡slave¡¡labor¡£¡¡Some¡¡of¡¡these¡¡States¡¡became¡¡free¡¡while¡¡others¡¡remained¡¡slave£»¡¡but¡¡between¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡the¡¡two¡¡sections¡¡there¡¡was¡¡continuous¡¡communication¡£¡¡Slaveholders¡¡came¡¡into¡¡free¡¡States¡¡to¡¡liberate¡¡their¡¡slaves¡£¡¡Non¡­slaveholders¡¡came¡¡to¡¡get¡¡rid¡¡of¡¡the¡¡competition¡¡of¡¡slave¡¡labor£»¡¡and¡¡free¡¡negroes¡¡came¡¡to¡¡avoid¡¡reenslavement¡£¡¡Slaves¡¡fled¡¡thither¡¡on¡¡their¡¡way¡¡to¡¡liberty¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡not¡¡a¡¡matter¡¡of¡¡choice£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡an¡¡unavoidable¡¡condition¡¡which¡¡compelled¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡the¡¡border¡¡States¡¡to¡¡give¡¡continuous¡¡attention¡¡to¡¡the¡¡institution¡¡of¡¡slavery¡£¡¡The¡¡modern¡¡anti¡­slavery¡¡movement¡¡had¡¡its¡¡origin¡¡in¡¡this¡¡great¡¡middle¡¡section£»¡¡and¡¡from¡¡the¡¡same¡¡source¡¡it¡¡derived¡¡its¡¡chief¡¡support¡£¡¡The¡¡great¡¡body¡¡of¡¡active¡¡abolitionists¡¡were¡¡from¡¡the¡¡slave¡¡States¡¡or¡¡else¡¡derived¡¡their¡¡inspiration¡¡from¡¡personal¡¡contact¡¡with¡¡slavery¡£¡¡As¡¡compared¡¡with¡¡New¡¡England¡¡abolitionists£»¡¡the¡¡middlestate¡¡folk¡¡were¡¡less¡¡extreme¡¡in¡¡their¡¡views¡£¡¡They¡¡had¡¡a¡¡keener¡¡appreciation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡difficulties¡¡involved¡¡in¡¡emancipation¡£¡¡They¡¡were¡¡more¡¡tolerant¡¡towards¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡letting¡¡the¡¡country¡¡at¡¡large¡¡share¡¡the¡¡burdens¡¡involved¡¡in¡¡the¡¡liberation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡slaves¡£¡¡Border¡­state¡¡abolitionists¡¡naturally¡¡favored¡¡the¡¡policy¡¡of¡¡gradual¡¡emancipation¡¡which¡¡had¡¡been¡¡followed¡¡in¡¡New¡¡York£»¡¡New¡¡Jersey£»¡¡and¡¡Pennsylvania¡£¡¡Abolitionists¡¡who¡¡continued¡¡to¡¡reside¡¡in¡¡the¡¡slave¡¡States¡¡were¡¡forced¡¡to¡¡recognize¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡emancipation¡¡involved¡¡serious¡¡questions¡¡of¡¡race¡¡adjustment¡£¡¡From¡¡the¡¡border¡¡States¡¡came¡¡the¡¡colonization¡¡society£»¡¡a¡¡characteristic¡¡institution£»¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡compromise¡¡of¡¡every¡¡variety¡£¡¡The¡¡southernmost¡¡section£»¡¡including¡¡South¡¡Carolina£»¡¡Georgia£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Gulf¡¡States£»¡¡was¡¡even¡¡more¡¡sharply¡¡defined¡¡in¡¡the¡¡attitude¡¡it¡¡assumed¡¡toward¡¡the¡¡anti¡­slavery¡¡movement¡£¡¡At¡¡no¡¡time¡¡did¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡of¡¡emancipation¡¡become¡¡formidable¡¡in¡¡this¡¡section¡£¡¡In¡¡all¡¡these¡¡States¡¡there¡¡was£»¡¡of¡¡course£»¡¡a¡¡large¡¡class¡¡of¡¡non¡­slaveholding¡¡whites£»¡¡who¡¡were¡¡opposed¡¡to¡¡slavery¡¡and¡¡who¡¡realized¡¡that¡¡they¡¡were¡¡victims¡¡of¡¡an¡¡injurious¡¡system£»¡¡but¡¡they¡¡had¡¡no¡¡effective¡¡organ¡¡for¡¡expression¡£¡¡The¡¡ruling¡¡minority¡¡gained¡¡an¡¡early¡¡and¡¡an¡¡easy¡¡victory¡¡and¡¡to¡¡the¡¡end¡¡held¡¡a¡¡firm¡¡hand¡£¡¡To¡¡the¡¡inhabitants¡¡of¡¡this¡¡section¡¡it¡¡appeared¡¡to¡¡be¡¡a¡¡self¡­evident¡¡truth¡¡that¡¡the¡¡white¡¡race¡¡was¡¡born¡¡to¡¡rule¡¡and¡¡the¡¡black¡¡race¡¡was¡¡born¡¡to¡¡serve¡£¡¡Where¡¡negroes¡¡outnumbered¡¡the¡¡whites¡¡fourfold£»¡¡the¡¡mere¡¡suggestion¡¡of¡¡emancipation¡¡raised¡¡a¡¡race¡¡question¡¡which¡¡seemed¡¡appalling¡¡in¡¡its¡¡proportions¡£¡¡Either¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Union¡¡or¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Union£»¡¡the¡¡rulers¡¡were¡¡determined¡¡to¡¡perpetuate¡¡slavery¡£¡¡Slavery¡¡as¡¡an¡¡economic¡¡institution¡¡became¡¡dependent¡¡upon¡¡a¡¡few¡¡semitropical¡¡plantation¡¡crops¡£¡¡When¡¡the¡¡Constitution¡¡was¡¡framed£»¡¡rice¡¡and¡¡indigo£»¡¡produced¡¡in¡¡South¡¡Carolina¡¡and¡¡Georgia£»¡¡were¡¡the¡¡two¡¡most¡¡important¡£¡¡Indigo¡¡declined¡¡in¡¡relative¡¡importance£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡production¡¡of¡¡sugar¡¡was¡¡developed£»¡¡especially¡¡after¡¡the¡¡annexation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Louisiana¡¡Purchase¡£¡¡But¡¡by¡¡far¡¡the¡¡most¡¡important¡¡crop¡¡for¡¡its¡¡effects¡¡upon¡¡slavery¡¡and¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡entire¡¡country¡¡was¡¡cotton¡£¡¡This¡¡single¡¡product¡¡finally¡¡absorbed¡¡the¡¡labor¡¡of¡¡half¡¡the¡¡slaves¡¡of¡¡the¡¡entire¡¡country¡£¡¡Mr¡£¡¡Rhodes¡¡is¡¡not¡¡at¡¡all¡¡unreasonable¡¡in¡¡his¡¡surmise¡¡that£»¡¡had¡¡it¡¡not¡¡been¡¡for¡¡the¡¡unforeseen¡¡development¡¡of¡¡the¡¡cotton¡¡industry£»¡¡the¡¡expectation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡founders¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Republic¡¡that¡¡slavery¡¡would¡¡soon¡¡disappear¡¡would¡¡actually¡¡have¡¡been¡¡realized¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡more¡¡difficult¡¡to¡¡carry¡¡out¡¡a¡¡policy¡¡of¡¡emancipation¡¡when¡¡slaves¡¡were¡¡quoted¡¡in¡¡the¡¡market¡¡at¡¡a¡¡thousand¡¡dollars¡¡than¡¡when¡¡the¡¡price¡¡was¡¡a¡¡few¡¡hundred¡¡dollars¡£¡¡All¡¡slave¡­owners¡¡felt¡¡richer£»¡¡emancipation¡¡appeared¡¡to¡¡involve¡¡a¡¡greater¡¡sacrifice¡£¡¡Thus¡¡the¡¡cotton¡¡industry¡¡went¡¡far¡¡towards¡¡accounting¡¡for¡¡the¡¡changed¡¡attitude¡¡of¡¡the¡¡entire¡¡country¡¡on¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡of¡¡slavery¡£¡¡The¡¡North¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡the¡¡South¡¡became¡¡financially¡¡interested¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡not¡¡generally¡¡perceived¡¡before¡¡it¡¡actually¡¡happened¡¡that¡¡the¡¡border¡¡States¡¡would¡¡take¡¡the¡¡place¡¡of¡¡Africa¡¡in¡¡furnishing¡¡the¡¡required¡¡supply¡¡of¡¡laborers¡¡for¡¡Southern¡¡plantations¡£¡¡The¡¡interstate¡¡slave¡­trade¡¡gave¡¡to¡¡the¡¡system¡¡a¡¡solidarity¡¡of¡¡interest¡¡which¡¡was¡¡new¡£¡¡All¡¡slave¡­owners¡¡became¡¡partakers¡¡of¡¡a¡¡common¡¡responsibility¡¡for¡¡the¡¡system¡¡as¡¡a¡¡whole¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡the¡¡newly¡¡developed¡¡trade¡¡quite¡¡as¡¡much¡¡as¡¡the¡¡system¡¡of¡¡slavery¡¡itself¡¡which¡¡furnished¡¡the¡¡ground¡¡for¡¡the¡¡later¡¡anti¡­slavery¡¡appeal¡£¡¡The¡¡consciousness¡¡of¡¡a¡¡common¡¡guilt¡¡for¡¡the¡¡sin¡¡of¡¡slavery¡¡grew¡¡with¡¡the¡¡increase¡¡of¡¡actual¡¡interstate¡¡relations¡£¡¡The¡¡abolition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡African¡¡slave¡­trade¡¡was¡¡an¡¡act¡¡of¡¡the¡¡general¡¡Government¡£¡¡Congress¡¡passed¡¡the¡¡prohibitory¡¡statute¡¡in¡¡1807£»¡¡to¡¡go¡¡into¡¡effect¡¡January£»¡¡1808¡£¡¡At¡¡no¡¡time£»¡¡however£»¡¡was¡¡the¡¡prohibition¡¡entirely¡¡effective£»¡¡and¡¡a¡¡limited¡¡illegal¡¡trade¡¡continued¡¡until¡¡slavery¡¡was¡¡eventually¡¡abolished¡£¡¡This¡¡inefficiency¡¡of¡¡restraint¡¡furnished¡¡another¡¡point¡¡of¡¡attack¡¡for¡¡the¡¡abolitionists¡£¡¡Through¡¡efforts¡¡to¡¡suppress¡¡the¡¡African¡¡slave¡­trade£»¡¡the¡¡entire¡¡country¡¡became¡¡conscious¡¡of¡¡a¡¡common¡¡responsibility¡£¡¡Before¡¡the¡¡Revolutionary¡¡War£»¡¡Great¡¡Britain¡¡had¡¡been¡¡censured¡¡for¡¡forcing¡¡cheap¡¡slaves¡¡from¡¡Africa¡¡upon¡¡her¡¡unwilling¡¡colonies¡£¡¡After¡¡the¡¡Revolution£»¡¡New¡¡England¡¡was¡¡blamed¡¡for¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡her¡¡citizens¡¡in¡¡this¡¡nefarious¡¡trade¡¡both¡¡before¡¡and¡¡after¡¡it¡¡was¡¡made¡¡illegal¡£¡¡All¡¡of¡¡this¡¡tended¡¡to¡¡increase¡¡the¡¡sense¡¡of¡¡responsibility¡¡in¡¡every¡¡section¡¡of¡¡the¡¡country¡£¡¡Congress¡¡had¡¡made¡¡the¡¡foreign¡¡slave¡­trade¡¡illegal£»¡¡and¡¡citizens¡¡in¡¡all¡¡sections¡¡gradually¡¡became¡¡aware¡¡of¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡that¡¡Congress¡¡might¡¡likewise¡¡restrict¡¡or¡¡forbid¡¡interstate¡¡commerce¡¡in¡¡slaves¡£¡¡The¡¡West¡¡Indies¡¡and¡¡Mexico¡¡were¡¡als

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ