beacon lights of history-iii-2-及54准
梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ● 辛指欺云匈競何
!!!!隆堋響頼紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響
temptation and with all the bias of a sinful natureis infinite。
Nothing which a created mortal can do is infinite察it is only
finite此the infinite belongs to God alone。 Hence an infinite
penalty for a finite sin conflicts with consciousness and is
nowhere asserted in the Bible察which is transcendently more
merciful and comforting than many theological systems of belief
however powerfully sustained by dialectical reasoning and by the
most excellent men。 Human judgments or reasonings are fallible on
moral questions which have two sides察and reasonings from texts
which present different meanings when studied by the lights of
learning and science are still more liable to be untrustworthy。 It
would seem to be the supremest necessity for theological schools to
unravel the meaning of divine declarations察and present doctrines
in their relation with apparently conflicting texts察rather than
draw out a perfect and consistent system察philosophically
considered察from any one class of texts。 Of all things in this
wicked and perplexing world the science of theology should be the
most cheerful and inspiring察for it involves inquiries on the
loftiest subjects which can interest a thoughtful mind。
But whatever defects the system of doctrines which Calvin
elaborated with such transcendent ability may have察there is no
question as to its vast influence on the thinking of the sixteenth
and seventeenth centuries。 The schools of France and Holland and
Scotland and England and America were animated by his genius and
authority。 He was a burning and a shining light察if not for all
ages察at least for the unsettled times in which he lived。 No
theologian ever had a greater posthumous power than he for nearly
three hundred years察and he is still one of the great authorities
of the church universal。 John Knox sought his counsel and was
influenced by his advice in the great reform he made in Scotland。
In France the words Calvinist and Huguenot are synonymous。
Cranmer察too察listened to his counsels察and had great respect for
his learning and sanctity。 Among the Puritans he has reigned like
an oracle。 Oliver Cromwell embraced his doctrines察as also did Sir
Matthew Hale。 Ridicule or abuse of Calvin is as absurd as the
ridicule or abuse with which Protestants so long assailed
Hildebrand or Innocent III。 No one abuses Pascal or Augustine察and
yet the theological views of all these are substantially the same。
In one respect I think that Calvin has received more credit than he
deserves。 Some have maintained that he was a sort of father of
republicanism and democratic liberty。 In truth he had no popular
sympathies察and leaned towards an aristocracy which was little
short of an oligarchy。 He had no hand in establishing the
political system of Geneva察it was established before he went
there。 He was not even one of those thinkers who sympathized with
true liberty of conscience。 He persecuted heretics like a
mediaeval Catholic divine。 He would have burned a Galileo as he
caused the death of Servetus察which need not have happened but for
him。 Calvin could have saved Servetus if he had pleased察but he
complained of him to the magistrates察knowing that his condemnation
and death would necessarily follow。 He had neither the humanity of
Luther nor the toleration of Saint Augustine。 He was the
impersonation of intellectlike Newton察Leibnitz察Spinoza察and
Kantwhich overbore the impulses of his heart。 He had no
passions except zeal for orthodoxy。 So pre´eminently did intellect
tower above the passions that he seemed to lack sympathy察and yet
such was his exalted character察he was capable of friendship。 He
was remarkable for every faculty of the mind except wit and
imagination。 His memory was almost incredible察he remembered
everything he ever read or heard察he would察after long intervals
recognize persons whom he had never seen but once or twice。 When
employed in dictation察he would resume the thread of his discourse
without being prompted察after the most vexatious interruptions。
His judgment was as sound as his memory was retentive察it was
almost infallibleno one was ever known to have been misled by
it。 He had a remarkable analytical power察and also the power of
generalization。 He was a very learned man察and his Commentaries
are among the most useful and valued of his writings察showing both
learning and judgment察his exegetical works have scarcely been
improved。 He had no sceptical or rationalistic tendencies察and
therefore his Commentaries may not be admired by men of ;advanced
thought察─but his annotations will live when those of Ewald shall
be forgotten察they still hold their place in the libraries of
biblical critics。 For his age he was a transcendent critic察his
various writings fill five folio volumes。 He was not so voluminous
a writer as Thomas Aquinas察but less diffuse察his style is lucid
like that of Voltaire。
Considering the weakness of his body Calvin's labors were
prodigious。 There was never a more industrious man察finding time
for everythingfor an amazing correspondence察for pastoral
labors察for treatises and essays察for commentaries and official
duties。 No man ever accomplished more in the same space of time。
He preached daily every alternate week察he attended meetings of the
Consistory and of the Court of Morals察he interested himself in the
great affairs of his age察he wrote letters to all parts of
Christendom。
Reigning as a religious dictator察and with more influence than any
man of his age察next to Luther察Calvin was content to remain poor
and was disdainful of money and all praises and rewards。 This was
not an affectation察not the desire to imitate the great saints of
Christian antiquity to whom poverty was a cardinal virtue察but real
indifference察looking upon money as impedimenta察as camp equipage
is to successful generals。 He was not conscious of being poor with
his small salary of fifty dollars a year察feeling that he had
inexhaustible riches within him察and hence he calmly and naturally
took his seat among the great men of the world as their peer and
equal察without envy of the accidents of fortune and birth。 He was
as indifferent to money and luxuries as Socrates when he walked
barefooted among the Athenian aristocracy察or Basil when he retired
to the wilderness察he rarely gave vent to extravagant grief or joy
seldom laughed察and cared little for hilarities察he knew no games
or sports察he rarely played with children or gossiped with women
he loved without romance察and suffered bereavement without outward
sorrow。 He had no toleration for human infirmities察and was
neither social nor genial察he sought a wife察not so much for
communion of feeling as to ease him of his burdensnot to share
his confidence察but to take care of his house。 Nor was he fond
like Luther察of music and poetry。 He had no taste for the fine
arts察he never had a poet or an artist for his friend or companion。
He could not look out of his window without seeing the glaciers of
the Alps察but seemed to be unmoved by their unspeakable grandeur
he did not revel in the glories of nature or art察but gave his mind
to abstract ideas and stern practical duties。 He was sparing of
language察simple察direct察and precise察using neither sarcasm察nor
ridicule察nor exaggeration。 He was far from being eloquent
according to popular notions of oratory察and despised the jingle of
words and phrases and tricks of rhetoric察he appealed to reason
rather than the passions察to the conscience rather than the
imagination。
Though mild察Calvin was also intolerant。 Castillo察once his
friend察assailed his doctrine of Decrees察and was obliged to quit
Geneva察and was so persecuted that he died of actual starvation
Perrin察captain´general of the republic察danced at a wedding察and
was thrown into prison察Bolsec察an eminent physician察opposed the
doctrine of Predestination察and was sentenced to perpetual
imprisonment察Gruet spoke lightly of the ordinances of religion
and was beheaded察Servetus was a moral and learned and honest man
but could not escape the flames。 Had he been willing to say察as
the flames consumed his body察 Jesus察thou eternal Son of God察have
mercy on me ─instead of察 Jesus察thou son of the eternal God ─he
might have been spared。 Calvin was as severe on those who refused
to accept his logical deductions from acknowledged truths as he was
on those who denied the fundamental truths themselves。 But
toleration was rare in his age察and he was not beyond it。 He was
not even beyond the ideas of the Middle Ages in some important
points察such as those which pertained to divine justicethe wrath
rather than the love of God。 He lived too near the Middle Ages to
be emancipated from the ideas which enslaved such a man as Thomas
Aquinas。 He had very little patience with frivolous amusements or
degrading pursuits。 He attached great di