beacon lights of history-iii-2-及49准
梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈梓囚徒貧圭鮗 ● 辛指欺云匈競何
!!!!隆堋響頼紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響
that Calvin was obliged to publish his Genevan Catechism in Latin。
He also offended many by his outspoken rebuke of sin察for he aimed
at a complete reformation of morals察like Latimer in London and
like Savonarola at Florence。 He sought to reprove amusements which
were demoralizing察or thought to be so in their influence。 The
passions of the people were excited察and the city was torn by
parties察and such was the reluctance to submit to the discipline of
the ministers that they refused to administer the sacraments。 This
created such a ferment that the syndics expelled Calvin and Farel
from the city。 They went at first to Berne察but the Bernese would
not receive them。 They then retired to Basle察wearied察wet察and
hungry察and from Basle they went to Strasburg。 It was in this city
that Calvin dwelt three years察spending his time in lecturing on
divinity察in making contributions to exegetical theology察in
perfecting his ;Institutes察─forming a close alliance with
Melancthon and other leading reformers。 So pre´occupied was he
with his labors as a commentator of the Scriptures察that he even
contemplated withdrawing from the public service of religion。
Calvin was a scholar as well as theologian察and quiet labors in his
library were probably more congenial to his tastes than active
parochial duties。 His highest life was amid his books察in serene
repose and lofty contemplation。 At this time he had an extensive
correspondence察his advice being much sought for its wisdom and
moderation。 His judgment was almost unerring察since he was never
led away by extravagances or enthusiasm此a cold察calm man even
among his friends and admirers。 He had no passions察he was all
intellect。 It would seem that in his exile he gave lectures on
divinity察being invited by the Council of Strasburg察and also
interested himself in reference to the Sacrament of the Lord's
Supper察which he would withhold from the unworthy。 He lived
quietly in his retreat察and was much respected by the people of the
city where he dwelt。
In 1539 a convention was held at Frankfort察at which Calvin was
present as the envoy of the city of Strasburg。 Here察for the first
time察he met Melancthon察but there was no close intimacy between
them until these two great men met in the following year at a Diet
which was summoned at Worms by the Emperor Charles V。察in order to
produce concord between the Catholics and Protestants察and which
was afterwards removed to Ratisbon。 Melancthon represented one
party察and Doctor Eck the other。 Melancthon and Bucer were
inclined to peace察and Cardinal Contarini freely offered his hand
agreeing with the reformers to adopt the idea of Justification as
his starting point察allowing that it proceeds from faith察without
any merit of our own察but察like Luther and Calvin察he opposed any
attempt at union which might compromise the truth察and had no faith
in the movement。 Neither party察as it was to be expected察was
satisfied。 The main subject of the dispute was in reference to the
Eucharist。 Calvin denied the real presence of Christ in the
Sacrament察regarding it as a symbolthough one of special divine
influence。 But on this point the Catholics have ever been
uncompromising from the times of Berengar。 Nor was Luther fully
emancipated from the Catholic doctrine察modifying without
essentially changing it。 Calvin maintained that ;This is my body;
meant that it signified ;my body。; In regard to original sin and
free´will察as represented by Augustine察there was no dispute察but
much difficulty attended the interpretation of the doctrine of
Justification。 The greatest difficulty was in reference to the
doctrine of Transubstantiation察which was rejected by the reformers
because it had not the sanction of the Scriptures察and when it was
found that this caused insuperable difficulties about the Lord's
Supper察it was thought useless to proceed to other matters察like
confession察masses for the dead察and the withholding the cup from
the laity。 There was not so great a difference between the
Catholic and Protestant theologians concerning the main body of
dogmatic divinity as is generally supposed。 The fundamental
questions pertaining to God察the Trinity察the mission and divinity
of Christ察original sin察free´will察grace察predestination察had been
formulated by Thomas Aquinas with as much severity as by Calvin。
The great subjects at issue察in a strictly theological view察were
Justification and the Eucharist。 Respecting free´will and
predestination察the Catholic theologians have never been agreed
among themselvessome siding with Augustine察like Aquinas
Bernard察and Anselm察and some with Pelagius察like Abelard and
Lainez the Jesuit at the Council of Trent a council assembled by
the Pope察with the concurrence of Charles V。 of Germany and Francis
I。 of France察the decrees of which察against the authority of
Augustine in this matter察seem to be now the established faith of
the Roman Catholic Church。
After the Diet of Ratisbon察Calvin returned to Geneva察at the eager
desire of the people。 The great Council summoned him to return
every voice was raised for him。 ;Calvin察that learned and
righteous man察─they said察 it is he whom we would have as the
minister of the Lord。; Yet he did not willingly return察he
preferred his quiet life at Strasburg察but obeyed the voice of
conscience。 On the 13th of September察1541察he returned to his
penitent congregation察and was received by the whole city with
every demonstration of respect察and a cloth cloak was given him as
a present察which he seemed to need。
The same year he was married to a widow察Idelette de Burie察who was
a worthy察well´read察high´minded woman察with whom he lived happily
for nine years察until her death。 She was superior to Luther's
wife察Catherine Bora察in culture and dignity察and was a helpmate
who never opposed her husband in the slightest matter察always
considering his interests。 Esteem and friendship seem to have been
the basis of this unionnot passionate love察which Calvin did not
think much of。 When his wife died it seems he mourned for her with
decent grief察but did not seek a second marriage察perhaps because
he was unable to support a wife on his small stipend as she would
wish and expect。 He rather courted poverty察and refused reasonable
gratuities。 His body was attenuated by fasting and study察like
that of Saint Bernard。 When he was completing his ;Institutes察─he
passed days without eating and nights without sleeping。 And as he
practised poverty he had a right to inculcate it。 He kept no
servant察lived in a small tenement察and was always poorly clad。 He
derived no profit from any of his books察and the only present he
ever consented to receive was a silver goblet from the Lord of
Varennes。 Luther's stipend was four hundred and fifty florins察and
he too refused a yearly gift from the booksellers of four hundred
dollars察not wishing to receive a gratuity for his writings。
Calvin's salary was only fifty dollars a year察with a house察twelve
measures of corn and two pipes of wine察for tea and coffee were
then unknown in Europe察and wine seems to have been the usual
beverage察after water。 He was pre´eminently a conscientious man
not allowing his feelings to sway his judgment。 He was sedate and
dignified and cheerful察though Bossuet accuses him of a surly
dispositionun genre triste察un esprit chagrin。 Though formal
and stern察women never shrank from familiar conversation with him
on the subject of religion。 Though intolerant of error察he
cherished no personal animosities。 Calvin was more refined than
Luther察and never like him gave vent to coarse expressions。 He had
not Luther's physical strength察nor his versatility of genius察nor
as a reformer was he so violent。 ;Luther aroused察Calvin
tranquillized。; The one stormed the great citadel of error察the
other furnished the weapons for holding it after it was taken。 The
former was more popular察the latter appealed to a higher
intelligence。 The Saxon reformer was more eloquent察the Swiss
reformer was more dialectical。 The one advocated unity察the other
theocracy。 Luther was broader察Calvin engrafted on his reforms the
Old Testament observances。 The watchword of the one was Grace
that of the other was Predestination。 Luther cut knots察Calvin
made systems。 Luther destroyed察Calvin legislated。 His great
principle of government was aristocratic。 He wished to see both
Church and State governed by a select few of able men。 In all his
writings we see no trace of popular sovereignty。 He interested
himself察like Savonarola察in political institutions察but would
separate the functions of the magistracy from those of the clergy
and he clung to the notion of a theocratic government察like Jewish
legislators and the popes themselves。 The idea of a theocracy was
the basis of Calvin's system of legislation察as it was that