太子爷小说网 > 英语电子书 > heretics >

第10节

heretics-第10节

小说: heretics 字数: 每页4000字

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!






There never was a man in love who did not declare that; if he strained



every nerve to breaking; he was going to have his desire。



And there never was a man in love who did not declare also that he ought



not to have it。  The whole secret of the practical success of Christendom



lies in the Christian humility; however imperfectly fulfilled。



For with the removal of all question of merit or payment; the soul



is suddenly released for incredible voyages。  If we ask a sane man



how much he merits; his mind shrinks instinctively and instantaneously。



It is doubtful whether he merits six feet of earth。



But if you ask him what he can conquerhe can conquer the stars。



Thus comes the thing called Romance; a purely Christian product。



A man cannot deserve adventures; he cannot earn dragons and hippogriffs。



The mediaeval Europe which asserted humility gained Romance;



the civilization which gained Romance has gained the habitable globe。



How different the Pagan and Stoical feeling was from this has



been admirably expressed in a famous quotation。  Addison makes



the great Stoic say







  〃'Tis not in mortals to command success;



   But we'll do more; Sempronius; we'll deserve it。〃







But the spirit of Romance and Christendom; the spirit which is in



every lover; the spirit which has bestridden the earth with European



adventure; is quite opposite。  'Tis not in mortals to deserve success。



But we'll do more; Sempronius; we'll obtain it。







And this gay humility; this holding of ourselves lightly and yet ready



for an infinity of unmerited triumphs; this secret is so simple that every



one has supposed that it must be something quite sinister and mysterious。



Humility is so practical a virtue that men think it must be a vice。



Humility is so successful that it is mistaken for pride。



It is mistaken for it all the more easily because it generally goes



with a certain simple love of splendour which amounts to vanity。



Humility will always; by preference; go clad in scarlet and gold;



pride is that which refuses to let gold and scarlet impress it or please



it too much。  In a word; the failure of this virtue actually lies



in its success; it is too successful as an investment to be believed



in as a virtue。  Humility is not merely too good for this world;



it is too practical for this world; I had almost said it is too



worldly for this world。







The instance most quoted in our day is the thing called the humility



of the man of science; and certainly it is a good instance as well



as a modern one。  Men find it extremely difficult to believe



that a man who is obviously uprooting mountains and dividing seas;



tearing down temples and stretching out hands to the stars;



is really a quiet old gentleman who only asks to be allowed to



indulge his harmless old hobby and follow his harmless old nose。



When a man splits a grain of sand and the universe is turned upside down



in consequence; it is difficult to realize that to the man who did it;



the splitting of the grain is the great affair; and the capsizing



of the cosmos quite a small one。  It is hard to enter into the feelings



of a man who regards a new heaven and a new earth in the light of a



by…product。 But undoubtedly it was to this almost eerie innocence



of the intellect that the great men of the great scientific period;



which now appears to be closing; owed their enormous power and triumph。



If they had brought the heavens down like a house of cards



their plea was not even that they had done it on principle;



their quite unanswerable plea was that they had done it by accident。



Whenever there was in them the least touch of pride in what



they had done; there was a good ground for attacking them;



but so long as they were wholly humble; they were wholly victorious。



There were possible answers to Huxley; there was no answer possible



to Darwin。  He was convincing because of his unconsciousness;



one might almost say because of his dulness。  This childlike



and prosaic mind is beginning to wane in the world of science。



Men of science are beginning to see themselves; as the fine phrase is;



in the part; they are beginning to be proud of their humility。



They are beginning to be aesthetic; like the rest of the world;



beginning to spell truth with a capital T; beginning to talk



of the creeds they imagine themselves to have destroyed;



of the discoveries that their forbears made。  Like the modern English;



they are beginning to be soft about their own hardness。



They are becoming conscious of their own strengththat is;



they are growing weaker。  But one purely modern man has emerged



in the strictly modern decades who does carry into our world the clear



personal simplicity of the old world of science。  One man of genius



we have who is an artist; but who was a man of science; and who seems



to be marked above all things with this great scientific humility。



I mean Mr。 H。 G。 Wells。  And in his case; as in the others above



spoken of; there must be a great preliminary difficulty in convincing



the ordinary person that such a virtue is predicable of such a man。



Mr。 Wells began his literary work with violent visionsvisions of



the last pangs of this planet; can it be that a man who begins



with violent visions is humble?  He went on to wilder and wilder



stories about carving beasts into men and shooting angels like birds。



Is the man who shoots angels and carves beasts into men humble?



Since then he has done something bolder than either of these blasphemies;



he has prophesied the political future of all men; prophesied it



with aggressive authority and a ringing decision of detail。



Is the prophet of the future of all men humble ?  It will indeed



be difficult; in the present condition of current thought about



such things as pride and humility; to answer the query of how a man



can be humble who does such big things and such bold things。



For the only answer is the answer which I gave at the beginning



of this essay。  It is the humble man who does the big things。



It is the humble man who does the bold things。  It is the humble



man who has the sensational sights vouchsafed to him; and this



for three obvious reasons:  first; that he strains his eyes more



than any other men to see them; second; that he is more overwhelmed



and uplifted with them when they come; third; that he records



them more exactly and sincerely and with less adulteration



from his more commonplace and more conceited everyday self。



Adventures are to those to whom they are most unexpectedthat is;



most romantic。  Adventures are to the shy:  in this sense adventures



are to the unadventurous。







Now; this arresting; mental humility in Mr。 H。 G。 Wells may be;



like a great many other things that are vital and vivid; difficult to



illustrate by examples; but if I were asked for an example of it;



I should have no difficulty about which example to begin with。



The most interesting thing about Mr。 H。 G。 Wells is that he is



the only one of his many brilliant contemporaries who has not



stopped growing。  One can lie awake at night and hear him grow。



Of this growth the most evident manifestation is indeed a gradual



change of opinions; but it is no mere change of opinions。



It is not a perpetual leaping from one position to another like



that of Mr。 George Moore。  It is a quite continuous advance along



a quite solid road in a quite definable direction。  But the chief



proof that it is not a piece of fickleness and vanity is the fact



that it has been upon the whole in advance from more startling



opinions to more humdrum opinions。  It has been even in some sense



an advance from unconventional opinions to conventional opinions。



This fact fixes Mr。 Wells's honesty and proves him to be no poseur。



Mr。 Wells once held that the upper classes and the lower classes



would be so much differentiated in the future that one class would



eat the other。  Certainly no paradoxical charlatan who had once



found arguments for so startling a view would ever have deserted it



except for something yet more startling。  Mr。 Wells has deserted it



in favour of the blameless belief that both classes will be ultimately



subordinated or assimilated to a sort of scientific middle class;



a class of engineers。  He has abandoned the sensational theory with



the same honourable gravity and simplicity with which he adopted it。



Then he thought it was true; now he thinks it is not true。



He has come to the most dreadful conclusion a literary man can



come t

返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 3

你可能喜欢的